by Guest » Thu 04 Nov 2004, 22:35:20
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Marco', 'H')i Drifter,
I accept your point about exit polls being unreliable. Like I said I am no expert here.
My point was that these e-voting machines leave no trace record for later verification or recount. All your doing is recounting the same data.
Also, they are said to be fairly easy to hack/program to shift results. I believe there is evidence of this in other election contests.
All the scrutineers/observers can do is monitor against obvious problems. They cant check to make sure a vote goes where it should in these systems. Therein lies the problem. My suspicians still stand.
PS: I do accept that the Dems ran a terrible campaign and the Reps a good (if base ) one. I also accept that Kerry had less electoral appeal than Mr Potato Head.
Still, the idea that Bush doubled his vote with coloured folk because they dont like gay marriage either seems ludicrous.
Marco
The idea that people in Ohio voted their "morals" is total BS. The Ohio economy is completely shattered. People, regardless of faith, vote their pocketbooks, not their morals.
There is no way Bush legitimately won Ohio. No way.