by Jack » Sat 03 Sep 2005, 01:51:49
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('trespam', 'Y')ou are wrong. You are using the fallacious argument made by some that the wealthy should give everything. That's not true. The argument that if I don't give 100% to the poor, I'm against the poor.
Not at all. I simply pointed out that you were retired and had some useful skills. I added that the folks in New Orleans could be helped by you. And then I pointed out that you constantly speak of helping others and cooperating as a method of dealing with peak oil. Yet you are not willing to do anything in the case of New Orleans. Notice that I never suggested giving 100%, or 50%, or 1% - I just pointed out the obvious disparity between your words and your deeds.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('trespam', '
') The rich will always have more than the poor. The poor live harder lives, and shorter lives. That's a given. You bring the black and white conception that because I argue we should help people, I must give all to all. Dumb argument.
The rich will always have more than the poor? Now there's a profound observation!
')You've made absolutely no progress in countering what I said. What I said. In general: I find your (a) comments about ridding the world of unnecessary people and taking their resourcs fascistic and (b) your comments trying to prove your sick thesis by using New Orleans to be pathetically sick.