Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Are some Doomers, life’s current economic losers?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Are some Doomers, life’s current economic losers?

Unread postby jdumars » Thu 09 Feb 2006, 05:32:44

Even though I didn't make the top 5 doomer list, I'd say I am right up there. I joke with people the the majority of my last name is DOOMars, so it only makes sense.

My economic profile is decidedly upper-middle class with almost no debt, land/car ownership, some paper investments and lots of physical asset investments for post-PO living. So, I would say that I don't fit the economically-disaffected description posited in the original post.

The question about what constitutes a doomer is a good one. I will take a shot at categorizing some different types.

Eco-doomer: A person who subscribes to the belief that human abuse of the Earth's ecosystem will (or is already beginning to) result in catastrophic conditions unfavorable to continued human (and other) life.

Econ-doomer: A person who believes the US (or world) economy is in eminent threat of complete collapse, such that the only acceptable form of future currency will be real goods, bartered skills or precious metals.

PO-doomer: A person who firmly believes that PO will trigger a complete breakdown in world finance (see Econ-doomer), social order, public infrastructure, government and virtually all forms of modern convenience. There are subsets of the PO-doomer profile that predict the speed and extent of breakdown -- these are the hard and soft landers.

Hard Lander: A person who believes that the post-peak transition will be both rapid and utterly devastating. This person believes a large part of the population will not survive the transition without additional, extensive preparation that may already be too late.

Soft Lander: A person who believes the post-peak transition will be relatively slow and relatively orderly. Most still qualify as doomers because they feel the transition is inevitable.

Schadenfreudoomer: A doomer of any variety that takes pleasure knowing that society (or elements of society such as consumerism or corporate monoculture) will cease to exist as we know it.

LATOC-doomer: A person that bases their outlook largely on Matt Savinar's site and book. This is a particular mix of the various doomer-profiles.

Doer-doomer: A doomer that believes a societal/energy/monetary crash is coming soon and is actively preparing their lives to avoid the most damaging anticipated aspects of it. This typically involves buying arable or remote land, learning trades, growing food and preparing for a life independent of third-party energy providers. Typically a doer-doomer is middle to upper class with the financial resources and motivation to actually accomplish preparations.

Festering-doomer: A doomer of any variety that does nothing to prepare for what they believe is coming, yet complains, frets and talks about it incessantly. The festering doomer typically feels helpless in the face of the threat due to circumstances beyond their immediate control such as finances, relationships, or family obligations. Many festering doomers are married to spouses who do not believe in PO and dismiss their ideas.

Happy-doomer: A doomer who is typically a happy person but has a tendency to assume that the worst case scenario is the most likely. This doesn't imply negativity as a personality trait, just a tendency to focus on the arguments or data that points toward the most severe outcome. Happy-doomers watch commodoties prices every day, watch CNN (and occasionally Fox for another viewpoint) endlessly, and have a regular suite of self-reinforcing blogs that they visit (such as deconsumption or depletion). Happy doomers can be very optimistic about lots of things -- except PO or anything to do with it.

Did I miss anything?
User avatar
jdumars
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 438
Joined: Sat 02 Apr 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Are some Doomers, life’s current economic losers?

Unread postby Liamj » Thu 09 Feb 2006, 07:32:50

Hey thanks jdumars, nice wrap. When we stack those classifications, say for an econecopodo-or doomer, should we order them with greatest-first, or just whatevers easiest to say?
User avatar
Liamj
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 864
Joined: Wed 08 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: 145'2"E 37'46"S

Re: Are some Doomers, life’s current economic losers?

Unread postby Battle_Scarred_Galactico » Thu 09 Feb 2006, 08:09:17

I think pretty much everyone is powerless, and "festering" just sounds horrible.

I'd put myself under Econ-PO.
---
Battle_Scarred_Galactico
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 935
Joined: Thu 07 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Are some Doomers, life’s current economic losers?

Unread postby dbarberic » Thu 09 Feb 2006, 09:23:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'D')Barberic, Anyone who criticizes run away consumption is just jealous? What cloistered prep school did you just step out of? Don't mistake genuine contempt and disdain for envy, or jealousy.


I am suggesting that perhaps a subset of the doomer population actually is jealous. I'm not suggesting or indicating as fact that all doomers are jealous.

In my life (outside of PO) I've met a number of people who are in general angry with the world. Angry that their life did not turn out as planned and angry that somehow they feel left out of society. Maybe they stopped pursuing their dreams, maybe something happened in their life unplanned that they blame for their current lot in life. Who knows.

However, you take that personality profile and layer Peak Oil knowledge on top of it, you have the doomer of all doomers. This person not only knows about Peak Oil, but wants to to happen. In a fantisy, illusional way they use the Peak Oil economic/society collapse as a way to believe that their current poor lot in life will be turned around and that they will become what they currently are not in life.
User avatar
dbarberic
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 231
Joined: Tue 27 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Are some Doomers, life’s current economic losers?

Unread postby rushdy » Thu 09 Feb 2006, 09:52:52

I agree with Schneider, what I crave more than anything else in life is REAL freedom. The freedom to live and learn only for myself, and to live or die by my efforts.

I detest taxation, especially council tax. This is one of the few things which prevents people from escaping the system. A lot of my views align with anarchism.

In general I try to help people close to me to understand and prepare for future problems, although they don't always listen. Once I have made the effort, I see my obligation to them as being fulfilled. I havn't kept it from them. After that they can make their own choices. If they don't listen, then I may not help them in the future.

I am quite a doomer in the sense that I think the future will bring big changes. As a lot of people have said though, I think the problem lies squarely at the foot of our civilisation today. These problems aren't the fault of individuals, but the collection of individuals which come together to cause these problems. o2ny is right, it isn't the fault of individuals who are born into our society. If they don't look outside of their own small lives they probably won't realise whats wrong. kochevnik is right too, seeing people living their lives like that makes me very angry. But it isn't the individual people themselves that are the problem, it is the collection of them which form our 'society'. It's important to realise this is not some collusion between evil greed mongers, but rather the collective stupidity of institutionalised individuals. Once the institution is gone, future generations will start from a different view of the world.

I would describe myself as firmly middle class. The main differance between the classes isn't money though (although I do fit into a middle class bracket) it's your attitude. To actually be middle class, in the real sense, you need to have some morals and values - although this is abused by politicians these days. It is these morals and values which set lower and middle class people apart. It isn't hard to recognise a lower class person who has slightly more money. Likewise, it isn't difficult to recognise a middle class person without as much money as most middle class people. Its who you are as much as what you've got.
User avatar
rushdy
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon 21 Nov 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Are some Doomers, life’s current economic losers?

Unread postby sjn » Thu 09 Feb 2006, 10:17:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dbarberic', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'D')Barberic, Anyone who criticizes run away consumption is just jealous? What cloistered prep school did you just step out of? Don't mistake genuine contempt and disdain for envy, or jealousy.


I am suggesting that perhaps a subset of the doomer population actually is jealous. I'm not suggesting or indicating as fact that all doomers are jealous.

In my life (outside of PO) I've met a number of people who are in general angry with the world. Angry that their life did not turn out as planned and angry that somehow they feel left out of society. Maybe they stopped pursuing their dreams, maybe something happened in their life unplanned that they blame for their current lot in life. Who knows.

However, you take that personality profile and layer Peak Oil knowledge on top of it, you have the doomer of all doomers. This person not only knows about Peak Oil, but wants to to happen. In a fantisy, illusional way they use the Peak Oil economic/society collapse as a way to believe that their current poor lot in life will be turned around and that they will become what they currently are not in life.

Who's to say this "doomer of all doomers" doesn't hve a point. If they believe that when things collapse that they'll take the initiative and make the most of the situation maybe they will.

I think it has been pretty well established that few here fall into this classification. Myself, I'm not financially well off, and currently my state of mind (aniexty-depression) makes it very hard for me to work, I do however own my own house, car and have no debts so I don't think that would make me an economic loser? I also cope much better in crisis situations than I do under normal conditions so I do have some hope that as things get bad I will cope relatively better than currently and survive.
User avatar
sjn
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 1332
Joined: Wed 09 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Re: Are some Doomers, life’s current economic losers?

Unread postby Specop_007 » Thu 09 Feb 2006, 11:01:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Liamj', 'A')re some Doomers, life’s current economic losers?
Fairly likely, not withstanding the testimonies above which suggest few are.

Are some Doomers, life’s current economic winners?
Very probably, given the prerequisites of leisure, IT hardware and connectivity, literacy, &? numeracy. And the testimonies above. So what?


Isn't it about time those who reflexively use the term doomer defined what and who is a doomer?

To me the doomers are those who can see no problem with oil depletion, nuclear weapons in iraq+afghanistan+bosnia, persistant organic pollutants, fishery collapse, water table pollution, ...
Their stupidity leads inexorably to doom. Specop is the biggest doomer here.


LOOK AT ME! BANG BANG BANG I HAVE A COMPUTER BANG BANG BANG

Do you even READ what I post??
I have a problem with PO.
I have a problem with nuclear weapons in all those places.
I dont like pollutants.
I dont like water table depletion.

I could go on, but your obviously too fucking stupid to understand what I type. So keep BANG BANG BANGing away on your shiny PC. Dont forget to attend your terrorist training tonight.
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Are some Doomers, life’s current economic losers?

Unread postby oowolf » Thu 09 Feb 2006, 17:08:19

Uberdoomer AND angry. Can't wait for massive dieoff (99.9%) Not because I will enjoy it, I just know behavior has consequences. I see dieoff as the only solution to biosphere destruction because (far too many) humans are incorrigibly STUPID. "Let's all kill each other over CARTOONS!!!" Gaia is thinking: "You call THAT a problem? Let me show you some REAL problems!" Stupidity + destructive behavior=death.

Haven't you folks, that don't like paying taxes, ever heard of the UNDERGROUND ECONOMY?

And DON'T SAY I'm not a caring person. I took care of a bipolar (DSM Type 1 with Severe with Psychotic Features) woman who died of ALS, for more years than some of you have been alive, and NEVER got one f***ing CENT from "Social Security" or SSI. After that, dieoff will be easy.

Now excuse me while I go have a beer.
User avatar
oowolf
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1337
Joined: Tue 09 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Big Rock Candy Mountain

Re: Are some Doomers, life’s current economic losers?

Unread postby threadbear » Thu 09 Feb 2006, 19:07:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dbarberic', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'D')Barberic, Anyone who criticizes run away consumption is just jealous? What cloistered prep school did you just step out of? Don't mistake genuine contempt and disdain for envy, or jealousy.


I am suggesting that perhaps a subset of the doomer population actually is jealous. I'm not suggesting or indicating as fact that all doomers are jealous.

In my life (outside of PO) I've met a number of people who are in general angry with the world. Angry that their life did not turn out as planned and angry that somehow they feel left out of society. Maybe they stopped pursuing their dreams, maybe something happened in their life unplanned that they blame for their current lot in life. Who knows.

However, you take that personality profile and layer Peak Oil knowledge on top of it, you have the doomer of all doomers. This person not only knows about Peak Oil, but wants to to happen. In a fantisy, illusional way they use the Peak Oil economic/society collapse as a way to believe that their current poor lot in life will be turned around and that they will become what they currently are not in life.


Okay, I hear you. You're back on my Christmas card list. :lol:
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Are some Doomers, life’s current economic losers?

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Thu 09 Feb 2006, 21:55:40

Nothing could be sweeter than the prospect of twenty more years of slow steady growth, stability and status quo. Prove all those doom&gloomers wrong and life will be great. Someday they'll have problems, but just not yet not here. There are some maybe with envy problems but not me; life's cozy. All I could ask for is nothing changes. happiness is the absence of pain.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: Are some Doomers, life’s current economic losers?

Unread postby AmericanEmpire » Fri 10 Feb 2006, 03:04:21

How about suicidal doomer. One who thinks that whats comming is going to be so horrible they don't want to stick around to witness and experience the misery and suffering that is about to befall our species.
AmericanEmpire
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Thu 14 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Are some Doomers, life’s current economic losers?

Unread postby k_semler » Sun 12 Feb 2006, 00:51:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TommyJefferson', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Phebagirl', 'T')he U.S. Constitution, upon which my entire sociology should be based, is being put through a paper shredder ...thousands upon thousand are being stripped off Medicaid


Where in the US Constition does the federal government become responsible for providing wheelchairs to quadrapelegics?

Do you really want to get rid of fascist corporate pigs?

If so, eliminate the trough at which they feed; Medicare, HUD, and the Dept. of Defense.

Pay your doctor like you pay your plumber, one-on-one, person-to-person. This cuts out the mafia-style skimming by corporations and government bureacracies.

If you are serious about stopping corporate fascism, stop feeding them.


I agree with you on most of your statements, but FYI, "providing wheelchairs" can be justified by these two clauses in the US Constitution.

Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1:
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts, and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but to all Duties, Imposts, and Excises shall be uniform throutht the United States;

Article 1, Section 8, Clause 18:To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or any Department or Officer thereof.

That didn't even take any leap of the imagination. And since Wickard v. Filburn (1942), this section also applies:

Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3:To regulate Commerce with foriegn Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;[/i]

Since 1943, Intrastate commerce has been pretty much interchangable with interstate commerce. Because of this ruling, US Congress can regulate virtually every aspect of your life, even if it is not directly involved in interstate commerce. The only thing that needs to be determined is that it could possibly affect interstate commerce, (even if your product is not for sale). I'm not saying whether it's right or wrong, it's just the way it is. I personally think the government has gotten too big for it's britches.
Here Lies the United States Of America.

July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005

Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."

Rest In Peace.

Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
k_semler
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Washington
Top

Re: Are some Doomers, life’s current economic losers?

Unread postby Aaron » Sun 12 Feb 2006, 08:51:24

By definition, everyone who is posting here is enjoying fabulous wealth & unprecedented prosperity.

Since the vast majority of your fellow humans live in squalid poverty, it's a little funny to me to watch a group of pampered individuals argue over who is an economic loser.

Let's pose a question to our members...

How many people have you seen starve to death?

Because roughly 10x the population of New Orleans died from lack of food worldwide... last year alone.

So buck up campers...

You & your culture have been very successful at concentrating wealth on yourselves, and isolating the vast majority of humanity from this wealth.

Congratulations.

You win!

So... how's that workin for ya so far?

I'm not frustrated by my own lack of prosperity... I'm frustrated at the systemic and rationalized exploitation of the majority.

------------------------------------------------

On the rich/poor gap:

The distinction is between rich & wealthy.

You six figure folks are rich... the guy who signs your check... is wealthy.

The rich/poor will suffer.

But the wealthy never do.

You might be surprised how many millionaires were created by the Great Depression.
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

Re: Are some Doomers, life’s current economic losers?

Unread postby Aaron » Sun 12 Feb 2006, 10:35:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'N')othing could be sweeter than the prospect of twenty more years of slow steady growth, stability and status quo. Prove all those doom&gloomers wrong and life will be great. Someday they'll have problems, but just not yet not here. There are some maybe with envy problems but not me; life's cozy. All I could ask for is nothing changes. happiness is the absence of pain.


This is an elegant statement which speaks directly to the fundamental aspects of our dilemma.

Nice Penn.
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston
Top

Re: Are some Doomers, life’s current economic losers?

Unread postby mekrob » Sun 12 Feb 2006, 11:05:47

I'm not really a doomer completely, but I do see how their view could come true,given international politics. I think there is a good chance for the world to completely go to shit but also a chance (much smaller) that PO could be kept within limits, although that is a pretty long shot. I am a college student, hence I have PLENTY of time to "waste" on the computer and entertaining "extreme" theories. I grew up in a lower middle/upper lower class family, but the way I live at college is about as low as possible for anyone here: no heat, no car, no bus (even though it's free). The only thing I really have is my computer and plenty of food. I got my laptop because of school policy, so it was free as well. Gotta milk the system while it's workin. I try to be as oil free as possible to benefit the world with less pollution and myself with life how it will be like for most in America after the shit hits the fan and how most in the world live right now anyway.
mekrob
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2408
Joined: Fri 09 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Are some Doomers, life’s current economic losers?

Unread postby FossilFool » Wed 15 Feb 2006, 18:09:12

Looking at people as economic losers I think is still looking through the view of a pre-peak lense. Like you are better if you went to college than if you work at McDonald's. Didn't understanding Peak Oil make you see that all of that is BS? Great, the economic winners have more expendable income to spend on stuff they "need" and make the problem worse. I spent years of my life in college and would give it all up to have worked at McDonalds and have that time back that I lost to gain the status of a "winner" instead of looked down on as "trailer trash."
User avatar
FossilFool
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 78
Joined: Sun 29 Jan 2006, 04:00:00

Previous

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron