Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

State of the Union speech.

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Unread postby KiddieKorral » Thu 03 Feb 2005, 06:53:33

Got back from a DFA meeting in the middle of the speech. I had to go pray, so I didn't catch the majority of it. Even so, I think my BS detector is fried from the overload.
American by birth, Muslim by choice, Southern by the grace of God!
User avatar
KiddieKorral
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 851
Joined: Fri 18 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Location: 28° N 81° W

Unread postby Aaron » Thu 03 Feb 2005, 08:24:30

Mentioned nuclear (Bush nucular) and alternatives...

Blasted Iran & Syria
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

Unread postby JoeW » Thu 03 Feb 2005, 11:34:26

I am about as anti-Bush as they come, but the Social Security change is intriguing to me. I am 29 yrs old, and I would like to think that the money I have been paying in will somehow come back to me. 33% is a reasonable amount to take out of regular social security contributions and place into a personal account where I can do whatever I want with it. In fact, I already have a similar setup for my pension contributions, where 33% of those contributions instead go to my 401k plan where I control the funds.
The problem that I have with both of these things (SS personal accts & 401k plan) is that in all likelihood, you will have a limited number of options as to what you can do with you investment. I like IRA's because you can put the money anywhere. I think my 401k plan has about 12 funds from which to choose. I understand that when you leave a company, you generally roll over the 401k into an IRA. I wonder if you can do this while you continue to work for a company...?

Other than that, I was impressed that Bush mentioned energy. There are only so many issues to be discussed in the address, and energy was one of them. It is a start.
Bush is still an elitist buffoon, of course, but I knew that before I tuned in last night.

JoeW
User avatar
JoeW
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 647
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: The Pit of Despair

Unread postby MonteQuest » Thu 03 Feb 2005, 20:57:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"')Today is Groundhog Day and the State of the Union Address. As Air America Radio pointed out, it is an ironic juxtaposition: one involves a meaningless ritual in which we look to a creature of little intelligence for prognostication and the other involves a groundhog."


:P
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

State-of-the-Union Preview

Unread postby Carlhole » Fri 27 Jan 2006, 16:09:30

State-of-theUnion Preview - Bush Impresssion

Found the link on Crooks and Liars
Carlhole
 

Energy policy from the State of the Union address

Unread postby Denny » Sat 04 Feb 2006, 21:56:58

I saw the part of the SOTU address on the news where Bush went on about reducing energy dependency and the need for new alternative energy development, such as swithgrass. I have heard most of it before.

But, I did not see any concrete action plan to effect change.

What is up with that? Why not lay out some major incentives for alternative energy?

The U.S. put the first man on the moon, and its the msot competent nation on earth to be leading the new world of alternative energy, but it has to get its plan together. I still don't see it.

For you Americans out there, what is happening right now to get America first on the alternative energy bandwagon?
User avatar
Denny
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1738
Joined: Sat 10 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: Energy policy from the State of the Union address

Unread postby coyote » Sun 05 Feb 2006, 01:13:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Denny', 'F')or you Americans out there, what is happening right now to get America first on the alternative energy bandwagon?

Absolutely nothing. Our president is a moron; he and everyone else in the administration care only for their own big business, big warfare, 'why the hell won't those commie environmentalists let us drill in ANWR' agenda; and no one who has a clue is anywhere near a position of authority. If the Democrats retake the government we might be at least a little better off, but by then it'll be too late. It's not just the government, either -- try telling anyone here about Peak Oil, even in the most reasonable and restrained way; and you'll shortly be checking to make sure you haven't suddenly sprouted an extra head. This entire country is completely in denial, about a great many things. Americans will probably be among the first to hear about Peak Oil; but they will probably be among the last to understand it.
Lord, here comes the flood
We'll say goodbye to flesh and blood
If again the seas are silent in any still alive
It'll be those who gave their island to survive...
User avatar
coyote
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Sun 23 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: East of Eden

Re: Energy policy from the State of the Union address

Unread postby Colorado-Valley » Sun 05 Feb 2006, 02:56:56

My local newspaper said Bush was starting to sound like one of those "environmentalist wackos" for even talking about such things.

We're toast ...
User avatar
Colorado-Valley
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 729
Joined: Mon 16 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Energy policy from the State of the Union address

Unread postby mekrob » Sun 05 Feb 2006, 09:31:48

I thought he did mention a couple billion for research. Probably going to oil companies though.
mekrob
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2408
Joined: Fri 09 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Energy policy from the State of the Union address

Unread postby KrellEnergySource » Sun 05 Feb 2006, 12:42:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Denny', 'I') saw the part of the SOTU address on the news where Bush went on about reducing energy dependency and the need for new alternative energy development, such as swithgrass. I have heard most of it before.

But, I did not see any concrete action plan to effect change.

What is up with that? Why not lay out some major incentives for alternative energy?


Here's the reason I heard....right in the speech itself.

"In a system of two parties, two chambers, and two elected branches, there will always be differences and debate. "

The US Government is not a system of two parties. The powers that be have fallen into two parties and every issue, as a result, is polarized and every speech...ESPECIALLY THE STATE OF THE UNION...has its main goal of showing the party in power is 'best' for the country. On the level of issues...they don't matter. Power does.

Brian
User avatar
KrellEnergySource
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 154
Joined: Mon 31 Oct 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Energy policy from the State of the Union address

Unread postby 0mar » Sun 05 Feb 2006, 19:01:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KrellEnergySource', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Denny', 'I') saw the part of the SOTU address on the news where Bush went on about reducing energy dependency and the need for new alternative energy development, such as swithgrass. I have heard most of it before.

But, I did not see any concrete action plan to effect change.

What is up with that? Why not lay out some major incentives for alternative energy?


Here's the reason I heard....right in the speech itself.

"In a system of two parties, two chambers, and two elected branches, there will always be differences and debate. "

The US Government is not a system of two parties. The powers that be have fallen into two parties and every issue, as a result, is polarized and every speech...ESPECIALLY THE STATE OF THE UNION...has its main goal of showing the party in power is 'best' for the country. On the level of issues...they don't matter. Power does.

Brian


You give them too much credit.

Democrats and Republicans are identical, not two different camps. If the Dems were in office, we'd have the same policies, same rhetoric, just phrased differently. American politics is a sharade to keep the public placated.
Joseph Stalin
"It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything. "
User avatar
0mar
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1499
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Davis, California
Top

Re: Energy policy from the State of the Union address

Unread postby UIUCstudent01 » Sun 05 Feb 2006, 19:06:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('0mar', 'D')emocrats and Republicans are identical, not two different camps. If the Dems were in office, we'd have the same policies, same rhetoric, just phrased differently. American politics is a sharade to keep the public placated.


Before I started watching blogs and comments (and votes!) by 'leading' democrats, I would have said that was defeatist drivel.

But now, I totally believe that...
User avatar
UIUCstudent01
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 838
Joined: Thu 10 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Energy policy from the State of the Union address

Unread postby coyote » Tue 07 Feb 2006, 01:01:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('0mar', 'D')emocrats and Republicans are identical, not two different camps. If the Dems were in office, we'd have the same policies, same rhetoric, just phrased differently. American politics is a sharade to keep the public placated.

I don't agree completely with that. It's true that there isn't nearly enough political diversity in this country. But the Dems and Pugs are not quite identical. They are polar on one of the few issues that really matter in the long run: environmentalism. I'm also fairly cynical about our two-party system; but though I maintain my political independence and am not a member of any party, I don't vote Republican any more. Ever. John McCain in the 2000 primaries was the last.
Lord, here comes the flood
We'll say goodbye to flesh and blood
If again the seas are silent in any still alive
It'll be those who gave their island to survive...
User avatar
coyote
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Sun 23 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: East of Eden
Top

State of the Union

Unread postby mekrob » Tue 23 Jan 2007, 18:32:26

PDF of the bullet points
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Energy: President Bush will ask Congress and America's scientists, farmers, industry leaders, and entrepreneurs to join
him in pursuing the goal of reducing U.S. gasoline usage by 20 percent in the next ten years – Twenty in Ten.

Spending Reform: President Bush will discuss three major reforms to spend taxpayer dollars wisely: balancing the
budget through pro-growth policies and spending restraint, enacting common-sense reforms to help prevent billions of
taxpayer dollars from being spent on unnecessary earmarks, and reforming entitlement programs.

Immigration: President Bush will call on Congress to pass a comprehensive immigration reform bill that will secure our
borders, enhance interior and worksite enforcement, create a temporary worker program, resolve – without animosity and
without amnesty – the status of illegal immigrants already here, and promote assimilation into our society.

War On Terror/Iraq: The challenge playing out across the broader Middle East is more than a military conflict – it is the
decisive ideological struggle of our time. For the safety of our people, America must succeed in Iraq, and the President
believes his new Iraq plan is the best way to succeed. Tonight, the President will propose to establish a special advisory
council on the War on Terror made up of leaders in Congress from both political parties.

Strengthening Our Military: Tonight, President Bush will ask Congress for authority to increase the overall strength of
our active Army and the Marine Corps by 92,000 Soldiers and Marines in the next five years.


So securing the border? Umm...sure Georgie boy.

92,000 troops in five years. That amounts to about 10,000 actual combat troops. Big whoop.

And more pro-growth policies to "balance the budget". Just what we need. And anti-earmarks? But how will Halliburton stay in business?

And oil...been discussed plenty already.
I want to put out the fires of Hell, and burn down the rewards of Paradise. They block the way to God. I do not want to worship from fear of punishment or for the promise of reward, but simply for the love of God. - Rabia
mekrob
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2408
Joined: Fri 09 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: State of the Union

Unread postby Daculling » Tue 23 Jan 2007, 20:39:22

without animosity and without amnesty – the status of illegal immigrants already here

Unless you amnesty them they will have animosity. If you amnesty them the American people will have the animosity... good luck with that georgie.

I'm convince PO will work this out one way or another before politics does.
Daculling
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1228
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: State of the Union

Unread postby NEOPO » Tue 23 Jan 2007, 20:44:46

Peak oil is in this pudding:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')ar On Terror/Iraq: The challenge playing out across the broader Middle East is more than a military conflict – it is the
decisive ideological struggle of our time. For the safety of our people, America must succeed in Iraq, and the President
believes his new Iraq plan is the best way to succeed. Tonight, the President will propose to establish a special advisory
council on the War on Terror made up of leaders in Congress from both political parties.
It is easier to enslave a people that wish to remain free then it is to free a people who wish to remain enslaved.
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX
Top

Re: State of the Union

Unread postby theragtopguy » Tue 23 Jan 2007, 21:18:38

Special advisory council? For what? So he can ignore their recommendations the way he did the other Iraq Study Group?

The best thing he could do tonight is resign. Along with that other crook Cheyney.

I hope the Democrats impeach them both and put them on trial as enemies of the state.
User avatar
theragtopguy
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 56
Joined: Thu 02 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Eastern Pennsylvania, US of A

Re: State of the Union

Unread postby NEOPO » Tue 23 Jan 2007, 21:22:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('theragtopguy', 'S')pecial advisory council? For what? So he can ignore their recommendations the way he did the other Iraq Study Group?

The best thing he could do tonight is resign. Along with that other crook Cheyney.

I hope the Democrats impeach them both and put them on trial as enemies of the state.

Hope springs eternal :-D
Yeah special study group - if you dont like what they say simply ask them again with that stern cowboy face....
Now please Ragtopguy rest a minute on Doctor Neopo's couch and explain to me why is it that you hate america?!!? :lol:

Its an ongoing joke that I simply cannot resist repeating over and over and over again.....
It is easier to enslave a people that wish to remain free then it is to free a people who wish to remain enslaved.
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX
Top

Re: State of the Union

Unread postby WildRose » Tue 23 Jan 2007, 21:59:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('NEOPO', 'P')eak oil is in this pudding:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')ar On Terror/Iraq: The challenge playing out across the broader Middle East is more than a military conflict – it is the
decisive ideological struggle of our time. For the safety of our people, America must succeed in Iraq, and the President
believes his new Iraq plan is the best way to succeed. Tonight, the President will propose to establish a special advisory
council on the War on Terror made up of leaders in Congress from both political parties.



Indeed.

Time and time again, Bush and Cheney have said the US must succeed in Iraq "for the safety of our people", or something to the effect of "preserving the American way of life". But they never come right out and say how oil is connected to that. Instead, they use the idea of an ideological or religious struggle or scare the American public into thinking that they are at ever-increasing risk from Middle East terrorists. How many people actually buy that?
User avatar
WildRose
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1881
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: State of the Union

Unread postby theragtopguy » Tue 23 Jan 2007, 23:11:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('NEOPO', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('theragtopguy', 'S')pecial advisory council? For what? So he can ignore their recommendations the way he did the other Iraq Study Group?

The best thing he could do tonight is resign. Along with that other crook Cheyney.

I hope the Democrats impeach them both and put them on trial as enemies of the state.

Hope springs eternal :-D
Yeah special study group - if you dont like what they say simply ask them again with that stern cowboy face....
Now please Ragtopguy rest a minute on Doctor Neopo's couch and explain to me why is it that you hate america?!!? :lol:

Its an ongoing joke that I simply cannot resist repeating over and over and over again.....


I know that you are joking Neopo. I love my America. I just hate these bastards that are ruining it and stripping away our rights slowly but surely. Not only do they ignore the obvious problems like Peak Oil but in their own stupid way they have managed to turn most of the world against us.
User avatar
theragtopguy
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 56
Joined: Thu 02 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Eastern Pennsylvania, US of A
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron