Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

US Govt: Vehicle Fuel-Economy Fraud

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

US Govt: Vehicle Fuel-Economy Fraud

Unread postby Graeme » Tue 13 Sep 2005, 23:24:52

New-Car Window Stickers Vastly Overstate Vehicle Fuel Economy Ratings
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')ew-car fuel economy tests conducted by Consumer Reports show that government figures posted on new-car window stickers can have shortfalls of up to 50 percent. In a study of 303 cars and trucks, model-years 2000 to 2006, Consumer Reports found that shortfalls in miles per gallon (mpg) occurred in 90 percent of the vehicles tested. The largest discrepancies involved city driving, with some models falling short of claimed mpg by 35 to 50 percent (see table).
Link
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: NewCar Window Stickers Vastly Overstate Vehicle Fuel Eco

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Tue 13 Sep 2005, 23:28:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Graeme', '[')b]New-Car Window Stickers Vastly Overstate Vehicle Fuel Economy Ratings
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')ew-car fuel economy tests conducted by Consumer Reports show that government figures posted on new-car window stickers can have shortfalls of up to 50 percent. In a study of 303 cars and trucks, model-years 2000 to 2006, Consumer Reports found that shortfalls in miles per gallon (mpg) occurred in 90 percent of the vehicles tested. The largest discrepancies involved city driving, with some models falling short of claimed mpg by 35 to 50 percent (see table).
Link

Fallacious numbers from the same government that praises the economy for 'little' inflationary pressures, when any rational person can see otherwise? Say it ain't so.
8)
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas

Re: NewCar Window Stickers Vastly Overstate Vehicle Fuel Eco

Unread postby some_guy282 » Wed 14 Sep 2005, 00:01:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', ' ')Fallacious numbers from the same government that praises the economy for 'little' inflationary pressures, when any rational person can see otherwise? Say it ain't so. 8)

But...but...if you exclude food and energy, inflation is practically non existent? After all, who needs to eat and buy gasoline? :P
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule. – Nietzsche

Time makes more converts than reason. – Thomas Paine

History is a set of lies agreed upon. – Napoleon Bonaparte
User avatar
some_guy282
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 651
Joined: Sun 18 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Re: NewCar Window Stickers Vastly Overstate Vehicle Fuel Eco

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Wed 14 Sep 2005, 00:04:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('some_guy282', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', ' ')Fallacious numbers from the same government that praises the economy for 'little' inflationary pressures, when any rational person can see otherwise? Say it ain't so. 8)

But...but...if you exclude food and energy, inflation is practically non existent? After all, who needs to eat and buy gasoline? :P

I love it! And, remember, oil is not as expensive now as it was in 1981, when it was at an all-time high of $49,324/barrel (adjusted for inflation, of course.)
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

Re: US Govt: Vehicle Fuel-Economy Fraud

Unread postby rogerhb » Wed 14 Sep 2005, 00:09:26

I've heard that with the inflation index you have the CPI and the core-rate.
For example, with CPI they use substitution, if beef gets too expensive then they substitute chicken.
So do they keep on doing the substitution, say beef then becomes chicken, then for the next quarter, chicken has now become the new beef and then substitute that for chicken again. Or have done beef to chicken, then chicken to sausages, then sausages to lard, then lard to cardboard.
So currently everybody is now eating tissue paper and drinking toilet water?
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand

Re: US Govt: Vehicle Fuel-Economy Fraud

Unread postby some_guy282 » Wed 14 Sep 2005, 00:14:47

Pretty much.
Jim Puplava did an article called The Core Rate about a month ago. He argued that the real rate of inflation is about 6 or 7%.
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule. – Nietzsche

Time makes more converts than reason. – Thomas Paine

History is a set of lies agreed upon. – Napoleon Bonaparte
User avatar
some_guy282
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 651
Joined: Sun 18 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Re: US Govt: Vehicle Fuel-Economy Fraud

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Wed 14 Sep 2005, 00:25:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('some_guy282', 'P')retty much.
Jim Puplava did an article called The Core Rate about a month ago. He argued that the real rate of inflation is about 6 or 7%.

Sounds legit. How does housing figure into inflation costs? Speculation is nothing but inflation, in my mind.
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

Re: US Govt: Vehicle Fuel-Economy Fraud

Unread postby FoxV » Wed 14 Sep 2005, 00:45:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', ' ')How does housing figure into inflation costs?
Housing you buy by burrowing money (nothing out of your income), you then pay back this money and have an asset (net value of transaction is 0), therefore housing cost is totally irrelvent to inflation.
They also add in an increase to your income equal to the rental value of your home (market adjusted of course). So if you have a more expensive home you also have a greater income counter acting your higher payments.
see again, no inflation.
isn't economics great :razz:
Angry yet?
FoxV
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed 02 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Canada
Top

Re: US Govt: Vehicle Fuel-Economy Fraud

Unread postby some_guy282 » Wed 14 Sep 2005, 12:26:38

Here's a link to Puplava's article.
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule. – Nietzsche

Time makes more converts than reason. – Thomas Paine

History is a set of lies agreed upon. – Napoleon Bonaparte
User avatar
some_guy282
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 651
Joined: Sun 18 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Re: US Govt: Vehicle Fuel-Economy Fraud

Unread postby eastbay » Wed 14 Sep 2005, 16:14:06

On the contrary, some are getting better mileage than that posted on the sticker. My '05 Honda Civic LX 5 speed 2 door should get 32/38 according to the EPA. But I've charted every fill-up since I bought the car a year ago and it ranges from 39 to 46 with an average of 43.5. The last two fill-ups have been 46.6 mpg (with the 13.7 gallon tank lasting me over 600 miles each time) which is very similar to the hybrid which claims 48 highway but in real-life gets about the same as mine.

I tell people to not waste the extra $6,000 to 8,000 on a hybrid, just buy the gas model and drive carefully because you will never recoup the cost of the hybrid.
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Re: US Govt: Vehicle Fuel-Economy Fraud

Unread postby glug_glug » Sat 17 Sep 2005, 17:06:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('eastbay', 'I') tell people to not waste the extra $6,000 to 8,000 on a hybrid, just buy the gas model and drive carefully because you will never recoup the cost of the hybrid.

When I had to get a replacement vehicle recently, I ultimately settled on Toyota's Scion xA instead of the hybrid, for that reason and the maintenance issues. The xA had the best fuel economy I could find in a straight gasoline engine, and I imagine that I'll do even better with my gradual acceleration driving style.
(I'm still waiting on the dealership to deliver the vehicle though... apparently they've suddenly become a hot item.)
User avatar
glug_glug
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu 25 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: N 34° 12' W 79° 52'
Top

Re: US Govt: Vehicle Fuel-Economy Fraud

Unread postby NEOPO » Sun 25 Sep 2005, 11:38:44

wow - this thread really stings my open PO wound :o
Yes - Driving style is something almost everyone is overlooking.
How do you drive Eastbay?
I believe that results will probably fall in line with driving habits, terrain and proper vehicle maintenence.
My wife is a "gas until its time to break" type driver :cry:
From my experiences on some of americas busiest interstates and highways - she is not alone.
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX

Re: US Govt: Vehicle Fuel-Economy Fraud

Unread postby JeeBoomba » Wed 28 Sep 2005, 10:10:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('NEOPO', 'M')y wife is a "gas until its time to break" type driver :cry:
From my experiences on some of americas busiest interstates and highways - she is not alone.

Oh god, my wife is just like that. She will ACCELERATE towards a red light, then nail the brakes at the last second. WTF is that all about?
User avatar
JeeBoomba
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Tue 09 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: US Govt: Vehicle Fuel-Economy Fraud

Unread postby eastbay » Thu 29 Sep 2005, 16:52:02

Yes - Driving style is something almost everyone is overlooking.
How do you drive Eastbay?
[I][B]
I drive at a steady 55 in the slow lane all the time in the Civic.
I'm the granny in the slow lane for sure...lol. My computer crashed a week ago and I lost all my stored data incl the chart I had for my Civic. :(
On my motorcycle I go around 60 to 65 generally unless I decide to momentarily jack it up really fast for a few seconds on my 3am ride home... it's unsafe IMO to ride a motorcycle at 55 on urban freeways due to generally much faster cars passing and approaching.
The Civic is really fantastic on gas if you drive really carefully. I coast on downhills and never gas up to a red light, always coast up.
The BMW gets 50 mpg at a steady 60 to 65 mph btw, but it drops to low 40's or worse if one rides fast according to the BMW website.
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Re: US Govt: Vehicle Fuel-Economy Fraud

Unread postby sol » Mon 10 Oct 2005, 04:08:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('NEOPO', 'M')y wife is a "gas until its time to break" type driver Crying or Very sad
From my experiences on some of americas busiest interstates and highways - she is not alone.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')h god, my wife is just like that. She will ACCELERATE towards a red light, then nail the brakes at the last second. WTF is that all about?
:lol: :lol: :shock:
It's becuase you don't won't the gap between you and the car in front to get to big lest another car jumps in front :-D :lol: :lol:
Last time I was in the city I used to take great delight 2nd gear putting along between those pathetic stop lights that are sperated by 2-300 meter before the next stop, used to blow me away watching people (everday types) drag race to the next still red stop light :shock: :cry:
Then when I'd choof of the start line on the way to the next still red light, they'd either be right on your arse, on the horn like they were trying to alert the rest of the pack there was a undersirable amongst them or overtake and brake hard before you both got to the next red light :cry:
Then to realy piss them off you turn off insted of stopping ROFL :lol: :lol:
Some people got no idea :oops:
Life without knowledge, is death in disguise
User avatar
sol
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon 11 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: North Australia
Top

Re: US Govt: Vehicle Fuel-Economy Fraud

Unread postby glug_glug » Tue 11 Oct 2005, 13:42:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('tinosorb', 'I')'ve always gotten better mpgs than sticker. It's the way I drive (very light foot, never over 55 mph, coasting as much as possible in the city) and also what I chose to drive. IMO the Japanese manual transmissions have the greatest potential for beating the EPA estimates.

In my experience, Japanese automatic transmissions aren't much worse than the manual ones. That's important for people who aren't really keen on "stickshifting" since they may end up making up the efficiency difference with clutch/transmission replacements.
If you drive softly, the efficiency difference will become negligible as the auto will shift into the highest gear before you hit 55 anyway.
I have repeatedly gotten 32 MPG in a '95 Honda Odyssey this way (sticker MPG was 27/hwy IIRC).
Look out for Donkey Kong as we get closer to the Peak.
User avatar
glug_glug
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu 25 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: N 34° 12' W 79° 52'
Top

Re: US Govt: Vehicle Fuel-Economy Fraud

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Wed 12 Oct 2005, 01:30:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sol', ' '):lol: :lol: :shock:
It's becuase you do'nt wo'nt the gap between you and the car in front to get to big lest another car jumps in front :-D :lol: :lol:
Last time I was in the city I used to take great delight 2nd gear putting along between those pathetic stop lights that are sperated by 2-300 meter before the next stop, used to blow me away watching people (everday types) drag race to the next still red stop light :shock: :cry:
Then when I'd choof of the start line on the way to the next still red light, they'd either be right on your arse, on the horn like they were trying to alert the rest of the pack there was a undersirable amongst them or overtake and brake hard before you both got to the next red light :cry:
Then to realy piss them off you turn off insted of stopping ROFL :lol: :lol:
Some people got no idea :oops:
What really bugs me, I'm coasting towards a red light, some pistonhead guns past me in the right lane, cuts in front of me and then turns on his (usually) signal for a left turn so I am stuck behind him until he can make the turn or I can squeeze into the right lane.
If you live in Sweden, Kiwiland or Japan reverse left <--> right in the above.
(Funny, my spellchecker doesn't complain about "Kiwiland").
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

Re: US Govt: Vehicle Fuel-Economy Fraud

Unread postby JeeBoomba » Tue 18 Oct 2005, 15:03:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('glug_glug', 'I')n my experience, Japanese automatic transmissions aren't much worse than the manual ones. That's important for people who aren't really keen on "stickshifting" since they may end up making up the efficiency difference with clutch/transmission replacements.

The clutch is the only consumable item in a manual transmission and, provided you actually know how to drive one properly, it should last a very long time. My last car still had the factory clutch at 170K miles with no signs of slipping and it was by no means a freak occurence--my father, for instance, has 180K miles on the clutch of his Tacoma.
Granted, when you do replace a clutch, it might cost $500 - $600 (or just the cost of parts if you do it yourself), but if anything at all goes wrong with an automatic, you're instantly looking at a much larger repair bill, and, since an auto tranny is about 5x times as complex as the engine itself, even experienced home mechanics probably can't/won't attempt to do it themselves.
I agree with you, though, that for most people an automatic is a better choice. I just wanted to point out that, driven properly, a manual can be pretty much zero maintenance, whereas an auto never can.
User avatar
JeeBoomba
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Tue 09 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: US Govt: Vehicle Fuel-Economy Fraud

Unread postby Roy » Tue 18 Oct 2005, 15:37:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he clutch is the only consumable item in a manual transmission and, provided you actually know how to drive one properly, it should last a very long time. My last car still had the factory clutch at 170K miles with no signs of slipping and it was by no means a freak occurence--my father, for instance, has 180K miles on the clutch of his Tacoma.
Granted, when you do replace a clutch, it might cost $500 - $600 (or just the cost of parts if you do it yourself), but if anything at all goes wrong with an automatic, you're instantly looking at a much larger repair bill, and, since an auto tranny is about 5x times as complex as the engine itself, even experienced home mechanics probably can't/won't attempt to do it themselves.
I agree with you, though, that for most people an automatic is a better choice. I just wanted to point out that, driven properly, a manual can be pretty much zero maintenance, whereas an auto never can.

well put and I agree 100%. A lifetime of experience with hot rods, race cars, and junkers confirms what you say. Plus MT forces a driver to pay more attention to the road, and affords better control of the vehicle. To me an AT always seems to be in the wrong gear for a given situation other than top gear cruising or initial take off. ATs cost a fortune to have repaired and often (my experience) fail suddenly with little warning, vs a slipping clutch giving ample warning before complete failure.
Just my 2 cents
Roy
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1359
Joined: Fri 18 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Getting in touch with my Inner Redneck
Top


Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

cron