by ubercynicmeister » Sat 07 Jan 2006, 20:37:12
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MR_SHERRILL', 'I') am shocked... Are you guys saying what I think you are saying on this site. The world is about to blow up around us????
UH, Mr Sherril...Um, no-one's saying the "world's gonna blow up"...in fact, "the world's gonna shut down" might be closer to the message here.
Firstly: this is Peak Oil. It need not become
Peak Energy, but, unfortunately, the run to convert to some "other" type of energy source (as yet undiscovered, perhaps) has been left too, too late. For example, the time to do that research on Nuclear fusion was in the 1970's. Only now are they re-starting an effort that was left languish for 30 years. I've said it before, I'll say it again: I cannot pick which technology had the
least research done on it in modern times: Nuclear Fusion or Steam Locomotives.
Secondly: Assuming that Peak Oil does become Peak Energy (the likely outcome, right now - but let's give some latitude, here - we
might possibly juuuust avoid it) then the modern world probably won't be destroyed by the wars that are fondly imagined. No Terminator "Judgement Day" style of apocalypse, if you follow me. More like the old saying "Humanity will end with a whimper, not a bang".
Thirdly: as Matt Savinar said (Love your book, Matt!) the problem is not so much lack-of-ideas, the problem is lack of time to implement those ideas. And instead of getting together, realising that we're all in the same oil-fuelled boat and that it's headed towards Niagara Falls just as the fuel begins to look like it's not gunna last the distance, we are spending our time idling it away, or going off to wars we neither needed nor were based on truth, or introducing yet more energy-consuming technology, or ignoring the problem, or being distracted by stories from the clueless media about Jennifer Lopez and her latest body piercings (or how Angelina Jolie is supposed to be having sex with her brother -
betcha THAT remarks gets more attention & comments than anything else I've ever written).
Therein lies the crux of the problem. We can't solve what we ignore. At some point (let's calls it Peak Oil) there comes a time when one simply has no lead-up time to effectively put in the effort to fix the problem. Or even effect a partial solution.
This can be expressed by the following example: a young apprectice lawyer (I'm picking on you, Matt) has some very rich parents and like most rich kids is a complete brat, prefering to spend every minute of the day sleeping and every minute of the night either partying, doing drugs or having sex. Sometimes all three at once. She (let's not be sexist here - females can be lawyers, too!) is getting $20,000 per month from her rich parents as an allowance.
Then comes the day of the Final Exams. A few hours before, the young brat awakes and realises she's done NO study, whatsoever...and there's no time left to study. And her parents are getting angrier and angrier with her, and it looks like they could "cut her off" or at least drop her allowance to only $10,000 per month. Because of all of her drug-taking, she's racked up lotsa debt and needs at least $20,000 per month to pay it all off. And these drug-lords are the Russian Mafia, and they'll shoot first and ask questions later.
So what happens?
We're all now in the same boat (pardon the pun) as that apprentice lawyer - we're facing a hurdle we've (collectively) made no effort to learn about it, no effort to "size up", no preparation to surmount and undertaken no training to attempt to do so.
Under such a circumstance, I'm predicting that the apprentice lawyer will fail her final exams. I'm predicting that humanity will also fail it's "energy exam". Not because we "can't" do it, but because we've frittered away every opportunity that we've been handed.
Solutions to Peak Oil exist. The time to implement them may NOT exist. Therein lies the entire cause of the dilemma at these boards: do we have enough time?
It is, In My Humble Opinion, just as "legitimate" to say 'yes, we have the time' as it is to say 'no, we do not.' Unfortunately, there's only one way to find out, and it's likely to be rather nasty in it's consequences if we get things wrong.