by beefstuinit » Mon 22 May 2006, 20:28:46
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', 'c')old fusion would help us ravage this planet a bit faster
i understand not ravaging the planet for the sake of the continuation of mankind. IE perserving the biosphere so we can sustainably live in it. if thats you position, ignore the rest of this thread
i absolutely connot understand tree huggers that think the earths better of without humans and that we should all die of to save the trees, and the bunnys, and the butterflies...
please please please take a geology class if thats the case. We're a blip in the eyes of the earth. a zit. our modern existence is so infintesimmly small on the scale of geologic time its comical.
we marvel at our ability to raise the earths temperature a couple degrees over 100 years. oh no you say, the poor animals, the poor trees!
ok, well more times than we can count meteroites the size of states have slammed into the earth and dropped the temperature of the earth tens of tens of degrees overnight and pumped tons of matter into the atmosphere. everything freezes or starves to death... even the trees, lots of cute bunny rabbits
maybe a few marsupial rabbits and mammals crawl into caves. some grass here and there, evolution cranks up and it all starts over again.
super volcanoes have erupted releasing more global warming causing methane/CO2 gas in a few days than we have in all of our existence.
you think the trees and the rabbits got it bad now, wait until texas hits montana at 10 thousand miles per hour.
yes we've negativly impacted things, but dont sweat it, the earths a hell of alot tougher than us. to think that we really made that big of a difference, is laughable. life will go on with or without us, whether we do or worst or not.