Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Why trust Peak Oil Prophets?

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Why trust Peak Oil Prophets?

Unread postby rogerhb » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 19:13:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jonathan_Hoag', 'D')reffeys


No, I haven't heard of him, perhaps you mean Ken Deffeyes?

My view is one of "managing the uncertainty", ie, choosing a path that allows for a number of possible futures without leaving oneself highly exposed, that's not being wishy-washy, that's called being strategic.

We've changed our lifestyle so if the SHTF then we are in a better position than if we had not changed, while still taking advantage of the current economic climate.

Do I think all is well in the world? No bloody way! Plenty of things don't add up, and I don't believe anybody else out there has my interests at heart.
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand

Re: Why trust Peak Oil Prophets?

Unread postby BlisteredWhippet » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 19:47:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jonathan_Hoag', 'I') mean, they are always wrong. Like that guy from the FedEX commercial.

Campbell prophesied peak oil for late 1990s, then early 2000s, now it's 2008 or thereabouts. Matt Simmons predicted $10 gas for this winter because of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita and is predicting $300+ oil for the near future.

Given their track record, should we not just label the lot of them "false prophets" and be done with it?


Heres why: These people are not "prophets". A prophet has an unreproachable explaination for "Things Not Seen". Jesus & Mohammed are prophets. ASk them why do you say "X"? They say, "Y" - Where "Y" is some zero-sum bullshit with no observable, predictable, or measureable effect or evidence, i.e. "God knocked up my mom," in the case of Jesus. We can infer future prognostications from this lot to be of much the same reasoning with a distinct lack of clear distinction between causes and effects.

Whereas the difference between Jesus and say, Simmons, is that Simmons is an OIL ANALYST, not a product of VIRGIN BIRTH, no matter how APOCALYPTIC the scenario he's offering up. Even then, Simmons is about as affable a witness to these events as any, hardly a sensationalist.
User avatar
BlisteredWhippet
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 848
Joined: Tue 08 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Why trust Peak Oil Prophets?

Unread postby Dreamtwister » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 19:55:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jonathan_Hoag', 'B')ut that has more to do with incresing demand from China and India than geological scarcity.


You sure about that?

Of course, the notion that China's economy managed to grow while using *less* oil is just as absurd as saying the current shortage has nothing to do with geological limitations.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jonathan_Hoag', 'T')here is no use of oil that can't be met by other energy carriers or other chemistries. Oil is not a miracle product.


Please, demonstrate how this is true. Because apparently you are privy to information to which thousands of experts in physics, economics, geology, politics, chemistry, biology and mathematics from all over the world have no access.

Demonstrate a substitute for chemical fertilizers and pesticides which can increase crop yields 400% without dramatically increasing price.

Demonstrate how you can replace the world's approximately 700 million cars and light trucks and the multi-trillion dollar infrastructure which supports them, preferably before large-scale demand destruction sets in.

Oh, and please give references.
The whole of human history is a refutation by experiment of the concept of "moral world order". - Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
Dreamtwister
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mon 06 Feb 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Why trust Peak Oil Prophets?

Unread postby rogerhb » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 20:00:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jonathan_Hoag', 'T')here is no use of oil that can't be met by other energy carriers or other chemistries. Oil is not a miracle product.


Absolutely true except for those irritating things like price, availability, conversion of current fleets, infrastructure, vested interests, etc.

Alas we have to solve problems in the real world starting with what we have now.
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand
Top

Re: Why trust Peak Oil Prophets?

Unread postby arretium » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 20:06:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jonathan_Hoag', 'I') mean, they are always wrong. Like that guy from the FedEX commercial.

Campbell prophesied peak oil for late 1990s, then early 2000s, now it's 2008 or thereabouts. Matt Simmons predicted $10 gas for this winter because of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita and is predicting $300+ oil for the near future.

Given their track record, should we not just label the lot of them "false prophets" and be done with it?



2 Words:

Dow 36,000
User avatar
arretium
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Mon 04 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Seattle, WA
Top

Re: Why trust Peak Oil Prophets?

Unread postby arretium » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 20:19:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jonathan_Hoag', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RonMN', '
')If you look at the russian gas supply just weeks ago...all it took was a single cold snap for hundreds to die (hell, it was 580+ dead in the ukraine alone).


That has more to do with economics and just accidents rather than supply shortage due to geologic depletion.

Even the Ukrainian supply problems were economical: Ukrainians were supposed to pay market prices (finally) but didn't want to.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')You can see we're NOT rebuilding the twin towers...


We are. It just takes a while. Any rebuilding project will have immense emotional and political impact, not merely economic one.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')nor New Orleans.


Wait a second. Again, we haven't even resolved all the legal issues about property ownership, condemnation, demolition, etc. Then comes planning, zoning etc. Only then comes development.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
') They may talk a big game but the cold simple fact is we're broke.


I guess that's why there's construction all over Atlanta, just to name one example I see every day.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')The only reason I haven't seen a $1000+ a month heating bill (so far) is because it's been 40 degrees in Minnesota in january (and my bills have still been over $200 a month). I don't expect this kind of luck to last forever.

Which is why you should look into better insulation, space heating (ability to selectivly heat only certain rooms), alternative heating methods etc. It's not a disaster.

You remind me of myself when I was a little younger. Thinking I could go over to the political forum and convince the people on the right how wrong they were. They didn't listen. Neither will the people here. Neither will you.

You have already presupposed what you set out to prove. It's useless to argue with someone who has already determined the final position and hasn't even seen all the evidence. I appreciate your ethusiasm, but many of your conclusions are based on presuppositions which are not fact in themselves and some of your cites are inherently wrong. For example, Simmons did not advocate $300 bbl oil in Jan-Feb '06. Please kindly show me where I was wrong. I will gladly admit my mistake. Will you?
User avatar
arretium
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Mon 04 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Seattle, WA
Top

Re: Why trust Peak Oil Prophets?

Unread postby BlisteredWhippet » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 21:00:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jonathan_Hoag', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dreamtwister', 'D')on't believe them. All you need to know is every time the Iranian President farts, oil goes up $0.75, the strategic petroleum reserve is now our swing producer, and President Bush, a Texas oilman, is preaching conservation.


Oil markets are tight, for sure. Not as tight as Simmons et al would have it, though. But that has more to do with incresing demand from China and India than geological scarcity. Not to say that that won't happen. It's just that it won't be cataclismic. There is no use of oil that can't be met by other energy carriers or other chemistries. Oil is not a miracle product.


You're right until you compare what is needed to substitute other energy sources for what oil provides for us today. It cannot be done. Even if it is phased in- biodiesel for diesel and synthetic gasoline, for example, the present structure of industrial agriculture as it is practiced today must change dramatically. And with it, how and what we eat, since those are food crops. And with it, where and how we grow food. And, how we retrofit to power all our new biodiesel cars and trucks, even as we pay more and more money for less and less stuff.

It seems to me like you're proposing that the total and complete alteration of our way of life won't happen overnight, but that it will be gradual to some degree, and hardly "catastrophic". Well, the "prophets" are right in line with this scenario. Dieoff's curves, for instance, take us down the yellow brick road over a period, of, say- our lifetimes.

But ultimately the main thing that is going to change- the pivotal thing- is the energy source, not energy itself. We'll be moving from a high-quality source to multiple decentralized sources and because of certain physical laws the effect will be detractive in the example of industrial agriculture. Formerly a cheap chemical foodstock for fertilizer- oil or natural gas- it will now be expensive. Retrofitting is expensive, but necessary- it is food after all. But without excess energy input yields will fall.

Dieoff.org, truly the place to start looking seriously at "prophecy" should make it clear that within the parameters of modern life, there are going to be some economic losers. Its no secret that the American quality of life in terms of real wages, benefits, and jobs have been declining for quite some time. But will this inevitable change be catastrophic?

Let me show you an example from Nepal.

I was just researching wood burning stoves the other day. I found a study of how rural Nepalese heat water and cook food, mainly using wood stoves. Unfortunately most of the environment by now is almost completely deforested, for two reasons- 1. too many people overusing scarce available resources, and 2. inefficient use of wood in cooking and heating.

A bundle of sticks takes about a whole day to collect and costs about $3US. Forget where you get $3 a day for sticks, lets look at the Nepalese economy. The dominant source of income is tourism. So, if something happens on a fundamental price point in the global economy, lets say the price of a unit of energy doubles, triples, quadruples... are the tourists still going to show up? Are the tourists going to show up if the price of aviation fuel goes through the roof, nevermind if airlines are still economically viable... the price of tickets will surely go up. Now, with prices climbing everywhere, and discretionary spending by the average American consumer going down, regardless if the economy at large is tanking, do you think that Nepal will be visited by more or less tourists, or get more or less tourist dollars?

Do you think that if the average Nepalese person no longer has a steady income, he will not take steps to collect wood and heat his home or cook his food throughout the harsh winter? And do you think if he and his fellow villagers are starving and freezing he will still be discouraged by a handful of soldiers demanding $3US per bundle of sticks from some of the last remaining stands of trees in the region? No, he will risk life and limb to take what he needs to survive, until he has to take risks to survive again. Ultimately, the forest will be gone, and he will face starvation or other deprivation.

This is, simply put, a catastrophe of apocalyptic proportion in this person's region, this person's society. And this effect, of the price of energy increases, is totally INDIRECT. His journey from comfort and community to anarchy and starvation will be, in your words, "gradual".

Will Joe Shmoe, out of work and unable to pay the mortgage in that McMansion in Atlanta, effectively squatting on the good graces of the forgiveness of the American Banking System, see Peak Oil as a series of mitigatable circumstances at the end of which is a lifestyle not much different in many ways that the one he was enjoying, circa Feburary 2006?

Lets take a trip illustrating the second law of thermodynamics...

At first, the Nepalese villager uses wood to heat and cook. Then, there is no more wood. He collects pinecones and twigs, until there are no more pinecones or twigs. Then he collects grass, shrubs, things that will not burn easily, and his own dung.

At first, the Atlanta-dwelling postmodern human drives his F-250, goes to his job making more McMansions and helping push urban sprawl out horizontally across formerly arable agricultural land. Then it costs twice as much to fill the tank, and the price of goods is twice as much because of inflationary pressure. And then 4 times as much. And then 8 times as much. Ostensibly by this point the "powers that be" are "turning the battleship around" and retrofitting and erecting biodiesel and PV production stations at Manhattan Project type of levels, even as the labor, price of components, and feedstock energy is less available and many times as expensive.

Joe Shmoe, if he can get gas at all, is paying through the nose. If he still has a job building McMansions, he is carpooling, or getting seriously in shape pedalling to work everyday IF the banks have decided its STILL a good idea to bankroll the development of a bunch of homes NO ONE wants to buy... IF the US Government by that time hasn't gone totally bankrupt.

Atlanta is at a pretty good longitude that shutting the heat off entirely wouldn't be too uncomfortable. But the guy has no job anymore and he still needs to eat. In fact, the entire metro Atlanta population still needs to eat and that energy is diverted to growing soybeans that will deliver biodiesel a year from now. The battle-hardened troops just back from Iraq enforce martial law, curfew, and rationing of what food is left. Inflation presses on, oil prices still continue to rise, the rule of martial law extends, aided by citizens who rightly fear other citizens just as depressed as they are.

By now Joe Shmoe's F-250's tank is bled dry and hasn't been run in months. The city is completely black at night punctuated by flickering fires at key intersections. Gunshots rattle in the distance. The media is non-existent. The TV does not work without electricity. The phone service is getting more sporadic every day. Local affiliate groups between citizens organically rise, to try and pool resources and plan strategies for everyday life. Women give birth to babies by candlelight. Men rip up their lawns attempting to plant food crops. The national guard fires on people attempting to collect water out of a city water main. Its been weeks without tap water, and people are getting sick.

Eventually, people needing to cook are cutting down the trees in their yards, or tearing siding off their houses. When there are no more trees locally that can be collected economically, they will start burning twigs, grass, and their own dung.

By this time some biodiesel is flowing. But Joe Shmoe sees none of it. There simply isn't enough biodiesel to go around, so the F-250 will continue to sit. Without a running engine the battery to freshen the electrolyte the battery has long since oxidized anyway. Sometimes he just climbs into the cab and wraps his hands around the steering wheel, feeling the soft leather of the seat underneath him. He stares out the window imagining the world as it once was.

He has heard a vague rumor that oil sells for $500 a barrel. Several years have passed by now. One child died from complications of the H5N1 bird flu, specifically, bacterial pneumonia. They were all sick around the same time. Without medical care and little food or water, it was 3 weeks of pure hell inside the house. They buried the child in the back yard. The city is quiet. The Guard patrols are less frequent and everyone wears masks. Bodies pile up in the street alongside the rest of the garbage. There has been no sign from one neighbor that anyone is there. After a few weeks him and another neighbor decide to go in an split everything they find 50/50. The stench at the door isn't too much worse than the stench in the streets, and it doesn't keep them out. There isn't much.

There has been no rain for months. The bank might have foreclosed on his house at one point early on, but the bank doesn't exist anymore- it was burned to the ground by an angry mob. Everyday he tends to the garden where his front yard used to be. He handled every seed with care and knows exactly what was planted where. Nothing is coming up though. Was it the ChemLawn that made his wife sick last winter? He doesn't know. He kneels down and picks up a handful of dirt that was once fertile loam. It blows away to dust.

By this time, the Nepalese man is long dead, his story being much less interesting since there really was nowhere to go after the wood ran out. When there was no food to be had, they joined the procession down out of the mountains, only to find more devastation. He was killed by a hatchet blow to the back of the head, and eaten.
Last edited by BlisteredWhippet on Sun 12 Feb 2006, 00:22:22, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
BlisteredWhippet
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 848
Joined: Tue 08 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Why trust Peak Oil Prophets?

Unread postby TheTurtle » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 22:16:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BlisteredWhippet', '
')...
Lets take a trip illustrating the second law of thermodynamics...



Nice story! 8O
“Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves.” (Ted Perry)
User avatar
TheTurtle
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1905
Joined: Sat 14 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Along the banks of the muddy Mississippi
Top

Re: Why trust Peak Oil Prophets?

Unread postby Antimatter » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 23:38:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheTurtle', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BlisteredWhippet', '
')...
Lets take a trip illustrating the second law of thermodynamics...



Nice story! 8O


Pretty tenuous extrapolation from the second law to all that, but it was a fun read.
"Production of useful work is limited by the laws of thermodynamics, but the production of useless work seems to be unlimited."
User avatar
Antimatter
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 587
Joined: Tue 04 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Australia
Top

Re: Why trust Peak Oil Prophets?

Unread postby MattSavinar » Sun 12 Feb 2006, 05:50:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Depends on how out-there the claim is. When Michael Ruppert talsk about US ending as a unified state because of high oil prices due to Katrina and Rita or when Simmons predicts $300 oil and $10 gas or when Duncan predicts we will revert to a neo-preindustrial age by 2030 then these claims are a bit wilder than $30 oil.


Yeah, cause Matt Simmons really needs money from selling books. His royalty on "Twilight" is probably a buck a book. Even if it's sold 150,000 copies (it was 60,000 summer of 05), he's probably got more coin sitting in between his couch seats than that.

Richard Rainwater need the money? Ah, no.

T. Boone Pickens selling books? Ah, no.

My guess is you don't make the same accusation of the mainstream folks, most of whome are also either sellling something or are getting paid by a group, or have more advice to sell: Daniel Yergin, for instance.

Best,

Matt
User avatar
MattSavinar
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sun 09 May 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Why trust Peak Oil Prophets?

Unread postby JAGUAR » Mon 13 Feb 2006, 01:26:01

The doomsters have it all wrong; mankind will adapt to life after cheap oil just like everything else that’s come our way. The Chinese and Indian people will go back to riding bikes when oil prices reach unacceptable levels. To say that China and India are going to follow the long-term oil consumption forecast as projected by the IEA is a very long stretch? It’s just a guess a best and anything beyond 3 years is a joke. Everyone would be speaking Russian if long-term forecast where easy and reliable. Anyway, I just don't believe the data that Peak Oil devotees use as proof that the end is near. You make your predictions of when peak oil production will occur, but then the date just passes by once again.
JAGUAR
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue 07 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Location: So. Cali

Re: Why trust Peak Oil Prophets?

Unread postby TonyPrep » Mon 13 Feb 2006, 02:20:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JAGUAR', 'T')he doomsters have it all wrong; mankind will adapt to life after cheap oil just like everything else that’s come our way.

Indeed, but, for many people, the adaption itself is a doomsday scenario. Life will go on, in some form or another.
User avatar
TonyPrep
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand
Top

Re: Why trust Peak Oil Prophets?

Unread postby rogerhb » Mon 13 Feb 2006, 02:46:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JAGUAR', 'T')he doomsters have it all wrong; mankind will adapt to life after cheap oil just like everything else that’s come our way.


Yeah, people really got off their arses and adapted during the black deaths of the middle ages and the spanish flu of this century.

Mankind may well adapt and move on, but not so many individuals.
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand
Top

Re: Why trust Peak Oil Prophets?

Unread postby Battle_Scarred_Galactico » Mon 13 Feb 2006, 06:10:05

"mankind will adapt to life after cheap oil just like everything else that’s come our way"

That's very true but your wording kind of implies that it won't be a monumental change, which it will. We're not talking about changing a flat here.

And the guy who said Oil isn't a unique resource clearly hasn't ever set foot outside his house, or even used a tiny portion of his brain to think about where the products he's been using his whole life have been coming from. Hint: It's not the supermarket.
---
Battle_Scarred_Galactico
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 935
Joined: Thu 07 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Why trust Peak Oil Prophets?

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 13 Feb 2006, 08:36:10

Really I think this is the issue, the profound change that will occur to our way of life, a change for which we as a society and as individuals are almost completely unprepared. There is no infrastructure in place for a low-energy way of life, and yes, we need an infrastructure. We need a way of living which requires far less income (because many of us will lose our jobs), a way of getting food, clothing, and shelter, especially. Most of us are not used to living in really abject poverty, which is what the low energy future will be like unless we create a new infrastructure which supports a low energy way of life. We don't have it, very few people are working on it.
Ludi
 

Re: Why trust Peak Oil Prophets?

Unread postby rogerhb » Mon 13 Feb 2006, 08:48:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'M')ost of us are not used to living in really abject poverty


Don't worry we'll get a crash course, however it will be on-the-job-training.
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand
Top

Previous

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron