Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Still proud to be an American?

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Re: Still proud to be an American?

Unread postby Daryl » Tue 20 Dec 2005, 15:10:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nocar', ' ')What if USA had not entered WWI? Perhaps that peace treaty had been less painful for the Germans? nocar


As long as you're going to blame the US for the terms of Versailles Treaty, why not throw in the Bubonic Plague and the Great Fire of London? You can never satisfy whiners, so why try?
User avatar
Daryl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 927
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Still proud to be an American?

Unread postby Ludi » Tue 20 Dec 2005, 16:35:51

I've never been "proud to be an American," an idea I find strange - proud to happen to be born in a particular country? I feel lucky to be an American and get to enjoy all this prosperity (fleeting as it may be), though there are countries which are "better" in some ways, I feel no urge to move there.
Ludi
 

Re: Still proud to be an American?

Unread postby FatherOfTwo » Tue 20 Dec 2005, 18:42:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Daryl', 'T')his what I have to say to ungrateful Europeans, Canadians and Australians. We have been paying for your security since WW1 with our money and lives. If it wasn't for the US, you would all be living under a Hitler, Stalin, Tojo, Mao Saddam or God know what other evil force might have emerged. The world is a dangerous place. We have created a stable environment that allows you to whine about our imperfections. Be careful what you ask for, you might just get it.


Daryl, I’ve agreed with you on a lot of other posts, so don’t take this personally, because based on your above post it’s pretty clear you are “charged” on this issue. So, consider what follows to be a spirited debate, ok?

A) The US was but one of the ALLIES in World War I & II. Contrary to American pop culture’s portrayal of events, it was not the Lone Ranger riding in to save everyone else’s ass. It was an important player in a team effort. The Soviets, the English, the Canadians, the US, everybody was important in defeating the Nazi’s.
B) The US’ cold war with the Soviet Union was a tremendously dangerous time and each aggressive action by the Soviets was met with equally aggressive actions from the Americans. Conversely, the US placement of nuclear missiles in Turkey, capable of reaching the Soviet Union in no time, was a clear aggression that the Soviets matched by trying to place nukes in Cuba. Both were at fault for attempting to be bigger and stronger than the other and the resultant arms race is a legacy that will continue to stay with us for a long, long time.
C) It’s disingenuous to assume that “your side” is always the good side. Every time I hear an American soldier in Iraq talking about fighting the “bad guys” I cringe and hope like hell it’s a euphemism for supporting your troops but know that it damn well isn’t. They believe it because it’s the propaganda that’s been force fed to them. It’s always assumed that the US is right, and everyone else is wrong. Don’t you see this as slightly dangerous? Don’t you think the Iraq war has further destabilized the world and placed the US in further jeopardy? Before the war Cheney and Bush were stating how dangerous a terrorist threat Iraq was to the US. Bullocks. Now they are saying that if the US leaves it’ll turn into a hornets nest. Oi vey, what idiots.
D) I would argue that the US is the most destabilizing force on the planet. It has, especially lately under the Bush administration, created many more enemies than friends. It’s unrepentant and unflinching efforts to exert as much control in the oil rich Middle East impacts everyone on the planet and can only be characterized as the actions of an oppressive empire desperate to stay as king of the hill. I mean, think about it. Aside from being religious nut cases with no regard for human life, Osama and their ilk have a legitimate beef with the US. How would you feel if the roles were reversed?
User avatar
FatherOfTwo
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 960
Joined: Thu 11 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Heart of Canada's Oil Country

Re: Still proud to be an American?

Unread postby Madpaddy » Tue 20 Dec 2005, 19:58:13

FatherOfTwo,

That was a tremendous post. To add to your point A.)

The US donated billions of dollars worth of weapons and equipment to the UK through the lend/lease programme. When it seemed likely that the loan would never be repaid because Germany looked like winning the war the US rowed in behind Britain to protect its investment so to speak.

76% of the German army was fighting on the Eastern Front so with the benefit of hindsight it seems that Russia would eventually have won the war on their own. Notwithstanding that, if Britain had surrendered or pulled out of the war in 1940 allowing Germany to invade Russia early in 1941, Germany would almost certainly have taken Moscow. That may or may not have led to a Russian surrender - taking Moscow certainly didn't help Napoleon in 1812.
User avatar
Madpaddy
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2043
Joined: Fri 25 Jun 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Still proud to be an American?

Unread postby Pops » Tue 20 Dec 2005, 20:51:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nero', 'A')fter all the news of renditions, secret jails and torture do you find your patriotism has slipped a little. Has it made you embarrassed to be American?


Mine has not slipped, I’m still proud.

The things you mention are passing, like the last big controversy, wasn’t it about sex?
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Still proud to be an American?

Unread postby Daryl » Tue 20 Dec 2005, 23:36:13

Heck yeah, I'll debate this a bit. Don't have all the answers, but I'll throw a couple of ideas out there.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FatherOfTwo', ' ')
A) The US was but one of the ALLIES in World War I & II. Contrary to American pop culture’s portrayal of events, it was not the Lone Ranger riding in to save everyone else’s ass. It was an important player in a team effort. The Soviets, the English, the Canadians, the US, everybody was important in defeating the Nazi’s


I majored in German and lived in Germany for several years. I talked to Germans who were infantrymen on the Eastern front against the Americans. While they had no respect for the fighting ability of the American soldier, they feel they were defeated in a "Material Schlact", a material slaughter. Everytime they blew up one tank, five more came up behind it. That's what beat Germany, an inexhaustible supply of manpower and equipment from the US.

My father was a career Air Force pilot and fought in WW2. He told me the best military force on the face of the Earth belongs to the British, which is really saying something, because he disliked working with other British officers in NATO. I would never want to take anything away from the British effort in WW2, but let's face it, they were exhausted, as were the Russians. Ask any German what would have happened if the US hadn't entered. The Canadians? Please, I don't want to dishonor the Canadian war dead, but really, be serious.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FatherOfTwo', ' ')
B) The US’ cold war with the Soviet Union was a tremendously dangerous time and each aggressive action by the Soviets was met with equally aggressive actions from the Americans. Conversely, the US placement of nuclear missiles in Turkey, capable of reaching the Soviet Union in no time, was a clear aggression that the Soviets matched by trying to place nukes in Cuba. Both were at fault for attempting to be bigger and stronger than the other and the resultant arms race is a legacy that will continue to stay with us for a long, long time.


Huh? Can Soviet Communism be any more discredited than it is today? Ask the Eastern Europeans what they think about life under Soviet domination. You can't equate America with the Soviets. Ask the Tibetians about the Chinese. This isn't propaganda, it's just fact.

Anyway, I have to turn in. Hopefully, I get a chance to continue tomorrow.
User avatar
Daryl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 927
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Still proud to be an American?

Unread postby arocoun » Wed 21 Dec 2005, 00:56:19

I never, ever understood patriotism. I never understood how someone could love their country above others just because they happen to live there. I never understood why some people keep fighting and dieing for their country, instead of justice and freedom themselves, or whatever. I never understood why patriotism is considered to be such a great virtue in itself, and why people are judged by how "patriotic" or "unpatriotic" they are. I never understood how people could treat their country like some kind of god to be worshipped and fought for, or why people are expected to be patriotic or be outcast. I never understood flag-waving, song-singing, or any of those other wierd rituals. I never understood the phrase, "I'm proud to be a [member of X country]." And what the hell does it mean when you say "I love my country?", when the earth hasn't devided itself into little fenced areas--that is what rulers, war, bloodshed, ethnocentrism, and self-proclaimed superiority have done.

I'm neither proud nor ashamed to be an American--I'm completely unfamiliar with such feelings.

-----

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'I')'ve never been "proud to be an American," an idea I find strange - proud to happen to be born in a particular country? I feel lucky to be an American and get to enjoy all this prosperity (fleeting as it may be), though there are countries which are "better" in some ways, I feel no urge to move there.


Agreed, mostly. I feel lucky to be an American, but I sure ain't "proud" of it.

I like the freedoms and stuff that America gives me; but, America still has a lot to answer for the way it treats non-Americans, and I'm no patriot. America's motto since it's very beginning: "Freedom for US, but to hell with THEM." THEM meaning Native Americans, slaves, Mexicans, small countries, and third world countries.
The Origin of Patriotic Philosophy
--We are Greek.
--The barbarians are not Greek.
--Therefore, we must conquer, exploit, and kill the barbarians.
User avatar
arocoun
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 212
Joined: Fri 15 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Illinois, USA
Top

Re: Still proud to be an American?

Unread postby EnergySpin » Wed 21 Dec 2005, 05:45:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Madpaddy', '
')
Thank god I live in a country where we are self sufficient in Guinness and Whiskey

You can say that again .. I was amazed by the sheer number of breweries in Cork when I visited it in 2003 :)
"Nuclear power has long been to the Left what embryonic-stem-cell research is to the Right--irredeemably wrong and a signifier of moral weakness."Esquire Magazine,12/05
The genetic code is commaless and so are my posts.
User avatar
EnergySpin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Still proud to be an American?

Unread postby Daryl » Wed 21 Dec 2005, 06:01:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FatherOfTwo', 'I') would argue that the US is the most destabilizing force on the planet.


I understand your comments. They are part of the the standard Democratic political talking points on Iraq these days. Of course, Democrats could have stopped the war, but they voted for it instead. They weren't "mislead". Nobody important seriously believed Saddam was an immediate threat in '03. UN didn't, right? Our Congress is just naive? As much as they are trying to make some political hay out of Iraq, Democrats supported the war, rightfully so and here's why:

It's very simple really. Let's say the US doesn't invade Iraq. Look 10 years out starting in '03. Sanctions fall completely apart in 2005. Oil is over $50 a barrel on its way to $100 in 200whatever. Guess who's rich again? Saddam, that's who. Doling out big dollars and contracts to his French, Russian and Chinese friends, by the way. Forget about WMD for a moment, let's assume he is unable to acquire or build anything like that between 2003 and 2013. He surely reconstitutes his army as an effective offensive infantry machine. Takes over all the Persian Gulf monarchies to the South, including SA. US does nothing, because they don't want to kill anyone or offend anybody or destablize the region. They want people to like them instead. Saddam is the new Saladin, true leader and uniter of the Arab and Muslim world. Before he moves on to the next steop of his plan - destroying the Persians, he turns to expel the Jew from his new empire. US does nothing because the UN doesn't want to hurt anybody and France is against the idea. Backed in a corner, Israel nukes the whole place. How screwed is everybody?

Here's another scenario for you. Say Saddam turns into a nice guy. The French talk to him and he sits down with a guitar and sing Kum-Ba-Yah with everybody. Woops, there is a Wahhabist led coup in Saudi. The entire Saudi royal family is beheaded in a public ceremony. The Kuwaitis, Omanis and the others flee. An Osama Bin Laden figure assumes control of the Gulf oil fields. Same scenario with Israel plays out.

Get the picture? This is not a stable region. Hasn't been since the Ottoman Empire went into decline in the 19th Century. Central Africa is not a stable region either, but they don't sit on most of the world's oil supply and there is no Israel problem. I agree with Kunstler. The Iraq invasion's overarching purpose was to move heavy armor and supply chain into the region to protect the oil supplies from whatever interested parties might show up one day. An added benefit was disbanding and destroying the only effective military force in the region, the Iraqi Army and removing a known powermad psychotic from power.

The point is that the US is trying to stabilize the region, not destablize it. Are they succeeding? Can they succeed? Too soon to pass judgement. In the past, superpowers have stablized large regions ie Pax Romana. Look what happened in the 90's in the Balkans when the Soviets pulled out. I question the ability of the US to perform this function because it is a democracy and it has relatively high moral standards. This is a job best done by Hitlers and Ceasars. Abu Gharib is a joke compared to what empires of the past have done to oppress and control their provinces. Having studied the Romans quite a bit in college, I know I as an American don't have the stomach to do what probably needs to be done to control a place like Iraq. Saddam did. The US is conducting a grand historical experiment, can a superpower stablize a province without committing mass murder and genocide?
User avatar
Daryl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 927
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Still proud to be an American?

Unread postby untothislast » Wed 21 Dec 2005, 08:25:40

I still think it possible to have great pride in your country (overall) while retaining the right to be disgusted, whenever a particularly nasty administration comes along to drag it into disrepute. Uncritical patriotism though, is never a welcome development if - underpinning it - is a reluctance to acknowledge those injustices and evil acts undertaken in our name.

Few nations have strutted the world stage, without getting up to some sort of reprehensible criminal activity - and for those with pretensions to 'empire', it's all part of the gameplan. Both the US and UK, for example, have populations dosed up on the propaganda that they're the world's 'square dealers' - fighting for truth and justice for all, when the stark reality is always more pragmatic and squalid. Look at the present UK government for example; apart from currently participating in an illegal, imperialist, and racist occupation, it came to power promising an ethical approach to armaments sales (one of our biggest export earners), yet currently sells its wares in some of the most unstable parts of the world, with scant regard for the consequences.

Growing up as I did during the 1960's, the culture was permeated with endless war movies depicting the Brits as the 'good guys'. Other nations fought dirty wars of course, but we always played with full respect for the rules. And yet recently, thanks to Freedom of Information rulings, we're now learning that the British military ran torture chambers (during and after WW2) that would have put the Gestapo to shame.
User avatar
untothislast
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 686
Joined: Sat 22 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: European Capital of Kulcha 2008

Re: Still proud to be an American?

Unread postby Daryl » Wed 21 Dec 2005, 08:39:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('untothislast', 'I') still think it possible to have great pride in your country (overall) while retaining the right to be disgusted, whenever a particularly nasty administration comes along to drag it into disrepute. Uncritical patriotism though, is never a welcome development if - underpinning it - is a reluctance to acknowledge those injustices and evil acts undertaken in our name.

Few nations have strutted the world stage, without getting up to some sort of reprehensible criminal activity - and for those with pretensions to 'empire', it's all part of the gameplan. Both the US and UK, for example, have populations dosed up on the propaganda that they're the world's 'square dealers' - fighting for truth and justice for all, when the stark reality is always more pragmatic and squalid. Look at the present UK government for example; apart from currently participating in an illegal, imperialist, and racist occupation, it came to power promising an ethical approach to armaments sales (one of our biggest export earners), yet currently sells its wares in some of the most unstable parts of the world, with scant regard for the consequences.

Growing up as I did during the 1960's, the culture was permeated with endless war movies depicting the Brits as the 'good guys'. Other nations fought dirty wars of course, but we always played with full respect for the rules. And yet recently, thanks to Freedom of Information rulings, we're now learning that the British military ran torture chambers (during and after WW2) that would have put the Gestapo to shame.


Gee, you finally grew up, congratualtions.
User avatar
Daryl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 927
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Still proud to be an American?

Unread postby LadyRuby » Wed 21 Dec 2005, 10:09:22

I also feel lucky to have been born in America (not that it's the best place on earth to live, by any stretch, but it's better than many). But I don't think God should bless my country more than others and I don't think I should blindly pledge allegiance to my country since my country is sometimes in the wrong.

I like being an American and some of the values I most treasure, freedom of speech and separation of church and state, are some of the values being threatened by this current administration. I also remember that once America was a role model to much of the world, admired for doing the right thing. Not so today.

I think we may be in the midst of a sea change, however, when America will start to live up to its own ideals. Perhaps the stink of corruption and government run amok, from the present administration, will be the turning point. We can do so much better.
User avatar
LadyRuby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1177
Joined: Mon 13 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Western US

Re: Still proud to be an American?

Unread postby Daryl » Wed 21 Dec 2005, 10:09:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Madpaddy', 'F')atherOfTwo,

That was a tremendous post. To add to your point A.)

The US donated billions of dollars worth of weapons and equipment to the UK through the lend/lease programme. When it seemed likely that the loan would never be repaid because Germany looked like winning the war the US rowed in behind Britain to protect its investment so to speak.

76% of the German army was fighting on the Eastern Front so with the benefit of hindsight it seems that Russia would eventually have won the war on their own. Notwithstanding that, if Britain had surrendered or pulled out of the war in 1940 allowing Germany to invade Russia early in 1941, Germany would almost certainly have taken Moscow. That may or may not have led to a Russian surrender - taking Moscow certainly didn't help Napoleon in 1812.


Listen, the British and Russian effort and sacrifice in WW2 was nothing short of heroic. I know also that some conventional historical wisdom holds that Hitler defeated himself by opening up a two front war. Think about the consequences though of Britain, Russia and Germany reaching a truce. The Nazis were the only ones with missile technology i.e. V1 and V2 rockets. How far were they from getting the bomb? What if Hitler had ended up in 1950 as the only power with a nuclear armed ICBM? Tell me how evil the US is again?

OK, we dropped two of them on Japan, probably wasn't necessary. Ask my father what he thought, though. He was flying B-17's over Germany for 12 months (majority never came back). On VJ day, one week after Hiroshima and Nagasaki, he was sitting in a bar in New Orleans, on his way to California to fight in the Pacific. He was pretty happy about VJ day. What did the US do with Germany and Japan. Built them back up into democratic economic powerhouses, that's what. Sure it was in the US interest, but can you ever imagine Hitler or Saddam Hussein doing that? No way.
User avatar
Daryl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 927
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Still proud to be an American?

Unread postby Daryl » Wed 21 Dec 2005, 10:19:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('LadyRuby', 'I') also feel lucky to have been born in America (not that it's the best place on earth to live, by any stretch, but it's better than many). But I don't think God should bless my country more than others and I don't think I should blindly pledge allegiance to my country since my country is sometimes in the wrong.

I like being an American and some of the values I most treasure, freedom of speech and separation of church and state, are some of the values being threatened by this current administration. I also remember that once America was a role model to much of the world, admired for doing the right thing. Not so today.

I think we may be in the midst of a sea change, however, when America will start to live up to its own ideals. Perhaps the stink of corruption and government run amok, from the present administration, will be the turning point. We can do so much better.


Don't forget, when did the world "admire" America so much? During the Cold War and only then. Why? We were the only thing stopping them from getting stomped on by the Soviet jackboot. You think that's propaganda? Let me tell you a story. In 1979 I worked in a factory in Germany for 6 months. One day a new guy showed up at work and the guys were calling him "the Russian". I ended up working a shift with him and asked him if he was Russian. He said no, he is an Austrian. He told me that in 1945 he was a teenager in a village in eastern Austria. The Russians pulled in after a German military retreat. They rounded up all the men between the ages of 15 and 50 and put them on a train. They ended up at a slave labor camp in Siberia. Starting in 1950, this guy was allowed to apply for an exit visa once a year, in Moscow, in person. So every year he traveled all the way to Moscow and applied for an exit visa, which was denied every year. Finally in 1978, the German govenment bought his release and got him a job in West Germany. NIce , huh?

The world is full of dangerous people. If you think you don't have to protect yourself, you're nuts. Sometimes talking and being nice doesn't work, in fact sometimes it is detrimental to the situation. Just because America doesn't always do nice things, doesn't mean they equate to the Soviet Union and Saddam Hussein.
User avatar
Daryl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 927
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Still proud to be an American?

Unread postby Madpaddy » Wed 21 Dec 2005, 11:25:37

Daryl,

I don't think the US is evil, far from it. More often than not they have been a force for good for the last 100 years. however, what annoys me is the believe held by many Americans that they are the bee all and end all and can do no wrong. In fairness that sort of American is conspiciously absent from this board.

Point taken about the cold war. In fact by the time of D-Day when German final defeat was inevitable, the US and Britain were in a rush to get a foothold on the continent before the Russians ended up holding Europe from Poland to the Pyrenees. Ike is certainly owed a debt of gratitude from all Europeans including us in Ireland. Funny how the French whose bacon he saved will never acknowledge it though !!!
User avatar
Madpaddy
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2043
Joined: Fri 25 Jun 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Still proud to be an American?

Unread postby Daryl » Wed 21 Dec 2005, 11:49:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Madpaddy', 'D')aryl,

I don't think the US is evil, far from it. More often than not they have been a force for good for the last 100 years. however, what annoys me is the believe held by many Americans that they are the bee all and end all and can do no wrong. In fairness that sort of American is conspiciously absent from this board.

Point taken about the cold war. In fact by the time of D-Day when German final defeat was inevitable, the US and Britain were in a rush to get a foothold on the continent before the Russians ended up holding Europe from Poland to the Pyrenees. Ike is certainly owed a debt of gratitude from all Europeans including us in Ireland. Funny how the French whose bacon he saved will never acknowledge it though !!!


I'm not sure the French never acknowledged it. I don't know much about DeGaulle. He wasn't so bad in that sense, was he?

About Nazi Germany's last days, the really fascinating thing was the competition between the Russians and the Allies to get hold of the German missile technology. With the nuke technology in the hands of the Allies and soon to be in the hands of the Russians, it didn't take a genius to figure out where weaponry was headed. This particular period and subject forms the backdrop for what is perhaps the greatest American novel ever written, Thomas Pynchon's Gravity's Rainbow. Read it sometime.

I'm not suprised if people in the world are somewhat afraid of the US at the moment. The combination of overwhelming military superiority, religious fundamentalism, redneckism and resource greed is frightening and that's part of what drives the "dislike America" feeling. Still, the Middle East is a combustible place, US or no US. It's not going to help anybody if that place ends up glowing in the dark. A superpower has the responsiblity to provide stability and guarantee the peace in an important region like that. My Roman history professor at Berkeley, Erich Gruen, made a career out of demonstrating how the Roman's were forced to create their empire in order to create stability on their frontiers. They finally put an end to the endless Greek city-state warfare, as in effect the US has done to Europe. Now we are being dragged into the Middle East because our interests our threatened there also.
User avatar
Daryl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 927
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Still proud to be an American?

Unread postby Daryl » Wed 21 Dec 2005, 11:55:48

Oh, I see you are an Irishman. You might appreciate Gravity's Rainbow even more. Pynchon modeled it in many ways on Joyce's Ulysses.
User avatar
Daryl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 927
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Still proud to be an American?

Unread postby Petrodollar » Wed 21 Dec 2005, 14:41:00

I just got back from a trip abroad where I spoke to 2000 foreigners. I will offer a grossly generalized answer to the initial post:

1) The majority of the world still likes American people
2) The majority of the world really fears and/or hates President Bush
3) The majority of the world really wanted Kerry to be president, and
4) They really don't understand how Bush won the 2004 election, especially given that the exit polls showed a Kerry victory.

(One european diplomat candidly asked me last week: "Why weren't the Americans in the streets like the Ukranian people were in Nov 2004 when their exit polls showed the election to be fradulent?" He wanted to know "What has happened to America? We don't understand what's going on over there." This was a serious question from a serious person, btw)

Given the original poster is from Canada, here's some evidence:


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]Canadians like U.S., not so hot on Bush: poll
CTV.ca News Staff

Canadians like their American neighbours but they aren't crazy about U.S. President George W. Bush and his administration, a new poll has found.

According to an Ipsos-Reid poll for CTV and The Globe and Mail, Bush is coming Tuesday to a country where a steady two-thirds of people or more "disagree fundamentally with the unilateral actions of the Bush administration," John Wright, Ipsos-Reid senior vice-president, told CTV.ca Monday.

"You can be anti-Bush but you're not anti-American," he said.

Wright said the indications in the last few weeks are that Bush is trying to set a more multilateralist tone for his second administration, and that his Canadian visit is a "test round" for this new approach.

It will be interesting to see if Bush succeeds in altering Canadians' views of him, and whether he can bridge some of the distance between himself and Canadians.

Canadians "will look back on this in a couple of weeks and decide if this was something substantive or if it was just a photo op," Wright said.

The numbers

On the issue of Bush's re-election on Nov. 2, there is a clear divide between the two countries.

For Canadians:

58 per cent view Bush's re-election as a bad thing.
26 per cent see it as a good thing.

For Americans:

41 per cent see it as a bad thing
56 per cent see it as a good thing

Within Canada, there was an urban-rural divide on the issue. Sixty per cent of urban respondents thought four more years of Bush is a bad thing, compared to 47 per cent of rural respondents.

However, only 15 per cent of Canadians agree with the following: "At the heart of it, I am actually anti-American -- I don't like or respect anything that the United States or its people stand for."

In that grouping, the most anti-American provinces were B.C. (22 per cent) and Quebec (17 per cent).

Eighty-four per cent of Canadian respondents disagreed with that statement.

When asked how they felt about this statement: "I value and respect the United States and its citizens -- it's just that I disagree fundamentally with their government," 70 per cent of Canadian respondents agreed.

Wright made this observation about Canadians and Americans to CTV News: "There's a fundamental difference between our two countries when it comes to how we see criticism about our governments and their policies.

"In Canada, Canadians are oftentimes easy about criticizing government, but it doesn't make them against the nation or its people," he said.

"In the United States, it's almost indivisible. A criticism about the president can mean a criticism of America or Americans, and that's simply not the case in Canada."


Perhaps Americans make an exception for Canadian criticism. When asked to respond to this statement: "Canada is a solid friend and close, dependable ally of the United States," 85 per cent of Canadians agreed and 82 per cent of Americans agreed.

The poll questioned 1,000 Canadians and 1,000 Americans between Nov. 19 and 22. It is considered accurate within 3.1 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.


http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/s ... hub=Canada

..and here's another poll from last moth (Nov 2005) that further reinforces this issue:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]Bush disliked by 73% in Canada
But 68% like Americans

Adrian Humphreys
National Post
Saturday, November 12, 2005


Canadians tend to dislike and fear George W. Bush, a new poll suggests. Seventy-three per cent expressed an unfavourable opinion of the U.S. President and 38% said they felt he was more dangerous to world security than Osama bin Laden.

Those results, however, should not be seen as sweeping anti-Americanism. While Mr. Bush is singularly disliked in Canada, the nation does not allow that feeling to taint its image of Americans as a whole. In fact, 68% of Canadians said they had a favourable opinion of Americans.

The poll of 1,016 randomly selected Canadians was conducted by Innovative Research Group for the Dominion Institute and the Canadian Defence & Foreign Affairs Institute. A corresponding survey of 1,000 Americans was also conducted on some questions for a comparison of national views. The results were provided to the National Post.

When Canadians and Americans were each asked their views on Mr. Bush, there was decidedly less love for the President north of the border. Forty-six per cent of respondents in Canada said they had a "very unfavourable" impression of Mr. Bush, while only 27% of U.S. respondents expressed that.

Another 27% of Canadians had a "somewhat unfavourable" impression of Mr. Bush compared with 16% of Americans.

While 25% of Americans said they were "very favourable" of Mr. Bush, only 5% of Canadians were similarly impressed, and while 23% of American said they were "somewhat favourably" impressed by Mr. Bush, only 16% of Canadians shared that view.

When residents of Canada and the United States were each asked who was more dangerous to world security, Mr. Bush or bin Laden, 73% of Americans said bin Laden, the al-Qaeda terrorist leader. Far less -- 21% -- said their own president was.

Opinion on that issue was far more divided in Canada.

Less than half (49%) of Canadians said bin Laden was more dangerous, with another 38% naming Mr. Bush.

"The results show that the rising tide of anti-Americanism in this country is driven not out of a dislike for the American people but as a visceral dislike of Mr. Bush and the war in Iraq," said Rudyard Griffiths, executive director of the Dominion Institute, a group promoting knowledge of Canadian history.

The poll may reflect a feeling that politicians already know.

Paul Martin, the Prime Minister, has been raising objections to U.S. policies as he draws closer to an election call. In his first radio address last month, he sternly lashed out at the U.S. stand on the softwood lumber dispute.

And when Jean Chretien, the former prime minister, was defending the legacy of his tenure in power in the face of the damning Gomery report, he highlighted as one of his key decisions his keeping Canada out of the U.S-led war in Iraq.

The public-opinion survey also suggests Canadians are deeply divided on the appropriate balance of resources dedicated to our military. Half of those questioned said Canada was pulling its weight on national defence, compared with 40% who said we were getting a free ride from the United States.

While Canadian opinion was split over the state of the country's military efforts since the end of the Second World War, the intensity of feelings over it are far from ambivalent.

Of the 50% of Canadians who felt that Canada was pulling its own weight on national defence, half of them described that view as one they "strongly" held.

Similarly, of the 40% who felt that Canada was getting a free ride from the United States on defence, 16% "strongly" held that view.

The survey was conducted in late October and is considered to have a margin of error of 3.1%, 19 times out of 20.

© National Post 2005



http://www.canada.com/national/national ... c28af1bba2

...and these "anti-Bush" but "pro-American" sentiments are shared with Europeans and Asians, based on my review of similar polling - FOX News will never make this distinction, but the above polls are representative of the broad trends.
User avatar
Petrodollar
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 406
Joined: Tue 19 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maryland
Top

Re: Still proud to be an American?

Unread postby Daryl » Wed 21 Dec 2005, 14:50:34

I don't know. I think that is a cop out. If the American people are so great, why did they elect such a bad government? Shouldn't the American people accept some resoponsibility for this?

When I lived in Europe in 1979, America might have been at its most popular. I had never traveled abroad and I was struck by two things: 1) how prevalent and pervasive Amercian popular culture was and what a lightning rod you were as an American. I traveled along with a Canadian fellow for awhile. He was ignored by people after he introduced himself, while I was invariably pinned to the mat, asked to explain innumerable issues to people. Evertbody was trying to start an argument with me about something. After observing Europeans interact with each other over time, though, I realized what was going on. They don't like each other. The carping that goes on between the English, French, Germans, whoever is incredible. Each side has a long list of the other's historical national crimes comitted to memory and is ready to spout them out at the drop of a hat. Americans are suprised when they find foreigners don't like them just because we don't get out much.
User avatar
Daryl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 927
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Still proud to be an American?

Unread postby Petrodollar » Wed 21 Dec 2005, 15:14:59

I hate to digress, but I will offer this retort to your question:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f the American people are so great, why did they elect such a bad government?


Not everyone believes the American people actually elected/re-elected this group, especially those who have some training in statistics...

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/158322 ... e&n=283155

....or know something about INFOSEC and our e-voting machines...

http://www.chuckherrin.com/hackthevote.htm
User avatar
Petrodollar
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 406
Joined: Tue 19 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maryland
Top

PreviousNext

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron