Can I give an analogy?
Sick person comes to a self-trained doctor. Self-trained doctor says, "Hopeless. Nothing you can do."
Has the self-trained doctor advocated anything? No.
Does his lack of judgment cause suffering? Yes.
MQ has set himself up as an expert. As far as I can tell, he is self-trained and doesn't have connections with an academic institution or with other people working in the field. These connections don't guarantee truth, but they weed out cranky theories and obvious errors.
Most of the time, self-proclaimed experts are harmless; they're writing about invisible energies or strange archaeololgical findings.
Unfortunately, Monte posts voluminously on a site devoted to a critical problem, frequented by newbies. Also, peakoil.com is a site where outsiders come to get an impression of Peak Oil people.
Personally, I'm sure he's a great guy. As I said, he's sincere and works hard. So, this isn't about personal criticism.
Nor is it about different opinions. I agree with much of what MQ says.
The problem is that he's dug himself into an intellectual hole; he's not getting or listening to feedback that would keep him connected to reality. If anyone is serious about social theories, they don't work alone and post proclamations on a loosely moderated discussion board. That's not how significant intellectual work takes place.
As counter examples, consider Richard Heinberg or Julian Darley. They write about the same material, but they're publishing books, speaking in public, getting feedback from professionals in the field.




!!
