by marko » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 14:31:11
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rogerhb', 'M')y theory is that the USA has no intention of helping to solve the Palastinian issue other than paying lip-service for the benefit of global relations.
Roger, maybe you don't understand how internal politics in the US work. It is very hard to imagine the US doing anything but backing the Israeli government. The only scenario where such backing might falter might be if such backing led to massive US casualties.
Here's why. US politicians rely entirely on the campaign contributions of wealthy and interested parties for election. Without such contributions, in the tens of millions of US$, they have no hope of winning an election against opponents buying hundreds of hours of TV ads at 100 times the scale of New Zealand's TV market.
A fraction of the US population composed of a large percentage, maybe a majority, of the Jewish population, plus some of the Christian evangelical population, is passionate in their support of the most aggressive Israeli policies and willing to give tens of millions of US$ to US politicians who back those policies. Not all US Jews back the aggressive Israeli policies, and not all people who back those policies are Jews. I am not being anti-Semitic or saying this is a Jewish conspiracy. Israel is an emotional issue for the people who are passionate about it because of their religious beliefs, family histories in the Holocaust, etc.
Meanwhile, of those in the US who don't like Israel's policies (some of whom are also Jewish), very few are passionate enough to offer large donations to a politician opposing US support for those policies. So, guess what? There are hardly any US politicians calling for an end to US support of Israel. The few politicians who have criticized Israel recently have been defeated in the next election by opponents who had huge funding advantages.
Mind you, most Americans are ignorant about Israel's policies and could care less, or from watching biased US TV, reflexively feel that the Israelis are the good guys and those evil Arab terrorists (all Arabs are terrorists, of course) are the bad guys.
Until this dynamic changes, and it is hard to see how it will, the US will continue to back any and all Israeli aggresssion, because that is where US politicians' bread is buttered.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rogerhb', 'I') also note that the USA is the most consistent supporter of Israel's side of any deal and despite claiming to be "at war against Terror", either the Levant is not included in this, or it only sees military solutions to problems and not political ones.
See my note above. The so-called "war on terror" is a cynical device used to justify 1) chipping away at civil liberties inside of and outside of the US and 2) wars for control of resources and territories around the world, particularly in the Middle East. None of the US government rhetoric about the "war on terror" should be taken at face value.