by bobcousins » Tue 03 Jan 2006, 09:37:33
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('elroy', 'O')f course, it's no coincidence the US claims terrorists are where the oil is.
Of course, there is no surprise here. Criminals always go to where the money is, and terrorists will use criminal means to get money. This has been true ever since money was invented.
Sure, you need willing bodies to do the fighting, but you also need a source of money. It's a fact that "terrorists" or whatever you want to call armed insurgents congregate where money is generated, e.g. oil, cocaine, diamonds. If those are not available, then protection rackets or simply robbing banks.
But the choice of where the US decides to interfere is clearly motivated by strategic interest. I can't recall a single comment by the US about Zimbabwe for example.