Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Unread postby CrudeAwakening » Mon 05 Sep 2005, 18:24:38

Richardmmm, I'm still a bit confused as to what you're suggesting. Are you saying that

1. Oil prices have been manipulated to their present levels, and

2. Soon we'll see oil prices drop back due to demand destruction

Just trying to clarify your position.
User avatar
CrudeAwakening
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 834
Joined: Tue 28 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Unread postby richardmmm » Mon 05 Sep 2005, 19:15:56

look, it's a hard call and I am no master economist but I have been following oil for the last 5 years and shorting the tops. I never went long which was probably dumb, it was easy money, but I wanted to be able to see the tops rather than get carried away with the bull run. I am not an investor, I invest in nothing in the markets. I am a speculator. I go in for profit and then I leave. If I take a hit then I jump out as soon as I know I am wrong.

Everything goes to extremes and the eventually switches back to opposite extremes. It was the same in Soybeans in 2004. The prices ran and ran and finally there was a huge strike in docks in Brazil and the soy beans were all rotting in the docks. The spike on that news was short lived and simply a chance for all the players who had bought at the bottom of the market to exit their positions in a market with heavy liquidity and lots of "dumb" money running in. The players running into the market at the top simply gave the hedge funds a chance to exit huge positions without impacting the prices too much. Once they were out, there were no buyers left and the prices collapsed. Check out a chart of 2004 soybeans. When the wosrt bad news came that should have doubled the price again, everyone sold. It is just a basic reverse psychology that the experienced players use. Something I am trying to learn and master.

Economists would have you believe that the increasing prices of oil over the last few years has not been a drag on the economy, but I believe that this is only the case because of hedging and subsidies that are all coming to an end. No one in the papers is really talking much about this which I find strange. Looking at the figures of major airlines their fuel bills have only increased slightly and they have added on some fuel surcharges, fedex for example also has a fuel surcharge. So basically they have been pretty well covered. But you can only be hedged for so long. 3-4 years is a pretty good mark I reckon. There was no one hedging in the recent spike, infact since $62.50 no one has been hedging. It's all just speculation. The prices are too high for hedging and too high to be sustained. Don't forget that people have been long since before you or I even dreamt of trading futures contracts. At one point tey have so much profits they have to exit. Many of the money managers are taking 20-25% of profits. If you held oil from $10 or even $30, at one point you are going to close so the open trade is finsihed goes onto the books and you get your commissions. You can't get commisions on open trade equity. Only on net profits.

You are not going to see oil prices drop in one day or even one week, it will gradually come down. Read The Remisanaces of a Stock Operator (he traded many commodities as well, it's not just a stock book.) The big longs who need to exit their positions which they opened at $10, will not let the market collapse. They will slowly reverse the market down, closing out longs in chuncks. Even buying more contracts to prop up the market if it goes too low. That way they they keep the new bulls hopeful of easy profits, dangling the $75, $85, $105 carrot, whilst the market slowly sags and sags. When oil hit about $58 after Ivan, it came back to $56 and Goldmans comes out with the $105 oil spike prediction...........why, because they use their power to hold the market up to create more buyers.........it's just salesmanship. In 10 years time when oil is $105 they can say they were right, but in the moment of the release, it was a massively bullsih statement in a declining market to create foolish buyers. Oil fell back to $50 with barely a bounce after their fantastic bullish announcement. It's been the same story this time. Suddenly Goldman, Morgan, Lynch etc. announce and increase in their target price for oil to $60. Right at the top they announced that. This means that basically that many inexperienced players will stay bullish and keep buying even as the market falls.

Soros and Gates and Buffet one at a time also announced they were hevaily long the Euro, and guess what each announcement marked a major top on the Euro. Dumb money ran in, they closed out. Thanks for the tip guys..........Long term they were right, but short term they made the announcement to create buyers so they could book profits for themselves at a major top.

The premise of this is that the markets are manipulated and that the big players pick a market and go long right at the bottom. Oil was clearly at a bottom in the late 1990s. They have huge amounts of capital and can build enormous positions, on futures contracts 5-10 years out and be able to hold them long term. Also as exhange members they only need about 50% of the margin of smaller players, so their abilitiy to hold is doubly increased.

Then the market starts running and you have huge paper profits right from the bottom, but with huge positions you cannot close out without collapsing the market, so you create a hype a lot fo buyers, you run the thing to silly levels. Then you close. Look at google. They didn't want to close at $280, no they created a lot of hype ran it up to $330, everyone was possesed with greed buying in at $320, $330, dreaming of $500, whilst the insiders and big investors were exiting huge positions. On average they probably got out at $250-$275, but they needed to the market to got to silly levels to get new blood in.

I am only running on this premise really. I am just a speculator. Where oil goes further into the future I cannot say, but $55 right now is not out of the question and there are so many people running in long now, increasing oil is on everyone's breath so basically you can be sure it's coming down.

There doesn't have to be an economic collapse for oil prices to drop. Only the futures traders need to anticipate the possibility and start building that risk into the prices. Thus prices drop.

There has been a lot of scare, a lot of rumor and a lot of manipulation to get prices to these levels. Every scare went away, Yukos never stopped pumping, neither did Chavez or Nigeria. Ivan came and went, etc etc etc. Every excuse under the sun in the media. Yet the prices carried on high as though everyone had forgotten about the inital reasons for the increases in the first place.

When they ran out of reasons to hold oil prices high they started with all this refinery stuff. They have been exporting gasoline out of California by the boat load every week.........why would they be doing that if refinery capacity is so tight ? To keep the price high. To keep the local stocks on paper low. It's the same with Tomatoes in Italy. They dump half the crop in the sea if it is a good summer, rather than let the prices fall. Otherwise next year, when the crop is smaller people will only pay the old price which is too low for them to make profits. It's a long term strategy.

When there was trouble in Ecuador recently with it's massive (NOT) 200,000 barrel a day production I was rolling about laughing as oil prices shot up. It would take a week to fill one tanker at 200K barrels a day. The strike didn't even last that long. It made no difference.

It's all just hype and scare. When you look into it, it makes no sense.

Katrina comes along and suddenly Kuwait is talking about increasing production for the US. Canada also sunddenly has extra production, so do the Saudis. Funny because at $40 they didn't want to annnounce that, rather let the prices run, but at $70, they'll sell you all the oil you want and then some...........

I expect you'll see Shell revising it's reserves upwards soon. It's all a rather dubious game.
User avatar
richardmmm
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 205
Joined: Sat 20 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Unread postby richardmmm » Mon 05 Sep 2005, 19:31:29

This is a very interesting snippet as well (below in italics). And I also think that Soros's book The Crisis of Global Captialism is looking more and more on the money lately. So often speculators are often just a bit ahead of themselves. I remember reading a story of how the Quantum fund was shorting gold at $600/oz back in the day. And they were crapping their pants as it carried on running to $800/oz. But as you do, they just threw another few hundred contracts at it and waited for the collapse they knew was coming. Pretty soon Gold was back to $450/oz.

I am not saying you'll never see oil above $70 a barrel again. What I am saying is that this is a major shake out. If oil comes back it will kill off all the alternatives, kill all the indepedant expolartion companies who'll have to sell their research to the majors for pennies, kill interest in investing in alternative companies. It will restore everyone's confidence in oil, etc etc etc. More than that, it has got people acustomer to paying a higer price and also started to make them thing about paying more to use less. This is very good for business, and helps the oil companies to prolong things if the oil is actually running out.

It's a great power game to play if you have the resources and the patience to do it. It stops anyone else from getting their foot in. You draw him out and then you crush him. It's basic tactics really.

We know that the oil business is a very dark business so I would expect them to be playing it like this. Their war chests are full, They are selling product for top dollar, now they are all primed for a drop in price and to snap up all the competitors.

Peak Oil is another matter altogether. It's a really hard call, and I don't think anyone can really say for sure what is going on. It's more of an ideology than anything else. Certainly there is a max. production level that the planet can physically produce. Whether we have reached that or not, or whether it has simply been made to appear that we have reached that, but cutting back US production and making it look like the US has peaked...............who can say.






"There was an interview on CNBC of the renowned funds manager Julian Robertson. He is one of the greatest of the old-timers. 53 years on the [Wall] Street. He manages the Robertson group of funds. They used to call him, still do call him 'Never Been Wrong' Robertson. He has predicted every economic cycle, every debacle, every bull market, and every bear market. Of course, he´s a very old man now. But his reputation on the Street is like nothing you could imagine. When the segment of his interview was through, his comments alone took the Dow Jones down 50 points. Just on his comments alone. That's how powerful this man's reputation is.


"Robertson was actually a teary-eyed, an old man. When Ron Insana asked him about his predictions, he said that he´s worried about the speculative bubble in housing and the fact that more than 1/4 of all consumer spending is now sustained by that bubble, plus the fact that 20 million citizens could lose their homes in a collapse of the speculative bubble in housing, and that the Fed and, indeed, central banks worldwide would act in concert out of desperation to reinflate the global economy in the process, creating an inflationary spiral unheralded in the economic history of the planet.

"Insana then asked, "Where does it end?" And he said, "Utter global collapse." Not simply economic collapse; complete disintegration of all infrastructure and of all public structures of governments. Utter, utter collapse. That the end is collapse of simply epic proportion.

"In 10 years time, he said, whoever is still alive on the planet will be effectively starting again.

"And the comments were so negative. I´ve never heard anything like it. From a guy who was 53 years on the Street. This is Julian Robertson, the renowned Republican. And yet he blamed everything on "the Bushonian Cabal," that the Cabal has now consolidated power and money on the planet to the maximum extent possible. That the planet's net liquidity--that is, net free cash flow--is now a negative number. That the planet is not simply sinking into a sea of red ink; it is already sunk.

"The people just don´t realize it yet."
User avatar
richardmmm
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 205
Joined: Sat 20 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Unread postby richardmmm » Mon 05 Sep 2005, 19:39:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wildwest1941', 'T')o heck with gold, silver, and oil, invest in toilet paper. With all the crap going around this is where everyone's money will be most useful in the years to come. 8)



I think guns and gasoline are probably the go :-)

When you have those then you can pretty much get your hands on the rest in the event of social disorder and breakdown.
User avatar
richardmmm
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 205
Joined: Sat 20 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Unread postby fossil_fuel » Mon 05 Sep 2005, 20:33:28

richard appears to be correct, at least for the moment. Oil down a buck on NYMEX at the market opening at 7pm tonight (labor day)
User avatar
fossil_fuel
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 386
Joined: Mon 03 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Unread postby fossil_fuel » Mon 05 Sep 2005, 20:36:13

what are your thoughts on the natural gas situation right now? it's up a bit more even though oil's down
User avatar
fossil_fuel
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 386
Joined: Mon 03 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Unread postby CARVER » Mon 05 Sep 2005, 20:45:19

That's interesting.

I think the reason that OPEC now seems willing to increase production, could be to prevent 'deadly' spikes in oil prices. If you can make oil go up steadily people will hardly notice, because the day to day differences are so small, consumers will not change their oil consumption. However Katrina made oil and especially gas go up way too fast, which could cause people to change their oil consumption. This is unpredictable, but you could see sudden demand destruction. (How to boil a frog). The oil companies don't want that, because it could let the oil price drop a lot. So the oil producers make statements that they will increase production, too bring the price of oil down a bit, to a level that will not make consumers change their consumption of oil. It could be that OPEC will not be able to increase production like they say they can, but by that time it might be that oil production in the GOM came online faster than expected. That way they can prevent a price spike caused by speculation. I think they will try to keep this up as long as they can.

The question is: did they succeed in doing that, or were they too late?

I am not sure how low oil can go. The release of oil from the SPRs lowers the oil price now, but will increase the oil price when they need to refill those reserves. The US has wants to increase their SPR and I think they will also want to increase their gasoline reserves. Other countries like China are likely to do this as well. If possible I think they will want to do this without pushing the economy in a recession. So whenever oil prices seem to drop a bit, they will probably start buying (extra) to fill their reserves and so the oil price will not drop very much.

As we move closer to actual shortages, this will become more difficult to maintain (If the economies make it that far before they collapse).
User avatar
CARVER
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu 19 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Holland

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Unread postby fossil_fuel » Mon 05 Sep 2005, 21:14:08

i don't know how it's possible to keep a real large gasoline reserve, wouldn't it have to be rotated regularly since gasoline begins to degrade after about a year?
User avatar
fossil_fuel
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 386
Joined: Mon 03 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Unread postby fossil_fuel » Mon 05 Sep 2005, 21:20:27

does this make sense?

gasoline on NYMEX is back down almost to where it was before the hurricane.

While many refineries are supposed to be back up soon, at least 4 major ones are projected to be offline for quite awhile.

Has that much demand destruction occurred already?
User avatar
fossil_fuel
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 386
Joined: Mon 03 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Unread postby richardmmm » Mon 05 Sep 2005, 22:08:02

there doesn't have to be demand destruction, only anticipation of drop in demand and more supply. That's why it's called futures. It anticipates the price and maintains a relatively lower volatility.

Imagine if there had been no anticipation of supply disruptions and no forward markets, oil would have gone from $40 cash price to $240 cash price in a day and caused absolute panic.

Futures were originally invented by the Samuri in Japan to prevent the price of rice racing up and down all over the place.

It creates a more stable price environment.

It's exactly at the moment of the most bullish events that the market has been anticipating for months, that prices take a dive.

How long they keep on diving is another question.

Personally I think it is going to keep on creeping lower and lower. If prices keep heading down with rapid spikes up, that's a sign of downward momentum. If they creep higher constantly with occasional massive drops, that's a sign of bullishness..
User avatar
richardmmm
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 205
Joined: Sat 20 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Unread postby richardmmm » Mon 05 Sep 2005, 22:41:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('fossil_fuel', 'w')hat are your thoughts on the natural gas situation right now? it's up a bit more even though oil's down



Natural Gas is a problem, but the price increase is the equivalent of oil at $120. Gas have moved from $1.80 upto $12. Oil has gone from $18 to $70.

You can see the numbers match almost perefectly on the charts just 1/10th of each other.

Natural Gas is looking to be more of a problem than Oil.

However LNG can be imported quite easily and is already being imported.

http://www.dom.com/about/gas-transmissi ... /index.jsp

This terminal for example can handle as much as 2% of US total consumption.

There is always the coal gas option.

Natural Gas was the cheap choice of the 90s, but I think the oil companies pushed it on everyone so that they could hike the prices later on.

As usual they planned ahead and no one else did so they get to drain everyone's wallets. It is going to be a great excuse for huge increases in electricity prices alla Enron. Thing is with prices increases is once people have got used to them then you only have to offer a small drop to keep them happy. So you get a shock with a bill at $500 for the month or a tank of gas at $75. You slice 10-15% off that and you are relived, even though you are still paying twice the prices from a couple of years ago...........neat huh !!.

Plus they'll be locking in all the utilities / power generation companies in on contracts for the winter at high prices on gas supply, before dropping the price shortly after.

http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/natu ... ng2003.pdf

actually it looks like about 10% of NG is currently imported and they could probably ramp that up to 20% if necessary. 25% of total US production is said to be in the GOM, but 25% of that is back on line, so assume mid term loss of 10-15% overall US production. It can pretty much be covered from imports and extra prodcution from other US fields.

it's looking more tenuous on paper than oil, I have to admit, but the price has also gone from $2 to $12, so it's due a pull in. It's way over done the blow off on NG.
User avatar
richardmmm
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 205
Joined: Sat 20 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Unread postby richardmmm » Mon 05 Sep 2005, 22:47:30

natural gas also gapped up on the sunday / monday that katrina hit.

while oil had a pull in on monday and filled it's gap, natural gas didn't properly fill the gap.

gaps create vacums in the market that suck the price there.

natural gas is also notoriously volatile with massive swings and reversals, from the iraq war, 9/11 and Ivan.

the up trend on NG puts it at about $3, the move accelerated up trend parks it about about $7.50

anything higher than that is seriously over extended.

many of the power plants can burn both coal and NG and it's not like the US joined Koyoto or has any kind of CO2 restictions inplace.

although NG is cleaner, i am sure dubya will be more than happy to authorise a winter to smogs and acid rains to keep things under control.
User avatar
richardmmm
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 205
Joined: Sat 20 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Unread postby richardmmm » Tue 06 Sep 2005, 16:16:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kochevnik', 'V')ery good points, Richard.

Consider also that if TPTB was concerned about PO (and rising gasoline prices), what better way to calm the herd than to drop oil prices down to only $40 a barrel for awhile. Consider that a few years ago, saying that $40 a barrel oil is cheap would have been laughable, now people just wish it were so. :lol:

Traffic at this site would drop 75 percent if oil dropped to the 40's for 6 months. It does nothing to negate the PO thesis though, IMO.

Richard (and other's buying the idea that oil will go down for the near future) ... HOW LOW DO YOU THINK IT WILL GO ? (and what kind of time frame are we talking about ?)

My guess is certainly the high-50's, possibly high 40's and I'd say as long as 6 months, but more likely only 1 to 2 months.

Opinions ?



It depends on how badly the housing market takes a wack and how much they are able to keep the ball rolling on the Greenspan insanity carry trade after the master has retired.

My guess is that after he's gone, they'll install a fall guy to take the blame and all markets will start taking a major wack across the board and cause a large recession even depression. Eventually the fall guy will get fired and go down in histroy as the worst FED chairman ever.

In the case of a large recession, the asian countries will suffer very badly with loads of excess capacity and cities now stuffed to the brim with people that used to be rural farm workers, suddenly all unemployed with no prospects and nothing to do............chaos.

I don't know if you've been to China but the cities are just crazy now and a recession there would cause major turmoil, far worse than in the US. It would be a major coup for the US to pull off a recession geopolitically, because it will crush China, just as they pumped up the Japanese thing of the late 80s and then crushed Japan once it unravelled. Imagine Canton and Shenzen with millions of factory workers all unemployed. People will be starving in the streets. China will collapse into chaos. Chinas banks are dogey as it is and all their funds are in US Treasuries which do them little good if they need liquidity to prop themselves up locally.........it's going to be a mess.............it always is after big booms like this, and China is the one that is booming, the US is just reaping the benefits, whilst the corporations are actually very very lean.................

Once the down turn kicks in the the price of oil will become a non issue again. I don't doubt that the world's capacity to produce oil has some cap on it, that's obvious. But in the next 5-10 years I think there is plenty of oil and it's all a bit of a ruse going on. Oil companies loading up their war chests, ready for lean times that are coming.

It can be that I am wrong and the stocks are running out, but if this was the case they;d be rolling out new technology to conserve and pepetuate oil as the energy source. Sell less at a higher price. I don't think the hybrids really do that.

Take a look at a chart of the S&P or Dow from June 2001 until Dec 2002 and you'll get the picture of what we are in for. A great finale until the end of 2005, with oil prices falling and stocks rallying and everything looking dandy. The fed printing money like water again to deal with the hurricane damage which will cause another mini economic boom......Followed by the truth hitting the fan sometime in Jan 06, poor reports start coming in, the delayed effects of oil and people cutting back on spending start to filter through.

Retail is already down. I reckon Xmas 2005 is going to be a total washout. Everone's got all the laptops, widescreens and digital cameras they need. Consumers are starting to get more of a make do attitude. It;s going to be neck ties and pairs of socks all round this Christmas :-)

It's more a question of perception than anything else. Once people start to be a little frugal and humble and see others doing the same it will spin off into a large decline in consumer spending, the realisation of which will strike after this Xmas.

They say that Bush invaded Iraq for oil, but if you think into it and consider that the run on oil prices is exaggerated and over done and that was something planned and manipulated, the last thing you'd want to do is to be feeding Sadam an extra $40-$50 a barrel. That's $100M per day...........

Everyone thinks that Bush failed, even though he invaded Iraq, oil prices ran. But they never thought to assume that they invaded Iraq so that they could run oil prices high without lining Sadams pockets with a quick 3 Billion dollars a week. There was so much corruption going on with that Food for Oil story I think that was one of the reasons they had to put an end to it once and for all.

Then you pump up oil prices, pump up the money supply, run the economy like wild fire, assett inflation etc etc. Eventually you dump the whole thing into a recession. China collapses into major turmoil, millions of city workers unemployed. The US middle classes takes a big hit, which is good, they are the liberals with the time on their hands to do all the complaining, a recession puts them back into line. The poor take a hit but no one gives a damn about them anyway.

Who comes out on top in a major recession the large global corporations most of whom are currently carrying large cash reserves ( I wonder why ??). They get to crush the unions, lay off workers, file for bankrupcy and wipe out pension funds, all the while consolidating their position, merging with rivals, gobbling up smaller compeitiors etc etc etc.

Look at all the legislation that is being put in place to nail the middle classes. Credit card debt is no longer something you can wipe, but they haven't changed the rules for corporations ??

The consumer is carrying huge amounts of debt backed with zero savings and based on an assett bubble in housing that can literally vanish over night. Meanwhile the corporations are loaded with cash reserves, are lean on staff and have trimed operations back relying on overseas operations..........they are ready to weather the storm and come out ontop.

Bubbles are just the way that the rich elite keep everyone guessing, running the markets all over the place and them dumping them when the time is right. They never really lose out, because if you have billions losing half you money on paper is meaningless.......
User avatar
richardmmm
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 205
Joined: Sat 20 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Unread postby fossil_fuel » Tue 06 Sep 2005, 16:52:59

in light of this, wha twould be the best course of action to take? sell short retailers for march '06? buy whoever manufactures LNG tankers? or is all this already priced into the market?
User avatar
fossil_fuel
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 386
Joined: Mon 03 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Unread postby fossil_fuel » Tue 06 Sep 2005, 16:54:03

this dow rally today is ridiculous. up 140 points just because oil went down $2? meanwhile new orleans is in ruins?
User avatar
fossil_fuel
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 386
Joined: Mon 03 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Unread postby fossil_fuel » Tue 06 Sep 2005, 16:54:33

irrational exuberance indeed!
User avatar
fossil_fuel
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 386
Joined: Mon 03 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Unread postby richardmmm » Tue 06 Sep 2005, 19:18:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('fossil_fuel', 't')his dow rally today is ridiculous. up 140 points just because oil went down $2? meanwhile new orleans is in ruins?



the market is a strange and curious animal. it never does what you would expect. It only pays the minority, never the majority. It moves where it needs to, not where you might think it would. New Orleans is only a city of 1/2M, its not the end of the world and rebuilding it will create a mini boom. Just like post 9/11 created a mini boom.

i think we'll see rallies to tremendous numbers on the indexes until the end of the year.

you have to consider that the smart money is fed up with bonds as interest rates are so low, and is finished with housing that has basically peaked.

therefore the money goes into stocks. it's the perfect time of year for fund managers to lock in new cash. if the market was tanking that would make their life quite difficult.

it can't last though because the effects of oil will start to show in the figures over the next 6 months, consumers are running short of breath, but it will run long enough to get everyone very bullish and thinking there is a huge recovery going on. it's going to be very hard to get short into the indexes over the next few months, but eventually there will be a top and an even larger decline to below 2002 levels. The rally since 2002 is according to all theroies simply a cyclical bull trend within a secular bear market that in every case in histroy going back over 120 years has always taken 10+ years to play out. We are only half way through. We need a recession to flush all the silly money out of the system. So far we have managed to avoid going through a proper cleansing phase, like some kind of junkie that has just switched from one adiction to the next.

The matter at hand right now is not how to survive peak oil or total collapse, it's more about how to survive one of those dreadful 1970s/80s recessions where the nightly news is more like a depressing list of how many more workers have been laid off, which unions are on strike and where the latest demonstation marches are happening. In these environments only very adaptable market players make any money. Everyone else from bar tenders to prized lawyers suffer the pressure. I recall these times vividly although I was only a teenager, they were miserable unimaginative times. I think everyone has forgotten what a real recession is like. No one wants to face the hang over so they just grab another beer.......

It's interesting to see the absolute boom in physical casinos, online gambling, poker championships etc. you can be sure with these kinds of pursuits taking such a lead in society that there is way too much easy money in the system and a major down trend is near.

interestingly energy futures only started trading in 1978 and that was only heating oil. Crude it's self was not traded as a futures contract until 1983 well after the last oil spike. therefore the economists are seeming to be spouting an even large ballon of ignorant hot air about oil not effecting the economy. There was no means to hedge in the late 70s / 80s oil spikes and price changes hit the economy directly. This time we have delayed it through hedging, but the truth is coming to bare soon. The flat yield curve also shows a possible recession. With so much liquidity pumped into the system it might play out something like Japans decline in the early 90s. Super low interest rates, but still no improvement, housing prices declining and deflation going on, as basically all the excess liquidity is slowly moped up out of the system.

The best thing to do is to keep a clear head and not be hasty with anything. For short term speculation long the S&P is probably not a bad one, a target of 1280 and then 1330 is on the cards right now, and it;s not too late at all to get in. I always think of the first move that is missed as an insurance policy. It's better to go in and be certain than rush in on a whim. However it's also not a good plan to chase markets so a pull in / test of 1225 on the S&P is an entry point. There will be a test of 1225 and in the event of a failure of 1225 will bring a rapid drop to 1200, so it will be clear if the long trade is wrong and the risk is relatively low with 1225 being such a key level. Stay long and watch for a top in later in the yaer, maybe Jan 06, and remember the big decline is coming soon and it will be good to be short then..........

Waiting a couple of months for a pull in on gold is also not a bad trade. 420, 400, 380 might be a good entry point, but it all depends on the day to day happenings.

Shorting the 30yr Treasuries is not a bad move either, looks like they have topped for the moment.

Natural Gas just has to take a wack at least back to $10, with a huge gap under the market at the moment. The worry about trading that is that they can make a huge spike up to $13,14,15 and even a mini is $5000 per dollar and it;s uncharted territory so anything can happen.

You'll have to research it all yourself, following the markets is an endless puzzle, that's why I like it so much. The best thing is never to trade on other peoples tips or ideas, you have to figure out things and see them for yourself. Just remember that the market is a very expensive teacher, but if you learn the lessons then you can reap the rewards :-) You can lose $10K in a morning, but if you learn your mistakes you can make it back again in the afternoon. Never be afraid of taking losses, only be afraid of wiping out an entire account.
User avatar
richardmmm
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 205
Joined: Sat 20 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Unread postby seb » Tue 06 Sep 2005, 22:19:52

Ok, wait for today's first post Katrina US petroleum report. If a sharp drop in gasoline stocks is reported (it may happen :lol: ), it would be interesting to see how the market react.

Once I read that everything is already priced in the market because investors anticipate the future economic situation. :P Nothing is as wrong as it. Nothing is priced, otherwise oil would cost 10 times what it costs now.

We don't know about the true situation of oil infrastructure in the GOM. We are still on very thin ice!
Not mother tongue. Sorry for the mistakes.
User avatar
seb
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 205
Joined: Tue 05 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Back France from Japan

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Unread postby KevO » Wed 07 Sep 2005, 15:52:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seb', 'O')k, wait for today's first post Katrina US petroleum report. If a sharp drop in gasoline stocks is reported (it may happen :lol: ), it would be interesting to see how the market react.


stocks keep rising, oil keeps dropping down £4 today alone and not far form going back below $60.
I guess the economists realise that peak oil is a long, long way off and respect to you Richard, you did say it would go down and down it is!
KevO
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2775
Joined: Tue 24 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: CT USA
Top

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Unread postby Grimnir » Wed 07 Sep 2005, 16:04:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KevO', 's')tocks keep rising, oil keeps dropping down £4 today alone and not far form going back below $60.


I'm wondering how much of the stock market's strength is do to government intervention. I suspected this right away when the Dow failed to drop at all in the immediate aftermath, and this report from a Canadian financial management group makes me even more suspicious (thanks, Matt):

http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/050906/65371.html?.v=1
Grimnir
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 851
Joined: Mon 04 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: USA
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron