by sch_peakoiler » Thu 19 Jan 2006, 15:26:35
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MichaelRyan23', 'C')an anyone tell me why these articles, suggesting peak oil is a myth, are not correct?
http://www.prisonplanet.com/archives/peak_oil/index.htmhttp://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/_wsj-oil_oil.htm
I can help you find places in those articles which are 100% percent lie (not true).
Take the prisonplanet.
ok, this is 80% - 90%lie:
"Peak oil is a theory advanced by the elite, by the oil industry"
Hey man, till 2004 every single oil company was hunting peakoilers and screaming like wild "scam!, witch!, Inquisition on them!, pagans! heresy! communists! and so on". PO theory was always advanced on websites and forums like this one here, by people who just want to know the truth, and are not connected to the oil industry. Not until 2005 did we hear something PO-like from oil industry (chevron with willyoujoinus.com). 2005 was i believe the first year where PO really came to media. True, PO experts like Campbell, Hubbert, are FROM the Oil industry. But the industry was always against them on that issue. Check what the Saudis said about their oil in 2005 - "The world will run out of uses for oil before we run out of it!!!".
This is the first lie a so in that article.
Second one: This is 110% LIE. Actually I think in US you can sue for this.
"There is a clear contradiction between the peak oil theory and the continual increase in oil reserves and production. "
CONTRADICTION my eye!!!! Peakoil theory actually goes with that increase, not against it. PO theory states : "Production increases till some timepoint, called PO, after which it begins to fall and never breaks that tendency again". So there is no contradiction - production will grow, till PO! and then it will fall. We did not have (hopefully) PO yet, thats why production growth goes along PO now.
see, its a 100 % lie, actually this discredits the whole article!
Sorry, dont have time to write more, if you really need arguments against those articles, to use them in a discussion, I can help you break that article into smallest pieces, it is actually a load of crap.
But if you dont need that that bad, I will prefer not to lose my time on that. Partly because things happening in the world now lead me to believe that we already had PO - in 2005. We will get at least one energy war and several energy crisises this year, and there would not be any néed to prove those articles wrong. People will see that at the pump.
Let me know if you need more arguments, though.