Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Doomers gotta DOOM

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: The Problem With Doomers...

Unread postby nero » Fri 04 Nov 2005, 23:11:02

Cornholio, very good post.

I think the key point you mention is the one MonteQuest zeroed in on. It's a question of time. How fast is this going to happen? MonteQuest and Omar seem to have a lot of faith in the accuracy of their crystal balls, and power to them they might be right!

However, I don't happen to share their faith in "crystal ball technology" so the problem I have with doomers is the same problem I have with optimists. I have no faith in the confidence intervals they put on their forecasts.
Biofuels: The "What else we got to burn?" answer to peak oil.
User avatar
nero
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1433
Joined: Sat 22 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Ottawa, Ontario

Re: The Problem With Doomers...

Unread postby Concerned » Fri 04 Nov 2005, 23:34:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Mesuge', 'H')m, my biggest problem to buy PO hardlanding 100% is that it seems to be a bit odd to witness the largest spectacle in the history of the mankind! Millions years of our species and I'll have the ticket to see and play in this prime time show..?! This is either matrix or very lucky (in perverse sense) moment to be here this time around..


Hehe too true. [smilie=new_popcornsmiley.gif]

My doomer scenario is the recession/depression people talk so glibly about.

Regards nuclear power it has lots of potential kind of like that whole world peace idea that keeps floating about. :roll:

China is experiencing constant blackouts and not building nearly enough electricical capacity let alone nuclear and from that nuclear none are the reprocessor type reactors like the closed down French super phoenix.

Am I a doomer absolutely, what worries me is the recession/depression leading to MASSIVE civil unrest and war with more terrorism including home grown terrorism.
[smilie=qleft5.gif] [smilie=qright5.gif] [smilie=XXbuzzsaw.gif]

If it gets to that stage you're looking at totalatarian government, restriction of freedoms, definately something the market is unable to correct but dead bodies will.

I agree however that if you're not dead then there is no die off for you, much like if you have a job in a depression you tend not to notice so much 8)
"Once the game is over, the king and the pawn go back in the same box."
-Italian Proverb
User avatar
Concerned
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1571
Joined: Thu 23 Sep 2004, 03:00:00

Re: The Problem With Doomers...

Unread postby cornholio » Fri 04 Nov 2005, 23:44:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Aaron', '[')img]http://websitedesignsolutions.net/images/starpeak.png[/img]


I'm not quite sure what you are trying to say, or who that was directed to, but that made me laugh : )

Thanks for the replies... I've flipped between hopelessly depressed and resolutely optimistic a few times already tonight (as I always do on this forum)

As above, I agree that timing and severity is everything... The topic is so big and involves economics, world trade, technology and industry. Way to complicated to predict (IMHO)... For example, how high can oil prices get before demand destruction, efficiency measures and recession kick in to reduce price... Can Asian industry support 7$/gallon gasoline?

Maybe it is like a rorschach test... You see what you want to see. As a peaceful pessimist I see recession/depression and reasons to be cautious and frugal but no reason to buy a shotgun :wink: Maybe an earth contact home and an orchard close to a reliable water source... And some gold. And a defensible perimeter.... Ok, maybe a shotgun too. But I would buy it for the hunting. And I garden because I find it relaxing.
User avatar
cornholio
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 139
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: MO, USA

Re: The Problem With Doomers...

Unread postby 0mar » Sat 05 Nov 2005, 00:47:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'O')mar,

I was quite impressed with your well-thought through and eloquent critique. :-D

This quote is a jewel about the scalability dilemma:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Omar', 'R')ight now, we are essentially telling a pre-mature baby to go and construct the Empire State Building


MQ


ahaha thanks :)
Joseph Stalin
"It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything. "
User avatar
0mar
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1499
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Davis, California

Re: The Problem With Doomers...

Unread postby aldente » Sat 05 Nov 2005, 02:12:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Mesuge', 'H')m, my biggest problem to buy PO hardlanding 100% is that it seems to be a bit odd to witness the largest spectacle in the history of the mankind! Millions years of our species and I'll have the ticket to see and play in this prime time show..?! This is either matrix or very lucky (in perverse sense) moment to be here this time around..


I came to the same conclusion at some point in the past. It seems too ridiculous a coincidence that we all are actually here right now witnessing the point of no return, referred to as Peak Oil. Too precise seems the timing on a historic scale and to unreal that we even have gotten wind of the magnitude of the consequences bound to unfold slightly beforhand.

However, all of a sudden I did realize that the number of people living though this experience is the largest ever carried in the history of this planet and in so far the maximum audience. Do a search on Bartletts presentation - it can be explained with the good old exponential function.

This being said, as one poster observed quite accurately before, chances are slim that the comming events are being accounted for to the loss of access to cheap energy, there will be an infinite array of explanations thrown out by any given real or self-declared authority. As I stated in the past, it is unlikely that Peak Oil will ever make it into the mainstream understanding...
User avatar
aldente
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1554
Joined: Fri 20 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The Problem With Doomers...

Unread postby DefiledEngine » Sat 05 Nov 2005, 02:44:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')I came to the same conclusion at some point in the past. It seems too ridiculous a coincidence that we all are actually here right now witnessing the point of no return, referred to as Peak Oil. Too precise seems the timing on a historic scale and to unreal that we even have gotten wind of the magnitude of the consequences bound to unfold slightly beforhand.


The statistical likelihood that you would exist in a time where humanity is at it's highest population is surely greater than if you were to exist when humanity is at it's infancy, a mere fraction of what it will become (if we do get to a space age and cover the galaxy/the universe with jillion zillions of us), no?

On the other hand, 60% of the people know that statistics mean nothing.
User avatar
DefiledEngine
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 344
Joined: Thu 19 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The Problem With Doomers...

Unread postby Encode » Sat 05 Nov 2005, 02:54:24

I apologize in advance if I'm not entirely clear, it's late and I'm still at work wrapping a project on Friday night :(

I enjoyed hopping back and forth over the fence and seeing both sides of this debate as good points were brought out by both sides. As Cornholio said, it's certainly a rollercoaster of emotions as you go between wanting to give up and then rallying yourself with optimism.

Regardless of where we're at on the Peak curve maybe there's a way to see what's coming, good or bad, and that might be by watching the actions of the Oil Companies themselves. If anyone knows when Peak Oil is going to happen it should be them. But like many have said, probably our last clue that we're doomed is when the prices have continued to ratchet up, and up, and up, and never come back down.

But we have to watch for some clues, so just what is it that we watch for? I ask that because it's a safe bet that while they prepare to drain consumers and industry of their last dollars, the Oil Companies won't sit on their hands and say, "well the holes have gone dry and we've got all of their money, so it's time to close up shop and go home.":!: They won't give up that easy. Especially if they think there's any possibility of transitioning the consumers or industry into another form of energy and keeping their profit machines in operation. Now as Omar and Thuja said, even if they further developed some known technology or even came up with something new, it takes time and scale to ramp up and change over and they could probably only replace a portion of what we had. But wouldn't that be something to watch for? To see if the Oil Companies start to pour dollars into research & development of new technologies. To see if they finally start to delve into existing technologies. And maybe see if they start to buy up companies involved in other forms of energy.

Now the downside to all of this and why watching the Oil Companies might not help is the same problem the public currently faces with trickle down technology. Sure we have satellite phones, carbon fiber, gps, rfid chips and Google Earth. But my friends if we have that, you can only imagine what the government and the industry elite currently have. And what they might be developing:!: So they could potentially keep the next technology hidden until it's finally time to bring it forth.

They're sitting on billions of dollars in profits so if anyone has the time and "energy" to throw a few hundred million at the next money machine, it's certainly going to be the Oil Companies. They hate losses and probably pass on oil wells that we would call good, only because they don't meet a minimum level of profit for them. So they're motivated by profit to move onto whatever is next.

Lastly, watching the media is probably the worst way to figure out what the Oil Companies are up to. So please toss out your comments on what we should be watching for.

And thanks again for all comments from optomists, pessimists and "concerned citizens" alike.

Encode
San Diego, CA


PEOPLE SHOULDN'T BE AFRAID OF THEIR GOVERNMENTS. GOVERNMENTS SHOULD BE AFRAID OF THEIR PEOPLE.
User avatar
Encode
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon 31 Oct 2005, 04:00:00

Re: The Problem With Doomers...

Unread postby aldente » Sat 05 Nov 2005, 03:45:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DefiledEngine', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')The statistical likelihood that you would exist in a time where humanity is at it's highest population is surely greater than if you were to exist when humanity is at it's infancy, a mere fraction of what it will become.

That statement is absolutely accurate and for sure takes away the weight that is commonly put in our minds when for example "voting". The sheer mass, according to this principle decides, nothing else.

Are there principles that could outrule these values? Do any of you posters play chess? You must understand what I try to refer to here...
Remember "Logans Run"?
User avatar
aldente
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1554
Joined: Fri 20 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The Problem With Doomers...

Unread postby DefiledEngine » Sat 05 Nov 2005, 06:03:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')That statement is absolutely accurate and for sure takes away the weight that is commonly put in our minds when for example "voting". The sheer mass, according to this principle decides, nothing else.

Are there principles that could outrule these values? Do any of you posters play chess? You must understand what I try to refer to here...


Actually, I'm not sure what you're getting at.
I used a statistical argument to show that the doomer scenario may be correct: It is very possible that right now, is about the top of human population, and we will never get off this world and populate the cosmos. Because if we did get to a space age; I would "probably" be then, not now. Although statistics may seem redundant, it can be an important tool for predictions.

You can think of it like this:
You have box with a vast amount (hundreds) of balls all coloured white except one black, and you're allowed to take out one ball at a time. How probable is it that you encounter the black ball first of all? in the beginning? in the middle? in the end? Now think of the black ball as yourself, and the rest as humanity. How probable is it that what you live now is only the beginning of human history? (If you know where I got this thought experiment from, you get 10 cool points).
User avatar
DefiledEngine
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 344
Joined: Thu 19 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The Problem With Doomers...

Unread postby aldente » Sat 05 Nov 2005, 07:39:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Albente', '
')Your obstacle in understanding this point obviously has to do with the element of time. November 5th, 1940 was not some moment in the past but is happening right now. The events recorded in history books related to that date are certainly of the past but not the actual moments experienced right then and there, just as you experience November 5th 2005 as the "now". It is irrelevant "who" experienced them, fact is that they occured and hence the occur NOW!

And no - I am not refering to any war related issues but randomly chose the date. What about November 5th 1970? Does that help?

There is no timeline!


I usually do not quote my own posts but there is a movie that perfectely describes this point, called Jacob's Ladder. If you have access to Netflix- rent it!
Image
Last edited by aldente on Mon 07 Nov 2005, 00:28:12, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
aldente
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1554
Joined: Fri 20 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The Problem With Doomers...

Unread postby Mesuge » Sat 05 Nov 2005, 08:00:50

So you want some more post PO collapse clues? I say follow the smoke..
Focus on the avantgarde of the countries already in decline of oil production:

- Mexico - there's a state of panic both in industry and goverment as they are going through a very steep decline of production but the remaining spare capacity on the world market (OPEC) hides this away so still not a CNN headline..

- Indonesia/Nigeria - several fold increase in price of oil in these production countries. Basically the oil industry MNCs operating there fucked the demand of the local people and dumped the oil on the world markets instead => riots/local insurgency in oil region, declining quality of life, Niger delta is in state of environmental holocaust already..

- UK - chairman of the board of industrialists (major capitalists lobby) speaks about 3day working weak and widespread shutdowns if they enter more than 12day period of sub 0C temperatures this winter. Last ten years of warm winter hided the issue. They produce 1/2 of their electricity from just-in-time system of pipelines from declining Norh Sea gas/oilfields..
UK government is giving a renewed thought to cold war era emergency laws to get prepared for rationing and riots this winter and on..

- Norway (outlier) - thanks to low pop and smart investment (unlike UK) they are sitting on a pretty giant pile of cash from their part of the North Sea oilfields revenues. Now they are quietly moving these assests away from US bond/stock market to some harbor of better liquidity..
(if they ever found one) :twisted:

..
.
------------------
Breaking News> Alegedly, the former Northrop Corp. inventor of B2 stealth technology sold secret plans to agents from 8countries incl. China, massive arrests by FBI on the way.. There were already some passive electromagnetic detectors capable of demask them but banned under the NATO agreement, China was trying to get them.. US blocked the sale because of the Taiwain issue..

I never believed in more open US<>China standoff but that was wrong. China needs lebensraum and oil that's not going to be pretty..
DOOMerotron: at all-time high [8.3] out of 10..
User avatar
Mesuge
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1500
Joined: Tue 01 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Euro high horse bastard on the run

Re: The Problem With Doomers...

Unread postby aldente » Sat 05 Nov 2005, 08:25:06

Peak Oil - fully understood - blows your brain away!
User avatar
aldente
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1554
Joined: Fri 20 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: The Problem With Doomers...

Unread postby Mesuge » Sat 05 Nov 2005, 08:34:50

I think there has never been a better time recently to go on vacation to Safari.. Take a camera! I bet that all the remaining wildlife fauna will be butchered by the impoverished population in a decade after the steep decline cca 2011-2020.. You can hang on these images on the wall of your new cave mansion in the era of great rellocation by 2033..
DOOMerotron: at all-time high [8.3] out of 10..
User avatar
Mesuge
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1500
Joined: Tue 01 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Euro high horse bastard on the run

Re: The Problem With Doomers...

Unread postby aldente » Sat 05 Nov 2005, 09:03:05

Mesuge, that was a weak post. I've been in Africa quite a few times, however it was the West, hence no Safari kind of thing.
Where are you located anyway?
Did you get any understanding out of my last post or does it still seem "unreadable"? To deal with time coordinates is about the most advanced element ever. I have to go to bed now...and yes I STINK, why are all Americans so opposed to body odor?

{image deleted due to pageview distortion by MQ}
User avatar
aldente
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1554
Joined: Fri 20 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: The Problem With Doomers...

Unread postby Heineken » Sat 05 Nov 2005, 09:27:58

Cornholio, in your analysis of "the problem" with doomers, you uttered . . .

Not one word about fresh water.

Not one word about the oceans.

Not one word about deforestation.

Not one word about desertification.

Not one word about food.

Not one word about global warming.

Not one word about epidemics.

Not one word about pollution.

Not one word about population.

Not one word about resource wars.

Many of these matters are intimately connected with energy use and availability.

So, with respect, I'd say you have a bit of a problem yourself.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: The Problem With Doomers...

Unread postby RonMN » Sat 05 Nov 2005, 10:08:18

I think what makes me a doomer is simply following an idea all the way to its logical conclusion. Let's take a depression for instance...

I hear the words "economic depression" tossed around like it's no big deal. I hear/read "we've been thru it before and we'll live thru it again"...Well, let's look at that one point.

1st we have never been thru an economic depression while the US Gov't was 9 trillion dollars in debt. This alone will be catastrophic because the US would not be able to make the interest payments on that debt in a depression...at that point they have only 2 options:
A - Default
B - Print the money (causing hyperinflation/dollar crash).
I don't believe there are ANY alternatives (please point one out if you know of one).

Next point is during the 1930's depression, 30% + of the US population lived on family farms (it gave LOTS of people a pace to go back to)...today, less than 2% live on family farms and you better bet your arse that those farms will be protected by smith & wesson!

My point is, i just don't see the "non-doomers/soft landers" (what ever you want to call them) following most points all the way to their logical conclusion...they seem to stop at a point & dismiss the rest (when IMHO the rest is not dismissable).

My 0.02 :)
User avatar
RonMN
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2628
Joined: Fri 18 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Minnesota

Re: The Problem With Doomers...

Unread postby JohnLudi » Sat 05 Nov 2005, 10:15:36

The American economy...and now much of the global economy, is predicated on the notion of constant expansion...it is not a maintenance economy, its health...and some would argue its very existence, is based upon a certain dependable level of expansion. If anything causes that expansion to cease (such as chronic energy shortages) the economy as we know it could go away very quickly. Given the Byzantine level of complexity and interdependency (and the mostly negative wildcard of human nature) in our current systems of doing practically everything, this spells Hard Landing at the very least.

Just my two cents on this post...hope I'm wrong...we'll find out sooner or later...
User avatar
JohnLudi
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Thu 23 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Chicago!!!

Re: The Problem With Doomers...

Unread postby Ludi » Sat 05 Nov 2005, 10:37:48

Cornholio, I missed your reply to my question:

In your scenario, what will the majority of people do for a living? How will they pay for food and shelter?

8O
Ludi
 

Re: The Problem With Doomers...

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sat 05 Nov 2005, 11:38:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RonMN', ' ')My point is, i just don't see the "non-doomers/soft landers" (what ever you want to call them) following most points all the way to their logical conclusion...they seem to stop at a point & dismiss the rest (when IMHO the rest is not dismissable).


Yes, as both you and Heineken have pointed out; they offer Solutions in Isolation. The epitome of myopic thinking.

As a ranger in Yellowstone, people would become upset when awakened to be reminded to secure their food inside a hard-sided vehicle to avoid attracting bears.

They would often respond, "Well, it's in a cooler."

That respond is not very well thought through. :roll:
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: The Problem With Doomers...

Unread postby cornholio » Sat 05 Nov 2005, 13:33:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'C')ornholio, I missed your reply to my question:

In your scenario, what will the majority of people do for a living? How will they pay for food and shelter?

8O


Ummm... I recommend expanding the service community to include everybody not directly involved in producing or distributing food (grains and beans), maintaining running water, maintaining existing homes, creating electricity or maintaining our cable TV infrastructure. If you are not in one of these crucial industries your "job" is to stay at home, eat your oatmeal, and watch cable TV. If consumption were trimmed to essential activities only (food, energy, shelter maintenence) the efficiency of modern farming (grains and beans and soymilk) and entertainment (cable tv, mostly reruns) could be provided to the population with most being able to live at home having the primary job of "not shopping," and "not driving" with additional responsibilities to include "not having babies" and "not turning on the air-conditioner." As cheaper houses fall into disrepair families have to consolidate, 2 to a room in McMansions. I haven't run the numbers, but that is my proposal. Oh, if you want you can telecommute, doing anything you want on the internet that does not encourage consumption of physical goods or energy.

SUMMARY: In our age of copious food (bean and grain) production and cheap cable entertainment most "work" just encourages unnecessary consumption and wasteful activity... Better to cut the "work" and the consumption out. Sustenance activity only.... It will just require a little more economic smoke and mirrors to make it appear that the service industry has expanded to include you sitting at home watching TV, eating oatmeal and getting paid for it. Panel trucks will deliver your grain and beans to your driveway weekly... No need for a car.

That sounds a little communistic, doesn't it? I haven't run the numbers, but as nobody I know actually produces anything I don't see why it wouldnt work...
User avatar
cornholio
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 139
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: MO, USA
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron