Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Way beyond Peak

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Way beyond Peak

Unread postby lateStarter » Mon 15 May 2006, 14:26:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Concerned', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Falconoffury', 'A')ren't the price gouging laws in the United States going to stop a natural balance between supply and demand?

Also, don't some countries such as Malaysia subsidize gasoline prices, resulting in lower prices than they should be?


Not to mention heavy taxation in some countries such as Europe or very little in countries like Iran.

Overall there is still a supply and demand on the micro level there are alot of factors that drive individual consumption. Anything from taxes, regulation, your salary level, the car you drive, public transport, ability to walk, have large family etc.. etc..

Quite frankly I don't think there is such a thing as a "natural" balance, what would one define as natural?


Not to be picky, but Europe is not actually a 'country' yet.... More like a very loose confederation of states....
We have been brought into the present condition in which we are unable neither to tolerate the evils from which we suffer, nor the remedies we need to cure them. - Livy
User avatar
lateStarter
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1058
Joined: Wed 06 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 38 km west of Warsaw, Poland

Re: Way beyond Peak

Unread postby GoIllini » Sat 20 May 2006, 20:15:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ohanian', '[')size=200]
This graph takes into account economic recessions.
[/size]

Image


Isn't a whole lot of your input getting bounced around by statistical noise? I mean, in one of your other examples, you might have chosen to leave out high prices in the early '80s, due to the Iran-Iraq war, but someone doing the same thing you just did with this more recent graph might have done the same thing back in '80 and projected oil would go to $200/barrel.

I think it's helpful to remember that history might not repeat itself, but it certainly rhymes. Back in the '70s, with the OPEC embargo, the U.S. got into a conservation frenzy and managed to get energy consumption to actually decrease for the first time in history while avoiding a massive recession.

If oil production isn't able to meet consumption, we'll see a much stronger long-term trend towards conservation than we're seeing now as prices increase. We're starting to see this conservation trend in car commercials and with many businesses.
User avatar
GoIllini
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 765
Joined: Sat 05 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Way beyond Peak

Unread postby RattlesnakeJake » Sat 27 May 2006, 10:49:54

I found a chart on a DoE web site that lists world oil production since 1970. I modified the spread sheet to show the change in production from one year to the next and to show 10 year averages of the year to year changes. The red numbers represent a decrease in production. Here's the result:

Image

As you can see from the data, the US is clearly past its peak (actually looks like a double peak), but the Persian Gulf and the World have not topped out.
User avatar
RattlesnakeJake
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon 08 May 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 48N 122W

Re: Way beyond Peak

Unread postby Zardoz » Sat 27 May 2006, 13:09:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RattlesnakeJake', '.')..the Persian Gulf and the World have not topped out.


We'll see:

World Oil Supply
"Thank you for attending the oil age. We're going to scrape what we can out of these tar pits in Alberta and then shut down the machines and turn out the lights. Goodnight." - seldom_seen
User avatar
Zardoz
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6323
Joined: Fri 02 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Oil-addicted Southern Californucopia

Re: Way beyond Peak

Unread postby TonyPrep » Sat 27 May 2006, 17:56:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RattlesnakeJake', 'b')ut the Persian Gulf and the World have not topped out.
It's impossible to say that, from your chart. Have another look in 5 years' time.

Tony
User avatar
TonyPrep
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand
Top

Re: Way beyond Peak

Unread postby RattlesnakeJake » Sun 28 May 2006, 10:02:00

Peak Oil, when it occurs, will be in the middle of many years of relative flat production before it begins declining. I don’t see the flat period, how can we be in the middle of it?

The recent increases in oil price are probably the result of increasing world-wide demand, rather than post-peak declines in production. For many years, continuously increasing production was more than enough to satisfy increasing demand. However, as oil production approaches peak, the increase slows and its corrective affect on increasing demand is eliminated. Small increases in production are no longer sufficient to satisfy the world’s desire for more and more oil, resulting in price competition for existing oil production.

According to the US Census Bureau, world population increased from 3.7 billion in 1970 to 5.3 billion in 1990, an increase of 43% in 20 years. During this period, according to the US Dept of Energy, oil production rose by 36%.

Since much of the world’s population increase occurred in under-developed countries, population increase alone doesn’t explain increased demand for oil. Here are a couple of items that might help:

1. According to Jay Stein’s article, referenced in the Number of Cars webpage, the world population of automobiles increased from 200 million in 1970 to 500 million in 1990, a 150% increase in 20 years.
2. According to this air traffic webpage, world airline traffic (passengers, baggage, freight, and mail) increased from 39 million ton-miles in 1970 to 161 million ton-miles in 1990, more than a 300% increase during the same period.

The good news: World oil production is not decreasing at this time.
The bad news: World oil production is not increasing enough at this time.

The good news will go away; the bad news is here to stay.

Our main concern about Peak Oil is rising prices and runaway inflation. I think the time of world peak oil is a trailing indicator for the expected problems. Rising prices and inflation will lead the peak by many years because they’re caused by increased demand rather than declining production. We may not be ‘way beyond Peak Oil’, but it sure feels like it. The consequences are here now.
User avatar
RattlesnakeJake
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon 08 May 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 48N 122W

Re: Way beyond Peak

Unread postby NEOPO » Mon 05 Jun 2006, 04:08:41

I understand completely.

Do you understand what I am suggesting really?

I have a hard time understanding why this is not fully possible.

If saudi arabia and most of the worlds current areas in production are not being exploited with the best technology then tell me where it is being used and why there instead.

Big reserve = big money = best tech and that is why we could possibly be well beyond half way before we notice a decline in world production.

I am convinced that you/we are correct with our overall PO outlook - I am not convinced that this theory of WAY BEYOND PEAK is 100% yet I also cannot accept it as being an impossibility.

IMHO - there is a 50% chance I am correct in believing that the gas tank is 60%+ depleted.

I hope I am wrong.
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX

Re: Way beyond Peak

Unread postby Doly » Mon 05 Jun 2006, 04:30:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RattlesnakeJake', 'P')eak Oil, when it occurs, will be in the middle of many years of relative flat production before it begins declining. I don’t see the flat period, how can we be in the middle of it?


Have you got any reliable figures on oil production? Because every time I try to figure it out, Saudi Arabia is saying that they're increasing production, and then it turns out that they didn't.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Way beyond Peak

Unread postby RattlesnakeJake » Mon 05 Jun 2006, 09:46:20

I found an old (2001) webpage that shows the effect of increasing demand. The assumption here is: unlimited ability to pump and refine (no production peak), and with no price increases. The only variables are total reserves and increasing demand.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')var Nering is a professor emeritus of mathematics at Arizona State University. He lives in Scottsdale, he is 80 years old, and he began teaching math during World War II. Nering wrote an essay, "The Mirage of a Growing Fuel Supply," that recently appeared in The New York Times. Nering said he often used consumption of a nonrenewable resource as an example of the exponential function in his calculus classes, and the simple equation might be helpful to those making decisions about national energy policy.

"Say you have a 100-year supply of crude oil," Nering would say to his students. "That is, the oil would last 100 years if consumed at its current rate. Now assume that people consume the oil at a rate that grows by 5 percent each year. How long would it last now?"

Students had no problem with the calculation, Nering said. The oil would last 36 years.

"What if you had a 1,000-year supply of oil that people used at the same increasing rate of 5 percent each year?" he would ask.

Answer: 79 years.

"What if oil company geologists find an incredible bonanza-a 10,000-year supply of oil, and that oil is consumed at the same rate. How long would that last?"

Answer: 125 years.

The five-percent increase in oil consumption is not a real number; Nering used it as a handy example for his class. The U.S. Energy Information Administration predicts an average rise in world oil consumption of about 3 percent each year for the next 20 years. But the numbers don't matter as much as the fact that humans are using more oil each year than the previous year, Nering said.
User avatar
RattlesnakeJake
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon 08 May 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 48N 122W
Top

Re: Way beyond Peak

Unread postby zensui-org » Mon 30 Oct 2006, 22:00:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('NEOPO', '
')(...)
I believe peak production will occur well beyond peak oil and that these two concepts are most definately NOT the same.
(...)


not exactly. peak production = peak oil ...but it doesn't have to happen at exactly 50% of oil extracted.
User avatar
zensui-org
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon 30 Oct 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Way beyond Peak

Unread postby NEOPO » Tue 31 Oct 2006, 01:11:27

ok whatever - read the whole thread and do some more homework and you may see.
It is easier to enslave a people that wish to remain free then it is to free a people who wish to remain enslaved.
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX

Re: Way beyond Peak

Unread postby LateGreatPlanetEarth » Fri 15 Dec 2006, 02:53:22

suppose a field has 1 well and has 1000 barrels reserves, and the well produces 100 bls per year for 5 years so that it reaches perk oil then.
now a second well is added in the 7'th year which would be peak production which is past peak oil. this is what SA may be doing.
LateGreatPlanetEarth
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue 13 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Cypress, CA

Re: Way beyond Peak

Unread postby NEOPO » Sat 30 Dec 2006, 00:51:32

Its also about EROEI, URR and energy density.
Heavy is not as energy dense as SLC, its harder to get (EROEI) and we wont get every last drop (URR).

After a review I am even more convinced maybe 75% that we are way past peak oil.
Its all in the definition folks.
It is easier to enslave a people that wish to remain free then it is to free a people who wish to remain enslaved.
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX

Previous

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron