Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Postby KevO » Wed 07 Sep 2005, 16:06:29

sorry I said £4 when I meant $3 - got them crossed!
Yes, who'd have predicted this day
weird
KevO
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2775
Joined: Tue 24 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: CT USA

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Postby CARVER » Wed 07 Sep 2005, 20:35:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Grimnir', '
')... I'm wondering how much of the stock market's strength is do to government intervention. ...


How about intervention in the energy market, from the
IEA press release:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')ember countries will make this additional oil available to the market, allowing market mechanisms to provide the most efficient method of directing the oil where it is needed. The IEA response can be adapted to changing market needs by adjusting the duration or quantity of oil.


The way I read that: We have a price target for oil and oil products, if the prices go higher we bring more on the market, if prices go lower we 'remove' it from the market.

But what about NG?
User avatar
CARVER
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu 19 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Holland

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Postby Jaymax » Thu 08 Sep 2005, 21:40:34

Richardmmm,

I owe you an apology.

While I remain inconvinced that you are a professional trader, while I have a fundamental problem admiting someone who argues for abiotic oil might have better market judgement than me, I can't not not acknowledge that had I shorted as per your recommendation, I might have made a tidy sum, rather than had to deal to a margin call this morning.

However, that said, I'm hanging on to my long positions (november unleaded and long-dated crude)...

So maybe I'll listen to your comments a bit more closely - but trust me, abiotic oil is bollox.

--J
Doomerosity now at 2 (occasionaly 3, was 4)

Currently (mostly) taking a break from posting at po.com. Don't trust the false prophets of doom - keep reading, keep learning, keep challenging your assum
User avatar
Jaymax
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 259
Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: England

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Postby Jaymax » Thu 08 Sep 2005, 21:52:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seb', 'O')k, wait for today's first post Katrina US petroleum report. If a sharp drop in gasoline stocks is reported (it may happen :lol: ), it would be interesting to see how the market react.


What's most interesting about the market report today is that the numbers simply don't balance.

Look at the refinery reductions, the imported gas reductions, and the inventory reductions should have been a LOT more significant.

I've wondered for some time if there isn't some intrinsic delay in the reports - like they don't actually state the position at close-of-play Friday.

I'm expecting a bigger drop next week - but I'm guessing. Still holding onto my long HUX5 for now (fortunatly now back above the pre-Katrina level)...

--J
Doomerosity now at 2 (occasionaly 3, was 4)

Currently (mostly) taking a break from posting at po.com. Don't trust the false prophets of doom - keep reading, keep learning, keep challenging your assum
User avatar
Jaymax
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 259
Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: England

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Postby richardmmm » Fri 09 Sep 2005, 13:51:10

beware of markets where they raise margin requirements..........i have seen margins raised on crude and energies several times in the last 3 years and it's always a sign that a major top is in place. they want to make sure everyone has the cash when the market reverses. and either way it moves, it also shakes people out unexpectedly, when margins are larger than usual.

they say a professional is just an amateur with lots of experience.......i can't say i am a professional trader just yet, but let's just say i made and lost enough money in the futures markets especially energies to make most peoples hair stand on end. the net result YTD is probably not quite as impressive as the specific gains and losses, as I made many mistakes myself, but my experience is building..........read the reminisance of a stock operator, that book is the bible to trading, especialy volatile markets and futures. it never really matters that much to make or lose money, only to stay in the game. Jesse Livermore, made and lost millions several times over, but his experiences always made him profitable eventually.

obviously the government is going to spread out the inventory numbers over a few weeks to stop further price spikes. obviously they can overstate numbers for a few weeks until shipments get unloaded and then understate them later on once things have settled down. like that the stats are manipulated to provide a cushion. that just means the government is siding with the shorts...........it a matter of national security..........thanks dubbya :-)

where it goes from here is a real hard call, i think a lot lower, but probably a quick run up first to keep the bulls hopeful and the buyers of calls coughing up to hedge themselves. if you want a good method for trading oil, go to nymex.com and check out the balance of open interest on the front month options. view all the calls on one window and all the puts on another and you can see roughly where the balance lies. As of Monday it was at about $62.50. Since the market makers mainly sell options, the price tends to revert to a point where they make the most profits and the maximum amount of puts and calls expire worthless.

Most likely on options expiration which is in one week, the market takes a dive to settle somewhere around $62-$63. Between now and then they'll want to keep the bulls interested and before V05 expires they'll want to get the bulls rolling over, so it's not going to crash in one shot.

Abiotic oil is an interesting one. I studied geology at Imperial College London, where alot of reasearch professors work. They were quite coy about the subject and definitely did not discount it, and infact said that there was a definite case for it in some places of the world, the granites in russia etc. where there are no sediment source rocks to be found and the oil appears to come from massive depths. I had all but forgotten about it when i came across that article on the internet that i first posted the link for here.

I was probably getting a bit over excited about it. I don't think that browsing the internet for articles is a qualification for making judgements. On the other hand it benefits the oil companies a great deal to keep it under wraps, and it's only been the russians that have reasearched into it in any detail. With communism only falling 15 years ago and oil having been researched for several hundred, it could take quite some time for it to get added into the text books. I don't think that anyone can totally deny that some oil is of abiotic origin. Cetainly none of my professors were jumping to discount it entirely, although they questioned how much oil could come from abiotic sources long term......But the fact that there is something to it, leads to some interesting logic about many of the other oil deposits that are loosely associated with subduction zones all over the planet, and I am sure with research, there are other reserves of abiotic oil that cuold be found by drilling deep enough in the right places,

Plate tectonics itself was of course ridiculed until the late 1960s when they discovered the magetic striping, and now we take it for granted. It could be that oil is produced at depth as some kind of lubricating by product of the break down of carbonate rocks under high pressure. There is a lot that science doesn't know and just like the flaw in capitalism tends to ignore things that have no price, such as clean water and air, quality of life etc etc. Science is also flawed in that anything that can't be immediately proved must be discounted as totally wrong. Modern Science is only one method of intellectual investigation. You could say that it is the religion of the post industrial era, and just as the other religions became increasingly dogmatic and stilted, I think science has unfortunately chosen that path as well.......human nature I guess.......There are other ways to approach investigating the physics and science of the universe about which we still know so little.

As far as oil goes, peak or not, the oil companies are playing games in concert with the government to run prices high and flop them low again. This of course has the effect not only of raising net prices and getting people comfortable with $40 oil and $2.50-$3 gas, It also wipes out small time companies, investment in alternatives etc. who go rushing in at $50, $60, $70 projections only to find they are not profitable.

If Albert Oil sands were so amazing then why weren't they all bought up years ago..........? no first they get everyone excited pouring money in, then they wack the price, then the big boys come in and buy them out for pennies.........
User avatar
richardmmm
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 205
Joined: Sat 20 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Postby rowante » Wed 14 Sep 2005, 05:03:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')veryone thinks that Bush failed, even though he invaded Iraq, oil prices ran. But they never thought to assume that they invaded Iraq so that they could run oil prices high without lining Sadams pockets with a quick 3 Billion dollars a week. There was so much corruption going on with that Food for Oil story I think that was one of the reasons they had to put an end to it once and for all.


I have been wondering about this lately and I find your take on it compelling. The triumvirate of oil in the Whitehouse (Bush, Cheney, Rice) provides reason enough for grave suspicion.

Have you read 'Addicted to Oil' by Ian Rutledge? He is an energy economist and has an interesting take on the current oil situation. He weighs up what he describes as the pessimist positions (Campbell, Simmons etc) with the optimists (Lynch, Odell) and reaches the conclusion that the date of the peak is not that relevant to America right now... but having access to develop the remaining reserves existing in the world is. The oil majors are currently blocked from the last significant high profit oil regions, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Venezuela, etc by nationalised oil industries.

Considering that oil companies live or die by constantly increasing their listed reserves, deliberately driving the price of oil up for new exploration and profit from marginal difficult oil sounds like a very plausible theory.

Anybody who discounts this sort of speculation as 'conspiracy theory' should read Sonia Shah's book The Story of Oil. The oil industry is truly a dark, nasty business.
Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you mad. - Aldous Huxley

Sydney Peak Oil
rowante
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 244
Joined: Tue 06 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Postby shakespear1 » Wed 14 Sep 2005, 05:53:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he oil industry is truly a dark, nasty business.


Few have an appreciation of this as it is dressed up in nice ties and proper etiquette. :)
Men argue, nature acts !
Voltaire

"...In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation."

Alan Greenspan
shakespear1
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1532
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Postby richardmmm » Thu 15 Sep 2005, 12:31:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shakespear1', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he oil industry is truly a dark, nasty business.


Few have an appreciation of this as it is dressed up in nice ties and proper etiquette. :)



yeah, and it's not just the oil. when you investigate and find out that all those nice logos like, BP, Exxon, Mobile, Texaco are all just parts or controlled by standard oil, and when you dig a bit deeper and find rothchilds and rockefellers or their minions on the board of literally dozens of companies then you start to understand that we are not a democracy but an oligracy.

electric motors almost never need servicing. they can run 500,000 miles and just need a change of bearings. i remember back in the 70s we had milkmen delivering milk and newspapera on electric driven vans. I wonder where they went ?

there is no need for all the commuter traffic, taxies, local city journeies to be made using gasoline. it could easily be electrical. It's not as convenient with current technology, but so many people drive to work and back or to the local school and back to get the kids etc. don't tell me that couldn't all be electic cars.
User avatar
richardmmm
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 205
Joined: Sat 20 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Postby shakespear1 » Thu 15 Sep 2005, 13:37:25

Here in Poland they have a magazine called FORUM. It takes good stories from all of the world and compiles them in this magazine under some theme.

The latest one was about our Neuroeconomics.

There's are story taken from the Der Spiegel titled "Taking a look at a Client's Brain". The story is about how he decide to buy things and what happens when we make that DECISION. The critical observation is that "When the brain comes in contact with a "brand" product it SHUTS OFF". We do not use reason but rather emotional side of our brain. It is not rational that GUIDES us but rather emotions.

I hope most appreciate what this means if they do not already do so.

5th Ave. Marketing People run our lives and most are not even aware of it. :-D

And it doesn't stop there. :roll:
Men argue, nature acts !
Voltaire

"...In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation."

Alan Greenspan
shakespear1
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1532
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Postby Dukat_Reloaded » Thu 15 Sep 2005, 13:41:57

Only Alternating Current Motors. I'd say some ac motors could last hundreds of years. The only problem with them is that they don't have much torq power, like an electric fan, you can put your hand in it and it will stop. Most electric cars use DC motors which means they have brushes that quickly wear out, but they are more powerful, if you stuck your hand into a dc powered fan it could cut your hand off. AC motors are good to use to generate power, you could set one up near a waterfall and never have to come back to check on it for years.
User avatar
Dukat_Reloaded
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 953
Joined: Sun 31 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Postby rockdoc123 » Thu 15 Sep 2005, 13:57:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'y')eah, and it's not just the oil. when you investigate and find out that all those nice logos like, BP, Exxon, Mobile, Texaco are all just parts or controlled by standard oil, and when you dig a bit deeper and find rothchilds and rockefellers or their minions on the board of literally dozens of companies then you start to understand that we are not a democracy but an oligracy


Oh for Christ sakes.....where do you come up with this crap? Maybe a lesson in history is necessary? Standard Oil was broken up under the anti-trust regulations in 1892. The spinoffs included Saucony which eventually became Mobil oil.....Esso which became Exxon.....Sohio which was taken over by BP....Amoco which was taken over by BP and Standard oil of California which eventually became Chevron. There is no Standard oil anymore ......there has been no such company for decades. All of these companies when they were spun off were required to have independent boards. To this date corporate governance regulations enforce the issue of independent board members as a means to protecting shareholder rights. There is currently no Rothschild or Rockefeller on the board of any of the companies you mentioned.
I would point out that these companies are competitors...they are at each others throats in many parts of the world...the thought that any of them would get together and agree on anything that is basically against the anti-trust regulations is so ludicrous as to be completely absurd. Trying to get two companies to even agree on a farm-in or purchase and sale agreement is like pulling eye teeth....anything beyond that sits in the realm of science fiction.
User avatar
rockdoc123
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7685
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Postby rockdoc123 » Thu 15 Sep 2005, 13:57:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'y')eah, and it's not just the oil. when you investigate and find out that all those nice logos like, BP, Exxon, Mobile, Texaco are all just parts or controlled by standard oil, and when you dig a bit deeper and find rothchilds and rockefellers or their minions on the board of literally dozens of companies then you start to understand that we are not a democracy but an oligracy


Oh for Christ sakes.....where do you come up with this crap? Maybe a lesson in history is necessary? Standard Oil was broken up under the anti-trust regulations in 1892. The spinoffs included Saucony which eventually became Mobil oil.....Esso which became Exxon.....Sohio which was taken over by BP....Amoco which was taken over by BP and Standard oil of California which eventually became Chevron. There is no Standard oil anymore ......there has been no such company for decades. All of these companies when they were spun off were required to have independent boards. To this date corporate governance regulations enforce the issue of independent board members as a means to protecting shareholder rights. There is currently no Rothschild or Rockefeller on the board of any of the companies you mentioned.
I would point out that these companies are competitors...they are at each others throats in many parts of the world...the thought that any of them would get together and agree on anything that is basically against the anti-trust regulations is so ludicrous as to be completely absurd. Trying to get two companies to even agree on a farm-in or purchase and sale agreement is like pulling eye teeth....anything beyond that sits in the realm of science fiction.
User avatar
rockdoc123
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7685
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Postby shakespear1 » Thu 15 Sep 2005, 16:20:05

Here a good link to keep an eye on things.

Charts

richardmmm - could you comment on what I see in the Philly Fed Survey link? I thing you have the qualifications to do this. :)
Men argue, nature acts !
Voltaire

"...In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation."

Alan Greenspan
shakespear1
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1532
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Postby richardmmm » Thu 15 Sep 2005, 19:37:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rockdoc123', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'y')eah, and it's not just the oil. when you investigate and find out that all those nice logos like, BP, Exxon, Mobile, Texaco are all just parts or controlled by standard oil, and when you dig a bit deeper and find rothchilds and rockefellers or their minions on the board of literally dozens of companies then you start to understand that we are not a democracy but an oligracy


Oh for Christ sakes.....where do you come up with this crap? Maybe a lesson in history is necessary? Standard Oil was broken up under the anti-trust regulations in 1892. The spinoffs included Saucony which eventually became Mobil oil.....Esso which became Exxon.....Sohio which was taken over by BP....Amoco which was taken over by BP and Standard oil of California which eventually became Chevron. There is no Standard oil anymore ......there has been no such company for decades. All of these companies when they were spun off were required to have independent boards. To this date corporate governance regulations enforce the issue of independent board members as a means to protecting shareholder rights. There is currently no Rothschild or Rockefeller on the board of any of the companies you mentioned.
I would point out that these companies are competitors...they are at each others throats in many parts of the world...the thought that any of them would get together and agree on anything that is basically against the anti-trust regulations is so ludicrous as to be completely absurd. Trying to get two companies to even agree on a farm-in or purchase and sale agreement is like pulling eye teeth....anything beyond that sits in the realm of science fiction.


not exactly since the same people all have the controlling interests
User avatar
richardmmm
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 205
Joined: Sat 20 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Postby rockdoc123 » Fri 16 Sep 2005, 16:21:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'n')ot exactly since the same people all have the controlling interests


do you have any idea how publicly traded companies work? Even if they did have controlling shares (which by the way they do not...the largest shareholders are institutional) the only sway they would have at all is at shareholder meetings. Most things that happen in companies do not go to a shareholder vote they are simply settled at either the senior management level or in certain circumstances at the board level.
I'm afraid this conspiracy theory doesn't hold any water at all.
User avatar
rockdoc123
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7685
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Postby richardmmm » Fri 16 Sep 2005, 19:58:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rockdoc123', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'n')ot exactly since the same people all have the controlling interests


do you have any idea how publicly traded companies work? Even if they did have controlling shares (which by the way they do not...the largest shareholders are institutional) the only sway they would have at all is at shareholder meetings. Most things that happen in companies do not go to a shareholder vote they are simply settled at either the senior management level or in certain circumstances at the board level.
I'm afraid this conspiracy theory doesn't hold any water at all.


oh yes forgive me I forgot how much sway shareholders have in the runing of corporations. i mean we only have to look at a situation like enron to see how important they are in day to day decisions............while we are on enron there is a perfect example of how they manipulated the electricity prices in california. it's not a conspiracy theory. a conspiracy theory is the president is a lizardman alien, or hilter is still alive and controls the governments decisions by using his secret deathray weapon to threaten them........what we are talking about here is simply hardnosed business, money and more importantly power / control. anyone would do the same if they were in that business.
User avatar
richardmmm
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 205
Joined: Sat 20 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Postby richardmmm » Fri 16 Sep 2005, 20:31:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shakespear1', 'H')ere a good link to keep an eye on things.

Charts

richardmmm - could you comment on what I see in the Philly Fed Survey link? I thing you have the qualifications to do this. :)




.......anyway, back to business,I really don't care if the president is a lizardman alien or the whole planet is secretly run by quakers, i am a speculator and all i really care about is what the market is doing, extreme politics is just a hobby.

to answer your question,

as far as one off economic reports like this are concerned i don't really follow them too closely other than to make sure i am not holding some enormous postion just before they hit the wires.

i tried to post yeasterday but there was an error, which is a shame because most of what i was trying to post played out pretty nice today, and is the setup for the rest of the year. quadurple witching happening today, which is a very important cross in the markets for the year. As everything played out so nicely, it's possible to get quite a nice idea of what the future holds. the key to trading is to see what the prices are doing, not what some schumuck in the Philly FED, with his figures that are probably jiggered with anyway, is doing.

oil prices are flopping about and as i predicted in this forum earlier, with options expiration on friday 16th (today), the market closed at $63.05 which exactly wipes out the maximum no# of options buyers. now they'll want to run the market up again, for a few days to get all the bulls rolling over into november before the OCT contracts expire sometime next week.
we can see $65, even a $67, but not much higher before we visit $58 again. After that who knows, but with my favorite anal-yst at goldmans shooting his mouth off about $105 oil again, you can be sure there'll be a fake rally followed by a large tanking move below $60. It may not even come and we might just move lower straight away. I am out of oil now, I only go in at insane prices. I consider $67 to be insane and I'll short the crap out of it if it goes that high, otherwise, I don't really care for it much at the moment. The best play on oil right now is selling naked Nov Calls, up high around $70. I got $1300 for one yesterday so I am protected until $71.30 and the option already halved in value to $650. Like picking cherries really.

S&P rallied and Bonds collapsed as I expected, Indexes will most likely move up until the end of the year, there is enough negative sentiment in general to keep them moving higher and fox everyone out. 1300 on the S&P at least. even 1350. We want to see the market bouyant again so that we can get a major dumb money top, then the bear will come out of hiberation sometime next year and eat everyone for breakfast. Check out a chart of the S&P from June01 thru Dec 02, that's the kind of idea we have on the cards right now.

Gold is an excellent buy, I went into DEC gold and Silver on monday, and everytime I checked the price I just had to buy some more. Infact I was thinking to even get some physical metal as well as holding contracts, the stuff is going to go to $3000/oz long term, it's only a question of time. Silver is an even better buy since it is at $7+ and can run as high as $50 once the bull run really starts in metals and hits the mainstream. You'll see the next mania is going to be in metals. For the rest of the year $500 mark will probably do the trick. maybe $8-$9 on silver. It will be hard to hold it long term though as there are bound to be some major correction as they try to stablise it. So it's worth hoping in and out as it goes.

So where were we, well basically Greenspan is retiring so once he is gone and the press has finished trumpeting his amazing achivements (of pumping out paper money like it was water from the hoover dam), then the results of his handy work will come to light next year as the stock market begins to tank, the metals roar through $1000/oz on gold and the brown stuff generally hits the fan.

I am not saying it will all happen at once, but in the next 1-3 years, it is happening. S&P needs to go to about 600 for earnings to match up. There could be a black monday situation next year with a major collapse in one day, we haven't had one of those in a while so it would be a bit of fun, but most likely it will just crumble slowly downwards as the press blames everyone except Saint Alan, who is infact the cause of all this mess, having totally overinflated money supply and caused more excess credit than there was in 1929..........you get the picture.................i do and it's not pretty, recession, probably depression. It's happening and this is not just a mad theory of mine, this is 5 years of exhaustive research on every aspect of fringe economics. I can't possibly explain it all here, but you can find many intelligent independant investor websites explaining what is going on right now, and it's not what you read in the WSJ.

there is so much credit and paper money in the system that it's going to make 1929 look like a vertiable tea party. this time the bankers will be probably be assisted in their jumps from windows by members of the general public heavily armed, but of course the patriot act and the homeland gestapo, might manage to quash that..........after all that wasn't enacted to protect anyone against terroism, it's to protect the rich elite against a massive uprising once 95% of the population is financially wiped out.

well, that's about it for now. bars of gold, guns and plenty of gasoline seem to be the best investments right now............

have fun with it..................and just remember in futures speculation, it never matters how much money you lose in a day, as long as you don't loose all of it. there is nothing bad about being wrong and taking a hit, as long as you are still comfortable to trade the markets again. if it nails you down to the bone, then you have a problem...............
User avatar
richardmmm
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 205
Joined: Sat 20 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Postby rockdoc123 » Fri 16 Sep 2005, 20:43:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'o')h yes forgive me I forgot how much sway shareholders have in the runing of corporations. i mean we only have to look at a situation like enron to see how important they are in day to day decisions............while we are on enron there is a perfect example of how they manipulated the electricity prices in california. it's not a conspiracy theory. a conspiracy theory is the president is a lizardman alien, or hilter is still alive and controls the governments decisions by using his secret deathray weapon to threaten them........what we are talking about here is simply hardnosed business, money and more importantly power / control. anyone would do the same if they were in that business


And what is your point here? You suggest that the Rothschilds and Rockefellers control the Boards of 5 major oil and gas firms...I then point out that they are not on any of the boards...you respond that Oh...well they still are the major shareholders and I respons...actually they are not and even if they were shareholders can't really control companies and then you come back with some completely inane comment about Enron that has no bearing whatsoever on your original position.
I have to say that your remarks regarding Standard Oil et al pretty much indicate you have absolutely no understanding of the oil and gas business at all. Having belief sets as you do regarding some weird backroom oil megalopoly castes fairly large suspicions on pretty much anything else you say. It would be good for a change if you posted some views based on factual information rather than that which you have made up.
User avatar
rockdoc123
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7685
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Postby something_awfull » Fri 16 Sep 2005, 22:15:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dukat', 'O')nly Alternating Current Motors. I'd say some ac motors could last hundreds of years. The only problem with them is that they don't have much torq power, like an electric fan, you can put your hand in it and it will stop. Most electric cars use DC motors which means they have brushes that quickly wear out, but they are more powerful, if you stuck your hand into a dc powered fan it could cut your hand off. AC motors are good to use to generate power, you could set one up near a waterfall and never have to come back to check on it for years.


You mean brushless Alternators, like they use in most (quality) Generators?, the AC motor out of my electric fan will not generate any sort of electricity, no matter how fast you turn it.
User avatar
something_awfull
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 264
Joined: Sat 13 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Sydney, Australia.
Top

Re: BUY ON RUMOR SELL ON NEWS

Postby richardmmm » Fri 16 Sep 2005, 22:18:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rockdoc123', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'o')h yes forgive me I forgot how much sway shareholders have in the runing of corporations. i mean we only have to look at a situation like enron to see how important they are in day to day decisions............while we are on enron there is a perfect example of how they manipulated the electricity prices in california. it's not a conspiracy theory. a conspiracy theory is the president is a lizardman alien, or hilter is still alive and controls the governments decisions by using his secret deathray weapon to threaten them........what we are talking about here is simply hardnosed business, money and more importantly power / control. anyone would do the same if they were in that business


And what is your point here? You suggest that the Rothschilds and Rockefellers control the Boards of 5 major oil and gas firms...I then point out that they are not on any of the boards...you respond that Oh...well they still are the major shareholders and I respons...actually they are not and even if they were shareholders can't really control companies and then you come back with some completely inane comment about Enron that has no bearing whatsoever on your original position.
I have to say that your remarks regarding Standard Oil et al pretty much indicate you have absolutely no understanding of the oil and gas business at all. Having belief sets as you do regarding some weird backroom oil megalopoly castes fairly large suspicions on pretty much anything else you say. It would be good for a change if you posted some views based on factual information rather than that which you have made up.



rockdoc123 confirms that the world is a free and fair place and everything runs perfectly smoothly with no manipulation, underhanded dealings, corporate-government back slapping etc.. and everything is presented to us exactly the way they spell it on fox news.......great, thanks, I am so relieved.

read the title of this forum and then check out the date it was posted and a chart of the price of oil. I think you'll find I am pretty on the ball when it comes to financial manipulation of prices.

it's easy to say after the fact that it all makes sense, but i surprised many people on this and other forums with my perfectly accurate analysis of what oil prices would do post Katrina infact accurate to 5cents on the close this Friday.

i can't say exactly who is pulling the strings but there is an elite group of very rich people, a royal family without the crown if you like, that basically does whatever the hell it damn wants to.

if you look into the history of standard oil you will see it was broken up into 34 companies most of which have slowly reamalgamated.

if you look into the histroy of the games that general motors and the oil companies play to take money out of everyone's pockets then you see something is not right.

when you understand that the FED is a private bank that hasn't been audited by congress since the 1950s and that it's establishment was questionable, rushed through congress a few days before chritsmas recess when half the senators were away, you see something isn't right.

when you consider that an average merchant in Ancient Rome could buy himself a set of good clothes for 1oz of gold and that same oz today would buy you a reasonable suit then you see the concept of inflation is totally false and that the whole game is setup to strip wealth and buying power from the middle classes and keep a rich elite in power, via a totally false paper money system.

ignore it at your peril because the next depression is going to alot worse than the last one.
User avatar
richardmmm
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 205
Joined: Sat 20 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron