by ubercynicmeister » Mon 12 Dec 2005, 21:39:30
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RacerJace', 'n')ice slam dunk there ubercynicmeister. my sentiments exactly... good post
LOL, thanks Racer.
I seeems that the Economist has decided that it's all just slapstick comedy, without actually answering any of my points.
I have to go, so I'll have to leave the whole point unanswered for now but to note that others have made the same point: "investors only invest in what exists".
Research to create the stuff to invest in is (under that idea) wasted money. Because it's "investing in what does not exist".
Note Well: I certainly support research, even if it gives us bad news. But it's a fact that under the Freemarket, we're doing less and less and less of it, we're spending less and less money on it, we're supporting less and less of it. This is without considering Peak Oil or anything else, just straight research.
So much for the Freemarket Fundamentalism that states that "the freemarket will always find alternatives". How can something find anything, Peak Oil or NO Peak Oil, if it won't even allow anyone to look?