by rwwff » Sun 09 Jul 2006, 15:10:52
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MicroHydro', 'S')o, people aged over 26 who didn't learn about the concept of peak oil until this century, please share with me what you were thinking back then. I promise not to be rude to anyone.
Simply wasn't interested at the time. Until I see a sustained drop of 10 mbpd, to be honest, I won't be convinced that the peak did happened. The problem is yall are relying on a prediction about discoveries. Now, maybe the trend does continue and there are no more big fields discovered, and if so, peak is somewhere around now, ie, 2005-2015, or therebouts. If yall are wrong, and 2015 produces about the same or more oil than we do in 2006, then you will have done yet more damage to the public's willingness to acknowledge impending disasters.
To a certain exent, I wasn't particularly interested since it just appeared to be yet another "issue" various left wing groups were attempting to use to move policy preferences. Since discussing this here and reading a few books (library only, not bought), I've come to the conclusion that these lefties have hitched themselves to a very unmanageable beast of burden.
If peak oil is truly coming into play now; then when its effects manifest, Americans are not going to be offended by the idea of fighting for oil; they are going to DEMAND it. When oil is $200 bbl, ANWR will be drilled with the quickest, dirtiest, most productive methodologies deployable; and you won't be able to find a dozen politiicians in the whole country that will oppose burning even the nastiest coal in order to turn food into gasoline.
They won't be looking for blame; they'll be looking for salvation.
Shell and ExxonMobile will raise their hands and say, "let us do ABC, and we'll save you." And the people will stand, and in one voice, shout: "make it happen!"