by cube » Thu 15 Jun 2006, 13:35:06
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', '.')..
Everything is containerized except for where people live...
That statement makes no sense. Containerization is a system of transport NOT a system of living arrangement.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Containerization
One of the effects of containerization is the relationship between: distance, time, and cost has been completely changed. Simply put, sometimes it's faster to travel a greater distance. Sometimes it's cheaper to transport something a greater distance.
For example: lets say you wanted to transport something from Japan to Portland, Oregon. It would be cheaper to ship the cargo up north to Seattle, Washington first and then truck it down to Portland. How the hell does this make sense? Portland has it's own seaport, so why not just send the ship directly to Portland?
Welcome to the new world of globalization that containerization has made possible. The answer is simple. Seattle has a larger and more modern seaport and thus can take advantage of "economies of scale". The savings in shipping costs make up for the increase in trucking costs. The cost of transporting something between points A and B has more to do with the quality of infrastructure and "economies of scale" rather then distance. Yes I know that's a real mind bender.
The trend for the past 50 years is for a small number of seaports to take on a larger share of business by growing very large, while the other seaports basically go out of business. Examples of seaports today that basically handle only a small fraction of what they used to: San Francisco, London, New York.
I assume this proposed seaport at Lazaro Cardenas, Mexico will be supersized beyond imagination. OF course ALL of this is completely dependant on cheap energy.
