Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Road & Highway Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Super Highway Stupidity

Unread postby Leanan » Thu 15 Jun 2006, 12:00:43

You realize that article is written by Jerome "No dinosaur ever walked on the bottom of the ocean, therefore oil is abiotic" Corsi, don't you?
"The problems of today will not be solved by the same thinking that produced the problems in the first place." - Albert Einstein
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Super Highway Stupidity

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Thu 15 Jun 2006, 12:13:02

From Corsi's article:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A') good reason Bush does not want to secure the border with Mexico may be that the administration is trying to create express lanes for Mexican trucks to bring containers with cheap Far East goods into the heart of the U.S., all without the involvement of any U.S. union workers on the docks or in the trucks.


Well, I think bypassing union ports workers (with whom Corsi apparently has an axe to grind) has little to do with it, and having a large, unsecure viaduct to import illegal workers has everything to do with it.
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas

Re: Super Highway Stupidity

Unread postby cube » Thu 15 Jun 2006, 12:15:28

I read about this before. It's a fascinating project. I'm a firm believer of PO but yet I still believe this project has a GOOD chance of happening.

I don't know why greenies have such a fetish for "localization".

Everytime mankind discovers a new mode of transportation everything gets a little bit more "consolidated"
horseback riding ---> canals ---> railroads ---> cars ---> airplanes ---> CONTAINERIZATION

This project is a direct result of humanity's most recent transportation innovation, containerization.

Maybe the ultimate fate of humanity is to get pushed pack to the stone age while the genetically engineered apes take over the planet, but for the near future (this century) the trend is towards consolidation.
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Super Highway Stupidity

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Thu 15 Jun 2006, 12:41:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', 'E')verytime mankind discovers a new mode of transportation everything gets a little bit more "consolidated"
horseback riding ---> canals ---> railroads ---> cars ---> airplanes ---> CONTAINERIZATION


Everything is containerized except for where people live, which happens to be more dispersed than ever. And that's the real problem, it seems.
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas

Re: Super Highway Stupidity

Unread postby cube » Thu 15 Jun 2006, 13:35:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', '.')..
Everything is containerized except for where people live...
That statement makes no sense. Containerization is a system of transport NOT a system of living arrangement. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Containerization

One of the effects of containerization is the relationship between: distance, time, and cost has been completely changed. Simply put, sometimes it's faster to travel a greater distance. Sometimes it's cheaper to transport something a greater distance.

For example: lets say you wanted to transport something from Japan to Portland, Oregon. It would be cheaper to ship the cargo up north to Seattle, Washington first and then truck it down to Portland. How the hell does this make sense? Portland has it's own seaport, so why not just send the ship directly to Portland?

Welcome to the new world of globalization that containerization has made possible. The answer is simple. Seattle has a larger and more modern seaport and thus can take advantage of "economies of scale". The savings in shipping costs make up for the increase in trucking costs. The cost of transporting something between points A and B has more to do with the quality of infrastructure and "economies of scale" rather then distance. Yes I know that's a real mind bender.

The trend for the past 50 years is for a small number of seaports to take on a larger share of business by growing very large, while the other seaports basically go out of business. Examples of seaports today that basically handle only a small fraction of what they used to: San Francisco, London, New York.

I assume this proposed seaport at Lazaro Cardenas, Mexico will be supersized beyond imagination. OF course ALL of this is completely dependant on cheap energy. :P
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Super Highway Stupidity

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Thu 15 Jun 2006, 13:47:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', '.')..
Everything is containerized except for where people live...
That statement makes no sense. Containerization is a system of transport NOT a system of living arrangement.


I suppose I was thinking 'consolidation,' something a bit different. Striking that from the record, your comment on economies of scale being utterly dependent on cheap energy is spot-on, IMHO. If you believe that to be so, then why are projects like the Trans-Texas Corridor so "fascinating," in your own words? It looks like they're destined to fail when the economy goes south. And the whole public/private tilt of the project is combining the worst aspects of both, ensuring that both effort and money will be wasted into turning this thing into basically Super Interstate II, with tolls.
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

Re: Super Highway Stupidity

Unread postby Zardoz » Thu 15 Jun 2006, 13:53:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Leanan', 'Y')ou realize that article is written by Jerome "No dinosaur ever walked on the bottom of the ocean, therefore oil is abiotic" Corsi, don't you?

He's the Michelangelo of bullshit artistry:

"Mr. Corsi is the author of several books, including "Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry" (along with John O'Neill), "Black Gold Stranglehold: The Myth of Scarcity and the Politics of Oil" (along with Craig R. Smith), and "Atomic Iran: How the Terrorist Regime Bought the Bomb and American Politicians." He is a frequent guest on the G. Gordon Liddy radio show. He will soon co-author a new book with Jim Gilchrist on the Minuteman Project."

Does he ever speak a single word of truth?
"Thank you for attending the oil age. We're going to scrape what we can out of these tar pits in Alberta and then shut down the machines and turn out the lights. Goodnight." - seldom_seen
User avatar
Zardoz
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6323
Joined: Fri 02 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Oil-addicted Southern Californucopia
Top

Re: Super Highway Stupidity

Unread postby EarthGamePlayer » Thu 15 Jun 2006, 21:13:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')e's the Michelangelo of bullshit artistry:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"')Mr. Corsi is the author of several books, including "Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry" (along with John O'Neill), "Black Gold Stranglehold: The Myth of Scarcity and the Politics of Oil" (along with Craig R. Smith), and "Atomic Iran: How the Terrorist Regime Bought the Bomb and American Politicians." He is a frequent guest on the G. Gordon Liddy radio show. He will soon co-author a new book with Jim Gilchrist on the Minuteman Project."


Does he ever speak a single word of truth?


No doubt, I wouldn't believe a word he says.

However, the plans for this thing are already in the works - of course it is a 50 year plan, and PO might just hit before then.
User avatar
EarthGamePlayer
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat 03 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: The Great White North eh?
Top

Re: Super Highway Stupidity

Unread postby pea-jay » Fri 16 Jun 2006, 02:35:31

If you look closely at this map
Image
you will see that it predominately traverses solidly red states (Illinois and Michigan excepted). And only the reddest among them is dumb enough to pursue it.
UNplanning the future...
http://unplanning.blogspot.com
User avatar
pea-jay
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1547
Joined: Sat 17 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: NorCal

Re: Super Highway Stupidity

Unread postby pea-jay » Fri 16 Jun 2006, 03:20:52

In another way, this plan resembles a grander and less thought out version of Schwartzeneggers boneheaded plan to build more CA freeways, in the name of meeting anticipated car growth. The governator has seen his plan whittled down somewhat, with fewer highways and more transit/rail.

This plan makes no sense on a number of fronts. Not only is there a well discussed energy aspect, but then we have the trucker issue as well. If anyone looks around now, you will find a relative shortage of truckers. Increasing the number of trucks only increases the number of drivers since most trucks usually carry one or two containers. On a few occasions you will see 3. what are we going to see on these corridors, ten container truck trains? A train needs few employees and extra cars can be added with no addl crew memmbers req. Now astute folks will guess, ah yes...Mexican truck drivers will be recruited. Then there is the whole land aquisiton and construction business. According to the web site, an undetermined amount of financing will originate from what will essentially be user fees. No studies on traffic levels needed to pay for it. No consideration whether truckers would use it if fees were to high. Then the debt financing issue. The original interstate system was built when US oil production was at its zenith and the economy seemingly limitless. This is most certainly not the case now.

I am not even going to get into the flawed statistics used to justify the boondoggle in the first place.

A cursory examination of the plan indicates "the numbers just dont pencil out".

Even if globalization were able to continue through some miraculous oil find, a more prudent and efficient way to move containers would be to import them through super massive ports, place them on long rail cars to inland rail/truck terminals which at that point would get delivered via trucking. No transcontinental freeway required, just a few rail routes with double or quadruple tracking and some imagination.

Certainly not sexy and would put far fewer dollars into truck manufacturers, construction interests, developers and anyone else likely to make a buck off this idea. Its obvious, no one with any brains is working on this project or allowed to propose an alternative solution.
UNplanning the future...
http://unplanning.blogspot.com
User avatar
pea-jay
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1547
Joined: Sat 17 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: NorCal

Re: Super Highway Stupidity

Unread postby SHiFTY » Fri 16 Jun 2006, 04:56:20

It's a property development scam.

Use dodgy laws to confiscate vast corridors of farmland under 'eminent domain', then sell it to the developers who convert the land next to the road- build new suburban, commercial and industrial areas, and sell the result for billions.

The only ones who lose are the farmers who are forced by the state to sell vast amounts of their land at a pittance, and society in general, who will probably end up paying for the construction.

Pretty disgusting.
User avatar
SHiFTY
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon 27 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Super Highway Stupidity

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Fri 16 Jun 2006, 09:53:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pea-jay', 'N')o consideration whether truckers would use it if fees were to high.


Speaking of rates, estimates range that trucks would have to pay an $80-90 toll to run the length of the TTC through Texas (about 550 miles, north-to-south), while cars would pay $20-$40. While certain laws could be made in state legislatures to essentially "force" thru commercial drivers onto the corridor, I could easily see the auto portion of the TTC becoming desolate and insolvent, esp. considering that high-speed rail is part of the overall plan.

Added HSR & freight rail capacity is the only redeeming part of the project, as far as I am concerned.
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

Re: Super Highway Stupidity

Unread postby lotrfan55345 » Fri 16 Jun 2006, 13:05:17

Ehh, this passes through Minneapolis
lotrfan55345
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1091
Joined: Tue 20 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Minneapolis / Pittsburgh

Re: Super Highway Stupidity

Unread postby pea-jay » Sat 17 Jun 2006, 04:21:46

The more I think about this scheme, the more I am inclined to think the word "stupidity" is an understatement.

I can't begin to imagine what the person or people who dreamed this up were or werent thinking. I am a planner by profession and I know planners and engineers come up some pretty grandious ideas. Many of these originate out of the almost ingrained trait to BLINDLY forecast future numbers by examining past trends without ever considering alternatives. Its insidous and clouds the thinking of otherwise very bright individuals.

And after an idea gets formented, it often gathers a life of its own as the originator(s} frequently treat any criticism as a personal attack and more often than not are unable to admit that an idea may have been wrong and perhaps should be dropped. Pride too often stands in the way.

I bet I could stand in front of those planners and explain why the idea is wrong and do it at a professional level and not even get the slightest agreement that their grand plan has little or no use for the future.
UNplanning the future...
http://unplanning.blogspot.com
User avatar
pea-jay
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1547
Joined: Sat 17 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: NorCal

Re: Super Highway Stupidity

Unread postby samovar » Sat 17 Jun 2006, 15:33:28

Just what North America needs - A Superhighway straight through the middle of nowhere. :-x No offense to those of you who live in fly-over country :P - I mean the Great Plains. :roll:

Seriously though, if oil supplies were infinite and pollution free, sending a continental highway through the plains via Texas, makes sense. But even in that cornucopian scenario, a train would still be more efficient. Given reality, its more of a Highway to Hell.
User avatar
samovar
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Baltimore, MD, USA

Re: Super Highway Stupidity

Unread postby savethehumans » Sat 24 Jun 2006, 03:58:13

See pea-jay's pretty NAFTA Superhighway map, above?

See Texas? See, right above Dallas & Ft. Worth, the city of DENTON?

That's me! [smilie=adios.gif]

One of the few HAPPY results of the coming collapse of civilization is that this Superhighway will NEVER be built!

I am glad. Denton is a nice small city, a university town that has a core community that might just rise again when the cow patties hit the fan.

But it's still a shock to see MY city on THAT map! [smilie=5eek.gif]
User avatar
savethehumans
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1468
Joined: Wed 20 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Super Highway Stupidity

Unread postby pea-jay » Sat 24 Jun 2006, 04:24:29

It seems to me that we already have a system that does part of what the NAFTA corridor espouses doing.

Lets examine

the NAFTA corridor
Image

does a lot of what this network (Canadian National railroad) also can do
Image

when combined and properly linked with this rail service
Image

and collectively improved to handle large freight movements could transport vastly greater amounts of freight when compared to the insane plan floated above, even if the trains run purely off of diesel.

If the entire route were double tracked and electrified, no liquid fuel whatsoever would be required to doe the same the dreamed up by the meglomaniacs behind this piece of work.
UNplanning the future...
http://unplanning.blogspot.com
User avatar
pea-jay
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1547
Joined: Sat 17 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: NorCal

Re: Super Highway Stupidity

Unread postby azreal60 » Tue 27 Jun 2006, 01:21:33

I wonder if anyone bothered to point out that fact to congress before they authored the bills nessesary to bring about the idea for that.. idea.
Azreal60
azreal60
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1107
Joined: Sat 26 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Madison,Wisconsin

Re: Super Highway Stupidity

Unread postby Novus » Tue 27 Jun 2006, 09:16:26

I get a sudden urge to play AC/DC's Highway To Hell over and over again.
User avatar
Novus
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Super Highway Stupidity

Unread postby cube » Tue 27 Jun 2006, 11:32:45

My gut feeling tells me this project will be built.

yeah I know a lot of people here don't like the idea but lets be honest with ourselves and admit that globalization is one of the most powerful forces today. Unless something else with more power comes by I see the trend continuing.

I guess this is the part where everybody says PO will be that "more powerful force" that will knock the wind out of globalization. Maybe so. But who knows when that's going to happen? Probably sometime after this project gets completed. I still see this project as being "viable" even if oil hits $200 a barrel. 8)
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron