by abbcampbell » Wed 14 Dec 2005, 20:06:46
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnviroEngr', '
')Precisely what was your aim in declaratively asking such a loaded question?
Sure.
My aim was to hopefully persuade Matt that his site, as it stands, may have some unintended consequences that I figured he wouldn't want it to have.
My aim was to alert him of this so that he could have the luxury of dealing with this rather than some distraught wife of someone else who actually mentioned LATOC in a suicide note. As I said in the initial post, Matt struck me as someone with a conscience, and I thought I might be doing him a favor to alert him of a potential unforseen problem. Ironic, huh? We seem to have switched roles to an extent.
Anyway, I don't see it as particularly loaded...just reality. You know, deal with reality... Anyway, I seem to have misjudged how others would take it. My bad.
Matt, I'm sorry it bothers you that I posted it in a public forum. Had I known it would bug you, I'd have sent you a PM. To be honest, though, I had no clue you would be so defensive over it. After all, I'm the one admitting on a public forum that I had a mental illness of that magnitude, while all I suggested of you was that perhaps you hadn't thought this particlar part through thoroughly. I've spoken with others who had a similar reaction, including one on a public forum. I'll be happy to send you a link if you like, since he posted anonymously. Still, it seems to have bugged you in a way I hadn't anticipated. Ironically, I've made a variant of the mistake I warned you of.
Now, with that behind us, do you feel LATOC has a resposnibility to at least mention things like that your major sources seem to disagree with you about the eventual results of the problem?