Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

New study questions sustainability of metal resources

Discussions of conventional and alternative energy production technologies.

New study questions sustainability of metal resources

Unread postby Graeme » Fri 20 Jan 2006, 22:54:23

New study raises questions about sustainability of metal resources

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')esearchers studying supplies of copper, zinc and other metals have determined that these finite resources, even if recycled, may not meet the needs of the global population forever. According to the study, if all nations were to use the same services enjoyed in developed nations, even the full extraction of metals from the Earth's crust and extensive recycling programs may not meet future demand.

However, the researchers believe scarce metals, such as platinum, face depletion risks this century because of the lack of suitable substitutes in such devices as catalytic converters and hydrogen fuel cells. The researchers also found that for many metals, the average rate of usage per person continues to rise. As a result, the report says, even the more plentiful metals may face similar depletion risks in the future.


physorg
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: New study questions sustainability of metal resources

Unread postby Hegel » Sat 21 Jan 2006, 05:47:22

Metals are still perceived as "infinte", because they can be "recycled". Unfortunately, Recycling metals is highly energy-intensive. Given the P.O.-scenario, recycling metals will turn-out to be a classy techno-fix.

Btw, my favourite metal is Cobalt. Any attempt to have a Fischer-Tropsch based economy will directly run into this limiting ressource. Have fun my pro-coal/shale/NG liquifying advocates with all those future oversized strip-mines and a insufficient amount of Cobalt-catalysts to keep up fuel production? ;)
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.

Current Doomerosity Level (Jaymax Scale): 5
User avatar
Hegel
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Sun 18 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Germany

Re: New study questions sustainability of metal resources

Unread postby shakespear1 » Sat 21 Jan 2006, 06:14:44

Hegel

Thanks for that interesting piece of information regarding Cobalt

I GOOGL'ed and found this

$this->bbcode_second_pass_code('', 'RAO Norilsk Nickel is the world's largest company producing nickel, cobalt and platinum group metals. Norilsk Nickel holds a monopoly in Russia for the production of nickel-electrolyte, copper-electrolyte, metallic cobalt, cobalt concentrate and metals of the platinum group. RAO Norilsk Nickel owns 100 percent shares of five daughter companies: Norilsk mining and metal combine (Norilsk); Severonickel combine (Monchegorsk, Murmansk Region); GMK Pechenganickel (Zapolyarnykh, Murmansk Region); Olenegorsky Mechanical Plant (Olenegorsk, Murmansk Region); and Gipronickel Institute (St-Petersburg).')

Cobalt

Amazing where all this leads. Hint: Mr. Putin's back yard :)

Just amazing
Men argue, nature acts !
Voltaire

"...In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation."

Alan Greenspan
shakespear1
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1532
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: New study questions sustainability of metal resources

Unread postby Hegel » Sat 21 Jan 2006, 06:43:53

You got it Shakespear1.
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.

Current Doomerosity Level (Jaymax Scale): 5
User avatar
Hegel
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Sun 18 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Germany

Re: New study questions sustainability of metal resources

Unread postby Devil » Sat 21 Jan 2006, 08:16:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Hegel', 'M')etals are still perceived as "infinte", because they can be "recycled". Unfortunately, Recycling metals is highly energy-intensive. Given the P.O.-scenario, recycling metals will turn-out to be a classy techno-fix.


This statement needs a large lump of qualification.

Which takes more energy:
1. Digging an enormous hole in the ground, extracting iron ore and transporting it to a smelting site; digging a second enormous hole in the ground, extracting coal and dirt, separating them, transporting it to coking ovens, coking it, crushing it, transporting it to the same smelting site; digging a third hole in the ground, extracting the limestone or other stone used for fluxing, crushing it and transporting it to the same smelting site; putting all three components into a blast furnace and run it for 24 hours to reduce the ore to metal which is ready for pigging; extracting the hot slag, crushing it and disposing of it; refining the pig iron by melting and blowing.
2. Melting down the steel in a car and blowing the molten metal for purification.
??????????????
Which causes more CO2 emissions?
Which causes more pollution?????
??????????????????????????????????

Sorry! Such statements reduce your credibility.
Devil
User avatar
Devil
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 816
Joined: Tue 06 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Cyprus

Re: New study questions sustainability of metal resources

Unread postby EnergySpin » Sat 21 Jan 2006, 09:14:53

By, the way ...
Someone/something screwed up with the announcement of the study found at the NSF web site. Specifically, the publication date is wrong; the current issue of PNAS (Jan 17th) does not feature it.
Furthermore, I could not find any PNAS papers by Thomas Graedel (supposedly one of the co-authors of that study) in the last 10 years.


@Hegel
There was a pretty article by Tufts a few months ago concerning the metal recycling, energy use and GHGs that kind of deconstructs your position regarding the sensibility of recycling in situations of decreasing energy use.
http://www.tufts.edu/tuftsrecycles/energy.htm

I will have to research this further, but IIRC the soil in certain landdfills have a much higher metal concentration than the ores the metal originated from in the first place :roll:
It seems that recycling will become the most prolific "mining" industry in the future.
"Nuclear power has long been to the Left what embryonic-stem-cell research is to the Right--irredeemably wrong and a signifier of moral weakness."Esquire Magazine,12/05
The genetic code is commaless and so are my posts.
User avatar
EnergySpin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: New study questions sustainability of metal resources

Unread postby Hegel » Sat 21 Jan 2006, 10:30:48

@Devil

Recycling Iron from old steel cars is one thing, but recycling rare metals from industrial components is something else.

I understand from your CV, available on your personal homepage, that you have lived and worked in Switzerland. I presume you are fluent in German Language, therefor I invite you to read the technical paper below dealing with recycling of industrial catalysts used in the chemical industry, as an example. Paper deals with all aspects and is a good introduction into this field.

Stand der Verwertung von verbrauchten Katalysatoren aus der chemischen Industrie sowie Einflussfaktoren zur Verbesserung der Kreislaufführung

The energy consumption of Recycling is raising, because of the wide range of high-tech consumer products containing a mixture of tiny quantities of rare and very rare metals. Just think the about recycling modern-day batteries, high-tech electronical goods, chemical fluids etc.

Concerning mining operations, yes indeed mining Iron ore is more energy-intensive than converting Iron from used steel cars. However Recycling yleld-back ratios aren't always 100%. In order to fill this gap and satisfy annual demand, you have to keep up mining. Teufelskreislauf ...

I hope this clarifies my standpoint. If not, I invite you to discuss this matter by Private Message.
Last edited by Hegel on Sat 21 Jan 2006, 10:49:41, edited 1 time in total.
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.

Current Doomerosity Level (Jaymax Scale): 5
User avatar
Hegel
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Sun 18 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Germany

Re: New study questions sustainability of metal resources

Unread postby waegari » Sat 21 Jan 2006, 10:36:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Hegel', ' ')Concerning mining operations, yes indeed mining Iron ore is more energy-intensive than converting Iron from used steel cars. However Recycling yleld-back ratios aren't always 100%. In order to fill this gap and satisfy annual demand, you have to keep up mining. Teufelskreislauf ...



And then there is this:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hile many point to the existence of a scrap steel "reservoir" - higher scrap prices tend to induce recovery from previously uneconomical sources - others argue there is a limit to what can be reasonably reclaimed in any given period. After all, the world can only discard so many cars and washing machines per year and only so many buildings can be demolished. Of course, it's also true to argue that in the future there will be more and more metallic goods in the system which ultimately will be scrapped. But the real question is, will there be enough scrap to sustain this sort of growth? Many have doubts, and point to a future where the demand for scrap steel will grow faster than the supply, which means supply will remain tight, which means prices for scrap will remain high.


From Your steel trash, China's treasure.
waegari
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 573
Joined: Tue 28 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Netherlands

Re: New study questions sustainability of metal resources

Unread postby Devil » Sat 21 Jan 2006, 11:11:41

I'm afraid your assumption is incorrect. I lived and worked for 35 years in Welschschweiz and I consider myself as bilingual French/English but my knowledge of German is very poor. Sorry :)

In my message, I did say $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')This statement needs a large lump of qualification.
knowing that your hypothesis does not apply equally to all metals, even if it may be valid for some. I suggest that at least 98% of metals, by weight, are both environmentally and economically able to be recycled. You mention, for example, hi-tech electronics as being problematic. I beg to differ. What metals are in a typical assembly? Gold, applied generally in thicknesses of 0.1 to 3 µm, has been recycled since the 1960s. The common metals are copper, tin, lead, nickel, silver and iron/steel, all of which are easy to recycle and make up the vast majority of the metals (some high-power circuitry may also have aluminium for helping with heat dissipation). The EU WEEE Directive acknowledges this and mandates 75% by weight recycling, The metals that may be present in trace quantities are palladium, arsenic, gallium and a few other semiconductor dopants. There are several ways of achieving the recycling. For example, the tin and lead (solder) thermally, some metals chemically and others (especially the copper) electrolytically. As refining copper is always an electrolytic process, it consumes no more energy than the refining after smelting from crude ingots (actually, probably less).

Whatever, my view is that recycling of resources is ALWAYS preferable to using virgin materials, even where there is a reasonable cost penalty, if only to reduce carbon emissions and pollutants. This would rule out recycling dopants, for example, as the cost penalty would not be reasonable (several orders of magnitude for some).
Devil
User avatar
Devil
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 816
Joined: Tue 06 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Cyprus
Top

Re: New study questions sustainability of metal resources

Unread postby Ludi » Sat 21 Jan 2006, 11:29:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergySpin', '
')It seems that recycling will become the most prolific "mining" industry in the future.


Definitely! Especially if thermal depolymerization becomes viable, all that unrecyclable plastic and other material will become valuable after all.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: New study questions sustainability of metal resources

Unread postby Hegel » Sat 21 Jan 2006, 13:12:04

@Devil and EnergySpin

I think I got you confused with the term "energy-intensive". I didn't mean recycling metals from used/spent products needs more energy during its process than mining a ore-rock and processing it to high-grade ore. There's no doubt about it that mining industry is an energy-guzzling monster.

What I meant is the additional net energy consumption that arises each time a recycle process is completed on the same unit of metals. It's unlikely to generate enough thermal and electrical energy to recycle future demand of metals by "renewables" when the mining industry stops operating due to uneconomical geological conditions. That's when P.O. consequences really kick in. Then we have to rely fully on recycling metals to 100% to keep teh status-quo up or face metal ressource-lags affecting all metal depended branches of our global society ...

Concerning Cobalt catalysts. Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis needs Cobalt catalysts to de-sulphurise the coal/shale feed economical. Iron-catalysts quickly wear down under more than normal athmospheric pressure while Cobalt-catalysts can be operated with higher pressure.

With that in mind, Cobalt becomes the limiting ressource for synthesised fuel production from coal/oil/natural gas which in turn limits/hinders recycling in general due to expected fuel shortages affecting the transportation/distribution systems.

@Ludi

De-polymerising used plastic isn't economical. Overhere in Germany we have a mandatory Recycling-System for plastics. Most of these polymeric plastics collected and seperated are usually burnt to heat smelters or purification plants and refuse incineration plants. Recycle it to fuel is certainly an energy sink ...
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.

Current Doomerosity Level (Jaymax Scale): 5
User avatar
Hegel
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Sun 18 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Germany

Re: New study questions sustainability of metal resources

Unread postby EnergySpin » Sat 21 Jan 2006, 13:27:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Hegel', '@')Devil and EnergySpin

What I meant is the additional net energy consumption that arises each time a recycle process is completed on the same unit of metals. It's unlikely to generate enough thermal and electrical energy to recycle future demand of metals by "renewables" when the mining industry stops operating due to uneconomical geological conditions. That's when P.O. consequences really kick in. Then we have to rely fully on recycling metals to 100% to keep teh status-quo up or face metal ressource-lags affecting all metal depended branches of our global society ...

Sorry Hegel,
I cannot understand what you were trying to convey when you wrote the aforementioned paragraph, except that it was addressed to Devil and myself. As long as there is energy (and the nuclear potential is there for a VERY LONG TIME) we can meet the demand for metals for a very long time. Recycling should almost ALWAYS be done, because of the the energy AND the environmental benefits. Even if it is 98% efficient, use your math skills to determine when it becomes unfavourable from an energy standpoint.

A couple more facts:
The concentration of most metals is bounded from below by their concentration in water sources => utilize passive adsorption methods+bioleaching, if you have to (and use the uranium from the seawater if you have to LOL).
And there are a few concentrated sources of metal at the sea bottom (Metaliferous Oxides) which could be mined with the right mix of ROV/AOVs.
"Nuclear power has long been to the Left what embryonic-stem-cell research is to the Right--irredeemably wrong and a signifier of moral weakness."Esquire Magazine,12/05
The genetic code is commaless and so are my posts.
User avatar
EnergySpin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: New study questions sustainability of metal resources

Unread postby Hegel » Sat 21 Jan 2006, 15:25:44

@EnergySpin

As a pessimist, I can't share your optimism concerning nuclear energy. I don't expect the number of nuclear plants grow spectacularly closing the expected energy gap in a timely fashion. Instead I do expect an all-out attempt to substitute petroleum refined products, distillates, lubricants and waxes by liquifying coal/shale oil/natural gas. It's the elegantest option modern-day societies has got in store to keep up current motorized transportation with-out radically replacing it. Ok, we are going to strip-mine in mind-boggling proportions and eventually boost CO2-emissions, but we haven't got any viable alternatives with similiar positive attributes left. Therefor I expect an additional 400 Cobalt-hungry FT plants will be build from today till 2025-2030.



If there will be new scientific break-throughs in reactor technology/design, it'd surely better the energy-outlook. I'm for it.
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.

Current Doomerosity Level (Jaymax Scale): 5
User avatar
Hegel
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Sun 18 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Germany

Re: New study questions sustainability of metal resources

Unread postby Starvid » Sat 21 Jan 2006, 15:53:01

No matter what you think about recycling of metals (and I think Devil is right, he almost always is), you have to go back and look at one very basic peak oil fact.

Peak oil is not peak energy. Peak oil is peak oil.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

Hence peak oil will not have a major effect on any recycling process which do not consume relatively large amounts of oil.
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

Re: New study questions sustainability of metal resources

Unread postby waegari » Sat 21 Jan 2006, 16:06:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergySpin', '
')And there are a few concentrated sources of metal at the sea bottom (Metaliferous Oxides) which could be mined with the right mix of ROV/AOVs.


Loads and loads of things are possible - for those who can afford it, financially.
waegari
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 573
Joined: Tue 28 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Netherlands
Top

Re: New study questions sustainability of metal resources

Unread postby Hegel » Sat 21 Jan 2006, 16:11:38

@Stardavid

I do not liken Peak-Oil to Peak-Energy. I do liken Peak-Oil to Peak-of petroleum based transportation which in turn artificially limits all depended operations.
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.

Current Doomerosity Level (Jaymax Scale): 5
User avatar
Hegel
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Sun 18 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Germany

Re: New study questions sustainability of metal resources

Unread postby Hegel » Sat 21 Jan 2006, 16:15:41

@waegari

Your approach to explain metals as limiting ressources is more efficient than mine :)
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.

Current Doomerosity Level (Jaymax Scale): 5
User avatar
Hegel
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Sun 18 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Germany

Re: New study questions sustainability of metal resources

Unread postby waegari » Sat 21 Jan 2006, 16:19:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Hegel', '@')EnergySpin

As a pessimist, I can't share your optimism concerning nuclear energy. I don't expect the number of nuclear plants grow spectacularly closing the expected energy gap in a timely fashion.


Let's give ES a break and for the sake of the argument let's just suppose it would be possible to build loads and loads of fast breeders worldwide. Wouldn't governments be required to start training nuclear physicists in appalling numbers, as of now? And not just in the US, the Netherlands, Japan, Germany, Spain, UK, China, etc., but also in Botswana, Costa Rica, Myanmar etcetera etcetera etcetera?

And still, how much time would be required to have them built?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'U')nder the plan, basic research at the Monju reactor will be completed around 2015.

Design and development policies for the new reactor, to be named the Post-Monju, will then be worked out. It is to be built around 2030.

The plan also envisages construction of a new plant that will reprocess spent nuclear fuel to produce uranium-plutonium mixed oxide fuel (MOX) for use at the fast-breeder reactor.

The government plans to put the reprocessing plant into operation around 2045 when the existing reprocessing plant in the village of Rokkasho, Aomori Prefecture, is expected to have finished operations.
, from Japan Times.

Wow, that's damn fast for an underdeveloped nation like Japan; sure the US would do that in two weeks. All of this, btw, under the assumption that an almost fast breederless world does not deplete uranium before a sufficient number of them gets online....

And then of course, would countries like Iran be allowed to have some? I'm afraid not. But which countries would be safe for the possible consequences of such free access to plutonium? The IAEA would be having field day after field day. If of course there was still plenty of oil to keep the airplanes going for shoving around their inspectors.

I mean, I'm all for it, but somehow I just don't believe it can work. It's always the same problem: time and scale, NOT technology.
Last edited by waegari on Sat 21 Jan 2006, 16:32:54, edited 1 time in total.
waegari
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 573
Joined: Tue 28 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Netherlands
Top

Re: New study questions sustainability of metal resources

Unread postby waegari » Sat 21 Jan 2006, 16:24:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Hegel', '@')waegari

Your approach to explain metals as limiting ressources is more efficient than mine :)


Thanks, though I was quite impressed by yours myself:).
waegari
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 573
Joined: Tue 28 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Netherlands
Top

Re: New study questions sustainability of metal resources

Unread postby Starvid » Sat 21 Jan 2006, 16:34:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Hegel', '@')Stardavid

I do not liken Peak-Oil to Peak-Energy. I do liken Peak-Oil to Peak-of petroleum based transportation which in turn artificially limits all depended operations.

Sure, but that only matters much if a large part of the costs (both of the financial and energy variety) are incurred during the transportation of the material that should be recycled.

That might be so, but I would guess a very large part of the costs (of both kinds) happen during the act of recycling: melting metals, electrolysis et cetera and not during the transportation of those materials.
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Top

Next

Return to Energy Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron