by ubercynicmeister » Sat 26 Nov 2005, 19:27:20
LOL, one thing that completely flummoxes me is the way that almost everyone here seems to get depressed and anrgy when first discovering Peak Oil.
I can assure you, when I started to read about Peak Oil, all I could think of was "Heck, so it's finally come, eh?"
To explain: I was involved in a local movement to try and stop the local politicians from ripping our local (well-used) passenger railway line out. I mentioned to a fellow participant that I was wondering when Oil would eventually get so expensive, we couldn't keep on expanding roads, and he put me on to the Lifeaftertheoilcrash.com website.
Y'see, it makes eminent sense - if one forces (or tricks - it doesn't matter, the overall effect is the same) every person on this planet to use one given resource, exclusively, then the price of that resource will rise.
At least a decade or two before I had ever HEARD of Peak Oil, being into Astronomy, I realised that our planet was of finite size - big to us humans, but still quite finite. If Oil comes from a finite planet (even if the very doubtful "abiotic oil" theory is right) then humans would start to run low on it, sooner or later.
I reached all of these conclusions long before I had ever heard of Peak Oil. And when I reached them, I did not feel "depressed" or "angry" or "in De Egyptian River" - instead my feelings were "well, let's get along and fix this problem,(if there is a fix) before it occurs". So I tried to do so - I joined various organisations that seeemed to be heading in the right direction of reducing our Oil dependancy and learnt a lot, mostly that few others were interested.
Then I was introduced to Peak Oil theory. I'll willingly confirm I have to say I beleive in it - I'm no Jean Laherre, or Colin Cambell, or Richard Heinberg - they have access to facts and experience that I simply do not have. Thus the theory has to be "belief" in my own case.
Upon beiong introduced toPeak Oil, I realised that all of my thoughts previously had been right - we could not go on growing (as the IDIOTIC Economic Rationalists had said) exponentially, without something giving.
Peak Oil theory (doomerosity) states that we've left our run too late, to do a smooth transition to another energy source. I cannot tell you if this is correct or incorrect. It sorta "feels" right, if you follow what I'm saying. Certainly, since the ruinous Economic Rationalists have gotten into power, we've scuppered several generations' worth of research (left completely undone), and with Political Correctness dumbing down our schools / colleges / Universities, we're doing everything we can to make the "doomerosity" happen.
CS Lewis said as much over 60 years ago. JRR Tolkien also said as much. But Professors Lewis and Tolkien existed in an era of rising Oil production - the Age Of Easy Oil.
Getting back to my own "experiences" Peak Oil simply confirmed what I'd been thinking since my early teens: that we were (worryingly) leaving research undone, year after year - that we were stopping those who wanted to learn from learning, because that might be discriminatory.
Peak Oil simply crystallised my own thinking, supplying me with information that gave me pause, but did not alarm me, in that sense. I have never ONCE felt angry, or "In de Egyptian River, or depressed or "accepting" of Peak Oil, simply because I've thought "that way" since my early teens.
What astonished me (and astonishes me still) is that anyone, given the vast amount of information we all have nowadays couild be in any way surprised that something like Peak oil (doomerosity) could not happen and that there's any doubt that the whole show really WILL end with a whimper not a bang....even if we somehow avoid Doomerosity, then this whole Universe is running down.
One day, perhaps billions of years from now, every star will have died, every black hole evpaorated (yes, thanks to Hawking Radiation, Black Holes evaporate), and all sub-atomic particles will have dissolved back to the radiation they once were. All will be cold, dead empty space.
Perhaps we'll have a Big Crunch? In which case, everything gets compressed to such a small size that not even individual quarks - or anything else - can exist.
Same result (Universal Extinction), different route to get there.
Remember: It is astronomy that teaches this, NOT Peak oil or Geology.
There is NO WAY to reach any other form of conclusion. Even if we avoid , right now, this or that particular Iceberg, the ship's still sinking. Ultimately, if this Universe is "all there is", then , well, the whole thing is FOR nothing.
I'll leave it up to those who want a religious argument to dispute about the "meaning" of the Universe, as that's waaaaay outside the scope of what the original question was, but I will end by asking the obvious question:
Given that we've known this since the 1930's, how is it we've ignored these Ultimate Questions for so darn LONG?
Peak Oil is a very small rock to trip us up, in the bigger picture of supernovae and Galactic Extinctors, but we should surely expect such "trip ups" in a world or Universe full of trip-ups?