Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal



Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /var/www/peakoil.com/public_html/wp-content/plugins/random-image-widget/random_image.php on line 138

Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /var/www/peakoil.com/public_html/wp-content/plugins/random-image-widget/random_image.php on line 139
PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Titan Thread (merged)

Discussions of conventional and alternative energy production technologies.

Re: Harvesting hydrocarbons from Titan: not feasible.

Postby JoeW » Tue 30 Aug 2005, 09:18:35

What if it was done with a nuclear spaceship, thereby converting nuclear energy into hydrocarbon energy?
The present energy situation on earth is that there is enough uranium, but not enough hydrocarbons.
User avatar
JoeW
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 647
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: The Pit of Despair

Re: Harvesting hydrocarbons from Titan: not feasible.

Postby Jenab » Tue 30 Aug 2005, 09:33:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Antimatter', 'N')ice analysis! However:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')bviously, Titan could supply a human colony in the Saturn system with energy for centuries - if there were such a colony.


Hydrocarbons are useless without large amounts of free oxygen, which we mere earthlings take for granted!

That's right. You'd have to produce free oxygen somehow. Silent Running? "Earth between my toes and a flower in my hair..." We'd take our planty comrades with us. Grow plants in domes and feed them all the CO2 they want.

Jerry Abbott
User avatar
Jenab
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 237
Joined: Tue 28 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Hillsboro, West Virginia

Re: Harvesting hydrocarbons from Titan: not feasible.

Postby whereagles » Tue 30 Aug 2005, 10:11:19

I've seen some crazy ideas for peak oil solutions, but this "Titan oil farming" rates to be in the top of unfeasibility 8)
User avatar
whereagles
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 586
Joined: Wed 17 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Portugal

Re: Harvesting hydrocarbons from Titan: not feasible.

Postby Jenab » Tue 30 Aug 2005, 10:44:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('whereagles', 'I')'ve seen some crazy ideas for peak oil solutions, but this "Titan oil farming" rates to be in the top of unfeasibility 8)

I believe that my original post was intended to show that using Titan's oil as a solution to Peak Oil was unfeasible.

On the other hand, it's not unfeasible to use plants to extract oxygen from carbonaceous strata - that's pretty much what plants are evolved to do. You could use a fraction of the hydrocarbon energy to produce the extra light that the plants would need 9.55 AU from the sun. Or you could simply use mirrors to focus more light on the forest. (They wouldn't need to be heavy, high quality mirrors, either. Foil on a light skeleton frame would do.)

Neither do you need to transport a whole forest from Earth. You need only a few seeds and some time, and you can grow one. If you're in a hurry, you can also take hydroponic algae for an interim oxygen supply.

Jerry Abbott
User avatar
Jenab
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 237
Joined: Tue 28 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Hillsboro, West Virginia

Re: Harvesting hydrocarbons from Titan: not feasible.

Postby Jenab » Tue 30 Aug 2005, 11:02:20

Another complication in finding a low-energy transfer orbit from Saturn to Earth arises from the fact that Saturn's orbit and Earth's orbit exist in different planes. I will demonstrate.

Saturn's orbital elements
semimajor axis, 9.55491 AU
eccentricity, 0.05551
inclination, 2.489 degrees
longitude of ascending node, 113.666 degrees
argument of perihelion, 339.391 degrees
time of perihelion passage, JD 2452832.9 = 12 July 2003 at 9h 36m UT

Earth's orbital elements
semimajor axis, 1.000000 AU
eccentricity, 0.016710
inclination, 0.0 degrees
longitude of ascending node, 0.0 degrees
argument of perihelion, 102.94719 degrees
time of perihelion passage, JD 2453009.3 = 4 January 2004 at 19:12 UT

The elements of the transfer orbit
semimajor axis, 5.178257 AU
eccentricity, 0.805321
inclination, 50.56564 degrees
longitude of ascending node, 161.52564 degrees
argument of perihelion, 182.44836 degrees

The time of departure: JD 2454755.5 = 16 October 2008 at 0h 0m UT
The time of arrival: JD 2456905.6 = 5 September 2014 at 2h 24m UT

The transfer orbit is an ellipse with aphelion at departure.
The transit time is 2150.1 days.
The transit change in true anomaly is 177.55164 degrees.

The transfer orbit's angular momentum (per unit mass) vector is
hx = +1.471152E+15 m^2 sec^-1
hy = +4.403359E+15 m^2 sec^-1
hz = +3.818150E+15 m^2 sec^-1

The departure velocity (sun relative, heliocentric ecliptic coordinates) is
V1x = -690.2 m/s
V1y = -2645.3 m/s
V1z = +3316.7 m/s

The departure delta vee (sun relative, heliocentric ecliptic coordinates) is
dV1x = +2643.0 m/s
dV1y = +6614.8 m/s
dV1z = +3022.4 m/s
dV1 (magnitude) = 7.738 km/sec

The arrival velocity (sun relative, heliocentric ecliptic coordinates) is
V2x = +7299.0 m/s
V2y = +24344.0 m/s
V2z = -30772.2 m/s

The arrival delta vee (sun relative, heliocentric ecliptic coordinates) is
dV2x = +1655.3 m/s
dV2y = +3898.2 m/s
dV2z = +30772.2 m/s
dV2 (magnitude) = 31.062 km/sec

Notice that the magnitude of the sun-relative velocity - that's V2, not dV2 - is about what I said in my original post: 39.91 km/sec. Under ideal astrodynamic circumstances, Earth and the approaching cargo vessel would be moving in the same direction, with the cargo vessel moving faster and thus overtaking Earth. Earth's sun-relative orbital speed would be subtracted from the cargo vessel's sun-relative orbital speed when calculating the Earth-relative speed of the cargo vessel.

Unfortunately, this is a highly inclined transfer orbit, and the cargo vessel is intercepting Earth at a steep angle to Earth's own motion around the sun. So the better part of the "velocity cancellation" that would occur in the ideal encounter does not occur in this one.

Jerry Abbott
User avatar
Jenab
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 237
Joined: Tue 28 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Hillsboro, West Virginia

Re: Harvesting hydrocarbons from Titan: not feasible.

Postby aflurry » Tue 30 Aug 2005, 11:42:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jenab', '(')2. "Feeding the hungry" has apparently cost us the chance to create something of enduring worth beyond the confines of our planet. And it may be a chance lost to us forever.)


Ya, it's always the hungry's fault. Stupid hungry and their stupid stomachs. Man, fuck the hungry.
User avatar
aflurry
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 824
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Harvesting hydrocarbons from Titan: not feasible.

Postby ohanian » Tue 30 Aug 2005, 12:00:08

Wrong! Wrong! Wrong!

You got to think BIG. Think laterally.

Use the hydrocarbon cargo to smash straight into the moon.

This will cause the moon to come closer to the earth. Then this
will cause bigger tide forces.

Next, use the tidal electrical generation scheme to extract the
energy to power our toyota prius.
User avatar
ohanian
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1553
Joined: Sun 17 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Harvesting hydrocarbons from Titan: not feasible.

Postby Licho » Tue 30 Aug 2005, 12:17:51

What about using aerobraking system? With advanced materials, containers could withstand touch with atmosphere at 11km/s and slow down..
User avatar
Licho
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 833
Joined: Mon 31 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Brno, Czech rep., EU

Re: Harvesting hydrocarbons from Titan: not feasible.

Postby Jenab » Tue 30 Aug 2005, 12:21:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('aflurry', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jenab', '(')2. "Feeding the hungry" has apparently cost us the chance to create something of enduring worth beyond the confines of our planet. And it may be a chance lost to us forever.)


Ya, it's always the hungry's fault. Stupid hungry and their stupid stomachs. Man, fuck the hungry.

No, don't. Not literally anyway. People should not breed more than they can support by their own labor. (As I see it, that applies as much to capitalists, who are basically parasites with power, as it does to the poor, who are parasites without power.) Food foreign aid should always be laced with sterilization drugs.
User avatar
Jenab
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 237
Joined: Tue 28 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Hillsboro, West Virginia
Top

Re: Harvesting hydrocarbons from Titan: not feasible.

Postby Jenab » Tue 30 Aug 2005, 12:30:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Licho', 'W')hat about using aerobraking system? With advanced materials, containers could withstand touch with atmosphere at 11km/s and slow down..

Well, you'd have one pass to get your speed below escape speed, which means you'd have to shed 3.6 km/sec during the first pass through the upper atmosphere, decelerating from 15.1 km/sec to 11.5 km/sec. With that done, you could shed the rest more gradually through successive aerobraking passes. How much energy is this? What material will take the heat? If the heatshield is ablative, remember that it had to come all the way from Saturn because it would defeat the whole purpose to send out an intercept rocket to install a heatshield in transit. The intercept rocket would use up more energy than could be recovered from the cargo.

Hey, I just noticed that a slowdown to below escape speed could be done with rockets at a cost of another 30% of the cargo's chemical energy. Maybe after that the elliptical orbit could be gradually circularized with aerobreaking. You'd still have maybe half the gross energy of the cargo as profit. Well! It looks like the "mining Titan" hypothesis is back on the agenda!

That stuff I wrote earlier, in italics above, is wrong. I miscalculated the energy needed for that slowdown. The energy required to permit Earth to capture the cargo vessel would be 110% as much energy as is in the cargo. So nevermind!

Jerry Abbott
Last edited by Jenab on Tue 30 Aug 2005, 13:26:46, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Jenab
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 237
Joined: Tue 28 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Hillsboro, West Virginia
Top

Re: Harvesting hydrocarbons from Titan: not feasible.

Postby Licho » Tue 30 Aug 2005, 12:59:34

You could aerobrake to orbital velocity with more passes! Perhaps orbit could be calculated to aerobrake around Earth (stripping some of the speed) and then slingshot/brake around some other inner planet ..
We do not need cargo immediately :-) Who cares if it's 7 years instead of 5 in transit?

And yes, at orbital speed, it will be no problem to brake even with current materials .. you could do many aerobraking orbits before final entry.

But still, are there really liquid hydrocarbons on Titan?
User avatar
Licho
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 833
Joined: Mon 31 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Brno, Czech rep., EU

Re: Harvesting hydrocarbons from Titan: not feasible.

Postby emersonbiggins » Tue 30 Aug 2005, 13:05:46

It's ironic that we're discussing harvesting resources from halfway across the solar system rather than learning to use the resources we already have more efficiently and responsibly.
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas

Re: Harvesting hydrocarbons from Titan: not feasible.

Postby Jenab » Tue 30 Aug 2005, 14:01:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Licho', 'Y')ou could aerobrake to orbital velocity with more passes! Perhaps orbit could be calculated to aerobrake around Earth (stripping some of the speed) and then slingshot/brake around some other inner planet ..
We do not need cargo immediately :-) Who cares if it's 7 years instead of 5 in transit?

And yes, at orbital speed, it will be no problem to brake even with current materials .. you could do many aerobraking orbits before final entry.

But still, are there really liquid hydrocarbons on Titan?

You need to get the cargo below Earth escape on the first pass - from 15.1 km/sec to about 11 km/sec. (I was wrong when I said 11.5 km/sec, it's less than that at R=6500 km.) The only exception is when you can do an on-and-return maneuver around the sun so that you can aerobreak again.

I don't know whether there are liquid hydrocarbons on Titan or not. NASA people have guessed that there might be pools of such stuff on the surface (the black stuff in that picture).

Jerry Abbott
User avatar
Jenab
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 237
Joined: Tue 28 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Hillsboro, West Virginia
Top

Re: Harvesting hydrocarbons from Titan: not feasible.

Postby Jenab » Tue 30 Aug 2005, 14:12:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', 'I')t's ironic that we're discussing harvesting resources from halfway across the solar system rather than learning to use the resources we already have more efficiently and responsibly.

Extreme conservation should have been practiced from the beginning of the Industrial Age, at least from 1900 on, and better if it had begun in 1750.

Your espousal of conservation now is like someone's wasting most of his paycheck and then being real careful about how he spends his last few dollars.

It's often said that anybody has clear vision in hindsight. I'm not so sure that's true. Some people may be blind, or nearly blind, even in hindsight - that's what your comment makes me believe.

In hindsight, if you have the faculty, it's obvious that abandoning the old aristocratic system of government in favor of mass democracy was a mistake. Maybe it made the masses happier, but, on the other hand, maybe it just gave them reasons to squabble amongst each other as everybody tried to live large and make somebody else pay for it. The aristocratic system had people doing that too, but there were fewer of them.

Jerry Abbott
User avatar
Jenab
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 237
Joined: Tue 28 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Hillsboro, West Virginia
Top

Re: Harvesting hydrocarbons from Titan: not feasible.

Postby emersonbiggins » Tue 30 Aug 2005, 14:20:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jenab', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', 'I')t's ironic that we're discussing harvesting resources from halfway across the solar system rather than learning to use the resources we already have more efficiently and responsibly.

Extreme conservation should have been practiced from the beginning of the Industrial Age, at least from 1900 on, and better if it had begun in 1750.

Your espousal of conservation now is like someone's wasting most of his paycheck and then being real careful about how he spends his last few dollars.

It's often said that anybody has clear vision in hindsight. I'm not so sure that's true. Some people may be blind, or nearly blind, even in hindsight - that's what your comment makes me believe.

In hindsight, if you have the faculty, it's obvious that abandoning the old aristocratic system of government in favor of mass democracy was a mistake. Maybe it made the masses happier, but, on the other hand, maybe it just gave them reasons to squabble amongst each other as everybody tried to live large and make somebody else pay for it. The aristocratic system had people doing that too, but there were fewer of them.

Jerry Abbott


I agree. Conveniences such as air travel on-demand and thousands of miles of free roads to travel on certainly have allowed us to piss away our inheritance of resources at an alarming rate. And I realize that we are all complicit in it, and the actions of our forefathers have come to bear upon us as our actions will bear upon our own children. I think it will be necessary for us to experience PO in order to rearrange our society from one of consumption to one of sustainability. Hypothetical trips to Titan for oil are only going to quell the masses into believing things aren't as they are, and that conquering space would somehow allow our wasteful lifestyle to continue unabated, and without consequences. This is a dangerous notion for the public to have.
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

Re: Harvesting hydrocarbons from Titan: not feasible.

Postby rogerhb » Tue 30 Aug 2005, 18:31:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jenab', 'E')xtreme conservation should have been practiced from the beginning of the Industrial Age, at least from 1900 on, and better if it had begun in 1750.


1750 is a bit late, it all went pear shape when some geezer said "Go forth and multiply"
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand
Top

Re: Harvesting hydrocarbons from Titan: not feasible.

Postby aflurry » Tue 30 Aug 2005, 18:54:56

This thread is fun. It's like watching an episode of Star Trek written by Himmler.
User avatar
aflurry
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 824
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Harvesting hydrocarbons from Titan: not feasible.

Postby DigitalCubano » Tue 30 Aug 2005, 19:50:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('aflurry', 'T')his thread is fun. It's like watching an episode of Star Trek written by Himmler.


Now THAT'S a keeper! :lol:

Anyhow, am I missing something here (it has been...geez...5 years since I took Orbital Mechanics...getting old) but what about the energy spent getting to Titan?
User avatar
DigitalCubano
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 434
Joined: Fri 19 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Harvesting hydrocarbons from Titan: not feasible.

Postby evilmonkeyspanker » Tue 30 Aug 2005, 20:04:57

Do you kids remember what they taught you in schools?
Or how about them after school specials?



Crack is bad!! Please don't use crack!!
User avatar
evilmonkeyspanker
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 516
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Missouri

Re: Harvesting hydrocarbons from Titan: not feasible.

Postby EnergySpin » Wed 31 Aug 2005, 07:52:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jenab', ' ')No, don't. Not literally anyway. People should not breed more than they can support by their own labor.

Humans are not overunity devices - no one can support him or herself from craddle to grave by his own labor. This is a matter of simple physics (thermodynamics). In reality WE ARE ALL SUPPORTED BY SOMETHING/SOMEONE ELSE. The hypothesis that helping the poor is the reason we are not in the stars is BS.
Last edited by Tanada on Thu 26 Mar 2015, 22:12:37, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: fixed broken quote
"Nuclear power has long been to the Left what embryonic-stem-cell research is to the Right--irredeemably wrong and a signifier of moral weakness."Esquire Magazine,12/05
The genetic code is commaless and so are my posts.
User avatar
EnergySpin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Energy Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron