Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Energy from Human Dung

Discussions of conventional and alternative energy production technologies.

Re: Energy from Human Dung

Postby Ludi » Mon 15 May 2006, 13:28:19

Sorry, you lost me pstarr with your comments about the greenhouse. Which greenhouse? The one on Martha's Vineyard? I was talking about the waste processing systems, not the greenhouse.
Ludi
 

Re: Energy from Human Dung

Postby MonteQuest » Mon 15 May 2006, 13:34:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'M')onte, I'm not the one claiming they are inconvenient to use, someone else posted that, months ago, I don't remember which thread.

I know they collected the dung before, to use as fuel.

*sigh*


Sorry, Ludi... I apologize for being blunt...but then why did you post that if you knew better????
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: Energy from Human Dung

Postby Ludi » Mon 15 May 2006, 13:40:56

Because I remembered that objection from the other person's post and wanted to bring it up to see what the answer might be to the question "do you know how many are being used?" The answer seems to be "they are building more" but that isn't a clear answer to my question. I'm starting to give up trying to get clear answers to what I think are clear questions.

Trying to get information is often just too hard.
Ludi
 

Re: Energy from Human Dung

Postby Ludi » Mon 15 May 2006, 13:46:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'I') assume all waste material is recycled into nutrients via greywater and blackwater systems. (At this point I do prefer Humanure--lower tech and just as safe.)


And there's another example. :(

Still not sure what you're talking about pstarr. The Solviva Winter Garden greenhouse didn't have a human waste component. The operation was commercial until Anna decided she wanted to spend more time with her design projects, so I don't know what you mean about it being "ludicrous." Her business from the greenhouse was very successful while she was the manager.

Are we even talking about the same person?? 8O
Ludi
 

Re: Energy from Human Dung

Postby MonteQuest » Mon 15 May 2006, 14:46:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'B')ecause I remembered that objection from the other person's post and wanted to bring it up to see what the answer might be to the question "do you know how many are being used?" The answer seems to be "they are building more" but that isn't a clear answer to my question. I'm starting to give up trying to get clear answers to what I think are clear questions.

Trying to get information is often just too hard.


Ludi, I was clear. I said, "no." I don't know how many are still being used. Sorry.

Google biogas India
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: Energy from Human Dung

Postby Ludi » Mon 15 May 2006, 15:39:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '
')
Ludi, I was clear. I said, "no." I don't know how many are still being used. Sorry.

Google biogas India


Sorry about my braindeath problem.
Ludi
 

Re: Energy from Human Dung

Postby Ludi » Mon 15 May 2006, 16:01:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'S')olviva is a super-insulated solar-lit and solar-heated greenhouse that I assume uses compost for heat and nutrients. That is the principle that might prompt the construction of such an elaborate structure.

The structure is made from wood ("natural") and glass (?) rather than long-lasting concrete, steel, and alumimum. It's constant maintanence (especially on wood-denuded Martha's Vineyard) detracts from its longevity and sustainability. The Ark at New Alchemy was designed to last hundreds of years.

I do not believe the Solviva system is integrated into the immediate ecosystem (the land and organisms around the structure). It would only be sustainable (by permaculture measures) if it relies on regional nutrients including local human wastes, recycled and returned compost, and some on-site fertilziers (green manure, animal poop)

Solviva is an important demonstration device to remind Martha's Vineyard ecotourists (such as myself) of possible alternative living systems (and "living systems (tm)")


Pstarr, you're making judgements about something you clearly don't know much about, making assumptions about it, and leaping to conclusions about it (that its premise was "ludicrous" or something). The Solviva Winter Garden greenhouse was designed as a TEST for various techniques, not in itself the one and only answer to a problem. Anna learned what she wanted from it, and with a few changes, continues to promote these technologies. In her book she even addresses the very points you make above. So I don't know what your beef is with it, why you consider it "not commercial" or "ludicrous" or whatever your vague complaint about it is. You write of the greenhouse in present tense, mentioning its "constant maintenance." Are you not even aware that it no longer exists?

I just see this as another example of your vague crapping on so much of the information I find useful and helpful and want to share with people here. You keep doing this, this scattershot crapping, and I still don't understand why.

We were talking about HUMAN WASTE and you drag in the greenhouse, which didn't even work with HUMAN WASTE, apparently simply so you could crap on the Solviva ideas. Why?
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Energy from Human Dung

Postby gigacannon » Tue 16 May 2006, 11:56:28

Humans mainly eat simple sugars, so there's not much carbon left in human dung. Cows, on the other hand, eat grass, which is mainly composed of cellulose. Cellulose is broken down by bacteria in the cows' stomachs, and it's this that leads to so much of the methane produced.

This isn't as good an answer as I'd like. I'd better go research it.
User avatar
gigacannon
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Tue 02 May 2006, 03:00:00
Location: UK (Unless I'm at sea)

Re: Energy from Human Dung

Postby Caoimhan » Tue 16 May 2006, 12:55:36

Isn't this a biofuel thread? Waste is biomass.
User avatar
Caoimhan
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 557
Joined: Tue 10 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Energy from Human Dung

Postby grabby » Tue 16 May 2006, 18:26:26

I think more appropriately we could say

Biomass = waste.

More accurate.
___________________________
WHEN THE BLIND LEAD THE BLIND...GET OUT OF THE WAY!
Using evil to further good makes one evil
Doubt everything but the TRUTH
This posted information is not permissible to be used
by anyone who has ever met a lawyer
User avatar
grabby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1291
Joined: Tue 08 Nov 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Energy from Human Dung

Postby nethawk » Sat 20 May 2006, 00:12:20

Waste-to-Energy of course cannot completely meet the world's demands for energy, but that doesn't mean that it shouldn't be used. WTE for sewage make perfect sense, especially on large treatment plants. The Hyperion Treatment Plant which serves Los Angeles generates over half of its internal needs via the digestors, offsetting millions of dollars worth of electricity bills per year, and saving the natural gas that would been used to make that electricity.

The treatment plant in my town processes about 3 million gallons per day, but they currently flare the methane during summer and use it for heating during the winter. With all of the housing units that are being added and former septic-tank areas that are being connected to the treatment plant, methane production may make a generator feasable. Electricity prices are unlikely to influence it, as the local utility (PPL) uses local coal for 60% of its energy, nuclear for 30%, and hydro for most of the remainer. Very little oil and gas (which is good).

Digestor gas should AT LEAST be used for heating when it is needed, and it would be nice to see digestors installed at the large commercial (factory) farms which currently pump manure into lagoons and waste its energy value and usually fertilizer value as well. They could burn the methane in IC engines, generate electricity for on-farm needs, sell the remainder to the grid, and use the waste heat from the engines to heat the animal barns during winter.

It makes no sense to throw that energy away.
User avatar
nethawk
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu 23 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Selinsgrove, PA

Previous

Return to Energy Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron