As more of the news of biofuel and plug-in hybrid innovations are coming to light, I'm seeing two schools of thought emerge:
1. Switchgrass & other cellulosic biofuels, combined with plug-in hybrids, will allow us to continue in the project of sprawling out hundreds of miles into the countryside, relatively unabated. It can be inferred that the current infinite growth economic paradigm would remain unchallenged and no new conservation measures would be needed, other than those channeling waste and previously neglected feedstocks into the energy system.
-versus-
2. While the previously mentioned innovations will obviously be incorporated into the future economy in some fashion, it will be by necessity for mere survival, not as a preventative measure against losing unattainable goals like 100% automobile ownership and McMansions for 'all.'
Herein lies the crux: certainly we should champion more sustainable ways of living, but to take up the cause of biofuels and electric cars seems antithetical to that goal. To hear environmentalists wax poetic over the laurels of cleaner biofuels and suggested increases in fuel economy indicates a deep desire for them to 'have their cake and eat it, too,' for lack of a better phrase.
Your thoughts?







