by small_steps » Sat 01 Oct 2005, 15:17:38
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('backstop', 'B')eside the issue of a 10 to 15 year replacement period for such vehicle just within the US, a number of other issues seem relevant.
First, this option fails to utilize viable extant vehicles with retro-fit designs, thus wasting energy in their replacement.
Second, it fails to encourage the advance of non-fossil fuel transportation, implying a dead end down the road.
Third, until we've agreed a global treaty on the capping & (tradable) allocation of fossil energy emission rights,
every drop of oil saved in one sector in one country will be burned elsewhere as energy demand strives to continue growth.
So, nice numbers and good engineering, but surely little relevance to getting beyond fossil fuel dependence ?
regards,
Backstop
There is little questioning the fact that these applications are some of the best suited to hybridization.
The replacement or retirement of the vehicles already occurs due to the NPV economics, and the idea that it would be more favorable to retrofit an already old vehicle to hybridize it would be a serious misallocation of tax dollars. There are significant efforts to reduce costs within the drivetrain to get the high cost of the hybrid vehicles to where they are today, which is still significantly higher than the std vehicle. An example of this can be seen in the prius, where the ICE and one of the IPMs share the same casting, and also in the transission, where the planetaries and the other IPM also share the same casting. The idea that the vehicles can be easily retrofitted also ignores the facts that these older vehicles have various parts and control systems, that wouldn't be easily integrated into a hybrid package. Hell, we've got enough problems with the smooth transfer or transition between the ICE and the motors as it is in the new vehicles. Add an old gearbox with worn gears and the additional backlash you'll find there, and the complexity increases drastically, and the performance of the system as a whole would be greatly diminished. You also ignore the overall system optimization that occurs when the land speed and the ICE operation are decoupled by the hybrid powertrain, and the benifits of the reduced engine size, as well as the potential for fuel savings.
Secondly, you must crawl before you walk, and walk before you run, etc.
What system do you propose that might accomplish the duties that these types of vehicles without "a dead end down the road"?
Third, isn't this the way economies work?
The developers don't see these vehicles as a way to remove fossil fuel dependance, simply as a cost saving measure for the customer, and a method of keeping their company in business, and to keep food on their family's table. While the future cost and availability of fuel is becoming more prominant in the decision making process, the adaption by the public is a much stronger influence. A stronger influence may be not needing garbage trucks at all, or at least a reduced need, as the general population buys less disposable goods, and thus has less crap to be disposed of.