Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Post peak: Individuals vs. the collective

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Post peak: Individuals vs. the collective

Unread postby doufus » Mon 15 Aug 2005, 19:55:44

{Old title: "Why Collapse Won't Happen" was inaccurate- jato}

It's laughable for growing energy shortages to lead to the collapse
of civilisation, hordes attacking armed defenders of food caches,
mass die-off and the rest of the D grade sci-fi fantasies.

The people wanting to "bring it on" in this scenario are as clueless
about the horrific realities of social breakdown as they are stupidly optimistic
about their ability to survive the "survival of the fittest" game. In such
scenarios god help them if they acquire the simplest of medical issues like
an infected wound, appendicitis or even adult onset asthma.

IF, IF, IF PO takes hold the more likely scenario is the most historically
common- MASSIVE social and economic redesign under marshall law.
That is, massive reallocation of energy priorities, forcably MOVING people to places of industry, nationalisation of all major assetts including homes
and land in order to forcibly optimise the economy for food production and
manufacturing of crucial goods.

Marshall law is always about sacrificing the wants of the few for the
needs of the many.

People now preparing their 100 acres may have a few city families turn
up with the national guard. These are your new, big happy family and
the 20mm cannon on the APC says so. You and your survivalist morons
gonna argue? Go right ahead.

Energy wastage in any form is an instant capital offense. Everything
becomes local- school, work, consumption etc.

Rationing is TOTAL. Blackmarketing demands summary execution.

Now some people would say that this IS the end of civilisation. Not true.
It's the end of the fairy land of infinite consumption but it's a lot
better than the alternatives.

Obviously the doomer, survivalist nuts with their M-16s and MREs will
hide until their MREs run out and being incapable of actually surviving
in an environment that's a shadow of what it was in Daniel Boone's day,
they will eventually come out of the hills and join the work queue.

Everything in their lair will be confiscated for common use and all
those years of paranoia and preps will be for nothing.

Maybe it would be better to work NOW for a future without these
features?
User avatar
doufus
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Why Collapse Won't Happen

Unread postby Jack » Mon 15 Aug 2005, 20:16:52

What an interesting presentation of the optimistic case!

Thank you for your perspectives.
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Why Collapse Won't Happen

Unread postby something_awfull » Mon 15 Aug 2005, 20:53:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', 'W')hat an interesting presentation of the optimistic case!

Thank you for your perspectives.


Optimistic? I'd hate to see the pessimistic view. 8O


edit: I guess socialism will get to have it's time in the sun.
Last edited by something_awfull on Mon 15 Aug 2005, 20:59:35, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
something_awfull
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 264
Joined: Sat 13 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Sydney, Australia.

Re: Why Collapse Won't Happen

Unread postby jato » Mon 15 Aug 2005, 20:54:02

You just described a collapse situation....yet your post title states "Why Collapse Won't Happen"... I am confused.
jato
 

Re: Why Collapse Won't Happen

Unread postby gt1370a » Mon 15 Aug 2005, 21:08:18

Yeah, that sounds like a collapse to me.

By the way, the Washington Post recently reported that the Pentagon has drafted plans for martial law.

Of course they don't call it that, but when the military does crowd control and disaster management, that is the definition of martial law. FEMA and local police normally do it.
User avatar
gt1370a
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 422
Joined: Sat 02 Apr 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Why Collapse Won't Happen

Unread postby dub_scratch » Mon 15 Aug 2005, 21:13:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jato', 'Y')ou just described a collapse situation....yet your post title states "Why Collapse Won't Happen"... I am confused.


I think he is defining "collapse" as population collapse- dieoff. The question can be more accurately stated as "what kind of collapse can we expect." That's when we get into the whole realm of discussion over scenarios.

BTW, the only way we may not have a collapse due to energy decline is with some new superabundant energy source like fusion.
dub_scratch
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 700
Joined: Thu 16 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Santa Monica, CA

Re: Why Collapse Won't Happen

Unread postby Schweinshaxe » Mon 15 Aug 2005, 21:53:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('something_awfull', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', 'W')hat an interesting presentation of the optimistic case!

Thank you for your perspectives.


Optimistic? I'd hate to see the pessimistic view. 8O


edit: I guess socialism will get to have it's time in the sun.


Yup, you're right. The world after PO will NOT be one of the following:

1. A green, ecological dream society where everyone runs naked hand in hand through fields full of flowers and where lions and deer bask in the sunshine together.

2. A Mad Max hell full of zombies with assault rifles trying to steal your last potato.

The post PO society will be a society full of corrupt politicians. A world of bureaucracy, political correctness and political indoctrination. This is the kind of world which is already getting closer and closer. Collectivistic oppression when it comes from the right is called fascism, collectivistic oppression when it comes from the left is called socialism. Different names, same shit.
Was soll das?
User avatar
Schweinshaxe
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 700
Joined: Sun 29 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Schweinland-Pfalz

Re: Why Collapse Won't Happen

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 15 Aug 2005, 22:22:33

I'd feel more confident of your predictions if you were able to spell "martial" correctly.
Ludi
 

Re: Why Collapse Won't Happen

Unread postby meekoil » Mon 15 Aug 2005, 22:27:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Schweinshaxe', 'Y')up, you're right. The world after PO will NOT be one of the following:

1. A green, ecological dream society where everyone runs naked hand in hand through fields full of flowers and where lions and deer bask in the sunshine together.

2. A Mad Max hell full of zombies with assault rifles trying to steal your last potato.

The post PO society will be a society full of corrupt politicians. A world of bureaucracy, political correctness and political indoctrination. This is the kind of world which is already getting closer and closer. Collectivistic oppression when it comes from the right is called fascism, collectivistic oppression when it comes from the left is called socialism. Different names, same shit.


Give me the Mad Max world instead. At least that would be fun while it lasted.
User avatar
meekoil
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Mon 11 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Why Collapse Won't Happen

Unread postby doufus » Mon 15 Aug 2005, 22:48:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'I')'d feel more confident of your predictions if you were able to spell "martial" correctly.


yep, details like that really matter. I've read some of your posts and they
are wonderfully spelt and fantastically opaque.
User avatar
doufus
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Why Collapse Won't Happen

Unread postby doufus » Mon 15 Aug 2005, 22:54:05

"Give me the Mad Max world instead. At least that would be fun while it lasted."

Why wait. Plenty of places can give you mad max right now!

Get yer cammies on, lock n load and go out right now.

My bet is you'll run.
User avatar
doufus
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Why Collapse Won't Happen

Unread postby Schweinshaxe » Mon 15 Aug 2005, 22:54:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'I')'d feel more confident of your predictions if you were able to spell "martial" correctly.


What about marshmallow law?

I'd go for my number 1 world and run naked hand in hand with Jennifer Connelly through a field of blossoming marshmallows. I could show her some of my yuppie survivalist label outdoor equipment behind a bush. We could tell eachother post PO dream stories under the stars in my corporate lawyer sleeping bag.

Jesus! It's always something wong. You either can't spell, master the English (American?) grammar or you're a yuppie survivalists. We're a mixed bunch of people here. Everyone doesn't have a PhD in the English language.

The post was very well written and interesting. Give the guy a break...
Was soll das?
User avatar
Schweinshaxe
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 700
Joined: Sun 29 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Schweinland-Pfalz
Top

Re: Why Collapse Won't Happen

Unread postby gego » Mon 15 Aug 2005, 22:56:34

My take is the originator of this thread sees some sort of collapse, else he would not have his fantacy of how it develops.

I say his description of the competing fantacies is between those who advocate freedom and self reliance (the survivalists) against those who advocate collective control and theft from producers for the benefit of the collective (the plunderers).

Really government has always been a form of taking by force from those who produce to give to those who do not, principally the power elite (kings, princes, and all sorts of modern day equivalents) so the idea of how society will be is just a rehash of the majority of history.

While there will be plenty of plunder in the future in a breakdown situation, I doubt that the leaders of the collective will do much more than plunder for their own benefit, so doufus will probably still do without, in spite of his fantacy that the big mama/papa government will take care of him by stealing from producers.

My bet is that doufus is totally dependent upon the system, hence he is opposed to those who would take matters in their own hands, and actually produce their own food and defend themselves against the agression of others.
gego
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1265
Joined: Thu 03 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Why Collapse Won't Happen

Unread postby EnergySpin » Mon 15 Aug 2005, 22:59:48

You guys are so IGNORANT. :P: :razz:
Modern teenagers know of only one Marshall Law
Done deal ...
For the record the socialist/collective future is the one likely to happen.
People will have their ecovillages and their organic farming but it will be centrally planned and managed. Total recycling will be the rule (Lundberg has advocated burrying the dead humans with reverence deep in our gardens) so both eco-utopians and technocratists like myself will not complain. People will be given the freedom to either serve as fertilizers or be thermally depolymerized to serve as plastic feedstock (yes I will come back as a computer!!!!). Courtesy of genetic engineering there will be plenty of new species to populate the gardens and provide manure.
Mad Max people will either be executed or hired as guards.
I kind of like this future ... 8O 8O
Last edited by EnergySpin on Mon 15 Aug 2005, 23:01:59, edited 1 time in total.
"Nuclear power has long been to the Left what embryonic-stem-cell research is to the Right--irredeemably wrong and a signifier of moral weakness."Esquire Magazine,12/05
The genetic code is commaless and so are my posts.
User avatar
EnergySpin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Why Collapse Won't Happen

Unread postby jato » Mon 15 Aug 2005, 23:00:19

I think you are right gego. I am going to change the title of this thread...it is misleading.
jato
 

Re: Why Collapse Won't Happen

Unread postby Jack » Mon 15 Aug 2005, 23:51:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('something_awfull', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', 'W')hat an interesting presentation of the optimistic case!

Thank you for your perspectives.


Optimistic? I'd hate to see the pessimistic view. 8O


edit: I guess socialism will get to have it's time in the sun.


Hmm? Silly me, I thought the mantra of the optimistic sort was something to the effect that collapse wouldn't or couldn't happen.

Of course, the assumption seems to be that in lieu of collapse, a regime reminiscent of Pol Pot's would come into being; and yet, such compulsion - all for the greater good, of course - seems to be the norm for the peak oil optimists.

But, perhaps I'm mistaken?
Dieoff. Fun to watch. Better with hot buttered popcorn! [smilie=new_popcornsmiley.gif]
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Post peak: Individuals vs. the collective

Unread postby Kylon » Mon 15 Aug 2005, 23:57:16

It would seem the logical thing to do then, would be to try and hide all of your resources as best as possible. Don't let the government know what you have, hide what you've got. I do not mean tax evasion for that would be illegal, and I am in no way supporting or giving my consent to tax evasion, I am strongly against tax evasion and all related crimes. I mean like resources you buy and what not.

Also, if this is the case, it may just be best to move to Canada(assuming your in the United States), or some South American country. They will probably want to keep their citizens trapped in the United States so they can use them for forced labor. Population density in Canada is much lower, therefore you'll probably have more land per person, and thus higher yields of food. Also land up there I think is cheaper, and far more remote, from cities, which is where everyone will migrate from, under this scenario.

When/If things get draconian, nobody will weep if you starve, or if they have to make you starve so they can be fat and happy.

Also, in a draconian society, a government official may take a liking to your wife/girlfriend/lover and decide to imprison you, for some real or made up crime, rape her, then either leave her(and there probably won't be any contraceptives available to middle class citizens, so she might get pregnant), or to cover his tracks, have her imprisoned as well, in some sort of concentration camp, where she will die, and the truth will die with her.

Dictatorships are no fun, anarchy is much better. At least with anarchy you have a chance of not getting screwed. Dictatorships there is a 100%.
User avatar
Kylon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 836
Joined: Fri 12 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Why Collapse Won't Happen

Unread postby doufus » Tue 16 Aug 2005, 01:08:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gego', 'M')y take is the originator of this thread sees some sort of collapse, else he would not have his fantacy of how it develops.

I say his description of the competing fantacies is between those who advocate freedom and self reliance (the survivalists) against those who advocate collective control and theft from producers for the benefit of the collective (the plunderers).

Really government has always been a form of taking by force from those who produce to give to those who do not, principally the power elite (kings, princes, and all sorts of modern day equivalents) so the idea of how society will be is just a rehash of the majority of history.

While there will be plenty of plunder in the future in a breakdown situation, I doubt that the leaders of the collective will do much more than plunder for their own benefit, so doufus will probably still do without, in spite of his fantacy that the big mama/papa government will take care of him by stealing from producers.

My bet is that doufus is totally dependent upon the system, hence he is opposed to those who would take matters in their own hands, and actually produce their own food and defend themselves against the agression of others.


Umm you could not possibly be more wrong on the latter. Although i
think die off/survivalist fantasies are unlikely, the IRONY is that I
would have many multiples of survivability than you. I live in the
Northern territory of australia. My back yard is the size of europe with
200,000 people in it. My capital is 80,000. Crocodile dundee country.
12 ft of rain a year. Plenty of fish, kangaroos, wallaby and turtle. I have a holiday coastal property with water and good soil. I am very experienced
in this country and its properties. I am also quite fit and very healthy.
Even so I have no desire to be utterly reliant on my own efforts for
survival. I have shot and butchered enough buffalo to know that I
don't want to hauling back meat on my shoulders thru a swamp or
flood plain. Crocs. flies. heat. It is a VERY hard life even though it's possible.

But although I am sure that there COULD be a collapse of standard
of living thru PO over decades I am scornful of the survivalist
and individualist mentality HOPING for die off. In a place like the US- heavily populated
with a stuffed environment and high energy habits- I can't see the
point of individual efforts. They will be swamped by the demands of
the collective.

Do u think people won't find you? Do you think the government will
surrender control to the mob or provincial groups? Do you think they will abandon their tax base and political power because energy is tight?

It's NOT a question of me wanting government to take care of me.
It's the reality that government will always want to control YOU.

You didn't think that your farm would be commandeered by government
gunpoint? You didn't think that in the mass population shifts that
happen in such scenarios, somebody would find you and report you
to the people with bigger guns than you?

Individualism is a nice fantasy, but dirty harry only exists in the movies.
Anybody who has ever done this stuff for real is very hopeful that
the mutual benefits of civil society stay in place. They certainly don't
look forward to it.

Even so, I doubt if die off will happen. The great depression wasn't
die off. It was authoritarian. And those who think they can take care
of number one and avoid it are kidding themselves. it WILL find you
and it WILL bend you to its will.

That's why I'd prefer to work to build a soft landing for peak oil rather
than polish a .308 hunting rifle and calculate how many rounds I need
for another 20 years. It's pathetic.
User avatar
doufus
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Why Collapse Won't Happen

Unread postby Ludi » Tue 16 Aug 2005, 10:04:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('doufus', '
')
yep, details like that really matter. I've read some of your posts and they
are wonderfully spelt and fantastically opaque.


I agree, I have a heck of a time communicating. But I'm happy to clarify any points you don't understand, to the best of my ability. All you have to do is ask. :)
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Why Collapse Won't Happen

Unread postby dissimulo » Tue 16 Aug 2005, 11:37:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('doufus', '
')That's why I'd prefer to work to build a soft landing for peak oil rather
than polish a .308 hunting rifle and calculate how many rounds I need
for another 20 years. It's pathetic.


I'm not quite sure where people get the idea that guns and stockpiling are all there is to it. I see lots of posts from "survivalists" on this site, but they are generally quite a but more comprehensive than the frequent "guns and freeze-dried foods" simplifications.

Guns and stockpiling are a strategy to get through potential hard times to a point where a more sustainable life can be lived. I don't think there are very many people here who are thinking of anything else. These strategies may provide individuals a soft landing, even if society as a whole doesn't make it (although I think a wholesale unraveling of society is pretty unlikely).

In any disruption lasting longer than a few months, guns and buckets of grain are a failed strategy if they are your only prepation, but I don't think anyone who is employing this strategy would be surprised by that.

I really find fascinating the number of people on this site who seem utterly opposed to individualism.
User avatar
dissimulo
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 348
Joined: Wed 01 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron