






Expressing one's thoughts about overshoot is very difficult and perilous. I don't know if you heard Matt Savinar the other night. He fell into the trap that lurks at the heart of this issue of peak oil. He was discussing the oil situation with Richard Hoagland, former science advisor to Walter Cronkite at CBS. Hoagland is now an Apostle for ET and believes that Shadow Government agencies have possession of alien technology and an infinite energy source. What Hoagland did, in my estimation, was to lay a subtle trap for Savinar to expose the 'doomerism' that underlies the whole Peak Oil issue. He suggested to Savinar that it would be a good thing if they could use the Freedom Of Information Act to get this infinite energy source out in the open and available for our general use. Savinar replied that an infinite energy source would doom us all to totally trashing the planet in short order, or words to that effect. Most people hearing that would likely assume that Savinar hates humanity and wants us all to die. Remember that the ecological mindset which regards humans as a species displaying the same behavior as bacteria in a petri dish or reindeer breeding their way to a die-off is not welcome to most people. I myself agree with Monte and others who have come to understand these ecological issues as a deadly peril to us. To most people, such views are misanthropic, bad news that they would resist fervently. Its like the line in the movie A Few Good Men, 'You can't handle the Truth.' Hoagland's trap, then, was to bring this aspect of the Peak Oil message to everyone's attention as a way of marshalling a negative response from the public to Matt Savinar. Hoagland wants everybody to get on board with the Trekkie bullshit he is peddling. What Hoagland also did, which is my point here, is to exploit the 'bad news' aspect of Peak Oil; it is precisely that aspect which makes it difficult to look at this issue clearly.



Expressing one's thoughts about overshoot is very difficult and perilous. I don't know if you heard Matt Savinar the other night. He fell into the trap that lurks at the heart of this issue of peak oil. He was discussing the oil situation with Richard Hoagland, former science advisor to Walter Cronkite at CBS. Hoagland is now an Apostle for ET and believes that Shadow Government agencies have possession of alien technology and an infinite energy source. What Hoagland did, in my estimation, was to lay a subtle trap for Savinar to expose the 'doomerism' that underlies the whole Peak Oil issue. He suggested to Savinar that it would be a good thing if they could use the Freedom Of Information Act to get this infinite energy source out in the open and available for our general use. Savinar replied that an infinite energy source would doom us all to totally trashing the planet in short order, or words to that effect. Most people hearing that would likely assume that Savinar hates humanity and wants us all to die. Remember that the ecological mindset which regards humans as a species displaying the same behavior as bacteria in a petri dish or reindeer breeding their way to a die-off is not welcome to most people. I myself agree with Monte and others who have come to understand these ecological issues as a deadly peril to us. To most people, such views are misanthropic, bad news that they would resist fervently. Its like the line in the movie A Few Good Men, 'You can't handle the Truth.' Hoagland's trap, then, was to bring this aspect of the Peak Oil message to everyone's attention as a way of marshalling a negative response from the public to Matt Savinar. Hoagland wants everybody to get on board with the Trekkie bullshit he is peddling. What Hoagland also did, which is my point here, is to exploit the 'bad news' aspect of Peak Oil; it is precisely that aspect which makes it difficult to look at this issue clearly.













Return to Open Topic Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests