by JeeBoomba » Tue 18 Oct 2005, 15:03:39
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('glug_glug', 'I')n my experience, Japanese automatic transmissions aren't much worse than the manual ones. That's important for people who aren't really keen on "stickshifting" since they may end up making up the efficiency difference with clutch/transmission replacements.
The clutch is the only consumable item in a manual transmission and, provided you actually know how to drive one properly, it should last a very long time. My last car still had the factory clutch at 170K miles with no signs of slipping and it was by no means a freak occurence--my father, for instance, has 180K miles on the clutch of his Tacoma.
Granted, when you do replace a clutch, it might cost $500 - $600 (or just the cost of parts if you do it yourself), but if anything at all goes wrong with an automatic, you're instantly looking at a much larger repair bill, and, since an auto tranny is about 5x times as complex as the engine itself, even experienced home mechanics probably can't/won't attempt to do it themselves.
I agree with you, though, that for most people an automatic is a better choice. I just wanted to point out that, driven properly, a manual can be pretty much zero maintenance, whereas an auto never can.