by backstop » Mon 23 Jan 2006, 10:46:24
Madpaddy -
while travelling (by 20HP 50mpg 1939-designed Citroen Arcadienne) in your glorious but, as you imply, sadly deluded Isle,
I realized that it had suffered a massive and tragic depletion of practically all of its entire huge population of donkeys.
Having contacts in Brussels my enquiries found that there had been a very covert deal arranged in the name of progress :
that for every donkey exported to Italy for salami, credit would be made available to Irish banks
to fund a debt-boom of McChuck-'em-up bungalows across the land.
Given that the land is now devoid of further donkeys to export, and is cluttered with hideous flimsy bungalows,
while no significant new productive industry has been established to pay off the debt,
it would appear that the Irish are going to need every last scrap of their exceptional sense of humour . . .
Stu -
The distinction between good news and stupefying disinformation seems central to the thread.
The maintenance of business-as-usual, and the provision of solutions-in-isolation that are plainly no solution, appear to be anything but good news -
Yet there certainly are positive developments now going on from the perspective that fundamental change is inevitable in view of PO, GW, Soil loss, Water insecurity, population overshoot, etc.
30 yrs of inaction with regard to changing course would say that the sooner things come apart the better,
in that the new paradigm seems unable to break through while the old still functions, and resources are being destroyed on a daily basis.
That said, there are huge information and physical resources available for restructuring now that may well be lost in a collapse,
meaning that warding off collapse in relevant sectors while initiating the re-structuring is perhaps the critical path to be followed.
In this light the disclosure of information [openness, Glasnost] is key to public awareness of and growing involvement in the restructuring [Perestroika].
Thus for example Brown calling for reserve transparency and Rockerfeller remarking that the oil problem is not soluble are very good news, as was Katrina,
in that US popular awareness of GW appears to have been transformed by the impact on New Orleans and the loss of between 1,300 to 7,900 lives.
Maybe this is too cold-blooded a perspective for most posters on this board ?
I think not, in that there are plenty of sites for those seeking re-assurance that the American dream is reality,
and plenty more for those seeking the buzz of despair at the scale and virulence of the problems we face.
In addition, much really positive news seems to get discounted on the bizarre grounds that it fails to help maintain the status quo,
due either to its scale
- e.g. the global spread of small scale locally reliant organic farming and energy production techniques,
or to its radical orientation to a new paradigm
- e.g. the formal calls at the UN for the equitable global climate-policy framework of "Contraction & Convergence."
As a forum for identifying just what is good news and what is disinformation and for promoting the former while dissing the latter, this thread seems a real advance for the site.
regards,
Backstop
"The best of conservation . . . is written not with a pen but with an axe."
(from "A Sand County Almanac" by Aldo Leopold, 1948.