Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Are all Americans looters?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Unread postby Licho » Wed 29 Sep 2004, 08:02:36

Barbara, population increase is not dramatic in Europe. In 1951 Italy had 47 millions, in 1981-2001 57 millions (stabilized already) .. And oil consumption before WW2 was only extremely tiny fraction of todays consumption of european countries..
(In 1921 40 millions - and that was completely without modern fertilizers/mechanized agriculture)


Jato - no I don't have direct experiences with US. I have only first hand stories :-) Two my relatives live in US for decades, and few others and friends who live here are visiting US regurally, but I don't have direct experiences that's true.. Even if I had, I would have to live many years in US to comprehend it all and learn all social differences I guess..
User avatar
Licho
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 833
Joined: Mon 31 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Brno, Czech rep., EU

Unread postby Licho » Wed 29 Sep 2004, 08:58:54

Regarding "different world".. I suppose it really is different here than in USA.. You might find these pictures interesting or funny..

This is president of the Czech republic, the man that represents country (former economist and university professor):
Image
Acting as a hobo on advertisiment. Text says: "After finishing school, you can do whatever you desire" :-) It's comercial for university studies.

And this is prime minister - most powerfull man, chief of executive of the country (former engine-driver):
Image
In his ordinary flat in Prague.
User avatar
Licho
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 833
Joined: Mon 31 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Brno, Czech rep., EU

Unread postby Aaron » Wed 29 Sep 2004, 09:13:38

Image

But we look so good with em...

Don't worry... these guys will protect you!


Image

"Remember... as the Europeans surge your way use short, controlled bursts."
Image


The new American Hummer!
Image

"I told you to take out the trash!"
Image

American frequent flier miles can really add up!

Image

An American eye-chart...
Image

Iraq's weapons of mass destruction finally located!
Image

You don't need to own a gun before society collapses...

There will be plenty of em laying around in short order...
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

Unread postby Jack » Wed 29 Sep 2004, 09:22:33

You ask if all Americans are looters. Sure. Every one of us. Just as all Europeans (French, Germans, Swiss, etc.) live in castles, drink French wine, flog the serfs, and speak with British accents. :lol:

Truth is, America is a fast-changing and diverse society. Cultural diversity creates a great many opportunities for friction - wherein one group behaves in such a way as to frighten or offend other groups. Europe is presently experiencing this with the influx of islamic residents; notice the unrest in Holland and France. Europeans are clearly concerned about further such changes; the ongoing hesitation to admit Turkey to the EU being a case in point.

It is my impression - and please correct me if I am laboring under a misimpression - that Europeans delegate protection of their lives and property to the State. Thus, if one is being robbed, one goes to the police.

The U.S. has more of a tradition of self-defense. Thus, we tend to frame our thinking around what we can do to protect ourselves rather than how we can get some governmental unit to protect us.

As an example - most would argue that civilization has not yet broken down completely, even in Texas. And yet, about a year ago, I was sitting at my computer, annoying only a few of my fellow netizens, when I heard an insistent knocking at the door. I ignored it, but dug a firearm out from under some papers. Then I heard a splintering of wood, suggestive of a crowbar being used to force the door open. I carefully (but briefly) explained why the person really shouldn't do that :twisted: . They, being the wise burglar they were, departed before they succeeded in opening the door.

Had I called the police, it would have taken at least 30 minutes for them to arrive. And I would have had to deal with a home invasion, and a possible deadly threat.

So if we see such a scenario today, it seems entirely possible that harsher times may witness an increase in criminal behavior coupled with reduced availability of law enforcement resources. My conclusion is that self-defense is a valuable option in such an environment.
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby Specop_007 » Wed 29 Sep 2004, 09:23:20

I'm not going to argue one way or the other as to Americans being looters. Fact is, some of us are.
Those of us who want guns arent going to be the ones looting though. Perfect examples are after Hurricanes or hell even the Rodney King trial. Some people in America loot, those of us with guns (or who want guns) are just protecting ourselves fropm those who DO loot.
However, you can see signs of this all over the world. Protestors and looters exist in EVERY country, and to single out on example is a bit shortsighted.
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby Licho » Wed 29 Sep 2004, 09:34:55

Yes, "bad" people are in all countries, but what made me wonder initially, was why just Americans seem to be concerned with this possibility and some want to escape to farms stockpiled with guns.. Whole idea seem to be strange, because people are unlikely to survive longer time alone without external supplies/help of other people.
It can be explained by the fact, that such remote places exists only in USA, and few other rare countries. But why are Canadians or Australians (countries with even better remote places) not concerned about this serious problem (defending your farm from mobs) and do not discussing farm defense systems yet?
So you say, that is's because of social differences and minorities? Because of cultural diversity? From my pov of outsider, American society seem to be very stable..
User avatar
Licho
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 833
Joined: Mon 31 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Brno, Czech rep., EU

Unread postby Falconoffury » Wed 29 Sep 2004, 09:51:50

There will always be a few people with guns, even in Australia. When you ban guns, all you are really doing is giving power to a small group of people.

Also, guns will be critical, I repeat critical for hunting wild game if the food system is sufficiently interrupted. You might be able find wild rabbits, goats, deer, or whatever and possibly not starve to death. Trust me, guns are a very useful tool. Anyone who wants to survive economic meltdown should have a gun. Licho, you may not think there will be a meltdown, but you're better off safe than sorry. Get yourself a gun.

I think there are those desperate enough to loot in any country. When food is tight, people will be so hungry, they will loot. It's human nature and has nothing to do with a country. Guns will of course discourage looting. Looters will go for the easy targets first, not gun owners.
"If humans don't control their numbers, nature will." -Pimentel
"There is not enough trash to go around for everyone," said Banrel, one of the participants in the cattle massacre.
"Bush, Bush, listen well: Two shoes on your head," the protesters chant
User avatar
Falconoffury
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue 25 May 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby nigel » Wed 29 Sep 2004, 10:22:07

Armand Hammer's (Occidental Petroleum) spread is for sale..

http://bohnrealestate.com/Kaufman/Statistics.htm

Please advise..

1. Why is an oil family selling such an essential item at this time?

2. How many guns will I need to defend it?

3. Where are those irresistible hogs? (apols to H..C).

4. Is that place really worth $7,500,000? Any die-off takers out there?
nigel
 

Unread postby gnm » Wed 29 Sep 2004, 12:08:11

I would have to disagree that there is no true wilderness left - Out here in NM anyway (which is roughly the size of Germany yet wiht on ly 1million people) there are plenty of places I could walk for 50 miles and not ever see another person...

-G
gnm
 

Unread postby nailud » Wed 29 Sep 2004, 12:27:57

I think a lot of the American interest in guns is because it was only a few generations ago that you couldn't survive here without one. Attitudes do get passed down. BTW-I don't own one or have any interest in them.
User avatar
nailud
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Are all Americans looters?

Unread postby Guest » Wed 29 Sep 2004, 12:31:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Licho', 'W')hy are so many Americans concerned with looters, angry mobs etc.. why do Americans want to have guns at homes?

I don't see similar attitude from others..
Is this caused by different style of living?
Europeans living mostly in cities, while Americans are more spread and more isolated from others?

Some escape to farm with gun sounds so irrational for most Europeans.. Most further away you can get from road or other house is probably 5km :-) there is no true wilderness..

Transition will take years of slow oil decline, there will not be "crash" point when masses of people decide to leave cities.




Not to make anyone angry, but I find this post (and the one below) to be mind-boggling naive ...

First, Europe ... here is a region that has had the most horrific wars in human history, complete with death camps, starvation, destruction ... and it's the Americans that you think are the most violent ??? :roll: :wink: :shock: Your great society, your wonderful culture, can roast 6 or 8 million Jews, Gypsies and Gays a few generations ago, then pass it off as if it will never happen again. Get real. My sincere apologies to Barbara, but if those millions of Jews, Gays and Gypsies had guns, and been sufficiently violently pissed off THEY would still be here to tell there story ... instead we have to hear from the descendants of the killers and accomplices of killers who helped erase these people and their descendants from the earth forever.

All Europeans, their forbears and descendants are complicit in these acts ... I don't think you have much of a leg to stand on, frankly.



$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MarkB', 'T')hey have an aggressive culture and just about everything I have read on a "hard landing" with bandit cultures and the like is penned by Americans. Not that I'm saying it won't happen in the US. I suspect it will without question.

So I'm glad I'm not there. I prefer to live in a saner nation where cooperation will happen. Australians do not kill each other on mass, as evidenced in US history i.e. their civil war and the current day of endless deaths by guns. Nor have Australian govts set about to kill Australian citizens to get leverage, aka Northwoods Documents.

Put simply, the racism and class anger in that country is clearly evident with everyman and his dog armed with guns, rather than team work.



On to the Aussies ... :roll: :wink: :shock:

Ummm ... let's see ... aggressive cultures ... ah, saner nation ... don't kill each other 'en masse' ... govt doesnt kill citizens ... no racism, class anger ... ok, got it.

Would you mind, please, making these points to an Abo, please ???

Your nation, your class, your race is ALSO complicit in a series of horrific crimes. I don't think the aborigines would particularly care for your personal interpretation of events. And (again apologies to Barbara :)) but if those particular dark people had been armed and sufficiently violently pissed off, I think they would still be in charge of the continent they have controlled for over 40,000 years. Oh, you mean they're not, anymore ? Well, gee, I guess someone else who had GUNS came along and stole their land, destroyed their culture and murdered their people EN MASSE.

Don't get me wrong, Americans did their own crappy things, but for God's sake, USE YOUR BRAIN and stop parroting the politically correct garbage of the politicians.

No matter where you live, your hands will never be clean ... they'll always be covered with blood of history.

kochevnik
8O
Guest
 

Unread postby Licho » Wed 29 Sep 2004, 13:07:14

Guest, I was not pointing to some superior culture or whatever your imagination created from original post, but just to the fact, that Europe is so crowded and interconnected, that some farm escape sounds like a fairy story here..

But it's simple fact, that Europe is now more peacefull than in any time in its history, maybe because of direct experiences with two terrible wars. I also don't think that all descendants are responsible for something that happend in past and was caused by crazy nazi ideology.. I'm one of the lucky not-roasted Jews anyway :-) I don't blame you for killing millions in vietnam, millions in civil war, for faked reasons to start at least 3 wars (Spannish, Vietnam, Iraq) I don't even blame you personally for killing 17 000 civilians in Iraq this war, and hundreds of thousands previous + consequences, even if you are indirectly responsible for acts of your own goverment.
User avatar
Licho
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 833
Joined: Mon 31 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Brno, Czech rep., EU

Some corrections

Unread postby guest » Wed 29 Sep 2004, 14:13:13

Bush, while very rich, is not a billionaire by any stretch. Kerry's wife is worth somewhere between $500M and $1B, so Kerry might be classified as a billionaire.

What's amusing is that we commonly associate Cheney & Bush with greed, yet Kerry and Edwards are both wealthier than Cheney & Bush. Edwards made millions as a successful trial attorney.

I have found that Republicans (generalizing here) tend to elevate self-made men and put down those that rely on government programs. What a contrast between Bush & Edwards ... Edwards came from nothing to become a successful attorney (the first one in his family to attend college) while Bush was born with a silver spoon in his mouth, managed to run 3 companies in the ground (while making $$$ doing insider trading), made millions with his baseball team at taxpayers expense, etc.

I'm posting as guest because I cannot get my account turned on, e-mails to Aaron were not answered :(
guest
 

Unread postby Aaron » Wed 29 Sep 2004, 14:34:33

I'm not a machine... :)

& you should be able to login now...

Let me know if you have problems.
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

Unread postby dmtu » Wed 29 Sep 2004, 15:22:47

Anybody up for a soccer match?
You observed it from the start
Now you’re a million miles apart
As we bleed another nation
So you can watch you favorite station
Now you eyes pop out your sockets
Dirty hands and empty pockets
Who? You!
c.o.c.
dmtu
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 538
Joined: Sun 04 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Western US

Unread postby Itch » Wed 29 Sep 2004, 15:37:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')y sincere apologies to Barbara, but if those millions of Jews, Gays and Gypsies had guns, and been sufficiently violently pissed off THEY would still be here to tell there story


Or the Nazis would just cut off their food supply, and demand them to turn in their guns if they want food.

Many Americans are looters right now, and many middle class people, who have their material needs satisfied by buying things legitimately, will loot in the event of a severe economic depression, not necessarily because because they have to, but because they want to. I don't think there are many people in America that are actually starving; if they're having some kind of food related problems, one reason is that it is probably due to the quality of food they eat. So not many people loot for necessity; they usually do it for simply getting more materials so the thief can validate himself, which is the dominant religion of this country.

Looting usually occurs when there is a crowd of unhappy people near a source of loot, and also when treasure is left unguarded. I'll acknowledge that not all protestors do this, but many people at protests, no matter what kind of self-righteous protest they're participating in, usually, at some point, end up with looting, though it may be on a small scale. There was the nonsense in Florida, the Rodney King beatings, the WTO in Seattle, and countless protests which all seem to suggest that no matter what skin color you're wearing on a particular day, there will always be looters in cities.

So it seems that the trick is to stay away from cities. If you're in the country, I would find masses of looters to roam the country side, looking to steal food. The farther they get away from the cities, the more dispersed they'll get. And if they're pissed off and starving to begin with, they would probably have better luck finding food in the cities. If things are so bad in the cities, then there would be hordes of trash lying around, which would mean that it would attract plenty of animals. They may not be walking tri-tip steaks, but starving people generally don't give a fuck about what they eat; most of the people in America don't give a fuck about what they eat already. Besides, all animals that eat city waste are complacent as hell, and much easier to catch, as opposed to wild animals who are ridiculously alert of their natural predators. Starving people will not have the patience, energy, knowledge, or discipline to catch wild animals. If they have lived in the cities all of their life, then what would they know about the contry? It's a completely different environment.

I'll admit that guns are pretty useful tools to have, though I'm not the kind of guy that is very enthusiastic about shooting guns, even though I own one. I know it's a trite thing to say, but it is better to have one than not need one than to need one and not have one. Of course, a gun is a tool used to kill things; I'm not going to lie to myself by saying that it's used solely for self defense, trying to hide the actual purpose of a gun.

It's particularly useful for hunting some of the larger mammals, simply because of the range. If you were to hunt with a bow, and wanted to hunt deer, it would be difficult to kill a deer unles you're in a tree, because the deer will be able to pinpoint your exact location from a half mile away just from the your scent.

Guns have a longer range, which make killing deer from a distance much easier, especially if you're using hollow point rounds.
The downside of having a gun is that it takes a bit of maintanence if you want it to work right, and require lubricants which are petroleum based. Maybe there are substitutes but I have not found any that aren't mass produced.

Bows don't need much maintanence, and their ammunition is renewable.

Americans usually don't work well together. Individualism has been successfully marketed ever since the beginning. There was cooperation in rural areas all the time, probably because the residents were in a fixed position, rather than subscribing to the frontier mentality, where people were a bit more selfish. Contemporary marketing has recently revived itself to fit the classic American views of the frontier. Car commercials, particularly SUVs, will show one car roaming trhoughout the country by itself, while most people use these cars to drive in paved areas. Most advertised products depict how their product will benefit the buyer. Most commercials aimed at guys will say, "Buy our shit, and you'll fuck tons of hot chicks," while commercials targeted at girls will say, "you'll look good if you buy our shit." Marketed insecurity has been insidiously successful. Why does this matter? Most people have been conditioned to want materials. Some steal them, some buy them, or they simply do both. To think that people will be able to work together under bad circumstance will not happen unless it is heavily marketed, otherwise many people will continue what they have been told to do, meaning that they wil still go forth and get materials in one way or another.

I would not feel comfortable living in a city even right now. If there was some kind of breakdown in a city, I would want heavy firepower, because most people are fuckin' crazy, at least in my opinion they are.
User avatar
Itch
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 317
Joined: Wed 30 Jun 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby smiley » Wed 29 Sep 2004, 15:49:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')irst, Europe ... here is a region that has had the most horrific wars in human history, complete with death camps, starvation, destruction ... and it's the Americans that you think are the most violent ??? Your great society, your wonderful culture, can roast 6 or 8 million Jews, Gypsies and Gays a few generations ago, then pass it off as if it will never happen again.


Exactly my point I don't think this is something which is typically american.

Think about it. Why did the jews get prosecuted during WWII? Hitlers initial message was clear. "The people are poor and the Jews are to blame for it".

You have to understand that the Jews had a very influential position in that time. They were the bankers. They provided the loans, and they were generally quite rich. A lot of the current banks like Goldman and Sachs and Lehman Brothers have a Jewish origin.

So you have the population which is poor and the Jews which were rich (simply put).

Hitler just exploited those differences. And just like the French turned against the establishment during their revolution, the Germans turned against the Jews. It later evolved in the racial purity thing (ubermensch), but it started as an outcry against the wealth of the Jews.

I'm not saying that we have become better people after that event. The main thing that we've learned is that people like us, who consider themselves to be decent, are capable of the most horrible crimes and probably are capable of doing them again.

Therefore we have spend a lot of time investigating the Shoa. Trying to find out how it could go so horribly wrong. And we have also put safeguards in place to prevent such an event in the future.

One of these measures is to try to equalise the differences between people. If all people are equal there won't be an us or them. If all people have equal opportunities there won't be a reason for envy or hate.

Now that is some kind of tree-huggin' socialist ideal that never will be realised. And probably you don't want it to be realised as well. But by keeping the differences relatively small you remove much of the breeding ground for a social disaster.

Therefore I dub it very unlikely that such an event will reoccur in Europe in the near future. For the USA I see the ever growing social differences as a definite risk factor. It is not a certainty, but with the right catalyst it can turn into something very nasty.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ush, while very rich, is not a billionaire by any stretch. Kerry's wife is worth somewhere between $500M and $1B, so Kerry might be classified as a billionaire.

What's amusing is that we commonly associate Cheney & Bush with greed, yet Kerry and Edwards are both wealthier than Cheney & Bush. Edwards made millions as a successful trial attorney.


I agree, I dislike both of them. Especially the way Kerry keeps bragging about his Vietnam experience. You want him to fix the economy not to tell war stories.
User avatar
smiley
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2274
Joined: Fri 16 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Europe
Top

Unread postby MarkB » Wed 29 Sep 2004, 15:58:30

guest, aka kochevnik...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'b')ut if those particular dark people had been armed and sufficiently violently pissed off, I think they would still be in charge of the continent they have controlled for over 40,000 years. Oh, you mean they're not, anymore ?


Yes, that was a tragic history.

But how about you look at your nation's treatment of indigenous people. A brutal and systematic slaughter of 20 million Indians to steal the land. Your country even sent your US forces on mass to do that.

That pales the crimes of WW2, it's up there with Stalin. Not to mention this all ramped up straight after the Civil War, a war that had already seen one million Americans dead. No problems slaying your brothers. A war that saw in the invention of "total war" -- a pattern which would form the shape of conflict well into the 20thC. No problems chaining your people up on plantations either. In fact that goes on with over 2 million in US prisons and increasing, with 70% of the number whacked needlessly into the grey bar hotel on non-violent drugs charges. So now the US stands as the most prison planet state of all on the globe. Not to mention a country with the death penalty, where other civilised nations have abandonded that practice. Hey, I guess this "convict" thing is a hoot, given I'm from Australia, which is supposed to be the convict nation. ;) I mean they all got to America on the Mayflower. *whatever*

Digging more dirt:
It even came out in the Nuremberg trials that the Nazis simply ripped the American eugenics programme (like wise the V2 tech). Needless to say, it didn't fly as a defence, but it did embarrass the US. But hey, your country then hired the Nazis for CIA intel and interestingly enough, it's now out of the bag that your prez Bush had a family biz history with the Nazis. So it's hardly like the Americans can whip the Europeans over that period of history. Gets better, IBM and Ford were also doing biz with the Nazis.

More recently, Nam saw upwards of 2 million dead Vietnamese, including the use of weapons of mass destruction, aka napalm, agent orange and white phosphorus. Not that much different to the growing body count in Iraq, up to 18,000 dead now and increasing with loads of DU running a half-life of 4.5 billion years removing loads more folks from the viable gene pool -- but I guess paying $2 a gallon is more the issue in the American mind? After all, the US can "liberate" with weapons of mass destruction, even though they can't find any *smirk*.

So no surprise to me really, just biz as usual ain't it. Yeah, the most obese problematic nation there is, with a wasteful consumerist America chewing up 1/4 of the world's oil and running an illegal war to rip Iraq reserves. Much to be expected, given a US history of two dozen or so regime changes since WW2, with many democratically chosen by the given nation's people. Even Australia wasn't spared, the CIA were involved in the 1975 Whitlam sacking for payback of pulling the diggers out of Nam. Sum cause, it's all that American Empire game, playing for keeps way into post-peak. Yup, taking the world to hell in a shit cart. This is not past history, these trends of crimes continue today and to the future!

Well, when one considers that as a backdrop, then little wonder a mere four years alone will see more Americans killed by fellow Americans with guns, than what fell in Nam. Yep, Sep 11th wasn't the real killer, it's other Americans. Violent nation, without question. One loaded on fear of "when the bad guys come". Well, the US and her armed population will never be invaded, it does that to everyone else for crying out loud. The thing that can't be ignored is the US already has the culture to kill itself since the bad (attitude) is entrenched. I can only say a post-peak crash will be ugly in the US and hey, you can't expect a great deal of world sympathy. That was squandered in the wake of 911 by wars of looting aggression. Bandit culture.

FYI, I've been to the US and Europe and a number of other places. Europe is without question far saner. They've learnt their lessons, they've moved on. The US calls that "old Europe". What a hoot. As an aside, it's a shame Australia was dragged into that "coalition of the willing", more the coerced, for all the spin to keep ANZUS.
User avatar
MarkB
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Sat 18 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Australia
Top

Unread postby Permanently_Baffled » Wed 29 Sep 2004, 15:58:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('NiKfUrY69', '
')
Also hope you ain't in one of those countries that may owe a debt of gratitude from WWI or WWII.

NiK


Gratitude?, if it wasn't for the French my friend you'd still be part of the British empire, remember the red coats kicked your ass in all the battles apart from the last one! :lol:

PB
User avatar
Permanently_Baffled
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1151
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: England
Top

Unread postby smiley » Wed 29 Sep 2004, 16:54:09

Well at least the US government seems to be well prepared for trouble.

Stand or you'll be microwaved!!

http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/active ... nology.htm

These are strange times indeed.
User avatar
smiley
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2274
Joined: Fri 16 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron