by waegari » Sat 21 Jan 2006, 16:19:40
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Hegel', '@')EnergySpin
As a pessimist, I can't share your optimism concerning nuclear energy. I don't expect the number of nuclear plants grow spectacularly closing the expected energy gap in a timely fashion.
Let's give ES a break and for the sake of the argument let's just suppose it would be possible to build loads and loads of fast breeders worldwide. Wouldn't governments be required to start training nuclear physicists in appalling numbers, as of now? And not just in the US, the Netherlands, Japan, Germany, Spain, UK, China, etc., but also in Botswana, Costa Rica, Myanmar etcetera etcetera etcetera?
And still, how much time would be required to have them built?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'U')nder the plan, basic research at the Monju reactor will be completed around 2015.
Design and development policies for the new reactor, to be named the Post-Monju, will then be worked out. It is to be built around 2030.
The plan also envisages construction of a new plant that will reprocess spent nuclear fuel to produce uranium-plutonium mixed oxide fuel (MOX) for use at the fast-breeder reactor.
The government plans to put the reprocessing plant into operation around 2045 when the existing reprocessing plant in the village of Rokkasho, Aomori Prefecture, is expected to have finished operations.
.
Wow, that's damn fast for an underdeveloped nation like Japan; sure the US would do that in two weeks. All of this, btw, under the assumption that an almost fast breederless world does not deplete uranium before a sufficient number of them gets online....
And then of course, would countries like Iran be allowed to have some? I'm afraid not. But which countries would be safe for the possible consequences of such free access to plutonium? The IAEA would be having field day after field day. If of course there was still plenty of oil to keep the airplanes going for shoving around their inspectors.
I mean, I'm all for it, but somehow I just don't believe it can work. It's always the same problem: time and scale, NOT technology.