Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Towards a heavy sour crude oil world.

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Towards a heavy sour crude oil world.

Unread postby Dan1195 » Sun 21 Aug 2005, 10:58:15

This simply tells us that the peak is close at hand. Just another piece of evidence which suggests peak most likely in 2-3 years at most.
User avatar
Dan1195
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 277
Joined: Sat 19 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Towards a heavy sour crude oil world.

Unread postby JudoCow09 » Sun 21 Aug 2005, 14:04:20

There was an article a while back on the home page about OPEC increasing production. The numbers were like 45% LightnSweet, 42% Medium, and only about I think 3% Heavy. It sounds as though either they don't care too much about Heavy, or they don't have much left. Please comment.
User avatar
JudoCow09
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 241
Joined: Sun 07 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Towards a heavy sour crude oil world.

Unread postby BitterSweetCrude » Sun 21 Aug 2005, 15:38:21

This is very interesting to see the numbers, and that light oils are become increasingly scarce. I found it interesting that OPEC's oil is mostly sour.
User avatar
BitterSweetCrude
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Wed 27 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: OHIO, USA

Re: Towards a heavy sour crude oil world.

Unread postby wilburke » Mon 22 Aug 2005, 23:26:43

Question: where can I find a good, detailed source describing the difference, both in financial and energy costs, of refining sweet vs heavy crude?

I've seen some charts with accompying simplistic descriptions, but I've yet to find this topic fully dissected. This would seem to be yet another crucial topic for us to consider in depth.
User avatar
wilburke
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon 09 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Towards a heavy sour crude oil world.

Unread postby clv101 » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 15:39:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wilburke', 'Q')uestion: where can I find a good, detailed source describing the difference, both in financial and energy costs, of refining sweet vs heavy crude?

I've seen some charts with accompying simplistic descriptions, but I've yet to find this topic fully dissected. This would seem to be yet another crucial topic for us to consider in depth.

For decent information you might have to look for books like these:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASI ... 81-6507863
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASI ... 81-6507863
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASI ... 81-6507863
"Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen." The Emperor (Return of the Jedi)
The Oil Drum: Europe
User avatar
clv101
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Wed 02 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Bristol, UK

Unread postby spudbuddy » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 15:53:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sparaxis', '
')
Second, heavy crude contains more energy than light crudes per unit volume, not the other way around. The problem is that we don't demand crude directly: we demand the products made from crude. Since we have strict requirements on the quality of the final products, we have to expend a lot more energy to process sour heavy crudes into final products, so in the end the net energy availability is lower, not gross energy availability.


This raises an interesting question:
Is it possible to create a burnable fuel product that is "watered down" - to the point where a smaller portion of it goes a longer way?
I'm thinking of the possibilities more along the lines of things other than actual private automobiles...such as train locomotives, furnace fuel (home heating, etc.)
It occurs to me that all the high-octane super refinement is designed specifically for highly tuned car engines...which in itself is a more wasteful use of the resource.
Another issue would be the actual burning....would it be more energy efficient or less? Would it burn cleaner or dirtier?
User avatar
spudbuddy
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 150
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Towards a heavy sour crude oil world.

Unread postby wilburke » Wed 24 Aug 2005, 00:00:48

Thanks for the info, clv101. I had a feeling that I'd end up digging into some pretty esoteric stuff, but I think that the details of heavy oil refining are important. So far as I can already determine, there will be far greater costs per barrel to squeeze out the fuel, greater environmental damage, and probably more expensive so-called "by-products" like plastic and asphalt. Not a pretty picture, and this is the future of oil refining.
User avatar
wilburke
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon 09 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Towards a heavy sour crude oil world.

Unread postby clv101 » Wed 24 Aug 2005, 03:07:46

Here's an excellent article on the subject: Sweet and Sour.
Contains some graphs from the EIA about the spread between light sweet and heavy sour.
"Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen." The Emperor (Return of the Jedi)
The Oil Drum: Europe
User avatar
clv101
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Wed 02 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: Towards a heavy sour crude oil world.

Unread postby wilburke » Thu 25 Aug 2005, 09:46:42

Thanks again, clv101. Terrific article. Excellent blog as well, BTW.
User avatar
wilburke
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon 09 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Towards a heavy sour crude oil world.

Unread postby kwftide » Thu 25 Aug 2005, 10:35:14

This is an excellent discussion!

But it leads to the following question:

If light, sweet crude has indeed peaked and we are going to become heavily dependent on heavy, sour (or some other combo), how do we know how much of that remains.

Let me ask another way:

From past oil fields, can we determine the "usual" proportion of light, sweet to heavy, crude. If we have this data, then we could safely deduce how much conventional but albeit sulfur-laden / gooey oil we have left.

I visualize a big pool with light, sweet floating at the top and the heavy, nasty stuff on the bottom. Is this in any way accurate?
User avatar
kwftide
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed 24 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Towards a heavy sour crude oil world.

Unread postby LadyRuby » Thu 25 Aug 2005, 10:39:41

I remember seeing somewhere (maybe on this site) that a barrel of light sweet crude produces x amount of gasoline, while a barrel of heavy sour crude produces y amount (less than x) of gasoline. And this is one reason the U.S. uses more light sweet crude since we need more gasoline from our crude than most other countries. -- anyone know where I can find this chart again?

But my actual question is, does anyone know about heating oil and light sweet versus heavy sour crude? Is heavy sour crude a better crude for heating oil (versus gasoline)?
User avatar
LadyRuby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1177
Joined: Mon 13 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Western US

Re: Towards a heavy sour crude oil world.

Unread postby Fuzzy_McDermit » Thu 25 Aug 2005, 15:49:55

One of our local papers just ran a story about the refinery in my province, how it was actually designed in the 60's with sour crude in mind. It has also just undergone a 6 million dollar upgrade to it gasoline processing unit, so that it now produce gas with some of the lowest sulfur content in the world. And a 21 million dollar diesel upgrade to make it virtually sulfur free is underway as well . They also reclaim all the sulfur and sell it to fertilizer and pharmaceutical companies.

They realized that sour will make up a larger and larger portion of the oil in the world. Currently our province is producing a lot of sweet crude and all that appears to be going to the U.S. The article states that plants have to either upgrade or close in the future as sour will become the primary oil type in the future.
User avatar
Fuzzy_McDermit
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri 05 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Towards a heavy sour crude oil world.

Unread postby Sparaxis » Thu 25 Aug 2005, 16:45:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('LadyRuby', 'I') remember seeing somewhere (maybe on this site) that a barrel of light sweet crude produces x amount of gasoline, while a barrel of heavy sour crude produces y amount (less than x) of gasoline. And this is one reason the U.S. uses more light sweet crude since we need more gasoline from our crude than most other countries. -- anyone know where I can find this chart again?

But my actual question is, does anyone know about heating oil and light sweet versus heavy sour crude? Is heavy sour crude a better crude for heating oil (versus gasoline)?


We tend to treat heavy-sour and light-sweet as inseparable Siamese twins, but they aren't. There are sour light crudes (such as some of the new Saudi streams) and sweet heavy crudes (such as nearly all of China's domestic production and Indonesia's leading grade.)

Yields of various products from these crudes has nothing to do with sulfur content. Sulfur content (and more importantly, allowable sulfur in the final products) is an indicator of the degree of processing (hydrogen-based processes) that has to go on to remove the sulfur. That basically doesn't change the yield.

You have to distinguish between a "primary" yield from crude (i.e. what you would get if you just simply heated and distilled the crude like corn mash) and "cracking" yield from crude (what you would get if you took the output from the primary distillation and further cracked the molecules to get more light stuff.)

Light crudes yield more light products (naphtha, gasoline, kerosene, diesel) than heavy crudes on a primary distillation basis. Heating oil in the US is diesel, so light crudes make more of that.

However, refineries with a lot of cracking units can take heavy crude and make the same amount of light products as a simpler refinery running just light crude. It just takes more energy to do it. And of course, the investment, operations and maintenance, and complexity of a heavy crude refinery is a lot higher than a simple light crude processing refinery, which is why there is a preference to build simpler refineries running light crude than expensive refineries to run heavy crude.

Since the US demand slate is heavily weighted to gasoline, and we have strict sulfur limits in the final product, yes, there is a preference in the US to run light sweet crudes.
User avatar
Sparaxis
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 106
Joined: Wed 27 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: California

Re: Towards a heavy sour crude oil world.

Unread postby kwftide » Thu 25 Aug 2005, 17:16:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sparaxis', '
')Since the US demand slate is heavily weighted to gasoline, and we have strict sulfur limits in the final product, yes, there is a preference in the US to run light sweet crudes.


So, does that mean we are going to see sky high gas prices in the near future? Assuming we 1. don't build new refineries or upgrade existing refineries 2. don't raise the sulfur level standard for our gasoline, then it seems we will be continually dependent on light.sweet crude for our gas / diesel.

Another option exists I suppose: buy gas / diesel from a refinery that exists outside the US and has invested in "heavy" processing equipment.
User avatar
kwftide
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed 24 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Towards a heavy sour crude oil world.

Unread postby Sparaxis » Thu 25 Aug 2005, 22:03:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kwftide', '
')So, does that mean we are going to see sky high gas prices in the near future? Assuming we 1. don't build new refineries or upgrade existing refineries 2. don't raise the sulfur level standard for our gasoline, then it seems we will be continually dependent on light.sweet crude for our gas / diesel.

Another option exists I suppose: buy gas / diesel from a refinery that exists outside the US and has invested in "heavy" processing equipment.


We are going to see sky-high prices anyway :) Refineries will build upgrading units, but it doesn't happen over night. These are multi-hundred million dollar and multi-year projects, and have all the environmental impact and hearings and all those other hurdles to go through first. We're actually moving (as are many countries in the world--thus the squeeze) to lowering allowable sulfur even further in gasoline and diesel. In California, where we already require ultra-low sulfur diesel (10 ppm), the price is over $3/gallon since we have only a handful of refineries to produce it and can't bring it from other states. The EU, China, Japan, SE Asia, India and other countries are all moving to lower sulfur products in the next few years, exacerbating the crude-refinery situation.

We already import 1 million b/d of our 9 million consumption from other countries, particularly from the Caribbean and Europe. For us to import more means further upgrading at other refineries as well. This is a global issue, not just the US.

You can use heavy sour crude to make ultra-low-sulfur clean products, but the capacity to do it just isn't sufficient at the moment.
User avatar
Sparaxis
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 106
Joined: Wed 27 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: California
Top

Previous

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron