Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Fuel Cell Thread (merged)

Discussions of conventional and alternative energy production technologies.

Re: Cheaper fuel cells

Postby big_rc » Thu 06 Apr 2006, 13:47:24

I am intimately familiar with the problems of fuel cell membranes (I did my graduate work on methanol fuel cell membranes). This review sounds promising although I would not get your hopes up too high because there is a huge difference between lab and real world results. Without going into gory details, there are a bunch of issues that this membrane is going to have to deal with before its a winner. Hopefully, it works out.
Simon's Law: Everything put together falls apart sooner or later.

I don't think of all the misery, but of all the beauty that still remains.--Anne Frank
User avatar
big_rc
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Sat 17 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Amerika (most of the time)

Re: Linear Combustion Engine - more effective,fuel cell repl

Postby small_steps » Mon 05 Jun 2006, 00:16:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', 'V')ibration doesn't effect magnets that I am aware of, and as for heat, I wouldn't expect 240 F to be a problem, a lot of magnets suffer that or worse constantly.

Actually, severe vibration tends to randomize the oreientation of the magnetic domains, and demagnetize the material. And some magnets can handle that type of temp, but not your typical neo.

Translational motors tend to suck compared to rotary designs, and it isn't clear why they require such a high powered computer to do this work...
small_steps
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 258
Joined: Sat 03 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Postby miniTAX » Tue 20 Jun 2006, 17:42:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', '
')Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 1:06 pm Stock Chart for Ceres Power

Do you mean to tell me that Ceres Power (the company that is about to save the world) can't impress it's share holders? It's stock has fallen by more than 20% since it was first issued. This shows a lack of confidence in its ability to make a profit (which it has yet to do, btw). If Ceres Power had the ability to make cheap useful fuel cells, the wealthy/educated/informed investor would jump at the chance to own a piece of the action, right? RIGHT???

Just a reminder for peak-oilers, just in case they forgot their dire predictions :P

Image
User avatar
miniTAX
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 368
Joined: Wed 18 Jan 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Bordeaux

Fuel cell vehicles

Postby methofuel » Sun 16 Jul 2006, 00:23:13

There is an news item about fuel cell cars. It says,"Ballard Power Systems signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and fuel cell supply agreement with Shanghai Fuel Cell Vehicle Powertrain Co., Ltd. to cooperate on the development of fuel cell vehicles for demonstration and field trial programs planned in China in 2006 and 2007.

"Under the terms of the agreements, Ballard will supply fuel cells and related services and Powertrain will integrate those fuel cells into vehicles.

"As a first step in the relationship, Ballard and Powertrain have signed an agreement for the supply by Ballard to Powertrain of up to 20 Mark 902 automotive fuel cells. Ballard will ship two Mark 902 automotive fuel cells to Powertrain for integration into vehicles later this year, and will provide related applications engineering and field service support. Upon successful integration of the fuel cells into vehicles, Powertrain will purchase up to an additional 18 Mark 902 fuel cells for the program in 2007. "

"The Shanghai Municipal Government recently announced funding for a program that will demonstrate 100 fuel cell vehicles on the road by the end of 2007. The 100 vehicles are the first phase of an announced program that will see 1,000 vehicles on the road by 2009-2010, and 10,000 by 2011-2012. "

The world probably be in need of millions of fuel cell cars by 2011 they these people are only talking 10,000??? why not 10,000,000 or more? what's holding them back?

There are probably hundreds of posts on this issue, would appreciate if somebody can update us on the latest findings.
User avatar
methofuel
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri 21 Apr 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Fuel cell vehicles

Postby rogerhb » Sun 16 Jul 2006, 00:50:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('methofuel', 'T')he world probably be in need of millions of fuel cell cars by 2011 they these people are only talking 10,000???


Need? You won't need a car if

(a) you're quietly interned at one of the new labor opportunity camps springing up around the US.

(b) you've been drafted
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand

Re: Fuel cell vehicles

Postby NeoPeasant » Sun 16 Jul 2006, 00:50:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('methofuel', 'T')he world probably be in need of millions of fuel cell cars by 2011 they these people are only talking 10,000??? why not 10,000,000 or more? what's holding them back?


Uh, maybe because they cost about a million dollars each? Platinum aint cheap, or abundant either.
The battle to preserve our lifestyle has already been lost. The battle to preserve our lives is just beginning.
NeoPeasant
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1003
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Fuel cell vehicles

Postby MonteQuest » Sun 16 Jul 2006, 01:06:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('methofuel', ' ')The world probably be in need of millions of fuel cell cars by 2011 they these people are only talking 10,000??? why not 10,000,000 or more? what's holding them back?


Ballard Power, the leading fuel cell company, says that first there needs to be a “fundamental engineering rethink” of the proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell before hydrogen fule cell cars go mainstream. Because of membrane deterioration, today’s PEM fuel cells typically fail during their first 2,000 hours of operation.

Also, the stock BLDP is a penny stock. 5.89/share up $.08 on Friday. Stock was at $119.00/share before the Tech stock crash and the awareness of the 2nd Law of Thermodyamics by investors.

Today, it takes 700 square feet of photovoltaics (god knows what they must cost) operating for one week to produce enough hydrogen to drive a fuel cell car costing about $1 million dollars, 160 miles.

Decades away.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Fuel cell vehicles

Postby methofuel » Sun 16 Jul 2006, 01:33:28

Thanks guys. This platinum catalyst in the PEM fuel cells could well be the main hurdle, but I vaguely remember someone mentioned about nano-catalyst. Have they tried nano-catalyst?

What about other fuel cells that dont need platinum catalyst?
User avatar
methofuel
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri 21 Apr 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Fuel cell vehicles

Postby EnergyUnlimited » Sun 16 Jul 2006, 02:08:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('methofuel', 'T')hanks guys. This platinum catalyst in the PEM fuel cells could well be the main hurdle, but I vaguely remember someone mentioned about nano-catalyst. Have they tried nano-catalyst?

What about other fuel cells that dont need platinum catalyst?


Unfortunatele fuel cells DO need platinum or other platinum group metals.

Massive development of this approach would produce peak platinum within decade or two.
Until new catalysts are developed (or amount of platinum used can be dropped by 2 orders of magnitude) fuel cell car is commercial no go area.
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Fuel cell vehicles

Postby methofuel » Sun 16 Jul 2006, 03:28:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', 'U')nfortunatele fuel cells DO need platinum or other platinum group metals.

Massive development of this approach would produce peak platinum within decade or two.
Until new catalysts are developed (or amount of platinum used can be dropped by 2 orders of magnitude) fuel cell car is commercial no go area.


that's really sad!
User avatar
methofuel
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri 21 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Fuel cell vehicles

Postby mrflora » Sun 16 Jul 2006, 10:49:20

pstarr wrote:$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'a')in't nothin like a nano-catalyst, huh? Gonna save the day. ahem.


No wonder you have so many posts - your remarks are always fatuous , lack reasoning, and add nothing to the debate.

Regards,
M.R.F.
User avatar
mrflora
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 115
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Fuel cell vehicles

Postby Kingcoal » Sun 16 Jul 2006, 11:11:11

I don't think fuel cells will ever be practical because hydrogen is so hard to store in significant quantities. Hydrogen will leak out of any sealed container. The atomic footprint is so small that everything appears to be porous. Secondly, hydrogen must be kept at very high pressure and temperatures close to zero K to remain liquid. There are ideas for hydrogen cooled power lines but this requires huge infrastructure upgrades. Decades away, and by that time, the energy to build that infrastructure will be much more expensive.

I think the "super capacitor has a better chance.
"That's the problem with mercy, kid... It just ain't professional" - Fast Eddie, The Color of Money
User avatar
Kingcoal
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2149
Joined: Wed 29 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Re: Fuel cell vehicles

Postby EndOfSewers » Sun 16 Jul 2006, 12:41:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', 'M')assive development of this approach would produce peak platinum within decade or two.


IIRC, the world's total known platinum reserves would be sufficient to replace 2/3 of the vehicles currently on the road with fuel-cell vehicles. So even if fuel cells were perfected tomorrow it's still a total dead end.
User avatar
EndOfSewers
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Thu 20 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Fuel cell vehicles

Postby NeoPeasant » Sun 16 Jul 2006, 14:16:15

Kunstler on cars:
As we stumble into the future of a permanent global energy crisis, an interesting delusional theme has taken shape among the public and virtually all our leaders in politics, business, and even science: the obsessive notion that it's all about keeping our cars running by other means, at all costs. This is very unfortunate because it will be a colossal act of futility.
The battle to preserve our lifestyle has already been lost. The battle to preserve our lives is just beginning.
NeoPeasant
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1003
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Fuel cell vehicles

Postby Drjay » Sun 16 Jul 2006, 20:57:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kingcoal', 'I') don't think fuel cells will ever be practical because hydrogen is so hard to store in significant quantities. Hydrogen will leak out of any sealed container. The atomic footprint is so small that everything appears to be porous.


Actually a metal hydride works quite well storing the same amount of hydrogen in a given volume as compared to 4000 psi in a pressure vessle without the problems. It works extremely well in combination with a fuel cell. The fuel cell vehicle that was developed here has a 350 mile range with a relatively small tank.
Drjay
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon 19 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Fuel cell vehicles

Postby EnergyUnlimited » Mon 17 Jul 2006, 12:07:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kingcoal', 'I') don't think fuel cells will ever be practical because hydrogen is so hard to store in significant quantities. Hydrogen will leak out of any sealed container. The atomic footprint is so small that everything appears to be porous.


I do not observe hydrogen cylinders leaking when valve is closed.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kingcoal', 'S')econdly, hydrogen must be kept at very high pressure and temperatures close to zero K to remain liquid.


False.
At -254*C hydrogen remains liquid at atmospheric pressure.
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Fuel cell vehicles

Postby Doly » Mon 17 Jul 2006, 12:28:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', '
')At -254*C hydrogen remains liquid at atmospheric pressure.


That is pretty close to 0 Kelvin, isn't it?
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Fuel cell vehicles

Postby EnergyUnlimited » Mon 17 Jul 2006, 12:47:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Doly', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', '
')At -254*C hydrogen remains liquid at atmospheric pressure.


That is pretty close to 0 Kelvin, isn't it?


The argument was that you do not need low themperatures AND high pressures at the same time, as Kingcoal suggested.

Cryogenic vessels to handle hydrogen at -254*C are not such a great problem as large scale SUPPLY of hydrogen (energy carrier) is.
We simply cannot produce enough of hydrogen (energy intensive process) to maintain status quo.
There will NOT be enough energy for hydrogen economy (unless something like fusion was mastered in the future on substantial industrial scale).
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Energy Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron