by MrBill » Wed 02 Nov 2005, 07:03:39
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rogerhb', 'I') agree there is a lot of subjectivity, but imagine what would happen if we were wealthier.
1. we would not need to so much time at work to make ends meet.
2. we would be able to pay off our houses quicker
3. we would be able to retire earlier
4. we would be saving more than digging ourselves in to more debt.
5. we would not need two incomes instead of one to get by in a household.
These are not arguments about whether we get more value from improvements in quality of products, I'm trying to look at it from a bigger picture.
In otherwords, will the rat-race ever end, or will houses always soak up available funds, and will we ever have enough consumer goods that are irrelevent to survival.
Eg, are the problems because we are incapable of saying 'enough'.
Roger, we have a two income home (soon to be one) and we earn more than average. If we choose to live a lifestyle similar to my grandparents after the second world war we would have no problem. A modest 1500-1800 sq. foot home. No luxury ammenities. One car. Home prepared meals using basic groceries and no precooked meals. No big screen TV, stereo, VCR/DVD player or modern day consumer electronics, just a plain TV with no cable. Hobbies include playing cards, visiting friends, home entertainment, square dancing, etc.
Really, not a problem. We could likely live comfortably on a quarter of my salary and still pay-off our house in no time. As a matter of fact, we do not live that sparsely, but we don't need two incomes. Therefore we choose quality of life or quantity. No debt. No unnecessary purchases. One car. The same stereo, TV, VCR, etc. that we have had for over 10-years now. Modest accumulation of other items mostly in the form of birthday, Christmas, anniversary gifts. We enjoy hiking, biking, skiing and the outdoors. The rat race is what you make it

The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.