Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The USA has no intention of solving the Palastinian Issue

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

The USA has no intention of solving the Palastinian Issue

Unread postby rogerhb » Thu 13 Jul 2006, 23:10:06

I'm putting this in the Open Discussion before Monte does....

My theory is that the USA has no intention of helping to solve the Palastinian issue other than paying lip-service for the benefit of global relations.

I also note that the USA is the most consistent supporter of Israel's side of any deal and despite claiming to be "at war against Terror", either the Levant is not included in this, or it only sees military solutions to problems and not political ones.

(edit for a couple of sp)
Last edited by rogerhb on Thu 13 Jul 2006, 23:33:42, edited 1 time in total.
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand

Re: The USA has no intention of solving the Palastinian Issu

Unread postby J-Rod » Thu 13 Jul 2006, 23:27:13

I was thinking about this, my thinking leads me to believe that the rest of the world can't really afford to let shit get too crazy, everyone is dependent on the flow of the Spice. This regardless of our position with Israel.
Reality is agreed perception. Unfortunately there is also a reality imposed by nature.
http://thisis.peakdoom.com - For all your doom needs!
User avatar
J-Rod
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 375
Joined: Tue 17 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Northeast Ohio

Re: The USA has no intention of solving the Palastinian Issu

Unread postby Novus » Thu 13 Jul 2006, 23:58:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('J-Rod', 'I') was thinking about this, my thinking leads me to believe that the rest of the world can't really afford to let shit get too crazy, everyone is dependent on the flow of the Spice. This regardless of our position with Israel.


Actually this is the best time for the US to show its hand and strike. The US will never have a better chance to pull the rug out from under Chindia then now. Iran does not sell Oil to the US or Europe. Taking out a Iran now knock the wind out the only real competitor the US has for domination over the world's oil. For things to continue on in the West as it has been someone else must lose. The only way any of this can happen is for all hell to break loose in the middle east and have the US step in with a major power play.
User avatar
Novus
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: The USA has no intention of solving the Palastinian Issu

Unread postby worrier » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 00:53:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')ctually this is the best time for the US to show its hand and strike. The US will never have a better chance to pull the rug out from under Chindia then now. Iran does not sell Oil to the US or Europe. Taking out a Iran now knock the wind out the only real competitor the US has for domination over the world's oil. For things to continue on in the West as it has been someone else must lose. The only way any of this can happen is for all hell to break loose in the middle east and have the US step in with a major power play.


There would be a backlash if that happened. It might take a while to build up, but there would be a backlash.
User avatar
worrier
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Tue 15 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: The USA has no intention of solving the Palastinian Issu

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 01:51:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('worrier', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')ctually this is the best time for the US to show its hand and strike. The US will never have a better chance to pull the rug out from under Chindia then now. Iran does not sell Oil to the US or Europe. Taking out a Iran now knock the wind out the only real competitor the US has for domination over the world's oil. For things to continue on in the West as it has been someone else must lose. The only way any of this can happen is for all hell to break loose in the middle east and have the US step in with a major power play.


There would be a backlash if that happened. It might take a while to build up, but there would be a backlash.
Backlashes? What does that mean? The time for end game considerations isn't far off. I doubt any global rationing system will hold up under the pressure of a die-off. Novus has put up an idea that I haven't seen or thought of before. Though I don't agree that now is the time, the time will surely come. Interesting ideas lead to others. There will not be an offensive war against North Korea because it isn't neccessary. They are already putting the screws to them in a quiet way. There may never be a war against China because all that needs to be done is to choke off their energy supllies and they will collapse in a pile of ruin: social strife, polluted rivers, chaos. The end game isn't large resource wars, it's strategic control of energy. Little wars in small weak oil producing countries and control of shipping lanes, etc.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: The USA has no intention of solving the Palastinian Issu

Unread postby Doly » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 05:29:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'I') doubt any global rationing system will hold up under the pressure of a die-off.


Hey, you are negative! If you really think dieoff is going to happen in a serious way, why aren't you running for the hills?
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The USA has no intention of solving the Palastinian Issu

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 10:15:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Doly', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'I') doubt any global rationing system will hold up under the pressure of a die-off.


Hey, you are negative! If you really think dieoff is going to happen in a serious way, why aren't you running for the hills?
Read that last post again, you'll see it.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: The USA has no intention of solving the Palestinian issu

Unread postby Eli » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 11:20:57

Roger

Well I think the underlying fact is that no one can solve the Palestinian problem.

Hamas is now in power there and at least 2/3 of the general population will settle for nothing less than the total destruction of the state of Israel. You can't force peace on people if they do not want it.

And let us not forget that there are other large players that do not want peace in the area either namely Syria and Iran.

There may come a time when that some of the big players will sue for a peace but it will only be a temporary peace, called a hudna in Arabic.

If Syria and Iran had the capability of wiping out Israel they would do it. Once they get the ability they will.
User avatar
Eli
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a van down by the river

Re: The USA has no intention of solving the Palastinian Issu

Unread postby marko » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 14:31:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rogerhb', 'M')y theory is that the USA has no intention of helping to solve the Palastinian issue other than paying lip-service for the benefit of global relations.


Roger, maybe you don't understand how internal politics in the US work. It is very hard to imagine the US doing anything but backing the Israeli government. The only scenario where such backing might falter might be if such backing led to massive US casualties.

Here's why. US politicians rely entirely on the campaign contributions of wealthy and interested parties for election. Without such contributions, in the tens of millions of US$, they have no hope of winning an election against opponents buying hundreds of hours of TV ads at 100 times the scale of New Zealand's TV market.

A fraction of the US population composed of a large percentage, maybe a majority, of the Jewish population, plus some of the Christian evangelical population, is passionate in their support of the most aggressive Israeli policies and willing to give tens of millions of US$ to US politicians who back those policies. Not all US Jews back the aggressive Israeli policies, and not all people who back those policies are Jews. I am not being anti-Semitic or saying this is a Jewish conspiracy. Israel is an emotional issue for the people who are passionate about it because of their religious beliefs, family histories in the Holocaust, etc.

Meanwhile, of those in the US who don't like Israel's policies (some of whom are also Jewish), very few are passionate enough to offer large donations to a politician opposing US support for those policies. So, guess what? There are hardly any US politicians calling for an end to US support of Israel. The few politicians who have criticized Israel recently have been defeated in the next election by opponents who had huge funding advantages.

Mind you, most Americans are ignorant about Israel's policies and could care less, or from watching biased US TV, reflexively feel that the Israelis are the good guys and those evil Arab terrorists (all Arabs are terrorists, of course) are the bad guys.

Until this dynamic changes, and it is hard to see how it will, the US will continue to back any and all Israeli aggresssion, because that is where US politicians' bread is buttered.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rogerhb', 'I') also note that the USA is the most consistent supporter of Israel's side of any deal and despite claiming to be "at war against Terror", either the Levant is not included in this, or it only sees military solutions to problems and not political ones.


See my note above. The so-called "war on terror" is a cynical device used to justify 1) chipping away at civil liberties inside of and outside of the US and 2) wars for control of resources and territories around the world, particularly in the Middle East. None of the US government rhetoric about the "war on terror" should be taken at face value.
User avatar
marko
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Mon 31 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Massachusetts
Top

Re: The USA has no intention of solving the Palastinian Issu

Unread postby rogerhb » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 18:19:51

BUSH: "America's commitment to Israel's security is strong, enduring, and unshakable"

He said America and Israel were "natural allies and these ties will never be broken."

So we have a nice balanced approach to start with....
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand

Re: The USA has no intention of solving the Palastinian Issu

Unread postby DantesPeak » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 23:15:07

I think the US government supports democracy in principle, as long as it doesn't conflict with the primary goal of worldwide military empire - the military being mostly an energy protection service. Helping Israel is further down the list of priorities - but important for the reason specified above.

There also seems to be a miscalculation by both the US and Israel about the last election - they didn't foresee Hamas winning. Otherwise an election would have been postponed to acheive the desired results. See Iraq for an example.

Unfortunately the US and Israel have made more than one miscalculation here, and the final result may be the opposite of what was originally desired.
User avatar
DantesPeak
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6277
Joined: Sat 23 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Jersey

Re: The USA has no intention of solving the Palastinian Issu

Unread postby rogerhb » Sat 15 Jul 2006, 18:21:07

The true peacemaker

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')t. Petersburg, Russia - President Bush rejected Lebanon's calls for a cease-fire in escalating Mideast violence on Friday, saying only that Israel should try to limit civilian casualties as it steps up attacks on its neighbor.
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand
Top

Re: The USA has no intention of solving the Palastinian Issu

Unread postby kmann » Mon 17 Jul 2006, 10:23:38

It's not the US' responsibility to fix every world problem. It can't even fix its own.
User avatar
kmann
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 551
Joined: Mon 25 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Re: The USA has no intention of solving the Palastinian Issu

Unread postby rogerhb » Mon 17 Jul 2006, 18:01:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kmann', 'I')t's not the US' responsibility to fix every world problem. It can't even fix its own.


Not every problem, but having a permenant seat in the UN security council should not be about looking after one's own interests and to hell with everyone else except Israel.
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand
Top

Re: The USA has no intention of solving the Palastinian Issu

Unread postby marko » Tue 18 Jul 2006, 12:06:12

Even if you think that the US has no responsibility to fix world problems, I hope that you agree that the US has a responsibility not to worsen world problems. The US's unconditional support for Israel, including c. $4 billion in direct aid and the promise of military backing, contributes directly to Israeli aggression against neighboring Arabs. Cutting the flow of aid to Israel and the risks and expense of the security guarantee would allow the US to refocus resources on its own internal problems.
User avatar
marko
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Mon 31 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Massachusetts


Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests