by Carlhole » Fri 14 Apr 2006, 13:25:36
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('howard', 'F')urthermore the reason I originally took the bait regarding ‘peak oil’ as a theory is that at the beginning of Iraq war ‘part two’ I was on a personal mission to find out the real reasons for invading the country. To me and alot of the public it made no sense. So I decided to trawl through the internet to find some justification for it (bingo! PEAK OIL = ECONOMIC MELTDOWN = IRAQ HAS OIL) I don’t personally believe that Bush and Co are truly evil to an extent they would invade a country for a bit of extra cash. To me it made more sense that they needed it. But taken to the extreme you could even comprehend that peak oil theory is fabricated for people like me to justify perhaps an even bigger plan for the powers of this world?????
I think the real reasons for invading Iraq were:
1. In the 90's the US became the sole remaining superpower. The Soviet Union was lost as a check to American international power projection. A power vacuum was created in Central Asia and opportunities opened up for American expansion in the ME. However, the forces favoring American imperial ambitions were thwarted for a few years by Clinton's two terms.
2. The neoconservatives wished to establish a Pax American over the global economy. In order to do this, the US had to have a permanent set of bases in the ME, the most energy rich region in the world and a geostrategic region in general.
3. The neoconservatives (whose philosophy contradicts true conservatism in many ways {see
Exporting 'Democracy' – Importing Trouble} are heavily infiltrated by pro-Israeli foreign policy movers and shakers such as Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith and others.
The Israeli leadership were very keen on pushing the US into confrontation in Iraq and Iran. They still are. The Bush Administration employed Christian Evangelical beliefs about biblical prophecy as further, mostly tacit, justification for ME invasion and as consolidation with pro-Israeli power blocs.
4. The realities of Peak Oil have been known for several decades. It became a critical foreign policy factor in the late 90's. It became apparent the time to strike in the ME was at hand because the effects of PO would be obvious to everyone worldwide by 2010 or 2015.
So the US had to pounce. It would have been unthinkable to allow a ruler such as Saddam Hussein to have entered into petroleum agreements with China - oil for money and weapons, etc.
America's financial position with Asian economies in general and the Chinese in particular needed a dramatic and pre-emptive counterbalance.
If the US could largely control ME, it would effectively control world forces of CAPITAL. The Chinese and other Asian nations effectively control world LABOR. (Bit too simplistic there, but oh well).
5. The US had also found that it's corporations were being excluded from opportunities in Iraq because Saddam was making deals with Europe and Russia but eschewing American companies. Also, Saddam had begun denominating oil sales in euros rather than dollars - which is something of a threat to US economic hegemony albeit one that is still being debated.
6. America's relative industrial and financial strengths have eroded tremendously since the end of WWII. In order to prop up the failing petrodollar system and to stay solvent during a time of rapidly increasing American debt, the US had to make a move on what would inevitably become the most valuable real estate in the world - the ME.
The invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan had all been planned prior to the attacks of September 11, 2001.