by aflurry » Thu 11 May 2006, 11:07:46
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wednesday', 'T')here's a difference between drifting off-topic during the course of a conversation and purposely trying to hijack a thread.
I'm glad you started this thread, thank you, TWilliam.
OK. I am sorry. It is an interesting thread, but I didn't think there was anything wrong with a little zinger. Didn't mean to cause a stir. Next time i'll just use an emoticon like i'm supposed to.
I haven't noticed any supply disruptions here, but this is a major city with, i suppose, multiple distributors.
Always makes me wonder about the theories about where the most advantageous place to be would be as things unravel. People have strong opinions about staying away from (or close to) cities, living on a permaculture farm with your gold buried in the yard, staying out of the suburbs. Seems to me like there could be complex stages of collapse, and that no place will be consistently prefereable to any other for a while.
I do think it is premature to extrapolate imminent shortages of necessities on the basis of a few brands missing from the shelves. Smaller distribution networks (like those of Borax and Pears, presumably) with tighter margins, could easily be knocked off with a fuel price increase. This is what you would expect from any change in fuel cost, no matter if it is a harbinger of doom and collapse or not.
see how i stay on topic?