Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

NEWBIE OVERVIEW

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

NEWBIE OVERVIEW

Unread postby howard » Fri 14 Apr 2006, 10:47:07

Hey all,

I’ve been reading threads since about sept last year and have finally decided to give some input. If im completely honest I believe we are all slightly obsessed by this frightening theory of ‘peak oil’. Primarily because it has such hard hitting consequences in our lifetimes if proved correct but also because to obtain the absolute truth is kinda impossible as a task so we simply keep reading hoping that the next thread will lead to a total conclusion. I don’t speak for all I know but probably the majority.

Furthermore the reason I originally took the bait regarding ‘peak oil’ as a theory is that at the beginning of Iraq war ‘part two’ I was on a personal mission to find out the real reasons for invading the country. To me and alot of the public it made no sense. So I decided to trawl through the internet to find some justification for it (bingo! PEAK OIL = ECONOMIC MELTDOWN = IRAQ HAS OIL) I don’t personally believe that Bush and Co are truly evil to an extent they would invade a country for a bit of extra cash. To me it made more sense that they needed it. But taken to the extreme you could even comprehend that peak oil theory is fabricated for people like me to justify perhaps an even bigger plan for the powers of this world?????

My input is that I believe many people who do not believe in ‘peak oil’ tend to be dependent on the society as is. E.G. They have followed a path / career which has been promised by western society. Therefore, if the repercussions of peak oil are proved correct they accept that mentally a whole life which has been perceived by that individual is turned on its head and denial is the better option than misery for the ‘here and now’. The best analogy for this I suppose would be watching/playing for your favorite sports team or support something you are passionate about…. You think briefly about the fact that you could lose but focus on the winning and how brilliant it would be if it happens…. Why? It makes you feel good and keeps you focused on what you are doing is right and given the option why feel bad when you have hope?

Bah that’s the end of my first post…
User avatar
howard
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri 14 Apr 2006, 03:00:00

Re: NEWBIE OVERVIEW

Unread postby zberry » Fri 14 Apr 2006, 12:21:28

I think peak oil challenges many if not most of our underlying assumptions about life. For example, that there will always be economic growth, that our children's lives will be even more fast-paced and luxurious than our lives. And when you start following the trail, you discover things like Joseph Tainter's "Collapse" and Jarod Diamond's "Collapse of Complex Societies" and realize, uh-oh, we're in grave danger.
It's interesting how people come to peak oil in different ways. In your case, it was seeking an explanation for Iraq war. In my case, it was via a financial news show about gold's future prospects.
It seems like we're almost in a Matrix-type situation. People are happy, oblivious to the danger they are in and not realizing how unsatisfying and empty our lives are becoming as we depend more and more on autos. Just going along, making plans for trips to Hawaii, new SUV, kitchen remodel, whatever. Then you learn about peak oil and it's like you've taken the pill (I always forget which color it was) and start to see things differently than 99% of the population (who are being bombarded with a constant stream of messages telling them everything is OK).
User avatar
zberry
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue 21 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: NEWBIE OVERVIEW

Unread postby benzoil » Fri 14 Apr 2006, 12:36:24

Welcome howard!

It sounds like you've given the issue some thought. There are some great thoughts on this board about denial, etc. Many of them agree with you about people's acceptance being tied to their level of buy-in to the current set up. I don't read alot from middle managers at advertising firms on this site, for instance.

In fact, from what I've seen, the Peak Oil crowd seems to be college age or older than 50. I'm 36 and Matt Savinar is in his late 20's, but there seem to be few people in the "prime" of their careers who are buying in. A lot of this is economic. At 21, if you didn't have any college debt, you can make any choice you want. At 55, with your house paid for and a nice nest egg accumulating for retirement (and your 21 year old out of college!), you also have freedom of action. In between, you are trapped under credit cards, kids' college funds, mortgages, and High Definition TV's.

I suspect that there are many, who, like my friends, figure they'll jump off the treadmill at the last minute. Good luck. Ask a guy holding ARM's on 5 Florida condos how to time the leap.

Another thing I've noticed is that people tend to think of Peak Oil in terms of global warming - that there will be years of debate, and a gradual move towards action (once Miami is underwater? but I digress). The problem is that there won't be 4 decades to debate the best course of action. There is (probably) less than 1.

That said, you're going to have to decide for yourself what plans to make. Some people fear the end of civilization. Personally, I fear the end of cheap iPods, but I can live with that. As a historian and ex-IT guy, I will risk stating that while complex systems crash hard, civilizations rarely do. I'm planning for a long, slow decline to sustainable levels of life and energy with hiccups along the way.
User avatar
benzoil
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Windy City No Longer

Re: NEWBIE OVERVIEW

Unread postby howard » Fri 14 Apr 2006, 12:48:18

Thanks for replying zberry… I was hoping someone found what I said vaguely interesting…

Yes this whole matrix type scenario unfortunately only really exists for the western world though to be honest. The sad truth of it is that we exploit two thirds of the world for our own benefit and its just more recently we’ve been going about things a bit more blatantly – Iraq/Iran/Africa etc etc. In fact a lot of the real potential issues will be that we will be on par with the rest of the world and not sitting with our godlike status anymore.

I sound like a hippy now.... peace!
User avatar
howard
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri 14 Apr 2006, 03:00:00

Re: NEWBIE OVERVIEW

Unread postby skeptic » Fri 14 Apr 2006, 13:01:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('benzoil', 'I')'m planning for a long, slow decline to sustainable levels of life and energy with hiccups along the way.
This is already happening in parts of Europe and the Far East, particularly Italy and Japan as an unplanned, spontaneous revolt against the pace of modern life. A return to a simpler more traditionally paced pre-global-industrial lifestyle.

Its not formally organised and seems to have emerged spontaeously over the last few years. Its called the "Slow Life Movement"

http://www.inpraiseofslow.com/faqs.htm
I can't see it catching on in Manhattan!

Ironically, I recognise where the banner photo on that page was taken. The South East exit of Oxford Circus tube at the intersection of Oxford and Regent streets in London. The irony is that although the picture is intended to give an impression of speed, the traffic at that location is mostly moving at about 5mph - when it isnt gridlocked solid!
User avatar
skeptic
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 168
Joined: Tue 20 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: NEWBIE OVERVIEW

Unread postby howard » Fri 14 Apr 2006, 13:14:02

Hi benzoil,

To give you a summary of me im 25 years old and have decided to take limited action about the potential threat of serious P/O repercussions at the same securing a future with current society. Basically I have set up my own company which so far is going quite well (im saving the money to buy a property outright) and am keeping an eye out for signs that peak oil is a reality and whether the mainstream perception of the subject is being taken seriously.

I think the most important action is to remain in tact with society as it stands and exploit its benefits but at the same time make sure you jump ship before everyone else does as then it would be too late. Basically I live in the UK so I know we have a number of things which could go wrong here regarding energy so I plan to emigrate to Australia or NZ if I become completely convinced this ‘peak doomer scenario’ is going to occur sooner rather than later. For I know if I wait until the mainstream are aware house prices will be affected in those countries and immigration laws will be changed as a result and I will be stuck on this overpopulated potential timebomb of an island.
User avatar
howard
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri 14 Apr 2006, 03:00:00

Re: NEWBIE OVERVIEW

Unread postby Carlhole » Fri 14 Apr 2006, 13:25:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('howard', 'F')urthermore the reason I originally took the bait regarding ‘peak oil’ as a theory is that at the beginning of Iraq war ‘part two’ I was on a personal mission to find out the real reasons for invading the country. To me and alot of the public it made no sense. So I decided to trawl through the internet to find some justification for it (bingo! PEAK OIL = ECONOMIC MELTDOWN = IRAQ HAS OIL) I don’t personally believe that Bush and Co are truly evil to an extent they would invade a country for a bit of extra cash. To me it made more sense that they needed it. But taken to the extreme you could even comprehend that peak oil theory is fabricated for people like me to justify perhaps an even bigger plan for the powers of this world?????


I think the real reasons for invading Iraq were:

1. In the 90's the US became the sole remaining superpower. The Soviet Union was lost as a check to American international power projection. A power vacuum was created in Central Asia and opportunities opened up for American expansion in the ME. However, the forces favoring American imperial ambitions were thwarted for a few years by Clinton's two terms.

2. The neoconservatives wished to establish a Pax American over the global economy. In order to do this, the US had to have a permanent set of bases in the ME, the most energy rich region in the world and a geostrategic region in general.

3. The neoconservatives (whose philosophy contradicts true conservatism in many ways {see Exporting 'Democracy' – Importing Trouble} are heavily infiltrated by pro-Israeli foreign policy movers and shakers such as Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith and others.

The Israeli leadership were very keen on pushing the US into confrontation in Iraq and Iran. They still are. The Bush Administration employed Christian Evangelical beliefs about biblical prophecy as further, mostly tacit, justification for ME invasion and as consolidation with pro-Israeli power blocs.

4. The realities of Peak Oil have been known for several decades. It became a critical foreign policy factor in the late 90's. It became apparent the time to strike in the ME was at hand because the effects of PO would be obvious to everyone worldwide by 2010 or 2015.

So the US had to pounce. It would have been unthinkable to allow a ruler such as Saddam Hussein to have entered into petroleum agreements with China - oil for money and weapons, etc.

America's financial position with Asian economies in general and the Chinese in particular needed a dramatic and pre-emptive counterbalance.
If the US could largely control ME, it would effectively control world forces of CAPITAL. The Chinese and other Asian nations effectively control world LABOR. (Bit too simplistic there, but oh well).

5. The US had also found that it's corporations were being excluded from opportunities in Iraq because Saddam was making deals with Europe and Russia but eschewing American companies. Also, Saddam had begun denominating oil sales in euros rather than dollars - which is something of a threat to US economic hegemony albeit one that is still being debated.

6. America's relative industrial and financial strengths have eroded tremendously since the end of WWII. In order to prop up the failing petrodollar system and to stay solvent during a time of rapidly increasing American debt, the US had to make a move on what would inevitably become the most valuable real estate in the world - the ME.

The invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan had all been planned prior to the attacks of September 11, 2001.
Carlhole
 

Re: NEWBIE OVERVIEW

Unread postby howard » Fri 14 Apr 2006, 13:50:41

Hi Carlhole,

I agree with what your saying and think you will find that the main point on your message is actually agreeing with me. I said the main reason for iraq was economically related at ist core which you have justified in greater detail. I am well read in this area although i only joined the forum today.

Furthermore when I said "To me it made more sense that they needed it. But taken to the extreme you could even comprehend that peak oil theory is fabricated for people like me to justify perhaps an even bigger plan for the powers of this world?????".

Thsi was not so much of a naive statement on my behalf but one to make people think and give their opionions on a specific subject (zionism?) which is what this site is all about.
User avatar
howard
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri 14 Apr 2006, 03:00:00

Re: NEWBIE OVERVIEW

Unread postby newhunter-gatherer » Fri 14 Apr 2006, 13:58:26

Hi Howard, if you haven't already, read Savinar's 'The End Of The Oil Age' or Heinberg's 'The Party's Over' or Goodsteins' Out Of Gas' to get a better "overview" of the ramifications of P.O.
newhunter-gatherer
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue 11 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: about to go splat

Re: NEWBIE OVERVIEW

Unread postby NEOPO » Fri 14 Apr 2006, 14:08:52

Welcome Howard.

From all of us here at peakoil.com - thanks for the psychoanalysis!!!

Peak oil not only explains the last 4-5 years but if you look deeper you will see that it has dominated U.S. and world policy since at least the 70's.

Carter knows it but the people did not want to hear it.
Carters 1977 energy speech

Reagan and the Neocons knew it and colluded with the feds....
Image
SA and other oil producing nations.......
Image
and
Image

to slow down the economy (interest rates of 20% in 1980)
Image

kill demand for oil
[img][img]http://www.cjseymour.plus.com/finan/prodvdem.jpg[/img][/img]
at a time when much of Russia's GDP came as a result of Oil Exports....

Russia still depends greatly on oil revenue....
russia background EIA

Bush #1 had little choice but to stop Saddam in the 90's.
One more step and Saddam would have controlled a huge portion of the worlds oil = iraq+kuwait+SA.

Bush #2 and company probably believe there is little we can do but sit on the remaining resources and build a base for future efforts.

They needed/wanted the support of the U.S. people so they either allowed 911 to happen or possibly even helped engineer it or at least part of it.
This event is parrallel to the burning of the Reichstag building pre WWII which was blamed on Jews.

Reichstag history

The correlations are seemingly endless.
This is not history repeating itself.
It is TPTB using examples from history in order to further their objectives.
What worked once may work again etc etc...

If you want to understand the average consumer mindset then all one must do is look at it as an Addiction.
Denial, rationlization and fear.
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX

Re: NEWBIE OVERVIEW

Unread postby benzoil » Fri 14 Apr 2006, 17:01:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('howard', 'H')i benzoil,

I think the most important action is to remain in tact with society as it stands and exploit its benefits but at the same time make sure you jump ship before everyone else does as then it would be too late. Basically I live in the UK so I know we have a number of things which could go wrong here regarding energy so I plan to emigrate to Australia or NZ if I become completely convinced this ‘peak doomer scenario’ is going to occur sooner rather than later. For I know if I wait until the mainstream are aware house prices will be affected in those countries and immigration laws will be changed as a result and I will be stuck on this overpopulated potential timebomb of an island.


Before you emigrate to Australia check out the chapter on it in Jared Diamond's collapse. Who knew that the world's least forested continent was a leading exporter of wood chips? Also, there are growing problems with soil salinity.

You're right about using the fruits of modern capitalism to ease the transition though. I just bought an old farmhouse and 20 acres that I plan to rehab. First purchase: diesel tractor. It might be scrap in 10 years, but there's no way I can hold a regular job and prep the land without one. I suppose if I knew boo about horses I could go that route, but horses don't have a 540RPM PTO either...
User avatar
benzoil
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Windy City No Longer

Re: NEWBIE OVERVIEW

Unread postby newhunter-gatherer » Fri 14 Apr 2006, 17:19:04

Hey Benzoil

How do you think Australia will cope with P.O? In particular, their economy?
newhunter-gatherer
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue 11 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: about to go splat

Re: NEWBIE OVERVIEW

Unread postby bobbyald » Fri 14 Apr 2006, 19:50:27

Hi Howard,

Welcome to the forum. I'm also from the UK and have already applied to go to Australia. They have many problems of their own but on balance I feel it will give my kids a better chance of surviving PO should it turn bad.

Remember you always have the option of coming back if it doesn't work out (bloody long swim though).
Life results from the non-random selection of randomly generated replicators
User avatar
bobbyald
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Tue 18 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: London, UK.

Re: NEWBIE OVERVIEW

Unread postby howard » Fri 14 Apr 2006, 21:55:41

Hi Benziol

Ok I said Austrailia as a possible safe haven and you say its not. So where would you say would be safe in P/O times?
User avatar
howard
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri 14 Apr 2006, 03:00:00

Re: NEWBIE OVERVIEW

Unread postby BastardSquad » Fri 14 Apr 2006, 23:22:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('howard', 'H')i Benziol

Ok I said Austrailia as a possible safe haven and you say its not. So where would you say would be safe in P/O times?


The heck with Oz,come over to the States :)

Here you can have all the assault weapons you could ever want :twisted: (unlike those silly Aussies who banned guns)

The Pacific northwest has a climate very similar to the one you're accustomed to,(again)unlike Austrailia :roll:

And if going through all the red tape to legally immigrate here is too much of a hassall,just take a vacation to Mexico and then just sneek across the border like everyone else 8)
"Switzerland is small and neutral.We need to be more like Germany,ambitious and misunderstood!" Futurama


"As for the dieoff of 5E+09 people - not a problem, so long as I'm not one of them." Jack
User avatar
BastardSquad
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 289
Joined: Sun 24 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: NEWBIE OVERVIEW

Unread postby Aimrehtopyh » Sat 15 Apr 2006, 11:52:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('howard', 'H')i Benziol

Ok I said Austrailia as a possible safe haven and you say its not. So where would you say would be safe in P/O times?


I'd say Oz is a safer haven than the UK, but parts of the states will be much safer than that. It's all relative though. I'm sure that as a Brit you recoil from the idea of violence (justified or not), and any sane person would agree that you should go to great lengths to avoid it. Non-violence is all well and good, but one has to accept that when the excrement hits the fan nobody stays clean.
"He who makes no mistakes isn't trying hard enough" Genghis Khan
"Everyone here is bribed not to kill each other." foodnotlawns
Coinflation.com
User avatar
Aimrehtopyh
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 375
Joined: Sat 18 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Minnesota, U.S.A.
Top

Re: NEWBIE OVERVIEW

Unread postby benzoil » Mon 17 Apr 2006, 00:18:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('howard', 'H')i Benziol

Ok I said Austrailia as a possible safe haven and you say its not. So where would you say would be safe in P/O times?


Didn't mean to dis Oz too much! Just meant to say that it isn't perfect - read up on it before making the leap. Australia does seem to have a population/arable land problem in the long run, but then, so does every other nation on the planet post P.O. I looked into a place in Tasmania aways back. Too far from Civilization for me, but it sounded nice.

As for a safe place post-P.O. - it depends on the scenario you envision. The doomers would say that any place within driving distance of a population center is unsafe. There are others who think that the old-style city cores with mass transit and walkable neighborhoods will fare best. Having seen Chicago struggle with fuel bills and transit budgets in the best of times, I don't see mass transit being an answer immediately. It'll take the states a generation to pay off their highway bonds and begin truly funding mass transit. By then, the die will have been cast.

OTOH, the country may be just as bad. Rural America is REALLY fossil fuel dependent. Everyone drives a giant truck and commutes 30 miles to buy groceries and get to work.

Personally, I cashed out on Chicago's booming (peaking?) real estate market and found 20 acres with woods and pasture in rural Michigan. I took a big pay cut, but I found a job less than 3 miles from my home and I am debt free with money in the bank. I did some research on climate change (there are some good models for the U.S.) and things like low energy life. That and proximity to Chicago (easy for me to scope out the places I was interested in) led me here. I don't know if society will collapse, but giving my kids a small town upbringing and some how-to knowledge of agriculture sounds like a good idea in any case.

Overall though, I think that the best preperations are personal. Follow the Boy Scout motto and be prepared. I'm not sure who orginated the PO mantra of "Get out of debt, Get in shape, Get some skills", but it definitely applies. Healthy, flexible people are much more inclined to do well in the coming economic shocks no matter where they live.
User avatar
benzoil
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Windy City No Longer
Top


Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron