Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Gasoline fron Coconut Oil

Discussions of conventional and alternative energy production technologies.

Gasoline fron Coconut Oil

Postby Louie » Mon 10 Oct 2005, 02:14:33

This may interest you.

www.cocogas.com

Regards.

Luis Matias
Louie
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun 09 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Gasoline fron Coconut Oil

Postby Heineken » Mon 10 Oct 2005, 09:13:08

Yeah, but what's the EROEI? How many zillions of acres of coconuts would it take to power the world's auto fleets, and what environmental devastation would result?
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: Gasoline fron Coconut Oil

Postby Caoimhan » Mon 10 Oct 2005, 11:01:30

*drumroll*

And now! Presenting my all-time favorite argument against an alternative energy technology...

"Since it can't replace all our oil usage, we shouldn't be doing it."

Thank you for your input, Heineken!
User avatar
Caoimhan
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 557
Joined: Tue 10 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Gasoline fron Coconut Oil

Postby Devil » Mon 10 Oct 2005, 11:10:26

Have we bred enough pig-tailed macaques to harvest the increased demand for coconuts? :D
Devil
User avatar
Devil
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 816
Joined: Tue 06 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Cyprus

Re: Gasoline fron Coconut Oil

Postby Heineken » Mon 10 Oct 2005, 12:54:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Caoimhan', '*')drumroll*

And now! Presenting my all-time favorite argument against an alternative energy technology...

"Since it can't replace all our oil usage, we shouldn't be doing it."

Thank you for your input, Heineken!


Thanks for the laugh, Cao.

Yes, maybe if we have about 29,834 jury-rigged, coconut-like operations we can replace 10% of current oil production. Something to be really optimistic about!

I think we have to stop trying to perpetuate the madness with coconuts or whatever. Instead, power down and start repairing the damage.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: Gasoline fron Coconut Oil

Postby KingM » Mon 10 Oct 2005, 13:14:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', '
')
I think we have to stop trying to perpetuate the madness with coconuts or whatever. Instead, power down and start repairing the damage.


Power down all you want, Heineken. Personally, I want to keep the lights on. Yes, we need to do that in a sustainable manner with as light an environmental footprint as possible, but when people say they want to return to the Dark Ages, it just tells me that they are historically ignorant.

Here's a quick lesson. Walk into any 19th Century graveyard and count the number of times you find a family plot with something like this:

John Jones b. Sept. 17, 1843, d. January 5, 1844
Baby Jones b. Aug. 3, 1847, d. Aug 6, 1847
Eliza Jones b. May 23 1842, d. April 10 1854
David Jones b. Oct. 8 1850, d. December 29 1853
User avatar
KingM
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 732
Joined: Tue 30 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Second Vermont Republic

Re: Gasoline fron Coconut Oil

Postby Heineken » Mon 10 Oct 2005, 13:29:11

Powering down does not mean returning to the Dark Ages, KingM. It means rationally redesigning, retooling, and above all downscaling and "localizing" for a time when much less net energy will be available to this civilization. Otherwise, that civilization goes ka-blooey and there will be graveyards that dwarf the 19th century ones. You can't have your cake and eat it too, but that's the essential mindset behind projects like the coconut one.

Giant new energy projects are not the answer to our predicament.

And I still want to know the EROEI on coconut power. If it's negative, as it generally is with biofuel projects, then there's nothing left to debate. Operations involving trees tend to be particularly energy-intensive, BTW.

AND I want to know the potential environmental impact.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: Gasoline fron Coconut Oil

Postby Caoimhan » Mon 10 Oct 2005, 15:54:30

Have you ever stopped to think that coconut -> fuel production might just be considered a local energy source like you claim we need? Particularly on islands where shipping of oil is expensive. Hawaii is one of the leaders in biodiesel production, partially BECAUSE they can use local agricultural sources for the fuel.

No one is arguing against conservation. But a lot of the doomers here talk about a massive "power down". Tell me... how would you like to go about it? Institute a massive energy ration on people, enforced by the guns of the government? People will conserve as financial common sense makes them conserve.
User avatar
Caoimhan
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 557
Joined: Tue 10 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Gasoline fron Coconut Oil

Postby Heineken » Mon 10 Oct 2005, 16:30:54

Read "Powerdown," by Richard Heinberg, and then get back to me.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: Gasoline fron Coconut Oil

Postby 0mar » Mon 10 Oct 2005, 19:59:34

The problem with most biofuels is that they take nearly a decade before reaching even a decent %. However, they are unsuited for taking over the decline, simply because fossil fuels operates on a whole different scale than alternatives.

It's like comparing the solar system to a rock formation. While the rock formation may be huge in context, compared to the solar system, it is but a speck. That's the difference in scale between fossil fuels and alternatives.
Joseph Stalin
"It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything. "
User avatar
0mar
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1499
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Davis, California

Re: Gasoline fron Coconut Oil

Postby frankthetank » Tue 11 Oct 2005, 01:31:33

I suppose once the Amazonian rainforest is gone, they'll want to diverisfy a little...maybe this will help?

sugarcane, soybeans ...coconuts?
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI

Re: Gasoline fron Coconut Oil

Postby evilmonkeyspanker » Tue 11 Oct 2005, 01:38:56

I am not giving up my electric razor... you all can just go to hell if you think I am giving that up :P
User avatar
evilmonkeyspanker
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 516
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Missouri

Re: Gasoline fron Coconut Oil

Postby Starvid » Tue 11 Oct 2005, 10:50:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'G')iant new energy projects are not the answer to our predicament.

Why? Large projects give massive amounts of cheap power due to economies of scale.
This fascination of small scale seems to be an environmentalist romantic idea.
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

Re: Gasoline fron Coconut Oil

Postby EnergySpin » Tue 11 Oct 2005, 11:20:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'R')ead "Powerdown," by Richard Heinberg, and then get back to me.

Heinberg is an unreliable potentially dangerous source of information. the guy is a neo-primitivist. Have you read the following authored by him YEARS BEFORE HE DISCOVERED PEAK OIL?
http://www.primitivism.com/primitivist-critique.htm
Where after a lengthy and mostly negative( 60-70% ) appraisal of civilization he concludes
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Naturally, we would like to have it all; we would like to preserve civilization's perceived benefits while restraining its destructiveness. But we haven't found a way to do that yet. And it is unlikely that we will while we are in denial about what we have left behind, and about the likely consequences of what we are doing now.

Left behind refers tp a manure powered / hanter-gatherer utopia
Last edited by EnergySpin on Tue 11 Oct 2005, 13:18:53, edited 2 times in total.
"Nuclear power has long been to the Left what embryonic-stem-cell research is to the Right--irredeemably wrong and a signifier of moral weakness."Esquire Magazine,12/05
The genetic code is commaless and so are my posts.
User avatar
EnergySpin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Gasoline fron Coconut Oil

Postby 0mar » Tue 11 Oct 2005, 13:19:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Starvid', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'G')iant new energy projects are not the answer to our predicament.

Why? Large projects give massive amounts of cheap power due to economies of scale.
This fascination of small scale seems to be an environmentalist romantic idea.


Did you miss the part where that mentioned any biofuel project would need to start today, grow at a fantastic rate for a couple decades and require trillions of dollars of investment before biofuels even make up a small percentage of our fossil fuel consumption?
Joseph Stalin
"It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything. "
User avatar
0mar
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1499
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Davis, California
Top

Re: Gasoline fron Coconut Oil

Postby BabyPeanut » Tue 11 Oct 2005, 13:23:05

Mmm, coconut gasoline! Part of your complete diet: [smilie=new_icecream.gif] [smilie=new_blowingup.gif] [smilie=new_all_coholic.gif] [smilie=qpepsi.gif] [smilie=tongue8.gif] [smilie=XXspam.gif] [smilie=coffee2.gif] [smilie=new_popcornsmiley.gif]
BabyPeanut
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: 39° 39' N 77° 77' W or thereabouts

Re: Gasoline fron Coconut Oil

Postby cube » Tue 11 Oct 2005, 13:51:26

Is it my imagination or am I starting to see a lot more "news" articles about how you can make oil from various renewable sources.

First there was the case of making plastic from orange peels.

Then there was the German inventor that vehemently protested when someone suggested he used a cat as the feedstock for making oil.

Now we've got coconut gasoline...hmmm maybe it'll smell better.

What will they think of next.....???
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Gasoline fron Coconut Oil

Postby Heineken » Tue 11 Oct 2005, 22:30:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergySpin', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'R')ead "Powerdown," by Richard Heinberg, and then get back to me.

Heinberg is an unreliable potentially dangerous source of information. the guy is a neo-primitivist. Have you read the following authored by him YEARS BEFORE HE DISCOVERED PEAK OIL?
http://www.primitivism.com/primitivist-critique.htm
Where after a lengthy and mostly negative( 60-70% ) appraisal of civilization he concludes
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Naturally, we would like to have it all; we would like to preserve civilization's perceived benefits while restraining its destructiveness. But we haven't found a way to do that yet. And it is unlikely that we will while we are in denial about what we have left behind, and about the likely consequences of what we are doing now.

Left behind refers tp a manure powered / hanter-gatherer utopia


He's dangerous to your vision of the world, you mean, energyspin. Actually, it's Heinberg's approach, and not the status-quo mentality, that in the end preserves something of our civilization.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia
Top

Re: Gasoline fron Coconut Oil

Postby EnergySpin » Wed 12 Oct 2005, 05:35:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergySpin', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'R')ead "Powerdown," by Richard Heinberg, and then get back to me.

Heinberg is an unreliable potentially dangerous source of information. the guy is a neo-primitivist. Have you read the following authored by him YEARS BEFORE HE DISCOVERED PEAK OIL?
http://www.primitivism.com/primitivist-critique.htm
Where after a lengthy and mostly negative( 60-70% ) appraisal of civilization he concludes
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Naturally, we would like to have it all; we would like to preserve civilization's perceived benefits while restraining its destructiveness. But we haven't found a way to do that yet. And it is unlikely that we will while we are in denial about what we have left behind, and about the likely consequences of what we are doing now.

Left behind refers tp a manure powered / hanter-gatherer utopia


He's dangerous to your vision of the world, you mean, energyspin. Actually, it's Heinberg's approach, and not the status-quo mentality, that in the end preserves something of our civilization.

I have to clarify my statement:
1) he is dangerous in the sense of repeating non-sensical statements about the EROIE of various alternative techs (wind+nuclear+solar) ERGO whoever believes his data will reach wrong conclusions
2) he is wrong in the sense that the preservation of civilization, is contigent upon the survival of technical civilizatrion
3) I do not agree about his vision of the world , but this is subjective view
His (deliberate?) incorrect analysis of the various technologies and the logical fallacy of thinking that one can preserve civilization (science, culture, arts) without a technical substrate make him a dangerous source of information for any unbiased observer/casual reader.
"Nuclear power has long been to the Left what embryonic-stem-cell research is to the Right--irredeemably wrong and a signifier of moral weakness."Esquire Magazine,12/05
The genetic code is commaless and so are my posts.
User avatar
EnergySpin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Gasoline fron Coconut Oil

Postby Heineken » Wed 12 Oct 2005, 11:01:35

Thanks for the clarification, energyspin. I'm sure we can agree to disagree.

I have little faith in techno-experts, I'm afraid.

Since PO and its consequences are all a gigantic experiment in progress, there are insufficient data to conclusively support either Heinberg's Weltanschauung or yours. However, I'm persuaded by his logic. Basically, I think we have to reverse "growthism," both in energy production and its economic byproducts. Yes, there is danger in that, but not nearly as much danger as there is in the course we're on. Heinberg suggests a path to a soft landing.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Next

Return to Energy Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron