Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Oil & NGas Infrastructure Thread (merged)

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby retiredguy » Mon 05 Sep 2005, 10:27:54

I agree with you fluffy, but with nukes and coal-fired plants not palatable to the general public, NG was the natural choice to produce electricity. Of course, the public still expected an increase in electricity production.
My choice is to install a wood-burning stove where my fireplace used to be. For the time being, there is still a lot of wood to burn around here.
Having said that, gas fireplaces still vastly outsell those that burn wood here.
And there won't be a collapse???
User avatar
retiredguy
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Tue 11 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: southern Wisconsin

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby Jaymax » Mon 05 Sep 2005, 10:38:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('tokyo_to_motueka', '[')url=http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/provider/providerarticle.asp?feed=AP&Date=20050904&ID=5084680]Grim Outlook for 4 Gulf Coast Refineries[/url]
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he prospects for the other four refineries that shut down ahead of the storm are more dire. The plants, in hard-hit areas southeast of New Orleans and in Mississippi, can process some 880,000 barrels a day of crude, more than 5 percent of total U.S. capacity.

So what price for gasoline in the states would result in a medium-term 5% reduction is gasoline usage?
Alternatively, I guess we could have something like a global price rise leading to a global 2% reduction...
Doomerosity now at 2 (occasionaly 3, was 4)

Currently (mostly) taking a break from posting at po.com. Don't trust the false prophets of doom - keep reading, keep learning, keep challenging your assum
User avatar
Jaymax
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 259
Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: England

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby Leanan » Mon 05 Sep 2005, 10:48:55

This blog is from Friday, but has some good info on Katrina's effect on the oil and gas production, including lots of charts and graphs.

This one, for example:

Image

His Thursday blog is also worth a read. Among other things, it's got this refinery status report, from the Dept. of Energy:

Image
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby J-Rod » Mon 05 Sep 2005, 11:05:27

Update on current damage assessment
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')ouston: Hurricane Katrina has damaged or displaced an estimated 58 Gulf of Mexico oil platforms and drilling rigs, the American Petroleum Institute has announced. Thirty of the rigs have been reported lost.
No company breakdown was available, said Tim Sampson, an API spokesman.
One of the more significant reported losses of production equipment came from Houston's Apache Corp.
On Friday, Apache said it lost eight platforms that had produced 7158 barrels of oil and 12.1 million cubic feet of natural gas a day.
That is about 10 per cent of the lost oil production and 2 per cent of the shut-in gas reported earlier this week, company spokesman Bill Mintz said.

LINK
User avatar
J-Rod
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 375
Joined: Tue 17 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Northeast Ohio

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby Armageddon » Mon 05 Sep 2005, 18:37:47

is this hurricane damage to the refineries and rigs worse than they are telling us ? and what are the implications
User avatar
Armageddon
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7450
Joined: Wed 13 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: St.Louis, Mo

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby Leanan » Mon 05 Sep 2005, 20:21:55

I think it is worse than they are saying. Bad news is bad for their stock price, y'know, so they have every reason to spin it.

We should probably look at what happened to Ivan for guidance. As I recall, at first they said damage was minimal, no worries. The full extent of the damage wasn't known for months.
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby frankthetank » Mon 05 Sep 2005, 21:15:09

Some updated info: LINK
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')Damage to oil platforms and pipelines in the Gulf of Mexico caused by Hurricane Katrina could be three times as bad as when Hurricane Ivan struck the area last year, warned international energy consultancy Wood Mackenzie.
Eugene Kim, senior energy analyst at WoodMac's Houston office said efforts to inspect damage to offshore installations and subsea pipelines will be severely hampered by the mass destruction of
onshore communication, power networks and lack of crew willing to leave their families to go offshore. ...
The US market has lost about 42 million gallons of gasoline production daily, equal to 10-per cent of the nation's normal consumption, according to government estimates.
Kim said: "We expect a definite negative impact on prices, not only from Hurricane Katrina, but because we're heading into high winter demand for heating oil with tight supplies."
The American Petroleum Institute estimates that about 58 oil and gas platforms and drilling rigs in the Gulf of Mexico have been damaged, including Shell's Mars deepwater platform.
"Mars is a much larger producer than the fields which were damaged by Hurricane Ivan, " Kim said. He warned that damage estimates so far are based on purely visual assessments and the true extent of damage may be far greater. "Only when you reman the platforms and push the start button will you know the damage level. It's early estimates, but the numbers look quite staggering . . . these are three times greater than with Hurricane Ivan."
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby frankthetank » Mon 05 Sep 2005, 21:18:03

more from rigzone.com
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he Coast Guard reported Monday that 26 oil platforms are missing, and 18 are damaged to varying degrees.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he recovery in offshore energy production after Hurricane Katrina will take at least as long as with Hurricane Ivan, and perhaps longer if there is extensive pipeline damage, said Ted Falgout, executive director of Port Fourchon, a key oilfield port in Louisiana.
"If this storm didn't wreak havoc on the pipelines, we probably can recover in the same time-frame as Ivan," which took six to seven months, Falgout said. "But, if in addition to the above-water damage there is is pipeline damage, then who knows?"

And oil is coming back on line faster then nat gas...not good!
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI
Top

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby Leanan » Mon 05 Sep 2005, 22:07:21

Wow. Three times as bad as Ivan would be very bad, indeed.

And there could be more where Katrina came from. We're still a couple of weeks from the start of peak hurricane season.
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby richardmmm » Mon 05 Sep 2005, 22:14:42

Natural Gas is looking to be more of a problem than Oil.
However LNG can be imported quite easily and is already being imported: Link
This terminal for example can handle as much as 2% of US total consumption.
There is always the coal gas option.
Natural Gas was the cheap choice of the 90s, but I think the oil companies pushed it on everyone so that they could hike the prices later on.
As usual they planned ahead and no one else did so they get to drain everyone's wallets as usual.
Plus they'll be locking in all the utilities on contracts for the winter at high prices on gas supply, before dropping the price shortly after.
EIA
actually it looks like about 10% of NG is currently imported and they could probably ramp that up to 20% if necessary. 25% of total US production is said to be in the GOM, but 25% of that is back on line, so assume mid term loss of 10-15%. It can pretty much be covered from imports and extra prodcution from other US fields.
it's looking more tenuous on paper than oil, I have to admit, but the price has also gone from $2 to $12, so it's due a pull in. It's way over done the blow off on NG.
User avatar
richardmmm
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 205
Joined: Sat 20 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby sjn » Tue 06 Sep 2005, 02:04:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('richardmmm', 'N')atural Gas is looking to be more of a problem than Oil. ... it's looking more tenuous on paper than oil, I have to admit, but the price has also gone from $2 to $12, so it's due a pull in. It's way over done the blow off on NG.

You state that 2% can be provided through LNG, which is fine but as you point out LNG imports are already in operation, there isn't the infrastructure to further increase LNG imports at this time. 2% from LNG is in no way going to make up for the loss in the GOM. The other NAFTA countries do not have the spare capacity to give the US more NG, Canada has reduced it's tar sands production due to running up against NG limits (more money to be made selling the NG than producing oil from tar sands).
User avatar
sjn
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 1332
Joined: Wed 09 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK
Top

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby fluffy » Tue 06 Sep 2005, 04:55:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('richardmmm', 'N')atural Gas is looking to be more of a problem than Oil.
However LNG can be imported quite easily and is already being imported. Link
This terminal for example can handle as much as 2% of US total consumption.

US LNG import capacity is already at 100% capacity; the price of natural gas was very high due to capacity constraints BEFORE the hurricane. There are serious issues with the expansion of LNG imports for the USA, these being another structural trade deficit (like oil, one that increases with currency depreciation) and strategic vunerability.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('richardmmm', 'T')here is always the coal gas option.

That's true, although I have to wonder if it will still be allowed due to extreme safety issues. (Carbon monoxide is NOT safe..) In any case, Coal gas plants take time and capital to construct.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('richardmmm', 'N')atural Gas was the cheap choice of the 90s, but I think the oil companies pushed it on everyone so that they could hike the prices later on.

It was the regan administration, IIRC, that dropped the ban on NG-fuelled electric plants.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('richardmmm', 'A')s usual they planned ahead and no one else did so they get to drain everyone's wallets as usual.

Although I'm not a great supporter of big business as currently conducted, I have to point out that you don't see people complaining about low prices destroying the profitability and investment flows of oil and gas companies.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('richardmmm', ' ')EIA
actually it looks like about 10% of NG is currently imported and they could probably ramp that up to 20% if necessary. 25% of total US production is said to be in the GOM, but 25% of that is back on line, so assume mid term loss of 10-15%. It can pretty much be covered from imports and extra prodcution from other US fields..
Currently, Canada, the major source of US imports, is suffering production declines of its own, yet you seem to think it can send 100% of its production south(?). Mexico is an importer of natural gas, and LNG imports are at 100% of capacity. Every rig that can drill was drilling at 100% capacity before Katrina, with day rates going through the roof.
The mid term loss will be around 5bcf/day. Over the last few years, the margin between storage and pressure loss has been around 400-600bcf. So if the above capacity is out for 3 months, the chances are that pressure loss will happen; a cold winter, or another GOM hurricane would make that a certainty.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('richardmmm', 'i')t's looking more tenuous on paper than oil, I have to admit, but the price has also gone from $2 to $12, so it's due a pull in. It's way over done the blow off on NG.
That all depends on the next few eeeks Storage reports.
User avatar
fluffy
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 289
Joined: Mon 26 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: UK
Top

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby tokyo_to_motueka » Tue 06 Sep 2005, 11:05:12

bloomberg
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')Plants on the Gulf Coast of Mississippi and near New Orleans may be off line for six months to a year, according to Kinetic Analysis Corp. of Savannah, Georgia, which uses computer models to assess natural disasters. A ConocoPhillips plant in Belle Chasse, Louisiana, probably had the worst damage, the firm said.
``I've never seen anything as devastating to the refining industry,'' said Dan Robinson, 57, president of Placid Refining Co. LLC, which operates a refinery near Baton Rouge, Louisiana. ``This is going to cause the refining capacity in this area to be down a lot longer than it has ever been.''
Exxon Mobil Corp. said yesterday it hadn't been able to complete an inspection of its 190,000 barrel-per-day refinery in Chalmette, Louisiana, just east of New Orleans. ConocoPhillips and other refinery owners said they can't yet estimate when plants will return to service.
Companies are providing almost no information about their facilities so far, Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. analyst Neil McMahon said in an interview. ``They're concerned about their own employees and getting people back to work and making sure that they're safe,'' he said. ``They're devoting time to the human side, which is correct.''
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')Four refineries took the worst blow from Katrina, according to a report form RBC Capital Markets analyst Joseph D. Allman. They are the ConocoPhillips plant; Chevron Corp.'s Pascagoula, Mississippi, refinery; Murphy Oil Corp.'s Meraux, Louisiana, facility; and the Chalmette facility, which is a joint venture of Exxon Mobil and Petroleos de Venezuela SA.
Having these four plants shut down would keep U.S. fuel output at least 5 percent below pre-storm levels that barely kept pace with demand.

Tent City
Chevron is erecting a "tent city'' at the Pascagoula, refinery for 1,500 workers and family members left homeless by the storm. Pascagoula was out of service for more than two months after Hurricane Georges flooded the plant with three to four feet of water in September 1998.
"There's no power in the area and we're still assessing the damage,'' Chevron spokesman Michael Barrett said in a phone interview yesterday. Lack of phone service is also hampering efforts by the San Ramon, California-based company, he said. Chevron is the second-largest U.S. oil company after Exxon Mobil
The Chalmette and Meraux refineries are in St. Bernard parish, an area that was flooded along with New Orleans when the levees failed.
The Meraux plant was accessible only by boat late last week, according to Murphy Oil spokeswoman Mindy West. ``You can't drive in, because they won't let you use any of the bridges until they can verify their soundness,'' she said. ``So for now, we're having to operate via the river.''

Personnel Shortages
Even after power is restored, floodwaters are pumped out and employees are allowed to return to evacuated areas, refinery repairs will be stalled by a shortage of contractors to replace damaged pipes and other equipment, said Chuck Watson, president of research and development at Kinetic Analysis.
Those four refineries have a combined crude processing capacity of about 887,000 barrels a day, or 5.2 percent of total U.S. capacity. Repairing damage to those plants will take months during a time when the U.S. refining system was already straining to keep pace with record fuel consumption.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')size=134]The U.S. Energy Department said U.S. fuel-making facilities were at 97 percent of capacity in the week before Katrina hit.[/size]
:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:
Full Spectrum Disorder, by Stan Goff.
Just read it!
User avatar
tokyo_to_motueka
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 486
Joined: Tue 19 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Tochigi
Top

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby RdSnt » Tue 06 Sep 2005, 13:59:24

Anybody hear about the Thunderhorse platform. DId it survive? Was it listing like the last time?
Gravity is not a force, it is a boundary layer.
Everything is coincident.
Love: the state of suspended anticipation.
To get any appreciable distance from the Earth in
a sensible amount of time, you must lie.
User avatar
RdSnt
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Wed 02 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby frankthetank » Tue 06 Sep 2005, 14:13:28

it survived...maybe next time?
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby AirlinePilot » Tue 06 Sep 2005, 16:32:33

The underwater story is going to be very important I believe. We need some info on that ASAP. Here we have lost 5% of refining capacity for lets say 6 months. NOBODY KNOWS yet what the loss is in production is with any certainty.

I think the underwater damage coupled with these refinery shutdowns, plus the lack of workers (lost/homeless) is going to be a triple threat that will plunge us right back into a price spike after the short term "feel good" climate is over. Right now the foreign imports of extra crude and from the SPR are a VERY short term panacea for what will be the big game come the crunch this fall and winter with heating oil. Hope and pray for a warm winter across the north this year.

Once again I do not believe the analysts are connecting the dots on this one. We may be flush with crude for the short term, but that puddle will dry up in a hurry once we restart the refineries again. I fear this attitude that things are getting back to normal will bite us in the ass with regards to consumption. Should have used this crisis to start massive conservation, but we will go right back to business as usual, suck up all the extra crude and watch the next big price spike as we see the lack of refinery problem rear its ugly head once again.

Demand will be very interesting to watch over the next month or two.
User avatar
AirlinePilot
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4378
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of Atlanta

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby Ming » Tue 06 Sep 2005, 18:26:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AirlinePilot', 'T')he underwater story is going to be very important I believe. We need some info on that ASAP. Here we have lost 5% of refining capacity for lets say 6 months. NOBODY KNOWS yet what the loss is in production is with any certainty.

I think the underwater damage coupled with these refinery shutdowns, plus the lack of workers (lost/homeless) is going to be a triple threat that will plunge us right back into a price spike after the short term "feel good" climate is over. Right now the foreign imports of extra crude and from the SPR are a VERY short term panacea for what will be the big game come the crunch this fall and winter with heating oil. Hope and pray for a warm winter across the north this year.

Once again I do not believe the analysts are connecting the dots on this one. We may be flush with crude for the short term, but that puddle will dry up in a hurry once we restart the refineries again. I fear this attitude that things are getting back to normal will bite us in the ass with regards to consumption. Should have used this crisis to start massive conservation, but we will go right back to business as usual, suck up all the extra crude and watch the next big price spike as we see the lack of refinery problem rear its ugly head once again.

Demand will be very interesting to watch over the next month or two.

I fully agree.
I expect prices to really go up after the next couple of EIA weekly stock reports.
User avatar
Ming
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 287
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby frankthetank » Wed 07 Sep 2005, 15:38:13

How can this not be REALLY BAD???

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')ix U.S. refineries ravaged by Hurricane Katrina remain down on Wednesday and at least four of these facilities could be out of operation "for months," Energy Information Administration chief Guy Caruso told a House panel on Wednesday. EIA is the statistical arm of the Energy Department. Those refinieres still out "will probably take longer" to restore, Energy Undersecretary David Garman told the House Energy and Commerce Committee. The Energy Department expects one of the six refineries to be fully operational by the end of Wednesday and another to take up to two weeks, according to an assesment released Wednesday.


from marketwatch.com
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI
Top

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby Leanan » Fri 09 Sep 2005, 08:27:50

CNN just reported that Shell says their Mars platform will out of commission until at least next year.
Remember the first reports from Shell? "Some damage to the upper deck." Obviously low-balling the damage, since the photos showed the superstructure was trashed and the legs broken off.
Now, a week and a half later, they admit it's not going to be pumping oil any time soon.
I think that's an indication of how this is going to go. They are going to soft-pedal the damage reports as long as they can, and dribble them out little by little, to avoid spooking the markets too much.
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby Eli » Fri 09 Sep 2005, 10:23:38

Yep Leanan
I think you are absolutely correct. It seems to me that the powers that be are really trying to keep a lid on this situation.
The EIA numbers come out and they are far better than what most expected and the natural gas decline along with the oil decline since Katrina do not add up.
And 5% of the refining capacity has yet to come back on line and they have recieved considerable damage.
I must commend them for really reining in the markets .
User avatar
Eli
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a van down by the river

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron