Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Firefly Energy Awarded Patent on New Lead-Acid Technology

Discussions of conventional and alternative energy production technologies.

Firefly Energy Awarded Patent on New Lead-Acid Technology

Unread postby Starvid » Wed 18 Jan 2006, 18:05:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')irefly Energy (earlier post) has received a US patent for a new carbon-foam lead-acid battery technology that it believes has the potential to revolutionize the existing global lead-acid battery market as well as serve applications such as hybrid electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids.

Firefly contends it can deliver lead-acid battery performance comparable to NiMH, but at about one-fifth the cost, and with greatly reduced weight compared to traditional lead-acid batteries.
http://www.greencarcongress.com/2006/01/firefly_energy_.html#more

It sounds excellent!

This is what Mesuge has been talking about, right?
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

Re: Firefly Energy Awarded Patent on New Lead-Acid Technolog

Unread postby Mesuge » Wed 18 Jan 2006, 18:53:04

Yes, they secured backing from a large garden& tools manufacturer Electrolux, many house hold name brands under their umbrella in the US market.

In addition they are planing to grab a huge portion out of the emerging world's hybrid battery market. That also means EV breakthrough if they will be ready to sell it on open market and not OEMs only which I doubt at least for the first production years..

Basically they promise close to NiMh/Li-ion performance for slightly higher lead acid pricing and no big retooling for the lead batt. industry.

Their patents went into similar direction as another battery company called Power Technology.. I've posted links to these patents in other threads..

The big and open question remains how long we have to wait for this product in the form of 6/12V @ 120-225Ah battery? If they deliver as promised the infernal engine is dead instantly the moment these puppies appear at your local market. However, there are a couple of big market ods against it so lets hope but not be too over optimistic..
DOOMerotron: at all-time high [8.3] out of 10..
User avatar
Mesuge
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1500
Joined: Tue 01 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Euro high horse bastard on the run

Re: Firefly Energy Awarded Patent on New Lead-Acid Technolog

Unread postby Tanada » Wed 18 Jan 2006, 21:10:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Mesuge', 'Y')es, they secured backing from a large garden& tools manufacturer Electrolux, many house hold name brands under their umbrella in the US market.

In addition they are planing to grab a huge portion out of the emerging world's hybrid battery market. That also means EV breakthrough if they will be ready to sell it on open market and not OEMs only which I doubt at least for the first production years..

Basically they promise close to NiMh/Li-ion performance for slightly higher lead acid pricing and no big retooling for the lead batt. industry.

Their patents went into similar direction as another battery company called Power Technology.. I've posted links to these patents in other threads..

The big and open question remains how long we have to wait for this product in the form of 6/12V @ 120-225Ah battery? If they deliver as promised the infernal engine is dead instantly the moment these puppies appear at your local market. However, there are a couple of big market ods against it so lets hope but not be too over optimistic..


I wish they had given an estimated time to market, if these are Caterpiller exclusive tech for a while it will have a delayed impact on the total market.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA

Re: Firefly Energy Awarded Patent on New Lead-Acid Technolog

Unread postby Mesuge » Thu 19 Jan 2006, 07:02:55

If I recall it correctly they planned in 2004 to launch pilot production for Electrolux lawnmovers and powertools in 2-3years that means sometime next year, 2007..

Again, big questionmark if there will be enough of them to leak into grey or official aftermarket. Also it's quite likely they will set up a specialized branch for high performance hybrid/EV batteries in cooperation with some big brand like Toyota, Honda etc. So this renders availability of this technology for Joe/Helmut/Lee Sixpack in the first production years a bit unrealistic..
DOOMerotron: at all-time high [8.3] out of 10..
User avatar
Mesuge
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1500
Joined: Tue 01 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Euro high horse bastard on the run

Re: Firefly Energy Awarded Patent on New Lead-Acid Technolog

Unread postby Starvid » Thu 19 Jan 2006, 11:36:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Mesuge', 't')he infernal engine

:-D I love that word! Especially when you say infernal combustion engine, it makes it sound even more Hellish. A malicious engine of some sort (siege engine?) that deliver infernal combustion. :twisted:

Sadly, it doesn't translate well to Swedish.
Last edited by Starvid on Thu 19 Jan 2006, 14:12:18, edited 1 time in total.
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

Re: Firefly Energy Awarded Patent on New Lead-Acid Technolog

Unread postby gnm » Thu 19 Jan 2006, 12:35:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Mesuge', '
')The big and open question remains how long we have to wait for this product in the form of 6/12V @ 120-225Ah battery? If they deliver as promised the infernal engine is dead instantly the moment these puppies appear at your local market. However, there are a couple of big market ods against it so lets hope but not be too over optimistic..


Well I guess the internal combustion engine is dead then because you can buy 12V/212Ah already...
Concorde PVX-2120L

-G
gnm
 
Top

Re: Firefly Energy Awarded Patent on New Lead-Acid Technolog

Unread postby Mesuge » Thu 19 Jan 2006, 13:55:58

gnm> ??? Could you elaborate more on your idea?

This is just ordinary heavy lead acid AGM battery rated at 450 deep cycles at maximum.. Perhaps a bit more on the quality side of the production spectra that's all..

FireFly or PWTC are next gen lead acid battery with only 1/3 of the weight, double the cycle life etc..
DOOMerotron: at all-time high [8.3] out of 10..
User avatar
Mesuge
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1500
Joined: Tue 01 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Euro high horse bastard on the run

Re: Firefly Energy Awarded Patent on New Lead-Acid Technolog

Unread postby gnm » Thu 19 Jan 2006, 14:11:03

I guess the point I was making is that its not likely that the ICE is going anywhere soon, nifty keen new batteries or not. Large capacity Li batteries exist already which have better specifications than these proposed new batteries. They are not being used for electric vehicles because of cost. Even with double the life and 1/3 the weight the cost alone would be the reason ICE engines would continue to be used.

-G
gnm
 

Re: Firefly Energy Awarded Patent on New Lead-Acid Technolog

Unread postby Mesuge » Thu 19 Jan 2006, 15:22:49

Gnm> I don't want to sound rude. But pls. read up something on EVs first before you post further - the available material is plentifull at this very forum but you apparently skiped that part..

Yes you can get lightweight and powerfull Li-ions for say $6-15K from China (triple the price for EU/US technology) per pack and this is only ment for some small/midisize vehicle. Firefly claims to provide the same storage for the price slightly above current lead acids = 4-5x cheaper!
DOOMerotron: at all-time high [8.3] out of 10..
User avatar
Mesuge
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1500
Joined: Tue 01 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Euro high horse bastard on the run

Re: Firefly Energy Awarded Patent on New Lead-Acid Technolog

Unread postby gnm » Thu 19 Jan 2006, 16:38:25

I have read up on EV's. So you are implying that these will be 4-5x cheaper than a 6-15K pak. That comes out at what 1.5-3k or so? And you are saying that this is still more than a conventional lead acid pak. I seriously doubt your numbers are correct there since I just bought 2 concorde 2120L AGM's at a delivered cost to me of about $750.00 US. Those two wouldn't even come close to running an EV any reasonable distance. I estimate my cost for a moderate EV pak using these conventional lead acids would be something closer to $4000 US. So if these are going to cost slightly more than that I say they aren't going to fly.

-G
gnm
 

Re: Firefly Energy Awarded Patent on New Lead-Acid Technolog

Unread postby Mesuge » Thu 19 Jan 2006, 17:58:57

OK I though this has been obvious for all but since you asked for it lets crunch some basic numbers.. Imagine some middle sized EV:

120V system voltage, 6Vx200Ah AGM/GEL lead acid batteries
=> 120x200Ah = 24kWh x .57 (C1hour coef. for lead acid) = 13,68 kWh of usable power in your "tank"

price: 20xAGM/GELs = 20 x $160 = $3200
range: consumption 200Wh/mile at 50mph => 13,68 kWh/200Wh= 68miles
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Li-ions the cheapest (tested in EVs) on the market are $2.5Ah TS from China, get ready to plunk down 2-4x more for similar stuff from US/EU company..

For similar 120V system you will need pack of 3.7V@150Ah cells (150Ah Li-ion cells allow for roughly the same discharge -slightly more- as 200Ah lead acid) - the other option is to use 100Ah cells which is too small for traction or 200Ah which is too costly..*

price: 33x150x2.5 = $12 375
*range: consumption 170Wh/mile (less because of batt weight reduction) at 50mph => 18 kWh/170Wh= 106miles

plus longer cycle life cca 100.000miles (2-3x more in comparison to lead acid)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So IF Firefly delivers the energy density close to Li-ions for slightly higher price than original cheap AGM/GEL lead-acid you get the picture. Suddenly 200miles range for only $8K is at our disposal..
DOOMerotron: at all-time high [8.3] out of 10..
User avatar
Mesuge
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1500
Joined: Tue 01 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Euro high horse bastard on the run

Re: Firefly Energy Awarded Patent on New Lead-Acid Technolog

Unread postby The_Toecutter » Thu 19 Jan 2006, 22:23:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he big and open question remains how long we have to wait for this product in the form of 6/12V @ 120-225Ah battery?


I'm waiting for an actual product and not company statements.

What I want to know is, when will I be able to buy some of these bastards to put in my Triumph, and how much power per unit weight do they put out?

300-400 miles range per charge sounds very nice for lead acid, when current lead acid would only give that car about 80-100 miles range.

If they don't provide at least 150 peak horsepower for an 800 pound pack of them though, I would rather stick with batteries like the Exide Orbital or Optima D750. My current plans are either a 1,125 pound pack of Optima D750s, or a 1,148 pound pack of Exide Orbitals.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') guess the point I was making is that its not likely that the ICE is going anywhere soon, nifty keen new batteries or not. Large capacity Li batteries exist already which have better specifications than these proposed new batteries. They are not being used for electric vehicles because of cost. Even with double the life and 1/3 the weight the cost alone would be the reason ICE engines would continue to be used.


Cost is not an issue with production for automotive volume and large numbers of electric cars produced.

Even today's lithium ion batteries would dip to < $250/kWh according to AC Propulsion if EVs using them were mass produced.

For a 30 kWh pack, that's $7,500. An aerodynamic Honda Civic sedan sized car that consumes 150 wh/mile would have a 200 mile range from this pack, and this pack would likely last in excess of 100,000 miles, if not double that. 400 cycle life to 100% discharge, and they last longer with the shallower discharges that would be more typical of american driving patterns. Most people don't drive more than 40 miles per day...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') seriously doubt your numbers are correct there since I just bought 2 concorde 2120L AGM's at a delivered cost to me of about $750.00 US. Those two wouldn't even come close to running an EV any reasonable distance. I estimate my cost for a moderate EV pak using these conventional lead acids would be something closer to $4000 US.


These are expensive batteries.

More typical of lead acid batteries for EV use are Trojan T105 flooded lead acid batteries(6V, 225AH, $60, 61 pounds weight), Exide Orbital AGM batteries(12V, 55AH, $96, 41 pounds), Optima D750 Yellowtop AGM batteries(12V, 65 AH, $100 from manufacturer, otherwise $145 retail, 45 pounds), among others.

An electric pickup truck might consume 300 wh/mile and use a 120V pack of Trojan T105 batteries. Counting in Peukert's effect, it might have about 15 kWh of usable capacity, or 50 miles range. This would be a $1,200 battery pack, and hobbyists typically get 20,000 miles or 5 years from such a pack, whichever comes first. They are considered 'dead' when they no longer deliver 80% of rated capacity. Many people choose to use them after that as well, with reduced range.



The battery pack I'm planning for my car, either 28 Exide Orbitals or 25 Optima D750s, would be $2,500 for the 25 Optimas. With proper battery management and testing from the company to verify the batteries are up to spec, it is theoretically possible for life to exceed 60,000-80,000 miles.

Commuter cars quotes the cycle life for the Optima D750 as follows:

%discharge/Cycle Life

10%/4600
20%/4250
30%/3400
40%/2100
50%/1200
60%/600
70%/400
80%/250
100%/200

My commute, round trip, plus miscallaneous stops is about 40 miles worst case. Out of 100 miles range, that's 2,100 cycle life, or over 80,000 miles. That works out to a meagre $.0313/mile battery cost with 80,000 mile pack life...

But, I don't expect my pack to last that long. It is possible in theory, but I'm not counting on it. So lets say 40,000 miles. That is $.0625/mile for batteries.

Electricity where I live is $.10/kWh, and this car is simulated to achieve about 150 wh/mile at 65 mph(assuming I do body modifications to lower coefficient of drag to .26 or so, although if I play with various scenarios, results vary from 130 wh/mile to 180 wh/mile). The charger I will use is 92% efficient, batteries 80% efficient. Electricity cost would be thus $.020/mile.

Brakes and tires and windshield wipers work out to about $.005/mile.

So $.0875/mile?

With gas at $2.20/gallon, and a typical maintenance cost for an IC car about $.04/mile, any gasoline powered car that gets under 46 miles per gallon would be more expensive to operate than this Triumph I intend to build, assuming the gas car has that $.04/mile maintenance cost.

And unlike a typical car, this Triumph will be able to hit 140 mph and do 0-60 mph in 5.5 to 6 seconds from simulation, which is basically performance like a Porsche Boxter or Audi TT. Try finding a production car available in the U.S. that goes from 0-60 mph in that time and gets 46 miles per gallon...

Looks like the economics work out very well. Porsche performance for less than Geo Metro money. People who think EVs aren't economically viable haven't crunched the numbers or shopped around.


Advanced lithium and nickel batteries are even cheaper to use per mile than the AGMs I plan due to much longer life.



As for these Firefly batteries, I'd pay $8k for a pack of them, but only if they offered decent power and were garunteed to last at least 100,000 miles...
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Firefly Energy Awarded Patent on New Lead-Acid Technolog

Unread postby Mesuge » Thu 02 Feb 2006, 06:56:38

There are some new press releases at FireFly's website. Now, they claim to launch their products in Electrolux appliances by 3/4 2007.. No word about direct sales though..

There is also an article/interview at evworld.com but I don't have the access..
http://www.evworld.com/view.cfm?section ... toryid=960


Toe> For planning your battery pack you can use this theoretical model/formula. I think it's quite accurate. Although pretty sobering range-wise even for the best agm/gel lead-acid if you allow for the 50% DOD requirement and less efficient low volt DC system and C1hour discharge rating of your battery..

No wonder, that a lot of people were destroying their batteries
with unadequate C20 100-120Ah (equals to tiny 68Ah@C1) lead and without proper BMS prematurely. That should be forbiden to install in low voltage EVs unless you drive very slowly and just a few miles a day..

http://www.cameronsoftware.com/ev/EV_Ba ... ysics.html
DOOMerotron: at all-time high [8.3] out of 10..
User avatar
Mesuge
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1500
Joined: Tue 01 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Euro high horse bastard on the run


Return to Energy Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests