I've been pondering the ongoing and often rancorous debate between cornucopians and doomers and I wonder if there is any room for common ground.
Often our arguments start as technical debates that become increasingly acrimonious. What I want to know is what is at the root of our frustration with each other.
As a doomer I'll be the first to say that I'm scared of cornucopians trying to implement their plans of monoculture ethanol crops, numerous new nuclear power plants and continued consumption of fossil fuels.
I fear that this road will exacerbate our current problems and could actually lead to a far worse crisis down the road.
However, I can understand that cornucopians are just as scared of us. They fear that doomers will set us back to a pre-industrial pre-modern dark ages that will cause starvation, war, and the end of civilization as we know it.
Each side is invested in winning their argument because they are scared of what losing means. They see the road painted by the other side as destructive, terrifying and possibly apocolyptic.
So my feeling is I don't fault cornucopians for their beliefs, even if I disagree with them. They genuinely think they are offering solutions that will stave off an immense crisis and thereby protect billions of lives.
But doomers, as well, are intent on preparing the best for the future by preparing for an impending catastrophe without believing in false hopes.
Two sides thinking they are doing the right thing with good intentions.





![new_popcornsmiley [smilie=new_popcornsmiley.gif]](https://udev.peakoil.com/forums/images/smilies/new_popcornsmiley.gif)


