by The_Virginian » Tue 20 Dec 2005, 12:54:22
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ubercynicmeister', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('The_Virginian', 'N')o doubt Gender Bender Chemicals are Fugging up humanity, Females are Graced by God with a double set of Chromosomes....
So any dammage in them geneticaly will take longer to show. And it only takes one man to 4-10 willing females to keep the population growing.
Wake up, will you? Where do you think the huge rise in female-only cancers (Breast cancer, ovarian cancer, cevical cancer) are coming from?
Two main causes, (smoking and chemical pollutants) one chemical: estrogen.
Have a google search for estrogen dominance, and you will see where a lot of the violence is coming from too: estrogen dominance.
Where's the estrogen coming from? Various pollutants, such as DDT & it's break-down product, DDE; plastics of all sorts; the hormonal-type contraceptive (in about equal parts, too). Smoking aso seems to add to it and hops-type beer (rather than the older, meade-type) both have a very high level of phyto estrogen.
And the female-only cancers get 20 times more funding as what male-only cancers get (testicular cancer, prostate cancer) all of which are on the rise as eostrogen dominance makes it's presence felt.
Mind you, the idiot Politically Correct still insist that Medical Research discriminates against women perhaps because there's only 2000% more money going to women, exclusively, as versus men?
Medical Research exclusively devoted to women-only issues: 20% of the total.
Medical Research exclusively devoted to MEN-only issues: 1% of total monies spent.
But that's still discriminatory against women.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')s for Poligyny, feminists actualy do recognize that in many societies, it keeps women MORE INDEPENDENT. Provides co-wives for high qaulity-guilt free child care, and more freedom running the Home...as the man is not there all the time (when the man provides a seprate home).
This used to be the way in the West: with "extended familes", there really was free-childcare. But, of course, extended familes were discriminatory, so they had to go.
So, we should all welcome this change? Only if we like early-onset cancer.