by jaws » Fri 02 Sep 2005, 02:54:42
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('joewp', 'L')et's not get all carried away, he's talking about ice. That's not energy, that's not something that people *need*, it's not oil/gas/gasoline. If you have a refrigerator and electricity you can make your own ice. If you don't have the electricity, you can't and need to buy it from price gouging ice merchants, who practice rationing by ability to pay. Make his example "food" instead of "ice" and see how well it plays out.
Ice is what people need to keep food from spoiling. What the gouging does is make people more selective about how much food they want to preserve. If ice is cheap then someone will buy all the bags to be extra sure that he will keep his food until the power comes back. That means other people will lose all their food. If instead ice was expensive, the first buyer might think "maybe I'll just keep the bare necessicities and that deer in the second freezer will have to thaw", then he'll just throw a barbecue to get rid of the deer. The second and third buyers of ice, who might be people having real emergencies will then have plenty of ice to buy (although they also will have to economize).
The same is true of food and energy. In an emergency we want to avoid waste as much as possible. If you keep gas prices low people will waste it driving around for no reason until everyone shorts out and no one can get gas. That applies to the rich and the poor. If you let prices rise only those who most desperately need it will get it.
The worst case scenario is of course someone buying all of a commodity, ice, gas, food or whatever, at the government-imposed lower price, who then resells it on the black market for the market price. That person has now abused government regulation and stolen from the original owner who couldn't raise his price.