Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Reaching for Sustainability; Avoiding Collapse

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Reaching for Sustainability; Avoiding Collapse

Unread postby rogerhb » Wed 01 Mar 2006, 20:39:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('johnmarkos', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rogerhb', '(')a) don't leave the world worse than when you were born
(b) don't leave debts for your children

Are we talking on a personal scale or on a global/civilizational one?


No worse means that the same resources that were available when you started are available when you die, you don't cut down trees faster than the rate they replenish and you plant the replacements, etc.

By debt I mean personal, national and global. The origin of national debt was that royalty wanted to wage war but had to get funding from parliament, parliament said no, so the king raised his own funds by borrowing and paying the interest, after a while these loans changed hands a number of times. Then the king's advisors twigged that they never had to pay back the principal, only to honour the servicing of the debt.

Anything else is not sustainable.
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand

Re: Reaching for Sustainability; Avoiding Collapse

Unread postby bobcousins » Thu 02 Mar 2006, 18:35:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rogerhb', 'N')o worse means that the same resources that were available when you started are available when you die, you don't cut down trees faster than the rate they replenish and you plant the replacements, etc.
...
Anything else is not sustainable.


So does that rule out any petroleum products, metals, minerals, stone? Everything apart from plant or animal products?
It's all downhill from here
User avatar
bobcousins
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1164
Joined: Thu 14 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Left the cult

Re: Reaching for Sustainability; Avoiding Collapse

Unread postby johnmarkos » Tue 28 Mar 2006, 14:11:03

I'm reading Bruce Sterling's little book Shaping Things, and found a quote on sustainability that grabbed me.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Bruce Sterling', 'A') small, beautiful, modest, hand-crafted society, living in harmony with its eco-region, relentlessly parsimonious in its use of energy and resources, can't learn enough about itself to survive.


That is, there's not enough information in such a society to make it truly sustainable. Such society cannot learn enough about threats to its existence to survive for a long time.
User avatar
johnmarkos
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Wed 19 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: San Francisco, California

Re: Reaching for Sustainability; Avoiding Collapse

Unread postby grabby » Tue 28 Mar 2006, 15:06:25

After a big bad peak oil there would be nothing to power another society, you couldn't get back to a technology to manufacture solar cells.

People will live in symbiosis with nature,.

A little electricity here and there, there would be lots of hydro power this will be the high tech, and radiostations am, no FM or TV.

alcohol burning cars if you're a rich farmer.

hey just like 1899
User avatar
grabby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1291
Joined: Tue 08 Nov 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby grabby » Tue 28 Mar 2006, 15:40:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sumwon', 's')eems to me that we're getting off topic here. There are plenty of places to discuss doom vs. anti-doom. Please, let's stick to the main purpose of the thread, which is to collect knowledge about sustainability.


I find it difficult to imagine that this ponderous system (the oblivious citizenry, the auto-based civil infrastructure, the capitalistic manufacturing sector, the corrupt political landscape, the worn-out industrial agricultural food chain, and the rest) can be changed in time to prevent social meltdown of some sort. This meltdown may be apocolyptic or merely a severe depression but I believe that it is inevitable. Given that, the immediate actionable goal should be personal. Like the cabin steward says, "secure your own oxygen mask before assisting your child."
...
I guess what I am sayi iss(be useful)



VERY TRUE we are a nation of trained parasites...
Teens are not fully developed (ergo unsmart)

They do not apply negative reinforcement to the problem as a cause, they assume the parents are mean.

When they move out and get a roomamte who does nothing but play intendo and eat the others food out of the fridge, then the light comes on that we are are responsible for our own actions.

Untill they go live on their own for a while they will never learn this lesson.

They will always assume you don't like them so that won't work.

Send them to a college where they live in a dorm.

some learn to cope by becoming useful and a few will learn to be parasites

if they become a parasite (everyone cleans up after them) then the only way to win is get them married to a woman who doesnt mind being abused for a little attention..

believe it or not this is about 25 percent of all low income family, we see them all the time.

it all works out.

The only way not to develop a parasite is to stop training a parasite.

If the mother always goes in to make their bed, cook their food, do their work, you are training a parasite.

because the parasite training is dominant, and overrules all other training the next generation will be a parasite also.

These are generalizations only not all kids follow this pattern, and some parasites become born again and decide they hate living off others and find work is fun especially if its fun work.
more about not training parasites.

if the kid blows his money and then needs some cash, and you give him the old lecture how it is better to save your money for a rainy day, then you give him 10 bucks for a movie cause you feel sorry for him, you just trained him to be a little more parasite and that you should never work for money, but ask for handouts. because the LAST ten bucks took 1 week of mnewspapers, and all you ahd to do for this ten bucks was whine a little.

never feed a whining parasite.
they get stronger and whine harder.

Tough tiddies is the appropriate answer for a dollar request on a BIG DATE

go to the park.
User avatar
grabby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1291
Joined: Tue 08 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Reaching for Sustainability; Avoiding Collapse

Unread postby uNkNowN ElEmEnt » Tue 28 Mar 2006, 17:41:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hat is, there's not enough information in such a society to make it truly sustainable. Such society cannot learn enough about threats to its existence to survive for a long time.


By sustainable we mean that they will figure out how to make do with what they have. Not how to make "naturally" the toys we want to have. One is necessary, one is not. We've survived for thousands of years without toys and power and we can do so again so I don't buy the following quote.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A') small, beautiful, modest, hand-crafted society, living in harmony with its eco-region, relentlessly parsimonious in its use of energy and resources, can't learn enough about itself to survive.


Otherwise we wouldn't have found all those Amazonian tribes the missionaries then proceeded to try to corrupt.
User avatar
uNkNowN ElEmEnt
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2587
Joined: Sat 04 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: perpetual state of exhaustion
Top

Re: Reaching for Sustainability; Avoiding Collapse

Unread postby Entropy2 » Tue 02 May 2006, 22:12:59

1. I am reading LTG+30.
2. I have read all the posts on this thread.
3. I am in a discussion group; tomorrow we will discuss sustainability.
4. I do not think that a smooth transition to sustainability is possible.
5. My opinion is that peaceful sustainability can or will only be achieved after a collapse of population and enlightened leadership emerges. This could take hundreds or thousands of years.
Entropy2
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue 28 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Reaching for Sustainability; Avoiding Collapse

Unread postby rwwff » Tue 02 May 2006, 22:24:40

I couldn't agree with ya more on the parasite thing. However, you can also look at those situations as an opportunity to teach them about trading effort for money. Whether you give them the opportunity to mow the lawn, or do three pages of algebra problems with pencil and paper only, they can earn their spending money just fine.

Bigger problem, grandparents that ooooze money all over your great work ethic teaching plans. Dad!! Why would I go get bit by mosquitos for $20? Grandma gave me a $100 last time we were over at her place. Grrrrrrrr.
User avatar
rwwff
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas

Re: Reaching for Sustainability; Avoiding Collapse

Unread postby Ibon » Wed 03 May 2006, 02:35:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('johnmarkos', 'I')'m reading Bruce Sterling's little book Shaping Things, and found a quote on sustainability that grabbed me.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Bruce Sterling', 'A') small, beautiful, modest, hand-crafted society, living in harmony with its eco-region, relentlessly parsimonious in its use of energy and resources, can't learn enough about itself to survive.


That is, there's not enough information in such a society to make it truly sustainable. Such society cannot learn enough about threats to its existence to survive for a long time.



This quote above made me think how modern humans have become so uniformed as a result of our adaptation and dependency to technology that we actually have lost so much diversity of skills, not only physical skills (like crafts and growing of food) but also the adaptation skills to react in non linear novel ways to new situations.

Reminds me when a species numbers fall too low there is not enough diversity remaining in the gene pool to insure their survival?
Modern humans suffer this deficit culturally as well. So when a small group tries to effect change out of the context of the evolution of whats happening culturally to the whole it may well prove futile.

One could just accept to do ones best as part of a declining culture and abandon the need to try to recreate some alternative culture, life boat etc. The need to create a wholesome alternative to slow collapse comes not so much from a primal instinct of survival as much as a need to have some meaningful hope within ones lifetime. But maybe this alternative is not achievable in our lifetimes and any attempt will be anattempt to satisfy ones ego to do so. Perhaps the unwinding and decline of what we have created will take several lifetimes before a real alternative will finally gain traction in any meaningful way. Who is to say that it has to happen in our lifetime? Maybe this process will go way beyond our lifetime for us even to be able to make any meaningful contribution to change. Maybe with humility we will just have to surrender to an acceptance that we are part of a decline with no silver bullet of change, for attempting to do so may only give us the illusion as in the quote by Bruce Sterling with no real evolution happening.

But that doesn't mean we shouldn't try, it's just maybe a good idea not to expect too much in these coming decades since our society will be mostly preoccupied with trying to patch up the holes and cracks as it crumbles. This is not meant to be depressing but rather to help avoid a future depression when things don't change as quickly as we would like them to. The dirt of over consumption that has accumulated collectively on our souls cannot be washed away in one lifetime. We will all have turned to ashes and be long gone by the time humans build any effective new cultural paradigm that will create a new wave of cultural evolution. It's good though to feel like a pioneer even if what you attempt is a dead end evolutionarily.

If we could all just accept that we are evolutionary dead ends than we could just sit back and be content, like a banana tree that has lost it's ability to procreate through sexual reproduction.
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama
Top

Re: Reaching for Sustainability; Avoiding Collapse

Unread postby Doly » Wed 03 May 2006, 05:04:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', 'T')he dirt of over consumption that has accumulated collectively on our souls cannot be washed away in one lifetime. We will all have turned to ashes and be long gone by the time humans build any effective new cultural paradigm that will create a new wave of cultural evolution.


Like I like to say in my peak oil meetings when anybody pushes the idea that people won't change enough that quickly, it's amazing how willing people are when they have to. Think how quickly people adapt to a war, for example.

And if you are worrying that the necessary information to establish a sustainable society doesn't exist yet, I see no particular problem in acquiring it fairly quickly (say, in the next twenty years). Whenever people have put a lot of effort into developing something, there has been progress quite quickly (think the Internet). Right now, there are sustainable farms that provide their own energy and still have a bit of spare energy to share. And we aren't even putting much effort into sustainability. How far could we go if there was a real will to change things?
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Reaching for Sustainability; Avoiding Collapse

Unread postby Ibon » Wed 03 May 2006, 11:15:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Doly', 'L')ike I like to say in my peak oil meetings when anybody pushes the idea that people won't change enough that quickly, it's amazing how willing people are when they have to. Think how quickly people adapt to a war, for example.


Think of the flourish of greek culture that lasted centuries all the way up to the time of Ptolemy, the mathematician and astronomer who mapped the stars and planets of the firmament in the 2nd century AD. It took 12 centuries until Copernicus came along in the 15th century AD and challenged Ptolemy's mathematics proving that the earth was indeed not the center of the universe. A study of history shows a pretty stagnant time culturally and technologically during the middle ages lasting many centuries.

Is this perhaps what awaits us, a long drawn out period of decline that may last generations? Initial attempts by small groups to acheive sustainability as we see today are only hijacking the available technology that has been developed during the ascendency of our modern technological age which may soon go into steep decline. To avoid extinction these earnest initial attempts will only be truely sustainable when they wont need to borrow infrastructure in a dependent way from the declining system from which they are trying to create an alternative. This would require a new civilization supporting this, not just backwater small local attempts that will only fizzle out after the solar panels and wind mills break down that can't be replaced.

Who is to say that our generation, that was fortunate to experience the fruits of the golden age of technology should also be deserving of a new golden age of sustainability?

Doesn't it make more logical sense that several generations of decline will be needed to truely recharge the batteries of cultural innovation to manifest and mobilize the culture at large. Why should we be deserving of a new golden age of sustainability or is this just another example of our sense of self entitlement that was bred into us during the current consumer culture that we have all grown up with?

I would go forward with more humility as to our place in the historical time line as our culture confronts its decline. To assume that we will bounce so quickly into a golden age of sustainaility rings a little cornucopian that is actually a cultural attribute of our current age, not the one that awaits us shortly around the corner.
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama
Top

Re: Reaching for Sustainability; Avoiding Collapse

Unread postby droper » Sat 03 Jun 2006, 19:06:09

Sustainability will happen after lots of people die. Elderly probably wont last long on their own. Standard of living will drop so low people will not be able to handle it and are too out of shape and without skills to overcome. This is not taking into consideration desperation that may lead to wars global and civil.
User avatar
droper
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed 31 May 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Reaching for Sustainability; Avoiding Collapse

Unread postby Liamj » Mon 05 Jun 2006, 00:42:36

Nice use of perspective Ibon, i'll buy it. ;) Luckily, none of us know whether such a stretch of time will be necesary, so the impatient can push on and the patient can contemplate soil carbon. TG there is so much agreement on general direction (proponents of space mirrors please spare your electrons).

JohnMarkos, is it instinct makes you think a 'small, beautiful, modest, hand-crafted society' would have insufficient information for sustainability, or are there relevant precedents? Given Ibon's time scale, and a decline in trivial information, i have hope we'll learn a few tricks.
User avatar
Liamj
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 864
Joined: Wed 08 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: 145'2"E 37'46"S

Re: Reaching for Sustainability; Avoiding Collapse

Unread postby Doly » Mon 05 Jun 2006, 08:28:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', 'D')oesn't it make more logical sense that several generations of decline will be needed to truely recharge the batteries of cultural innovation to manifest and mobilize the culture at large. Why should we be deserving of a new golden age of sustainability or is this just another example of our sense of self entitlement that was bred into us during the current consumer culture that we have all grown up with?


Several generations of decline happened during the Middle Ages because they had to deal with a change in climate AND deadly plagues that left only one fourth of the people in Europe alive. Under those circumstances, it's amazing how much knowledge they managed to preserve.

I personally don't think it's going to get that bad. Call me excessively optimistic if you like. But I see so much waste around me, that I can't help believing that simply cutting on all that waste and dedicating our efforts to the essential things is likely to be enough.

And I don't think I'm entitled to anything, thank you very much. My life philosophy is that all children deserve in life as soon as they're born is cold and hunger. If it happens otherwise, good luck for them. If I lose everything with peak oil, so be it. But I'm not going to give certain things up without a fight. And hope is one of them.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Reaching for Sustainability; Avoiding Collapse

Unread postby Ibon » Mon 05 Jun 2006, 13:19:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Doly', '
')Several generations of decline happened during the Middle Ages because they had to deal with a change in climate AND deadly plagues that left only one fourth of the people in Europe alive. Under those circumstances, it's amazing how much knowledge they managed to preserve.


Isn't that somewhat confirming my point? Isn't Gobal warming and bird flu for example modern day comparitives of the climate change and plagues that the middle ages had to contend with? You can add whatever other environmental stress from the current global overpopulation to the mix. There are enough stresses to cause systemic weaknesses that could last generations just as it did in the middle ages.

But conceding this point really doesn't provide any benefit or gain to the task at hand and actually I agree with your basic optimism that we have to focus all our energies in striving toward sustainability and educating people. The majority of my thoughts and posts actually fall more on the optimistic side of cultural transformation toward sustainability happening quickly. We need the help of catalysts though to get the masses to concede the sacrafices necessarry and those catalysts are further destabilizing events like worsening GW, Peak Oil, more Katrinas, terrorist attacks, failed resource wars etc.

So we are walking the knife's edge. The very destabilizing events that can transform us can also plunge us back into the dark ages.

I didn't even mention the global rise of religious fundamentalism that will flourish under the darker scenario if we are plunged back into the dark ages. The evidence is out there today.

Every current technological attempt at sustainability is actually being built on the back of the cheap oil infrastructure. I see a real danger that if that infrastructure weakens too drastically than all these solar panels and wind turbines will someday be recognized by future archeologists as failed life boats. That danger is real and not clearly enough understood by alot of people who think that this transition will happen with the same effortlessness that created this cheap oil age. That is where humility is required, too many of us have been raised during the cheap oil era when it was so easy to have so many of our personal needs met. That is another two edged sword since that allowed us to become quite self actualized at the same time as it imprisoned us psychologically to an unsustainable system.

As a consequence many people will assume that we are somehow deserving of this transition toward sustainability. Nothing could be further from the truth.
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama
Top

Re: Reaching for Sustainability; Avoiding Collapse

Unread postby Anthrobus » Tue 06 Jun 2006, 16:31:56

hello ibon,

(very interesting thread, thanks to all),
walking on the knifes edge, thats what we do. The prospect of a possible “peak civilisation” ist the on aspect of the whole peak oil story that really really scares me. Some mentioned possible futures are reminding me of olaf stapledons “Last and first men”, in which story the fall of the (second) technical civilisation was due to an energy crisis (that was denied by the government!). The next civilisation was again built upon sailing ships (basically) and the following not before the earth has spewn out enough new minerals to mine over some millions of years.

If the breakdown goes to fast, complex things (i. e. computers) can no longer be replaced, electricity grids not maintained and the gizmos just become useless, as well as our virtualized world on the harddisks and dvd's. When will this happen? How long can a city like, lets take munich, stay a living, prosperous town, when in winter, due to some extended brownouts, there are weeks without electricity or heating? What about electronically transmitted money, taxes, day trading, tight business plans, etc. And the virtualized, just in time everything now-society is actually going to be advanced further and further, hanging on an ever thinner thread. You can nowadays meet the deadlines hardly under the most favourite circumstances. Bankruptcy may only be some days away. And the prospect of power outages in winter may not be far in the future. Last winter, the pressure in the gas pipes fell already in the middle of europe due to some gazprom muscle playing. It didn't even take a real shortage, just someone who had some itch to rise the stakes.

Imagine, what resources have to be combined, to put an giant rig like for thunder horse together and in action. At some point in a decline, building a thing like this may be no longer be possible. No more oil. What next? Digging coal from 2 miles underground with a shovel? Ship stuff around the world when piracy is becoming a common phenomenon on the oceans?

I dreamt of writing a scifi story once, about isolated pockes of (an agricultural) civilisation mainly around coastal towns, connected by large cargo ships that carried, sold and bought anything, wood, minerals carried travellers ... It should have been a happy, peaceful society with people having lots of leisure time. Technology and Astronomy would be worked on in walled monasteries. And in every direction wilderness, overgrown ruins ... Greetings from “A canticle for Leibowitz”

This was before i knew of peak oil, now is am a bit more pessimistic. Perhaps sometime in the future, there will be just no more resources to plunder and people just are forced to live sustainable? But no more large wild mammals on earth, no more rain forests, everything gnawed bare, every species brought at least to economical extinction?

Even more dangers lurk for mankind that can by principle not be avoided.

Plagues will gererally not be wiped out. Bacteria & co had ages to evolv and survived asteroid impacts, ice ages and time. In my opinion, some penecillin wont stop them for long (only keep them at arms length), as soon as there are less resources in research, they will return quickly and deadly.

All people eycept maybe the american president know, that we will not leave this planet to colonize other stars. We will live, thrive and die here and cannot move to someplace pristine and yet unplundered. Our future is here.

Culture, reason and (humanitarian) knowledge cant be tought to babarians as we generally are. I am permanently baffled (hi), how babarious, short sighted, stubborn and stupid people usually act. As if we didnt have thousands of years of civilisation, most excellent writers, thinkers, philosophers. Its all said, thougt, laid down. The books, plays, poets are crying it in everybodys face, not to mention the world religions. Read, think, recognize yourself, behave morally, dont do to others what you wont like done to you. It seems all wasted on most people most of the time. In ones life, there is hardly enough time to be occupied with the very best, mankind has brought up. And what are most people doing most of the time? Surely nothing to their advantage.

Even such a shortsighted culture as we are takes thousands of years to built and may be lost within 100 years. 100 Years of a mindless, destructive, cruel world of nort corea like states and this might just have been it, nobody remembers anymore the peaks and summits that world culture had reached. You can just forget Thukydides, Herodot, Sokrates, Marc Aurel, Ovid and their successors.

If there are safe places, you can store books in dark ages for centuries (non acidic paper), if society breaks down, you can study the language and read them again. What about our informations, stored in invisible nanomter-scale patches? No civilisation lesser than ours in technology will be able to read these devices (they are not designed to last as long also, and there may be no more civilisations more technically advanced than ours). No individual or small group of resarchers would have the time to sift through this mountain of useless informations. Everything not readable by the eye will be lost. The internet, a myth.

Nobody in a future of scare food will care for cathedrals, paintings, frescos. They will just rot away. Think about it, the next time in the sixtine chapel.

humility? Surely not our generation. Not the mass of people. Dont forget that most of the people of the world still dream of our wealth. We should try to tell them, that we found something better and they just should skip the consumerish phase.

And yet, lasting doomerism is not the answer for me. I think if you keep trying to be a moral and decent human being, your skies shall not want, even with po.

Thinking about all this, i feel like watching the movie “Silent running”.

REJOICE IN THE SUN
(written by Diane Lampert / Peter Schickele)
Joan Baez
Fields of children running wild in the sun
like a forest is your child growing wild in the sun
Doomed in his innocence in the sun.
Gather your children to your side in the sun
tell them all they love will die, tell them why, in the sun
tell them it's not too late for today one by one
tell them to harvest and rejoice --- in the sun.
The mouse, i`ve been sure for years, limps home from the site of the burning ferris wheel with a brand new, airtight plan for killing the cat.

J. D. Salinger
Anthrobus
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 134
Joined: Mon 12 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Germany

Re: Reaching for Sustainability; Avoiding Collapse

Unread postby Ibon » Tue 06 Jun 2006, 17:43:13

We have been used to visionaries and leaders who inspire growth, wealth and power. But now we need a leader to inspire us to power down, reduce our net assets and shrink.
It's kind of like Popeye puking spinach.........
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama

Previous

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron