Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Post peak: Individuals vs. the collective

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Why Collapse Won't Happen

Unread postby Raxozanne » Tue 16 Aug 2005, 11:46:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('doufus', '
')That's why I'd prefer to work to build a soft landing for peak oil


How are you doing this doufus?
Hello, my name is Rax. I live in the Amazon jungle with a bunch of women. We are super eco feminists and our favourite passtimes are dangling men by their ankles and discussing peak oil. - apparently
Raxozanne
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 945
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Re: Post peak: Individuals vs. the collective

Unread postby bobaloo » Tue 16 Aug 2005, 13:58:42

I also think it's a bit of a straw-man argument. Most of the "reasonable" folks around here, meaning those that agree with me :) have more of a three-pronged approach. Land, gardens and livestock for sustainability, food storage to get through tough times and the means to protect those resources should it be necessary.

Yes, I've got a few AK's around the house, and a few thousand rounds of ammo, and yes, I have a year's worth of basic food for four people and still putting food away, but my main plan includes my gardens, fruit trees, livestock, chickens and friends and neighbors. With luck the food and guns won't be needed, but the same is true of health insurance and a lot of other things.

Maybe the government will try to get that opressive, but I really don't know how much luck they would have. They have a lot of ground to cover, I live in a county the size of Connecticut with less than 100,000 people in it, mostly mountains, small rural roads with one-lane bridges that could collapse at any time. It seems like it's going to cost them a lot of resources for very little in return.

In the eastern U.S. and more urban areas people will be asking for help and more willing to volunarily do what they're told in order to get a meal, but in the rural areas they're not. I think there are still a lot of members of the US armed forces who take their oath to defend the Constitution seriously and who will not participate in such a program, which could lead to the states fighting the feds.

None of us know what's going to happen, so as we say down in the Ozarks, "just hide and watch".
User avatar
bobaloo
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 468
Joined: Thu 14 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Why Collapse Won't Happen

Unread postby holmes » Tue 16 Aug 2005, 14:43:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('doufus', '
')
yep, details like that really matter. I've read some of your posts and they
are wonderfully spelt and fantastically opaque.


I agree, I have a heck of a time communicating. But I'm happy to clarify any points you don't understand, to the best of my ability. All you have to do is ask. :)


dont worry ludi. Tribal folks will be in great demand and will have it "easy" post po. My cousin just went crazy on his "lord" of the manor he cartakes for. He included oil depletion in the verbal assualt. LOL. The "lord" had no argument. he needs frank. He knows how to do things. the lords elite offspring are pampered spoiled brats that dont even do luandry they pile it up under the bed. They buy new stuff instead. sick.

I agree alot with this new doufas guy. except one thing. australia isnt this utopia. the cities are resource scarce. the country is predominantly urban and resource scare compard to human biomass. the cities are overshot big. and your outback there will surely be overrun with masses after the cities dry out. please be on top of your countries ecology.
Ive studied it in the past. you are having the same overconsumption/breeding problems as every one else.
I know feelings and emotions are running high nowadays as the time approuches. We all want to be in a safe place. and I know we are a pariah nation but The US will be one of the better places to be. contrary to the haters. Its the people that are fucked up here. and as I travel the world folks are pretty much the same everywhere.
holmes
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2382
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Post peak: Individuals vs. the collective

Unread postby doufus » Tue 16 Aug 2005, 20:35:17

While I'm not opposed to individual preps for natural disasters and a bit
beyond, i believe the loss of hope for any collective benefits/structures
is a recipe for disaster.

By pulling out mentally from participation in any larger system you
lose all of the benefits.

In essence, gross individualism guarantees die off and you will be part of
it too no matter how much you think u won't. I hope you enjoy watching your kids die for want of a 50 cent vaccine.

The knee you ruptured in the latest gunfight/ploughing session could do with some prednesoline. Nah, hobble for the rest of your life.

You want this because u think people are nasty and won't cooperate
for mutual gain? If that was the case society would be totally broken
now. and it ain't no matter how much gloom u want to shed. The odds
are someone will call an ambulance than put a round in your head and
take your shoes. The NORMS are the benefits we all accrue.

The hallmark of civil society is mutual involvement for mutual gain.

The notion that somehow the US govt will not have enough oil to
defend its own internal backyard is silly. 20-30 yrs maybe. Then again
it don't take much oil to nuke a problematic state.

Such outcomes r the end result of rampant individualism- one of the reasons the US is so stuffed in the first place. Consumption, greed and me
me me. When this is suppressed for the good of the many, we don't
have communism, we have a society.

Maybe you're right about country's "cultures". In my own country
we've never shot a politician . The pricks are not worth a bullet so
we just vote them out. But rampant individualism breeds both
oppressive governments and the nutcases who have to save us all
by taking matters into their own hands. Gross individualism has many
benefits- entrepreneurialism for one- but unchecked and it leads to
the loss of cohesion needed for good societies to work for the benefit
of all.

I've worked with many yanks and like the buggers a lot. Open, friendly
and straight up people who give a helping hand. I just don't understand
where this daniel boone mentality of guns, hate governments enough to
shoot them, me and my foxhole mentality comes from.
User avatar
doufus
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Post peak: Individuals vs. the collective

Unread postby doufus » Tue 16 Aug 2005, 23:08:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bobaloo', 'I') also think it's a bit of a straw-man argument. Most of the "reasonable" folks around here, meaning those that agree with me :) have more of a three-pronged approach. Land, gardens and livestock for sustainability, food storage to get through tough times and the means to protect those resources should it be necessary.

Yes, I've got a few AK's around the house, and a few thousand rounds of ammo, and yes, I have a year's worth of basic food for four people and still putting food away, but my main plan includes my gardens, fruit trees, livestock, chickens and friends and neighbors. With luck the food and guns won't be needed, but the same is true of health insurance and a lot of other things.

Maybe the government will try to get that opressive, but I really don't know how much luck they would have. They have a lot of ground to cover, I live in a county the size of Connecticut with less than 100,000 people in it, mostly mountains, small rural roads with one-lane bridges that could collapse at any time. It seems like it's going to cost them a lot of resources for very little in return.

In the eastern U.S. and more urban areas people will be asking for help and more willing to volunarily do what they're told in order to get a meal, but in the rural areas they're not. I think there are still a lot of members of the US armed forces who take their oath to defend the Constitution seriously and who will not participate in such a program, which could lead to the states fighting the feds.

None of us know what's going to happen, so as we say down in the Ozarks, "just hide and watch".


The issue is whether u are still and aim to be a participant in collaboration
for civil society. If so then your efforts are laudable. If not, then they are
wasted because those who hoard and attempt self sufficiency for a
hostile, chaotic breakdown will only see them taken away by those
stronger/more numerous than them- gov't or bigger groups.

In other words, the more people who mentally opt out and take the
individual approach, the more likely chaos will ensue and the more
likely the preparatory individual will lose it all to the law of the jungle.

You may or may not be safe in your locality from gov/t and others. Depends how desperate the hypothesised break down is. A truck full
of soldiers don't really use a lot of fuel. And i recall a place called waco
where some people resisted the government to no effect.

Not justifying it. But if you want to play law of the jungle you better be
the biggest dog around.

Ants kill the biggest dog if he's chained up. Cooperation does amazing
things.
User avatar
doufus
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Why Collapse Won't Happen

Unread postby doufus » Tue 16 Aug 2005, 23:26:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('holmes', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('doufus', '
')
I agree alot with this new doufas guy. except one thing. australia isnt this utopia. the cities are resource scarce. the country is predominantly urban and resource scare compard to human biomass. the cities are overshot big. and your outback there will surely be overrun with masses after the cities dry out. please be on top of your countries ecology.
Ive studied it in the past. you are having the same overconsumption/breeding problems as every one else.


Believe me, I'm on top of my own ecology. I drive the length of it monthly
in 4WD thru desert and scrub. It's my job. While the environment may
be fragile consider that 20 million people inside a continent is nowhere
near your situation with 300 million and plenty of concrete and pollution of every kind. We may have limited ground water but yours is almost
undrinkable in many places. We have an enormous artesian basin
that covers most of the continent. If the israelis can grow in a desert,
we can. We don't, because there are plenty of other more profitable
things to do, like farm in easy areas and mine the shit out of the place.

I was next to a guy from montana 2 days ago on a plane from sydney
to darwin. He couldn't believe it took 4 hrs. And that's not transcontinental.
Few people have a real sense of scale of how big this place really is
and how untapped. Our cities are small by international standards.

I don't wanna bump chests on survivability BS, since I'm not interested
in pushing an individual survival-at-all-costs mentality. I'm more
interested in preserving civil society and the benefits it brings.
If it's a case of being able to call an ambulance for someone or
driving a new bore by hand cos the old one collapsed cos the bore casing
corroded, man I know which one I want to fight for.

I wonder if many of you have EVER been in a survival situation of any
kind whatsover. If you had, i doubt if you would be so gung ho and
in particular i doubt if you would be so unrealistic about your chances
of living a life that was even a tiny fraction as healthy, fatigue and
injury free, or generally worth living as the one you have.
User avatar
doufus
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Post peak: Individuals vs. the collective

Unread postby doufus » Tue 16 Aug 2005, 23:36:24

Actually the real issue for those making individualist preps and
mentally opting out of working for a soft PO landing is:

Where do 300 million people go in the collapse you envisage?

Do they just die in the streets?

Or do they drive, hitch, walk, crawl and slowly migrate to where YOU
live?

Does the army take them to where u live?

300 million is a lot. Not counting those in MExico or even central america
who might think the US is worth a shot. I wonder how long the fence
lasts.

300 million is a lot of corpses. And they won't die straight away cos
so many are so fat. Even Hitler could only kill 6 million and he was
really organised about it.

You really think ANY individual preps will survive this? Fair enough if
they're intended for short term disasters, but mass dislocation and
upheaval will end up in your neighbourhood no matter where u live,
no matter how remote u think u are. They WILL find u.

Praise god and pass the ammo. Good luck with it. I'd rather try to
solve the PO problem than mentally prepare how to kill children.

Better u than me mate.

As for my scene- Indonesia usually implodes. Sukharno killed 2 million and
we barely got a boat. Still, I'd rather see an outcome for us all than
be part of torpedoing a 20 ft boat full of women and kids.

Just the way I am.
User avatar
doufus
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Post peak: Individuals vs. the collective

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Wed 17 Aug 2005, 00:14:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('doufus', '
')I've worked with many yanks and like the buggers a lot. Open, friendly
and straight up people who give a helping hand. I just don't understand
where this daniel boone mentality of guns, hate governments enough to
shoot them, me and my foxhole mentality comes from.
Thanks for the kind words. 'Daniel Boone' mentality is a funny way to put it. Ever see the movie Deliverance? Now that's a back woods mentality to consider. There is a long tradition of rebels and outcasts with their moonshine stills that hate the rev'nooers from the Government.

Copper Kettle:

Get you a copper kettle, get you a copper coil,

Fill it with new-made corn mash and never more youll toil.

Youll just lay there by the juniper while the moon is bright,

Watch them jugs a-filling

In the pale moonlight.

Build you a fire with hickory, hickory, ash and oak,

Dont use no green or rotten wood; theyll get you by the smoke.

Well just lay there by the juniper... etc.

My daddy, he made whiskey; my granddaddy, he did too.

We aint paid no whiskey tax since 1792.

We just lay there by the juniper... etc.

(last line repeated)
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: Post peak: Individuals vs. the collective

Unread postby bobaloo » Wed 17 Aug 2005, 01:36:04

doufus, just to be clear, I'm working my ass off in my community with a local peak oil / sustainability group, setting up a community garden system, demonstrating alternative energy, promoting local food production and generally trying to do everything I can to help the community as a whole deal with the coming changes.

I also think that I need to do everything I can to prepare for myself and my family so that we're not a burden and can be available to offer help to others. I live in a town of 1500 people where I probably know at least 1000 of them by name, I've been active in local government for 15 years, served on the City Council and many volunteer organizations.

Just laying that out to demonstrate that just because somebody "preps" doesn't mean that they're a kook hiding out in a cabin in the wilderness. Like I said in my first post, I see it like I see health insurance. I may not ever need any of that stuff, but if I do need it, it sure will be nice to have.
User avatar
bobaloo
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 468
Joined: Thu 14 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Post peak: Individuals vs. the collective

Unread postby NEOPO » Wed 17 Aug 2005, 01:58:15

Doufus scribbled in red crayon :

"By pulling out mentally from participation in any larger system you
lose all of the benefits."


Thats exactly why we are in this mess.
For not being able to conceive of a different way with "other" benefits and maybe even without the constraints of a rat race oriented society.

I cant imagine a life without my handy dandy can-do attitude :)

We cant help it if you lack imagination :o
You speak to this forum as if you know each of us personally.
If you did know each of us personally I am sure you would not talk about us like that :shock:

Now go wrestle a croc er something will ya!! perhaps Mike has a teet available for you to suckle ........and tell Steve Erwin that Neo said hi!! 8)
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX

Re: Post peak: Individuals vs. the collective

Unread postby doufus » Wed 17 Aug 2005, 04:02:20

Bobalo,

I think what you're doing is great. I agree preping is not bad in itself.

What I'm against is those that do so having already given up hope.
That just discourages others and helps the stampede. It becomes
a self fulfilling prophecy if everyone hoards, heads for the hills and
says "every man for himself". That way lies chaos.

But the ability to keep head above water is always handy- as long
as it has a community orientation. We're all in this together is an
attitude that helps preserve the mutual benfits of social cohesion.
User avatar
doufus
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Post peak: Individuals vs. the collective

Unread postby doufus » Wed 17 Aug 2005, 04:06:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('NEOPO', 'D')oufus scribbled in red crayon :

"By pulling out mentally from participation in any larger system you
lose all of the benefits."


Thats exactly why we are in this mess.
For not being able to conceive of a different way with "other" benefits and maybe even without the constraints of a rat race oriented society.

I cant imagine a life without my handy dandy can-do attitude :)

We cant help it if you lack imagination :o
You speak to this forum as if you know each of us personally.
If you did know each of us personally I am sure you would not talk about us like that :shock:

Now go wrestle a croc er something will ya!! perhaps Mike has a teet available for you to suckle ........and tell Steve Erwin that Neo said hi!! 8)


Neopo, I'm not an ardent supporter of the present system but i recognise
that fast and wide change is not a transition. It is a disaster for all of us-
even those people who think they have the skills and resources to
survive. We need system transition not destruction.

As for being known personally I was accused of being personally dependent on the system in some way. Clairvoyants are everywhere.

Steve Irwin said to say "CRIKEY MATE, that NEOPO well....crikey!"
User avatar
doufus
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Post peak: Individuals vs. the collective

Unread postby foodnotlawns » Wed 17 Aug 2005, 19:48:12

Here in a broken down, former mill town in New England, I have tried to organize my NASCAR nation neighbors and got nothing but contempt. They acted like I was absolutely kooky. Sometimes they vandalize my gardens, just for the hell of it.

However, when the collapse hits, I will seek out the really responsible people -- the town government types, the local farmers, the police chiefs, the Lions Club, maybe even the Grange, and try to get them organized. But things aren't bad enough for them to listen to me . . . yet. When it is, they will, and I will have set an example.

I always do a second job, and that second job is always working for a farmer in some form. When I no longer have a "job" in the convention sense, I will work for one or another of my farmer contacts.

It's really sick how the suburbanites treat the farmers around here. They move in to a rural town and then when the farmer spreads manure on his corn field, they take him to court and try to sue him out of existence. Works a lot of the time. A doctor and a lawyer bought Mcmansions near a dairy farmer and sued the farmer becuase of the cow manure smell. A judge ruled that the dairy farmer could spread manure on his cornfield, but it had to be processed manure, like the bagged stuff you get at the feed and grain store, instead of the stuff from his cows. The farmer sold his farm to a developer and moved to Maine.

I've noticed the farmers are too nice for their own good. They'll feed so many useless eaters and then starve themselves, it seems to me.
User avatar
foodnotlawns
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 234
Joined: Thu 07 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Post peak: Individuals vs. the collective

Unread postby doufus » Wed 17 Aug 2005, 20:08:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('foodnotlawns', 'H')ere in a broken down, former mill town in New England, I have tried to organize my NASCAR nation neighbors and got nothing but contempt. They acted like I was absolutely kooky. Sometimes they vandalize my gardens, just for the hell of it.

However, when the collapse hits, I will seek out the really responsible people -- the town government types, the local farmers, the police chiefs, the Lions Club, maybe even the Grange, and try to get them organized. But things aren't bad enough for them to listen to me . . . yet. When it is, they will, and I will have set an example.

I always do a second job, and that second job is always working for a farmer in some form. When I no longer have a "job" in the convention sense, I will work for one or another of my farmer contacts.

It's really sick how the suburbanites treat the farmers around here. They move in to a rural town and then when the farmer spreads manure on his corn field, they take him to court and try to sue him out of existence. Works a lot of the time. A doctor and a lawyer bought Mcmansions near a dairy farmer and sued the farmer becuase of the cow manure smell. A judge ruled that the dairy farmer could spread manure on his cornfield, but it had to be processed manure, like the bagged stuff you get at the feed and grain store, instead of the stuff from his cows. The farmer sold his farm to a developer and moved to Maine.

I've noticed the farmers are too nice for their own good. They'll feed so many useless eaters and then starve themselves, it seems to me.


Yes, but you're still in the system, committed and with an investment.
That is undeniably good despite its hassles.

I'm simply against people who flee the system totally either in their
heads or physically by heading for the hills with a "every man for
himself" attitude.

This just spooks the confused and creates even more panic.

So i admire your efforts.
User avatar
doufus
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Post peak: Individuals vs. the collective

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Wed 17 Aug 2005, 20:25:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('foodnotlawns', '
')
It's really sick how the suburbanites treat the farmers around here. They move in to a rural town and then when the farmer spreads manure on his corn field, they take him to court and try to sue him out of existence. Works a lot of the time. A doctor and a lawyer bought Mcmansions near a dairy farmer and sued the farmer becuase of the cow manure smell. A judge ruled that the dairy farmer could spread manure on his cornfield, but it had to be processed manure, like the bagged stuff you get at the feed and grain store, instead of the stuff from his cows. The farmer sold his farm to a developer and moved to Maine.

I've noticed the farmers are too nice for their own good.
That myopic doctor and lawyer who sued the dairy farmer stir up my more negative misanthopic feelings. I read about that kind of shit and think, bring on the energy crisis, now!
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: Post peak: Individuals vs. the collective

Unread postby EnergySpin » Wed 17 Aug 2005, 20:28:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('foodnotlawns', '
')
It's really sick how the suburbanites treat the farmers around here. They move in to a rural town and then when the farmer spreads manure on his corn field, they take him to court and try to sue him out of existence. Works a lot of the time. A doctor and a lawyer bought Mcmansions near a dairy farmer and sued the farmer becuase of the cow manure smell. A judge ruled that the dairy farmer could spread manure on his cornfield, but it had to be processed manure, like the bagged stuff you get at the feed and grain store, instead of the stuff from his cows. The farmer sold his farm to a developer and moved to Maine.

I've noticed the farmers are too nice for their own good.
That myopic doctor and lawyer who sued the dairy farmer stir up my more negative misanthopic feelings. I read about that kind of shit and think, bring on the energy crisis, now!

I guess No milk today for them.
Unfortunately that shit is real
"Nuclear power has long been to the Left what embryonic-stem-cell research is to the Right--irredeemably wrong and a signifier of moral weakness."Esquire Magazine,12/05
The genetic code is commaless and so are my posts.
User avatar
EnergySpin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Post peak: Individuals vs. the collective

Unread postby bobaloo » Wed 17 Aug 2005, 20:37:30

doufus, my attitude is something like this: I have given up on the system, but I haven't given up on people. I don't think there's anything that can be done at a state or national level at this time, as the big money has the congress and legislature sewn up to continue business as usual until the water is coming over the bow. Once the boat starts to sink, it may be a different matter, with the rats fleeing and possibly leaving an opening for some truth and common sense to come into play.

On the other hand, people in small groups can be smart. I'm lucky that even though I live in a small, rural town surrounded by farms in a relatively isolated area, lots of the folks here have come here from other areas and are smart and knowledgeable. In a town of 1500 we have 40-50 who regularly show up for our meetings / dinners to discuss sustainability issues, including local farmers, city council members, business owners and others with influence in the community. What we do is once or twice a month schedule a local pizza place for the evening and someone gives a presentation or shows an informational video. We try to make it fun, it's a good opportunity to socialize and network, and folks learn something much of the time.
User avatar
bobaloo
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 468
Joined: Thu 14 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Post peak: Individuals vs. the collective

Unread postby doufus » Wed 17 Aug 2005, 21:06:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bobaloo', 'd')oufus, my attitude is something like this: I have given up on the system, but I haven't given up on people. I don't think there's anything that can be done at a state or national level at this time, as the big money has the congress and legislature sewn up to continue business as usual until the water is coming over the bow. Once the boat starts to sink, it may be a different matter, with the rats fleeing and possibly leaving an opening for some truth and common sense to come into play.

On the other hand, people in small groups can be smart. I'm lucky that even though I live in a small, rural town surrounded by farms in a relatively isolated area, lots of the folks here have come here from other areas and are smart and knowledgeable. In a town of 1500 we have 40-50 who regularly show up for our meetings / dinners to discuss sustainability issues, including local farmers, city council members, business owners and others with influence in the community. What we do is once or twice a month schedule a local pizza place for the evening and someone gives a presentation or shows an informational video. We try to make it fun, it's a good opportunity to socialize and network, and folks learn something much of the time.


Again, my admiration. This is the stuff we should be doing regardless
of PO. Much of the negative in this site comes from unsatisfied lives.
Community and engagement are the antidote not just to env ills but
also to the vacuum that many have in modern society.
User avatar
doufus
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Post peak: Individuals vs. the collective

Unread postby whiteknight » Wed 17 Aug 2005, 21:06:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('foodnotlawns', ' ')Here in a broken down, former mill town in New England, I have tried to organize my NASCAR nation neighbors and got nothing but contempt. They acted like I was absolutely kooky. Sometimes they vandalize my gardens, just for the hell of it.


How do you talk to them? I have discussed Peak Oil with my family and some of their freinds when I last visited South Dakota. I had no problems. We had an intelegent discusion and at no time did they break off the conversation of do anything to change the subject. They were interested and we learned much from each other. They are going to try a few "green" technologies most likely. You just need to put things to them in a non threatening manner.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('foodnotlawns', ' ')However, when the collapse hits, I will seek out the really responsible people -- the town government types, the local farmers, the police chiefs, the Lions Club, maybe even the Grange, and try to get them organized.


Government types = responcible? maybe thats whay you aren't speaking the common mans language... My experience has been farmers are just about ready to take shotguns instead of checkbooks to the court houses.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('foodnotlawns', ' ')It's really sick how the suburbanites treat the farmers around here.


All the better! When a feudal lord is seeking peasantry the local farmers shall chear them for taking those useless suburbanites away from thier lands!
User avatar
whiteknight
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 254
Joined: Tue 09 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Previous

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron