Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Crops Fail, 2nd round of food inflation

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

US election is a fraud!

Unread postby Marco » Thu 04 Nov 2004, 21:50:47

I'm the first to admit that I am no expert on matters electoral. Nor do I really think a Kerry win would have changed anything policywise.

The US policy of grabbing oil/gas reserves in front of the PO wave would have remained- as would the need to enforce the p-dollar system. Ensuring US supplies in the face of growing competition would remain a priority.

Even so, the exit polls and official results don't seem the match up. official results showed a +5% discrepency to Bush only in states with electronic voting. The exit polls showed a Kerry lead.

In states with electronic voting (but with a paper trail) exit polls mirrored final results. More interesting is that all discrepencies between exit polls and official results favoured Bush.

This and the fact that the guy who owns the Diebold company promised a Republican result in Ohio make it all the more interesting.

I would not be surprised to find that the Bush cartel rigged/tampered with the results in key states. This does not include the usual voter scrubbing that goes on with minority groups. Does anyone doubt these guys are not capable of pulling of a massive fraud like this?

I think Bush needed a 'mandate' after the 2000 scandal. He needed to show the nation that most people supported his policies. I'm sorry but I dont buy the arguement that all those christians and rednecks turned out in such massive numbers to swing it his way. You dont need a terror attack to scare people your way. That already happened for a time after 9-11. the Madrid bombing (3-11) shows that people can be scared the other way too.

I suspect these guys are desperate enough to do this. They NEED another four years (at least) to fulfill their agendas. A Democrat win shoves the neocons back into the shadows and there is the added risk of a large left-Democrat push for reform within the party.

Much easier to put in a fix- and have Kerry take a fall in round 12 with no protest.

As an aside, I read a comment from a guy who claimed that Rove stated Gore actually won in 2000. Ergo Bush is eligible to stand in 2008. The comment was unsourced but it would be something this fixer would say. Incredible if true. A tacit admission of 2000 electoral theft. can anyone verify this comment?

I would love to be proved wong in my suspicions. Its far better to believe that the American people are just stupid rather than cheated. Even so, I have my suspicians about this one.

Marco
User avatar
Marco
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue 02 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Unread postby Guest » Thu 04 Nov 2004, 22:14:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Drifter', 'H')ey Marco.

No offense, but you had better educate yourself regarding exit polls. Exit polls are notoriously inaccurate. I hope you are not saying the Republicans 'stole' the election. Democratic lawyers were placed in almost every voting center in the US to keep watch.


But not even those nasty democratic lawyers can get inside the black boxes.

http://www.blackboxvoting.org
Guest
 

Unread postby trespam » Thu 04 Nov 2004, 22:21:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Anonymous', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Drifter', 'H')ey Marco.

No offense, but you had better educate yourself regarding exit polls. Exit polls are notoriously inaccurate. I hope you are not saying the Republicans 'stole' the election. Democratic lawyers were placed in almost every voting center in the US to keep watch.


But not even those nasty democratic lawyers can get inside the black boxes.

http://www.blackboxvoting.org


Maybe they ginned it up. Maybe not. I voted for Kerry. But you know what. Kennedy stole the election from Nixon in 1960. So stealing elections is nothing new. They used the mob to help them do it. As far as I can tell, Bush won the popular vote by a margin that makes it unlikely they stole that. Perhaps they used a little nudging to gain the votes of Ohio and Florida? But the winning of the popular vote makes some errors to either side in Ohio less concerning.

This is not to say that we should not have fair elections. We should. I think there is demonstrable evidence that more votes are thrown away in poor voting districts because they often use old equipment that results in hanging chads.

It's a little disconcerting that a country that can shock and awe to create "democracy" in other parts of the world can't engineer and pay for a voting system that will ensure we have democracy working properly here in this country.
User avatar
trespam
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue 10 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: San Diego, CA, USA

Unread postby Marco » Thu 04 Nov 2004, 22:30:21

Hi Drifter,

I accept your point about exit polls being unreliable. Like I said I am no expert here.

My point was that these e-voting machines leave no trace record for later verification or recount. All your doing is recounting the same data.

Also, they are said to be fairly easy to hack/program to shift results. I believe there is evidence of this in other election contests.

All the scrutineers/observers can do is monitor against obvious problems. They cant check to make sure a vote goes where it should in these systems. Therein lies the problem. My suspicians still stand.

PS: I do accept that the Dems ran a terrible campaign and the Reps a good (if base ) one. I also accept that Kerry had less electoral appeal than Mr Potato Head.

Still, the idea that Bush doubled his vote with coloured folk because they dont like gay marriage either seems ludicrous.

Marco
User avatar
Marco
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue 02 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Unread postby Guest » Thu 04 Nov 2004, 22:35:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Marco', 'H')i Drifter,

I accept your point about exit polls being unreliable. Like I said I am no expert here.

My point was that these e-voting machines leave no trace record for later verification or recount. All your doing is recounting the same data.

Also, they are said to be fairly easy to hack/program to shift results. I believe there is evidence of this in other election contests.

All the scrutineers/observers can do is monitor against obvious problems. They cant check to make sure a vote goes where it should in these systems. Therein lies the problem. My suspicians still stand.

PS: I do accept that the Dems ran a terrible campaign and the Reps a good (if base ) one. I also accept that Kerry had less electoral appeal than Mr Potato Head.

Still, the idea that Bush doubled his vote with coloured folk because they dont like gay marriage either seems ludicrous.

Marco


The idea that people in Ohio voted their "morals" is total BS. The Ohio economy is completely shattered. People, regardless of faith, vote their pocketbooks, not their morals.

There is no way Bush legitimately won Ohio. No way.
Guest
 

Unread postby Laurasia » Thu 04 Nov 2004, 22:43:00

In defence of the Spanish population who voted out Aznar immediately after the terrorist attacks in Madrid; they were not scared into voting him out of office (although the administration in DC would love to have you and me believe this), they voted him out of office to PUNISH him for getting into the Iraq war in the first place. About 90% of the population, apparently, did NOT agree with Spanish involvement. Remember the millions protesting in Barcelona and Madrid on Feb. 15, 2003?

Just wanted to put my two-cents worth in there...I basically agree with you on the rest of your post. That article about the Diebold guy came out quite a few months ago, didn't it? Long enough for lots of people to have forgotten about it (but not everyone, apparently :)

Regards,

L.
User avatar
Laurasia
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 544
Joined: Sat 10 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Toughing it out in suburbia

Unread postby Felix » Thu 04 Nov 2004, 22:48:22

G'day,

Just wondering, why do you guys use lever machines, that punch holes in cards anyway. I know this is probably quite primitive, but we just grab a marker pen here in New Zealand and tick a box next to the candidate. It's then counted by hand I think; the results are out within hours anyway.

So, no hanging chads here.

Another reason, why are hanging chads a problem? If there is a clear mark on the ballot, does it matter if it's a hole rather than a half a hole?

I'm just curious about the subtleties of voting in your part of the world.

Cheers,

Felix
Wellington
New Zealand
User avatar
Felix
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun 31 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby Marco » Thu 04 Nov 2004, 23:03:33

Hi Laurasia,

I stand corrected on the motives of the Spanish population re:Aznar. The Spanish people showed a lot more sense than the people of other 'democracies'.

Blair is up next- and faced with a choice between him and the Tories- well Britain at least has minor parties that have some chances.

At least britain uses a paper system.

regards Marco
User avatar
Marco
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue 02 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Exit polls

Unread postby Cool Hand Linc » Thu 04 Nov 2004, 23:43:08

I can give a reason why the exit polls were not correct. I heard it meantioned on talk radio shows that when exiting you should tell the opposite of how you voted. The same was being done to the telephone people. Everytime I got a call. I would tell them I was voting for Kerry. I voted for Bush.

I dislike the 30 phone calls I recieved before the vote. I studied the issues and studied the voting records and made my decision.
Peace out!

Cool Hand Linc 8)
User avatar
Cool Hand Linc
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 922
Joined: Sat 17 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Tulsa, Ok

Unread postby pepper2000 » Fri 05 Nov 2004, 01:52:37

Let me get this straight: there was a organized plan on the part of the right wing media to deceive the exit polls? Now why exactly would they do that?
User avatar
pepper2000
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 112
Joined: Fri 15 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

?

Unread postby Cool Hand Linc » Fri 05 Nov 2004, 01:55:28

Just because the lefties deserve it.

Listen to Randy Savage amoung others. I hate all the people with their telephone poles and the exit poles. I heard a caller tell him we should do this. I don't think it would be correct to say the right wing media did it.
Peace out!

Cool Hand Linc 8)
User avatar
Cool Hand Linc
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 922
Joined: Sat 17 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Tulsa, Ok

Unread postby TheSupplyGuy » Fri 05 Nov 2004, 07:32:37

Randy Savage has a radio show? :lol:
Anyway, I personally don't think it was rigged, but I do think our way of voting is stupid. Using a magic marker or electronic voting isn't that hard to count for crying out loud.
In the long run, men hit only what they aim at. Therefore, though they should fail immediately, they had better aim at something high.-Thoreau
Peak Oil
User avatar
TheSupplyGuy
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 235
Joined: Sat 15 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southeast USA

Unread postby khebab » Fri 05 Nov 2004, 10:18:23

The entire US democracy is a fraud! who else has two parties or less, dictatures have one!
:-D
khebab
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon 27 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Canada

Unread postby big_rc » Fri 05 Nov 2004, 12:22:04

Kerry might have won. Read this article to learn about voter "spoilage" in the 2004 US election.

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/1104-36.htm


You might be alot more right than you know. Check out this article to be even more depressed about the election.
Simon's Law: Everything put together falls apart sooner or later.

I don't think of all the misery, but of all the beauty that still remains.--Anne Frank
User avatar
big_rc
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Sat 17 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Amerika (most of the time)

Unread postby pip » Fri 05 Nov 2004, 12:47:12

The exit polls in 2000 were way off also.

I've heard on the radio that the Dems had found out where the exit pollsters would be and had their supporters voting at the right time and locations. That skewed the exit poll numbers.
The road goes on forever and the party never ends - REK
User avatar
pip
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 480
Joined: Wed 21 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Republic of Texas

Crops Fail, 2nd round of food inflation

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Wed 12 Dec 2007, 08:21:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he global economy is facing a second wave of food inflation after the US agriculture department on Tuesday warned of significant falls in stocks of corn, wheat and soyabean and heavy demand.

Officials forecast US wheat stocks would shrink to their lowest level in 60 years, dropping from 312m bushels to 280m by the end of the 2007-08 crop year.

The US is the world’s biggest exporter of wheat and importing countries are bidding heavily for its crops as other exporters cut supplies.

Cold weather damaged crops in Argentina and drought affected Australia’s wheat production. Flooding also damaged European crops.

Michael Lewis, of Deutsche Bank in London, said the decline in stocks and rising shortages in large parts of Asia suggested 2008 “could deliver another year of . . . price shocks”.

Corn and soyabean stocks will also be lower than expected as demand from emerging countries rises in spite of record prices.

Greg Wagner of Horizon Ag Strategies in Chicago said supplies of soyabeans and wheat had now tightened to “very uncomfortable levels”.


Article Here
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.
Top

Re: Crops Fail, 2nd round of food inflation

Unread postby Ayame » Wed 12 Dec 2007, 12:35:56

Also:

Global stockpiles are expected by the U.S. government to fall to 109.8 million metric tons by May 31, the lowest in 30 years.

article

It's looking dire especially since we have a far larger global population than 30 years ago.
Ayame
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 631
Joined: Thu 29 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: UK

Re: Crops Fail, 2nd round of food inflation

Unread postby Denny » Thu 13 Dec 2007, 01:25:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wisconsin_cur', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he global economy is facing a second wave of food inflation after the US agriculture department on Tuesday warned of significant falls in stocks of corn, wheat and soyabean and heavy demand.

Officials forecast US wheat stocks would shrink to their lowest level in 60 years, dropping from 312m bushels to 280m by the end of the 2007-08 crop year.


Didn't President Bush, when he was extolling the advantages of ethanol, make mention that it would be important to leave enough corn for "people and animals too"? Could he have been mistaken yet again? What a schmuck!
User avatar
Denny
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1738
Joined: Sat 10 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Canada
Top

Re: Crops Fail, 2nd round of food inflation

Unread postby Chesire » Thu 13 Dec 2007, 03:14:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Denny', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wisconsin_cur', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he global economy is facing a second wave of food inflation after the US agriculture department on Tuesday warned of significant falls in stocks of corn, wheat and soyabean and heavy demand.

Officials forecast US wheat stocks would shrink to their lowest level in 60 years, dropping from 312m bushels to 280m by the end of the 2007-08 crop year.


Didn't President Bush, when he was extolling the advantages of ethanol, make mention that it would be important to leave enough corn for "people and animals too"? Could he have been mistaken yet again? What a schmuck!


He meant american people and animals . :lol: The rest of the world that relys on plumpy nut and road kill can get fucked . We will see how much "resources" are when they want to trade for grain which america has and they don't [smilie=thefinger.gif]
User avatar
Chesire
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 245
Joined: Fri 13 Jul 2007, 03:00:00
Top


Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron